Governance strengths and weaknesses to implement the marine strategy framework directive in European waters

Marine Policy

Volumn 44, Issue , 2014, Pages 172-178

  Freire Gibb, Lucio Carlos ^a   Koss, Rebecca ^b   Margonski, Piotr ^c   Papadopoulou, Nadia ^d  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^d INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY   (Greece)

Author keywords

Governance; Marine policy implementation; Marine spatial planning; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MARINE POLICY; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; ATLANTIC OCEAN (NORTHEAST); BALTIC SEA; BLACK SEA; EUROPE; MEDITERRANEAN SEA;

EID: 84889604480     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Salomon M. The European Commission proposal for a marine strategy: lacking substance. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2006, 52(11):1328-1329.
2. van Hoof L. Who rules the waves. Governance and new institutional arrangements in Dutch fisheries management in the context of the European Common Fisheries Policy. 2010. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
3. Rätz H., Dörner H., Scott R., Barbas T. Complementary roles of European and national institutions under the Common Fisheries Policy and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Marine Policy 2010, 34(5):1028-1035.
4. van Leeuwen J, Raakjaer J, Ounanian K, Long R, van Tatenhove J, van Hoof L., et al. Legal, institutional, and stakeholder obstacles in implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Unpublished.
5. van Leeuwen J., van Hoof L., van Tatenhove J. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Marine Policy 2012, 36(3):636-643.
6. Ounanian K., Delaney A., Raakjær J., Ramírez Monsalve P. On unequal footing: stakeholder perspectives on the marine strategy framework directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management. Marine Policy 2012, 36(3):658-666.
7. Salomon M, Dross M. Challenges in cross-sectoral marine protection in Europe. Marine Policy 2013, 42:142-149.
8. Council of the European Union. Voting result. Marine Strategy Framework Directive. 2008. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/08/st09/st09324.en08.pdf.
9. Suarez de Vivero J.L., Rodríguez Mateos J.C. Atlas of the European seas and oceans 2007, Ediciones del Serbal, Barcelona.
10. European Commission. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Communities L 2008; 164: 19.
11. Long R. The Marine Strategy Framework Directive: a new European approach to the regulation of the marine environment, marine natural resources and marine ecological services. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 2011, 29(1):1-44.
12. Katsanevakis S., Stelzenmüller V., South A., Sørensen T.K., Jones P.J.S., Kerr S., et al. Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues. Ocean & Coastal Management 2011, 54(11):807-820.
13. United Kingdom Government. Marine Strategy Framework Directive consultation: UK Initial Assessment and Proposals for Good Environmental Status. Impact Assessment. 2012.
14. Parés M. River basin management planning with participation in Europe: from contested hydro-politics to governance-beyond-the-state. European Planning Studies 2011, 19(3):457-478.
15. Andersson I., Petersson M., Jarsjö J. Impact of the European water framework directive on local-level water management: case study Oxunda catchment, Sweden. Land Use Policy 2012, 29(1):73-82.
16. van Tatenhove J.P.M. How to turn the tide: developing legitimate marine governance arrangements at the level of the regional seas. Ocean & Coastal Management 2013, 71(0):296-304.
17. O'Keeffe A., Haggett C. An investigation into the potential barriers facing the development of offshore wind energy in Scotland: case study-Firth of Forth offshore wind farm. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012, 16(6):3711-3721.
18. Jay S., Klenke T., Ahlhorn F., Ritchie H. Early European experience in marine spatial planning: planning the German Exclusive Economic Zone. European Planning Studies 2012, 1-19.
19. Velikova V., Oral N. Governance of the protection of the Black Sea: a model for regional cooperation. Environmental Security in Watersheds: The Sea of Azov 2012, 159-171.
20. van Hoof L., van Leeuwen J., van Tatenhove J. All at sea; regionalisation and integration of marine policy in Europe. Maritime Studies 2012, 11(1):1-14.
21. Hegland T.J., Ounanian K., Raakjær J. What does 'regionalisation'mean? An exploratory mapping of opinions on reform of the common fisheries policy. Maritime Studies 2012, 11(8):1-19.
22. Suárez de Vivero J.L., Rodríguez Mateos J.C. The Spanish approach to marine spatial planning. Marine Strategy Framework Directive vs. EU Integrated Maritime Policy. Marine Policy 2012, 36(1):18-27.
23. Hegland T.J., Ounanian K., Raakjær J. Why and how to regionalise the Common Fisheries Policy. Maritime Studies 2012, 11:7.
24. Raakjaer J., Degnbol P., Hegland T.J., Symes D. Regionalisation-what will the future bring?. Maritime Studies 2012, 11:8.
25. de Vrees L. PISCES, EC LIFE+ project. In: DVD tutorial: European marine policy. 2010.
26. Fletcher S. Converting science to policy through stakeholder involvement: an analysis of the European Marine Strategy Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2007, 54(12):1881-1886.
27. Flyvbjerg B., Richardson T. Planning and Foucault. Planning futures: new directions for planning theory 2002, 44-63. Routledge, London. P. Allmendinger, M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.).
28. Raakjær Nielsen J., Mathiesen C. Stakeholder preferences for Danish fisheries management of sand eel and Norway pout. Fisheries Research 2006, 77(1):92-101.
29. Næss P. Urban structure matters: residential location, car dependence and travel behaviour 2006, Taylor & Francis.
30. Wakefield J. Undermining the integrated maritime policy. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2010, 60(3):323-333.
31. Connelly S., Richardson T. Exclusion: the necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2004, 47(1):3-17.
32. Hendriksen A, Jouanneau C. Fishing for opinions: stakeholder views on future management of the European Marine Environment. MARE Conference 2013. Unpublished.
33. Hendriksen A, Kraan M, van Leeuwen J, Jouanneau C. How to dance? The tango of stakeholder involvement in maritime governance research. MARE Conference 2013. Unpublished.
34. Valentin E.K. Away with SWOT analysis: use defensive/offensive evaluation instead. Journal of Applied Business Research 2011, 21:2.
35. Long R. Legal aspects of ecosystem-based marine management in Europe. Ocean Yearbook 2012, 26(4):417-484.
36. European Commission Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. Blue Growth: sustainable growth from the oceans, seas and coasts. Summary report of the online public consultation results. 2012 http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/consultations/blue_growth/blue-growth-consultation-report_en.pdf.
37. Caveen A.J., Gray T.S., Stead S.M., Polunin N.V.C. MPA policy: what lies behind the science?. Marine Policy 2013, 37:3-10.
38. European Commission. Public Opinion in the European Union. Standard Eurobarometer 2012; 77.
39. Attitudes of Europeans towards the issue of biodiversity. Flash Eurobarometer 2007, 219. European Commission.
40. De Santo E.M. 'Whose science?'Precaution and power-play in European marine environmental decision-making. Marine Policy 2010, 34(3):414-420.
41. Mesnil B. The hesitant emergence of maximum sustainable yield (MSY) in fisheries policies in Europe. Marine Policy 2012, 36(2):473-480.
42. Castaldi R. The Spinelli Group: an engine of the initiatives that Europe needs?. Centro Studi sul Federalism 2010, 2(2):1-14.
43. European Environment Agency. Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2012 - Tracking progress towards Kyoto and 2020 targets. 2012. http://www.eea.europa.eu/pressroom/newsreleases/eu-greenhouse-gases-in-2011.5.
44. ECORYS Nederland BV. 2012. Blue Growth. Scenarios and drivers for sustainable growth from the oceans, seas and coasts. Final Report, https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/maritimeforum/system/files/Blue%20Growth%20Final%20Report%2013082012.pdf.
45. European Commission. Blue Growth opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2012.
46. Barroso JMD. A strong maritime pillar for the Europe 2020 strategy Informal Ministerial meeting on EU Integrated Maritime Policy/Limassol 8 October. 2012. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-696_en.htm.
47. Seas at Risk. Limassol Declaration ignores limits to Blue Growth. 2012; http://www.seas-at-risk.org/news_n2.php?page=540.