MPA policy: What lies behind the science?

Marine Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 3-10

  Caveen, Alex J ^a   Gray, Tim S ^b   Stead, Selina M ^a   Polunin, Nicholas V C ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Advocacy coalitions; Discourse coalitions; Epistemic communities; Marine protected areas; Marine reserves; Science policy

Indexed keywords

ADVOCACY; DECISION MAKING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MARINE PARK; MARINE POLICY; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; PROTECTED AREA;

EID: 84867331146     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Garcia S.M., Rosenberg A.A. Food security and marine capture fisheries: characteristics, trends, drivers and future perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc B 2010, 365:2869-2880.
2. Sala E., Knowlton N. Global marine biodiversity trends. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2006, 31:93-122.
3. Worm B., et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 2006, 314(5800):787-790.
4. Clark C.W. Marine reserves and the precautionary management of fisheries. Ecol Appl 1996, 6(2):369-370.
5. Attwood C.G., et al. Review of the state of marine protected areas in South Africa. S Afr J Mar Sci (Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Seewetenskap) 1997, 18:341-367.
6. Wood LJ. MPA Global: a database of the world's marine protected areas. Sea around us project; 2007. http://www.mpaglobal.org.
7. NCEAS. Scientific consensus statement on marine reserves and marine protected areas. Annual meeting for the American association for the advancement of the sciences, 17 February 2001.
8. Pielke R.A. The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Haas P.M. Do regimes matter-epistemic communities and mediterranean pollution-control. Int Organiz 1989, 43(3):377-403.
10. Sabatier P.A. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-orientated learning therein. Policy Sci 1988, 21(2-3):129-168.
11. Hajer M. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalisation of practice: the case of acid rain in Britain. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning 1993, UCL Press, London. F. Fischer, J. Forester (Eds.).
12. Haas P.M. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination-introduction. Int Organiz 1992, 46(1):1-35.
13. Krasner S.D. International regimes 1983, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
14. Haas P.M. Policy responses to stratospheric ozone depletion. Global Environ Change 1991, 1(3):224-234.
15. Haas P.M. Banning chlorofluorocarbons-epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone. Int Organiz 1992, 46(1):187-224.
16. Keck M., Sikkink K. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics 1998, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
17. Sabatier P.A. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. J Eur Public Policy 1998, 5(1):98-130.
18. Weible C.M., Sabatier P.A. Comparing policy networks: marine protected areas in California. Policy Stud J 2005, 33(2):181-201.
19. Stone D. Introduction: global knowledge and advocacy networks. Global Networks 2002, 2(1):1-11.
20. Schlager E. Policy-making and collective action- defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sci 1995, 28(3):243-270.
21. Dryzek J.S. The politics of the earth: environmental discourses 1997, Oxford University Press.
22. Bulkeley H. Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environ Plann C 2000, 18(6):727-748.
23. Fischer F. Reframing public policy. Discursive politics and deliberative Practices 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Kelleher G., Kenchington R. Guidelines for establishing marine protected areas 1991, IUCN.
25. Salm R.V., et al. Marine and coastal protected areas: a guide for planners and managers 2000, IUCN, Washington, DC. 3rd ed.
26. IUCN. Establishing resilient marine protected area networks-making it happen. 2008.
27. Toropova C et al. Global ocean protection: present status and future possibilities. Brest, France: Agence des aires marines protégées. Gland, Switzerland, Washington, DC and New York, USA: IUCN WCP. 2011.
28. Kelleher Graeme. Guidelines for marine protected areas. Best practice protected area guidelines series 1999;3:1-107.
29. Pomeroy RS et al. How is your MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected area management effectiveness. How is your MPA doing? IUCN. 2004. p. 1-215.
30. NOAA. Framework for the national system of marine protected areas of the United States of America. 2008.
31. Ardron J.A. The challenge of assessing whether the OSPAR network of marine protected areas is ecologically coherent. Hydrobiologia 2008, 606:45-53.
32. Roberts C.M., et al. Application of ecological criteria in selecting marine reserves and developing reserve networks. Ecol Appl 2003, 13(1):S215-S228.
33. Ashworth J. et al. Delivering the marine protected area network: ecological network guidance to regional stakeholder groups on identifying. Marine conservation zones. 2010.
34. Edgar G. Does the global network of marine protected areas provide an adequate safety net for marine biodiversity?. Aquat Conserv-Mar Freshwater Ecosyst 2011, 21:313-316.
35. NFFO. MCZs: the opposite of the big society. 2012, http://www.nffo.org.uk/news/mczs.html.
36. Russ G.R., et al. Marine reserve benefits local fisheries. Ecol Appl 2004, 14(2):597-606.
37. Goni R., et al. Net contribution of spillover from a marine reserve to fishery catches. Ma Ecol Prog Ser 2010, 400:233-243.
38. Caveen A.J., et al. Are the scientific foundations of temperate marine reserves too warm and hard?. Environ Conserv 2012, 39(3):1-5.
39. Sale P.F., et al. Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 2005, 20(2):74-80.
40. Hilborn R., et al. When can marine reserves improve fisheries management?. Ocean Coast Manage 2004, 47(3-4):197-205.
41. Guenette S., et al. Marine reserves: from Beverton and Holt to the present. Rev Fish Biol Fish 1998, 8(3):251-272.
42. Mascia M.B., et al. Impacts of marine protected areas on fishing communities. Conserv Biol 2010, 24(5):1424-1429.
43. Spalding M., et al. The 10% target: where do we stand?. Global ocean protection: present status and future possibilities. Brest, France: Agence des aires marines protégées 2011, IUCN WCP, Gland, Switzerland, Washington, DC and New York, USA. C. Toropova, I. Meliane, D. Laffoley, E. Matthews, M. Spalding (Eds.).
44. Wood L.J., et al. Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action. Oryx 2008, 42(3):340-351.
45. Sanchirico J.N., Wilen J.E. A bioeconomic model of marine reserve creation. J Environ Econ Manage 2001, 42(3):257-276.
46. UNEP. Conference of the parties to the convention of biological diversity (COP9) Decision IX/20: marine and coastal biodiversity. 2008.
47. PDT. The potential of marine fishery reserves for reef fish management in the US Southern Atlantic.1990. 40 pp.
48. Ballantine W.J. Marine reserves-the need for networks. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 1991, 25(1):115-116.
49. Dayton P.K., et al. Environmental-effects of marine fishing. Aquat ConservMar Freshwater Ecosyst 1995, 5(3):205-232.
50. Gell F.R., Roberts C.M. Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 2003, 18(9):448-455.
51. Nowlis J.S., Roberts C.M. Fisheries benefits and optimal design of marine reserves. Fishery Bull 1999, 97(3):604-616.
52. Kendall M.S., et al. The influence of bottom type and shelf position on biodiversity of tropical fish inside a recently enlarged marine reserve. Aquat Conserv-Mar Freshwater Ecosyst 2004, 14(2):113-132.
53. Bohnsack JA et al. A rationale for minimum 20-30% no-take protection. Proceedings of the 9th international coral reef symposium. Bali, Indonesia; 2000.
54. Roberts CM. European scientists consensus statement on marine reserves. 2007.
55. NSW AMSA. Position statement on marine protected areas and no-take marine sanctuaries. 2008.
56. Willis T.J., et al. Burdens of evidence and the benefits of marine reserves: putting descartes before des horse?. Environ Conserv 2003, 30(2):97-103.
57. Lizaso J.L.S., et al. Density dependence in marine protected populations: a review. Environ Conserv 2000, 27(2):144-158.
58. Roberts C.M., et al. Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science 2001, 294(5548):1920-1923.
59. Russ G.R., Alcala A.C. Do marine reserves export adult fish biomass? Evidence from Apo island, central Philippines. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1996, 132(1-3):1-9.
60. Freeman D.J., et al. Habitat patches that cross marine reserve boundaries: consequences for the lobster Jasus edwardsii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2009, 388:159-167.
61. Shipp R.L. A perspective on marine reserves as a fishery management tool. Fisheries 2003, 28(12):10-21.
62. Willis T.J., et al. Protection of exploited fish in temperate regions: high density and biomass of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) in northern New Zealand marine reserves. J Appl Ecol 2003, 40(2):214-227.
63. Hutchings K., Griffiths M.H. Life-history strategies of Umbrina robinsoni (Sciaenidae) in warm-temperate and subtropical South African marine reserves. Afr J Mar Sci 2010, 32(1):37-53.
64. Sumpton W.D., Jackson S. Reproductive biology of snapper (Pagrus auratus) in subtropical areas of its range and management implications of reproductive differences with temperate populations. Asian Fish Sci 2010, 23(2):194-207.
65. Polunin N.V.C. Marine protected areas, fish and fisheries. Handbook of fish biology and fisheries. Volume 2: Fisheries 2002, 293-318. Blackwell Publishing. P.J.B. Hart, J.D. Reynolds (Eds.).
66. Jones P.J.S. Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground. RevFish Biol Fish 2001, 11(3):197-216.
67. Schneider S.H. Science as a contact sport: the battle to save earth's climate. Nat Geog Soc. 2009.
68. Gray T.S., et al. New cod war of words: cod is god versus sod the cod-Two opposed discourses on the North Sea Cod Recovery Programme. Fish Res 2008, 93(1-2):1-7.
69. Fanshawe S., et al. Restored top carnivores as detriments to the performance of marine protected areas intended for fishery sustainability: a case study with red abalones and sea otters. Conserv Biol 2003, 17(1):273-283.
70. Mee L.D., et al. How good is good? Human values and Europe's proposed marine strategy directive. Mar Pollut Bull 2008, 56(2):187-204.
71. Jackson J.B.C., et al. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 2001, 293(5530):629-638.
72. Lotze H.K., et al. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 2006, 312(5781):1806-1809.
73. Pauly D., et al. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 1998, 279(5352):860-863.
74. Pauly D., et al. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 2002, 418(6898):689-695.
75. Pauly D. On the need for a global network of large marine reserves. Symposium on aquatic protected areas as fisheries management tools 2003, 63. Amer Fisheries Soc, Quebec City, Canada. J.B. Shipley (Ed.).
76. Pauly D., et al. The future for fisheries. Science 2003, 302(5649):1359-1361.
77. Allison G.W., et al. Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecol Appl 1998, 8(1):S79-S92.
78. Hilborn R. Reinterpreting the state of fisheries and their management. Ecosystems 2007, 10(8):1362-1369.
79. Eden Lord. Speech in the House of Lords on the Marine and Coastal Access Bill, Committee (6th Day), 12 March 2009. Columns 708-709.
80. Stevens T. Rigor and representativeness in marine protected area design. Coast Manage 2002, 30(3):237-248.
81. Hiddink J.G., et al. Cumulative impacts of seabed trawl disturbance on benthic biomass, production, and species richness in different habitats. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2006, 63:721-736.
82. Hiddink J.G., et al. Assessing and predicting the relative ecological impacts of disturbance on habitats with different sensitivities. J Appl Ecol 2007, 44:405-413.