Stakeholder preferences for Danish fisheries management of sand eel and Norway pout

Fisheries Research

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 92-101

  Raakjær Nielsen, Jesper ^a   Mathiesen, Christoph ^a  

^a Nordsocentret   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process; Boxes; Decision making; Non human consumption fisheries; Norway pout; Sand eel; Stakeholder preferences

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

AVES; HYPOPTYCHIDAE; MELANOGRAMMUS AEGLEFINUS; MERLANGIUS MERLANGUS; TRISOPTERUS ESMARKII;

EID: 29844453109     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berlingske Tidende, 2002. Danish Daily Newspaper. 16, 25 and 30 April. Copenhagen, Denmark.
2. C. Carlson, and P. Walden AHP in political group decisions: a study in the art of possibilities Interfaces 25 1995 14 29
3. A.T. Charles Bio-socio-economic fishery models: labour dynamics and multi-objective management Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 46 8 1989 1313 1322
4. J.A. Crutchfield Economic and political objectives of fishery management Trans. Am. Fisheries Soc. 1973 481 491
5. P. Degnbol, and E. Kirkegaard Fisheries Biological Advice (in Danish). Fisk & Hav no. 51 2000 Danish Institute of Fisheries Research Charlottenlund
6. P. Degnbol Indicators as a means of communicating knowledge ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62 2005 606 611
7. European Union, 2002. Council Regulation (EC) No. 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002.
8. European Union, 2005. Council Regulation (EC) No. 27/2005 of 22 December 2004.
9. Expertchoice, 2005. http://www.expertchoice.com/customers/successstories. htm.
10. FAO, 2001. Reykjavik Conference on Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem. Iceland, 1-4 October 2001. http://www.refisheries2001.org/.
11. Fisheries Directorate, 2005. http://www.fd.dk.
12. J. Goodlad Co-management and Community Based Fisheries Management initiatives in Shetland S. Cunningham T. Bostock Successful Fisheries Management, Issues, Case Studies and Perspectives 2005 Eburon Academic Publishers Delft 91 110
13. Guldberg, M., Byskov, S., Holm, P., 2000. On Sand Eel Fishery (in Danish). Fiskeri-og Søfartsmuseet, Esbjerg.
14. ICES, 2000. The Status of the Fisheries and Related Environment of Northern Seas. Nord 2000:10. Copenhagen, Denmark.
15. ICES, 2001a. Report of the ICES advisory committee on fisheries management 2001. ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 246.
16. ICES Status of the North Sea Fish Stocks. Update Background for Fifth International Conference on Protection of the North Sea 2001 Advisory Committee on Ecosystems Copenhagen, Denmark
17. ICES, 2004. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fisheries Management and Advisory Committee on Ecosystems 2004. ICES advice, vol. 1, no 2. Book 2 part 2.
18. Information, 2002. Danish Daily Newspaper. 25 April. Copenhagen, Denmark.
19. P.S. Leung, J. Muraoka, S.T. Nakamoto, and S. Pooley Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) Fisheries Res. 36 1998 171 183
20. S. Mardle S. Pascoe Multiple Objectives in the Management of the EU Fisheries: Prefrence Elicitation CEMARE Report 64 2003 University of Portsmouth UK
21. S. Mardle, S. Pascoe, J. Boncoeur, B. Le Gallic, I. Herrero, J.J. García-Hoyo, R. Jimenez-Toribio, N. Padilla, C. Cortes, J. Raakjær Nielsen, and C. Mathiesen The objectives of Fisheries Management: case studies from the UK, France, Spain and Denmark Mar. Policy 26 2002 415 428
22. J. Raakjær Nielsen, P. Degnbol, K.K. Viswanathan, M. Ahmed, M. Hara, and N.M.R. Abdullah Fisheries Co-Management - an institutional innovation? Lessons from South East Asia and Southern Africa Mar. Policy 28 2004 151 160
23. T.L. Saaty The Analytical Hierarchy Process 1990 RWS Publications Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
24. K. Soma How to involve stakeholders in fisheries management - a country case study in Trinidad and Tobago Mar. Policy 27 2003 47 58
25. UN, 2002. World Summit on Sustainable Development. Plan of Implementation. http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/documents/summit_docs/ 2309_planfinal.htm.
26. UNEP, 2000. Decision 5/6 Ecosystem Approach. http://www.biodiv.org/doc/ decisions/COP-05-dec-en.pdf.
27. D.C. Wilson J. Raakjær Nielsen P. Degnbol The Fisheries Co-management Experience. Accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
28. Wright, P., Jensen, H., Mosegaard, H., Dalskov, J., Wanless, S., 2002. European Commission's Annual Report on the Impact of the Northeast Sandeel Fishery Closure and Status Report on the Monitoring Fishery in 2000 and 2001. FRS Marine Laboratory, Scotland, Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Denmark; Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Banchory Research Station, Scotland.
29. F. Zahedi The analytical hierarchy process - a survey of the methods and its applications Interfaces 16 1986 96 108
30. S. Zahir Clusters in a group: decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process Eur. J. Operational Res. 112 1999 620 634