How to turn the tide: Developing legitimate marine governance arrangements at the level of the regional seas

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 71, Issue , 2013, Pages 296-304

  Van Tatenhove, Jan P M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING BLOCKES; CAPACITY BUILDING; ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES; EU POLICY; INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT; INSTITUTIONAL SETTING; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY;

BIODIVERSITY; ECONOMICS;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; MARINE POLICY; REGULATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER;

EUROPE;

EID: 84870675268     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alexander E.R. Institutional transformation and planning: from institutional theory to institutional design. Planning Theory 2005, 4:209-223.
2. Ardron J., Gjerde K., Pullen S., Tilot V. Marine spatial planning in the high seas. Marine Policy 2008, 32:832-839.
3. Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance 2006, Springer, Dordrecht. B. Arts, P. Leroy (Eds.).
4. Arts B., Leroy P., Van Tatenhove J. Political modernization and policy arrangements: a framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal 2006, 6:93-106.
5. Multi-level Governance 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford. I. Bache, M. Flinders (Eds.).
6. Banks S.A., Skilleter G.A. Implementing marine reserve networks: a comparison of approaches in New South Wales (Australia) and New Zealand. Marine Policy 2010, 34:197-207.
7. Been P., Goodsir F., Rogers S. A Review of Operational Objectives in European Regional Seas 2011, Deliverable 6, WP3, EC FP7 ODEMM project.
8. Buunk W.W. Discovering the Locus of European Integration. The Contribution of Planning to European Governance in the Cases of Structural Fund Programmes, Trans-european Networks, Nature 2000 and Agri-environmental Measures 2003, Eburon, Delft.
9. Carter C., Smith A. Revitalizing public policy approaches to the EU: 'territorial institutionalism: fisheries and wine. Journal of European Public Policy 2008, 15:263-281.
10. Carter C., Pasquier R. The Europeanization of regions as 'spaces for politics': a research agenda. Regional and Federal Studies 2010, 20:295-314.
11. Chhotray V., Stoker G. Governance Theory and Practice. A Cross/disciplinary Approach 2009, Palgrave/Macmillan, New York.
12. Crowder L.B., Osherenko G., Young O.R., Airamé, Norse E.A., Baron N., Day J.C., Douvere F., Ehler C.N., Halpern B.S., Langdon S.J., McLeod K.L., Ogden J.C., Peach R.E., Rosenberg A.A., Wilson J.A. Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance. Science 2006, 313:617-618.
13. De Vos, B., 2011. Trust and New Modes of Fisheries Governance. PhD thesis. Wageningen University: Wageningen.
14. De Vos B., Van Tatenhove J.P.M. Trust relationships between fishers and government; new challenges for the co-management arrangements in the Dutch flatfish industry. Marine Policy 2011, 35:218-225.
15. Douvere F., Ehler C.N. New perspectives on sea use management: initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:77-88.
16. EC Green Paper: Towards a Future Maritime Policy for the Union: A European Vision for the Oceans and Seas 2006, European Commission COM, 275 final.
17. EC An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union 2007, Commission staff working document, European Commission SEC, 1278.
18. EC Blue Paper: An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union 2007, European Commission COM, 575 final.
19. EC Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) 2008, European Commission, Directive 2008/56/EC, OJ L 164.
20. EC Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: Achieving Common Principles in the EU 2008, COM, Brussels, 791 final.
21. EC Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy 2011, European Commission COM, 417.
22. EC Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Common Fisheries Policy 2011, COM, Brussels, 425.
23. Edelenbos J., Klok P.J., Van Tatenhove J. The institutional embedding of interactive policy making. Insights for a comparative research based on eight interactive projects in the Netherlands. The American Review of Public Administration 2009, 39:125-148.
24. Ehler C.N., Douvere F. Marine Spatial Planning: A Step-by-step Approach toward Ecosystem-based Management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme 2009, IOC Manual and Guides No. 53, ICAM Dossier No. 6, UNESCO, Paris.
25. Folke C., Hahn T., Olsson P., Norberg J. Adaptive governance of socio-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2005, 30:441-473.
26. Gehring T. Bargaining, arguing and functional differentiation of decision-making: the role of committees in European environmental process regulation. EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics 1999, 195-217. Hart Publishing, Oxford/Portland. C. Joerges, E. Vos (Eds.).
27. Gleason M., McCreary S., Miller-Henson M., Ugoretz J., Fox E., Merrifield M., McClintock W., Serpa P., Hoffman K. Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north central California. Ocean & Coastal Management 2010, 53:52-68.
28. Glenn H., Wattage P., Mardle S. Marine protected areas - substantiating their worth. Marine Policy 2010, 34:421-430.
29. Gualini E. Politicizing territorial governance: embedding the 'political economy of scale' in European spatial policy. Rethinking European Spatial Policy as a Hologram. Actions, Institutions, Discourses 2006, 113-134. Ashgate, Aldershot. L. Doria, V. Fedeli, C. Tedesco (Eds.).
30. Haas P.M. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 1992, 46(1):1-35.
31. Hajer M.A. Authoritative Governance. Policy-making in the age of Mediatization 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
32. Hall P., Taylor R. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies 1996, XLIV:952-973.
33. Halpern B.S., Walbridge S., Selkoe K.A., Kappel C.V., Micheli F., D'Agrosa C., Bruno J.F., Casey K.S., Ebert C., Fox H.E., Fujita R., Heinemann D., Lenihan H.S., Madin E.M.P., Perry M.T., Selig E.R., Spalding M., Steneck R., Watson R. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 2008, 319:948-952.
34. Healey P. Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30:1531-1546.
35. Healey P. Institutional analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education Research 1999, 19:111-121.
36. Healey P., De Magelhaes C., Madanipour A., Pendlebury J. Place, identity and local politics: analyzing initiatives in deliberative governance. Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society 2003, 60-87. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M.A. Hajer, H. Wagenaar (Eds.).
37. Hegland T.J., Ounanian K., Raakjaer J. Why and how to regionalize the common fisheries policy. Maritime Studies 2012, 11:7.
38. Holling C.S. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 2001, 4:390-405.
39. Jenson J., Mérand F. Sociology, institutionalism and the European Union. Comparative European Politics 2010, 8:74-92.
40. Jentoft S. Limits of governability: institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance. Marine Policy 2007, 31:360-370.
41. EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics 2009, Hart Publishing, Oxford/Portland. C. Joerges, E. Vos (Eds.).
42. Kjær A.M. Governance, Key Concepts in the Social Sciences 2004, Polity Press, Cambridge/Malden.
43. Knights A.M., Koss R.S., Papadopoulou N., Cooper L.H., Robinson L.A. Sustainable Use of European Regional Seas and the Role of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2011, Deliverable 1, EC FP7 ODEMM Project, University of Liverpool.
44. Liefferink D. The dynamics of policy arrangements: turning round the tetrahedron. Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance 2006, 45-68. Springer, Dordrecht. B. Arts, P. Leroy (Eds.).
45. Long R. The Marine Strategy Framework Directive: a new European approach to the regulation of the marine environment, marine natural resources and marine ecological services. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 2011, 29:1-44.
46. Lowndes V. Institutionalism. Theory and Methods in Political Sciences 2002, 90-108. Palgrave MacMillan, New York. second ed. D. Marsh, G. Stoker (Eds.).
47. March J.G., Olson J.P. The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review 1984, 78:734-749.
48. OSPAR-HELCOM., 2003. Statement on the Ecosystem Approach to the Management of Human Activities: First Joint Ministerial Meeting of the Helsinki and OSPAR Commissions (JMM), 25-26 June 2003, Bremen.
49. Ounanian K., Delaney A., Raakjær J., Ramirez-Monsalve P. On unequal footing: stakeholder perspectives on the Marine Strategy Framework Directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management. Marine Policy 2012, 36:658-666.
50. Pierre J., Peters B.G. Governance, Politics and the State 2000, St. Martin's, New York.
51. Raakjær Nielsen J., Vedsmand T. User participation and a institutional change in fisheries management: a viable alternative to the failures of 'top-down' driven control?'. Ocean & Coastal Management 1999, 42:19-37.
52. Raakjær Nielsen J.R. An analytical framework for studying: compliance and legitimacy in fisheries management. Marine Policy 2003, 27:425-432.
53. Raakjær J., Hegland T.J. Introduction. Regionalizing the common fisheries policy. Maritime Studies 2012, 11:7.
54. Ricketts P.J., Hildebrand L. Coastal and ocean management in Canada: progress or paralysis?. Coastal Management 2011, 39:4-19.
55. Sala E., Aburto-Oropeza O., Paredes G., Parra I., Barrera J.C., Dayton P.K. A general model for designing networks of marine reserves. Science 2002, 298:1991-1993.
56. Scharpf F. Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
57. Schmidt V.A. Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ides and discourse. The Annual Review of Political Science 2008, 11:303-326.
58. Stoker G. Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal 1998, 50:17-28.
59. Symes D. Regionalizing the common fisheries policy. Context, content and controversy. Maritime Studies (MAST) 2012, 11:9.
60. Thelen K. How institutions evolve. Insights from comparative historical analysis. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences 2003, 208-240. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Mahoney, D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.).
61. Van Haastrecht E.K., Toonen H.M. Science-policy interactions in MPA site selection in the Dutch part of the North Sea. Environmental Management 2011, 47:656-670.
62. Van Hoof L., Van Tatenhove J. EU Marine policy on the move: the tension between fisheries and maritime policy. Marine Policy 2009, 33:726-732.
63. Van Hoof, L., 2010. Who Rules the Waves? Governance and new institutional arrangements in Dutch fisheries management in the context of the European Common Fisheries Policy. PhD thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen.
64. Van Hoof L., Van Leeuwen J., Van Tatenhove J. All at Sea; regionalization and integration of Marine Policy in Europe. Maritime Studies (MAST) 2012, 11:9.
65. Van Kersbergen K., Van Waarden F. Governance as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research 2004, 43:143-171.
66. Van Koppen C.S.A., Mol A.P.J., Van Tatenhove J.P.M. Coping with extreme climate events: institutional flocking. Futures 2010, 42:749-758.
67. Van Leeuwen, J., 2010. Who Greens the Waves? Changing authority in the environmental governance of shipping and offshore oil and gas production. PhD thesis. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.
68. Van Leeuwen J., Van Hoof L., Van Tatenhove J.P.M. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union marine Strategy framework directive. Marine Policy 2012, 36:636-643.
69. Van Leeuwen J., Van Tatenhove J. The triangle of marine governance in the environmental governance of Dutch offshore platforms. Marine Policy 2010, 34:590-597.
70. Political Modernization and the Environment: The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London. J. Van Tatenhove, B. Arts, P. Leroy (Eds.).
71. Van Tatenhove J., Mak J., Liefferink D. The inter-play between formal and informal practices. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 2006, 7:8-24.
72. Van Tatenhove J.P.M. Integrated marine governance: questions of legitimacy. MAST (Maritime Studies) 2011, 10:87-113.
73. Wallace H. The policy process. A moving pendulum. Policy-making in the European Union 2000, 39-64. Oxford University Press, Oxford. fourth ed. H. Wallace, W. Wallace (Eds.).
74. Wenger E. Communities of Practice. Learning as a Social System 1998, Systems Thinker.
75. WWF Germany Towards a Good Environmental Status. A Network of Marine Protected Areas for the North Sea 2009, WWF Germany, Frankfurt.
76. Young O.R., Osherenko G., Ekstrom J., Crowder L.B., Ogden J., Wilson J.A., Day J.C., Douvere F., Ehler C.N., McLeod K.L., Halpren B.S., Peach R. Solving the crisis in ocean governance: place-based management of marine ecosystems. Environment 2010, 49:20-33.