Challenges in cross-sectoral marine protection in Europe

Marine Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2013, Pages 142-149

  Salomon, Markus ^a   Dross, Miriam ^a  

^a German Advisory Council on the Environment   (Germany)

Author keywords

Common agricultural policy; Common fisheries policy; Marine environment protection; Marine protected areas; Marine spatial planning; Marine Strategy Framework Directive

Indexed keywords

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; COMMON FISHERIES POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MARINE PARK; MARINE POLICY; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SPATIAL PLANNING;

EUROPE;

EID: 84875093748     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. OSPAR Commission. Quality status report 2010. London; 2010.
2. Grizzetti B., Bouraoui F., Aloe A. Changes of nitrogen and phosphorus loads to European seas. Global Change Biology 2012, 18(2):769-782.
3. IMO (International Maritime Organization). International shipping facts and figures - information resources on trade, safety, security, environment. London: IMO Maritime Knowledge Centre; 2012.
4. German Advisory Council on the environment. Cross-sectoral marine protection. Responsibility in a finite world. SRU environmental report. Berlin; 2012 [chapter 8].
5. Steele J.H., Thorpe S.A., Turekian K.K. Marine policy and economics: a derivative of the encyclopedia of ocean sciences 2010, Academic Press, London, Burlington, San Diego. 2nd ed.
6. German Advisory Council on the environment. Sustainable managment of fish stocks - reforming the common fisheries policy. Statement 16. Berlin: SRU; 2011.
7. German Advisory Council on the environment. Marine environment protection for the North and Baltic seas. Berlin: Nomos Verlag; 2004.
8. Anianova E. The international maritme organization (IMO) - tanker or speedboat?. International maritime organisations and their contribution towards a sustainable marine development 2006, Transaction Publishers, Hamburg. P. Ehlers, R. Lagoni (Eds.).
9. Knudsen O.F., Hassler B. I.M.O. legislation and its implementation: accident risk, vessel deficiencies and national administrative practices. Marine Policy 2011, 35(2):201-207.
10. Salomon M., Holm-Müller K. Towards a sustainable fisheries policy in Europe. Fish and Fisheries 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12009.
11. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: strategic goals and recommendations for the EU's maritime transport policy until 2018. COM (2009) 8 final, Brussels: European Commission; 2009.
12. Kachel M.J. Competencies of international maritime organisations to establish rules and standards. International maritime organisations and their contribution towards a sustainable marine development 2006, vol. 12:21-52. Literarische Schriften zum See- und Hafenrecht, Münster.
13. Khee-Jin Tan A. Vessel-source marine pollution: the law and politics of international regulation, Cambridge; 2006.
14. Van Hoof L., van Tatenhove J. EU marine policy on the move: the tension between fisheries and maritime policy. Marine Policy 2009, 33(4):726-732.
15. Markus T., Schlacke S., Maier N. Legal Implementation of integrated ocean policies: the EU's Marine Strategy Framework Directive. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2011, 26(1):59-90.
16. European Commission. Green paper - towards a future maritime policy for the union: a European vision for the oceans and seas. COM (2006) 275 final, Brussels: European Commission; 2006.
17. Suárez de Vivero J.L. The European vision for oceans and seas - social and political dimensions of the green paper on Maritime Policy for the EU. Marine Policy 2007, 31(4):409-414.
18. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. An integrated maritime policy for the European Union. COM (2007) 575 final, Brussels: European Commission; 2007.
19. Salomon M. Recent European initiatives in marine protection policy: towards lasting protection for Europe's seas?. Environmental Science and Policy 2009, 12(3):359-366.
20. UBA (Federal Environment Agency). Perspectives in European marine policy. Germany: Dessau-Roßlau; 2008.
21. Fletcher S. Converting science to policy through stakeholder involvement: an analysis of the European Marine Strategy Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2007, 54(12):1881-1886.
22. European Commission. Commission decision of 1 September 2010 on criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters. C (2010) 5956. Brussels European Commission; 2010.
23. Borja A., Elliott M., Carstensen J., Heiskanen A.S., van de Bund W. Marine management - towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2010, 60(12):2175-2186.
24. German Advisory Council on the Environment. The European commission proposal for a marine strategy: shying european responsibility? Comment on environment policy 5. Berlin; 2006.
25. Salomon M. The European Commisson proposal for a marine strategy: lacking substance. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2006, 52:1328-1329.
26. Rätz H.J., Dörner H., Scott R., Barbas T. Complementary roles of European and national institutions under the Common Fisheries Policy and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Marine Policy 2010, 34(5):1028-1035.
27. European Commission. Marine Strategy Framework Directive - implementation of the directive. Brussels: European Commission; 2011 [accessed 15.01.2013]. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/marine/implementation_en.htm.
28. European Commission. Informal meeting of water and marine directors of the european union, candidate and EFTA countries, Budapest, 26-27 May 2011. Final synthesis. Brussels: European Commission; 2011.
29. Van Leeuwen J., van Hoof L., van Tatenhove J. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Marine Policy 2012, 36(3):636-643.
30. HELCOM. The Baltic Sea action plan. A new environmental strategy for the Baltic Sea region. Helsinki. HELCOM; 2007.
31. Backer H., Leppänen J.M., Brusendorff A.C., Forsius K., Stankiewicz M., Mehtonen J., et al. HELCOM Baltic Sea action plan - a regional programme of measures for the marine environment based on the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2010, 60(5):642-649.
32. Agardy T. Marine protected areas and ocean conservation 1997, National Academic Press, San Diego, California.
33. Edgar G.J., Russ G.R., Babcock R.C. Marine protected areas. Marine Ecology 2007, Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, VIC, Australia. S.D. Connell, B.M. Gillanders (Eds.).
34. Roberts C.M., Hawkins J.P., Gelly F.R. The role of marine reserves in achieving sustainable fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 2005, B 360:123-132.
35. SCBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity). COP 10 Decision X/29. Nagoya. Marine and coastal biodiversity. Montreal: SCBD; 18-29 October 2010.
36. Council of the European Communities. Council decision of 25 October 1993 concerning the conclusion of the convention on biological diversity. 93/626/ECC, Brussels Council; 1993.
37. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM (2011) 244 final, Brussels: European Commission; 2011.
38. Markus T, Salomon M. Unter Zugzwang: Meeresrechtliche Anforderungen an die Gemeinsame Fischereipolitik (GFP), Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 2013; 24 (1):19-28.
39. Douvere F. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy 2008, 32(5):762-771.
40. BSH (German Maritime and Hydrographic Agency). CONTIS maps. Hamburg, BSH. ; 2012 [accessed 14.01.13]. http://www.bsh.de/en/Marine_uses/Industry/CONTIS_maps/index.jsp.
41. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: an Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union. COM (2007) 575 final, Brussels: European Commission; 2007.
42. European Commission. Communication from the Commission - Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: achieving common principles in the EU. COM (2008) 791 final, Brussels: European Commission; 2008.
43. Schubert M. Rechtfragen der maritimen Raumplanung - unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fischerei. Natur und Recht 2009, 31(12):834-841.
44. Erbguth W. Europarechtliche Vorgaben für eine maritime Raumordnung Empfehlungen. Natur und Recht 2012, 34(2):85-91.
45. Calliess C, Ruffert M. EUV/AEUV. Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta. Kommentar. 4. Aufl. München: Beck; 2011.
46. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Maritime Spatial Planning in the EU - achievements and future development. COM (2010) 771 final. Brussels: European Commission; 2010.
47. European Commission. Communication from the Commission - report to the European Parliament and the Council: an evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe. COM (2007) 308 final, Brussels: European Commission; 2007.
48. European Parliament Council. Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2002 concerning the implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Europe. 2002/413/EC, Brussels; 2002.
49. McKenna J., Cooper A., O'Hagan A.M. Managing by principle: a critical analysis of the European principles of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM). Marine Policy 2008, 32(6):941-955.