Perceptual Audio Evaluation-Theory, Method and Application

Perceptual Audio Evaluation-Theory, Method and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-442

  Bech, Søren ^a   Zacharov, Nick ^b  

^a BANG AND OLUFSEN A S   (Denmark)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889417720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470869253     Document Type: Book

References (478)

1. 3GPP. Technical specification group services and system aspects; AMR-WB speech codec performance characterisatio. Technical Report 3GPPTR26.976, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, 2001.
2. Aarts, R. M. Calculation of the loudness of loudspeakers during listening tests. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 39 (1991), 27-28.
3. Aarts, R. M. Comparison of some loudness measures for loudspeaker listening tests. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 40 (1992), 142-146.
4. Aarts, R. M. On the Design and Psychophysical Assessment of Loudspeaker Systems. PhD thesis, Delft Technical University, 1995.
5. AES. 20, AES Recommended Practice for Professional Audio-Subjective Evaluation of Loudspeakers. Audio Engineering Society, 1996.
6. AES. 17, AES Standard Method for Digital Audio Engineering-Measurement of Digital Audio Equipment. Audio Engineering Society, 1998.
7. AES. 6id, AES Information Document for Digital Audio-Personal Computer Audio Quality Measurement. Audio Engineering Society, 2000.
8. AES. 47, AES Standard on Interconnections-Grounding and EMC Practices-Shields of Connectors in Audio Equipment Containing Active Circuitry. Audio Engineering Society, 2005.
9. Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis.Wiley, 2002.
10. Airo, E., Pekkarinen, J., and Olkinuora, P. Listening to music over earphones: an assessment of noise exposure. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 82 (1996), 885-894.
11. Algazi, V. R., Duda, R. O., Thompson, D. M., and Avendano, C. The CIPIC HRTF database. Available from: http://interface.cipic.ucdavis.edu/CIL_ html/CIL_HRTF_database.htm, 2002.
12. Algazi, V. R., Duda, R. O., Thompson, D. M., and Avendano, C. The CIPIC HRTF database. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop of Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (New Plaza, New York, USA, 2002), IEEE.
13. Altman, D. G., Gore, S. M., Gardner, M. J., and Pocock, S. J. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. In Statistics with Confidence-Confidence Intervals and Statitical Guidelines M. J., Gardner and D. G., Altman, Eds. Universities Press, Great Britain, United Kingdom, 1998, ch. 9, pp. 83-100.
14. ANSI. S3.1-1991, Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. American National Standards Institute, 1991.
15. APA. PublicationManual of the American Psychological Association, 5th ed. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
16. ASTM. STP 758. Guidelines for the Selection and Training of Sensory Panel Members. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1981.
17. Atkinson, C. and Giddings, P. Grounding systems and their implementation. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 6 (1995), 465-471.
18. Audio Engineering Society. Perceptual audio coders: What to listen for. Compact Disc, 2001.
19. Audio Research Labs. STEP-Subjective training and evaluation program. http://www.audioresearchlabs.com/step_info.html, 2004.
20. Ballas, J. A., Brock, D., Stroup, J., and Fouad, H. The effect of auditory rendering on perceived movement: loudspeaker density and HRTF. In Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Auditory Display (Espoo, Finland, July 2001), pp. 235-238.
21. Bang & Olufsen. Music for Archimedes. Compact Disc CD B&O 101, 1992.
22. Barr, D. R. Using confidence intervals to test hypotheses. Journal of Quality Technology 1, 4 (October 1969), 256-258.
23. Barrett, P. A., Campos-Neto, S. F., and Sharpley, A. D. Fixedpoint subjective selection test plan for the ITU-T 4-kbit/s speech coding algorithm. Technical report TD 13 (WP2/12), Dakar, Senegal, 22-26 October, 2001 SG12 Meeting of the 2001-2004 Study Period, International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2001.
24. Barton, R. R. Design-plots for factorial and fractional-factorial designs. Journal of Quality Technology 30, 1 (1998), 40-54.
25. Beattie, R. C., Zentil, A., and Svihovec, D. A. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners. Journal of Auditory Research 22, 1 (January 1982), 71-76.
26. Bech, S. Listening tests on loudspeakers: A discussion of experimental procedures and evaluation of the response data. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 8th International Conference (1990), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 101-115.
27. Bech, S. Selection and training of subjects for listening tests on sound-reproducing equipment. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 40, 7/8 (1992), 590-610.
28. Bech, S. Training of subjects for auditory experiments. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 1 (1993), 89-99.
29. Bech, S. Perception of timbre of reproduced sound in small rooms: Influence of room and loudspeaker position. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 42, 12 (1994), 999-1007.
30. Bech, S. Timbral aspects of reproduced sound in small rooms. I. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 3 (March 1995), 1717-1726.
31. Bech, S. Timbral aspects of reproduced sound in small rooms. II. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99, 6 (June 1996), 3539-3549.
32. Bech, S. Calibration of relative level differences of a domestic multichannel sound reproduction system. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 46 (1998), 304-313.
33. Bech, S. The influence of stereophonic width on the perceived quality of an audio-visual presentation using a multichannel sound system. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 46 (1998), 314-322.
34. Bech, S. Spatial aspects of reproduced sound in small rooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103, 1 (January 1998), 434-445.
35. Bech, S. Methods for subjective evaluation of spatial characteristics of sound. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 16th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction (1999), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 487-504.
36. Bech, S. Requirements for low-frequency sound reproduction, part I: The audibility of changes in passband amplitude and lower system cutoff frequency and slope. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 50, 7/8 (2002), 564-580.
37. Bech, S. and Cutmore, N. Multichannel level alignment, part V: The effects of reproduction level, reproduction room, step size, and symmetry. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 108th International Convention (Paris, France, Feb. 2000).
38. Bech, S., Gulbol, M.-A., Martin, G., Ghani, J., and Ellermeier, W. A listening test system for automotive audio part 2: Initial verification. In Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Barcelona, Spain, May 2005).
39. Bech, S., Hamberg, R., Nijenhuis, M., Teunissen, C., de Jong, H. L., Houben, P., and Pramanik, S. K. The rapid perceptual image description method (RaPID). In SPIE Proceedings (1996), Vol. 2657, SPIE, pp. 317-328.
40. Bech, S. and Zacharov, N. Multichannel level alignment, part III: The effects of loudspeaker directivity and reproduction bandwidth. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 106th International Convention (Munich, Germany, May 1999).
41. Beerends, J. G., Hekstra, A. P., Rix, A. W., and Hollier, M. P. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ). The new ITU standard for end-to-end speech quality assessment part II-psychoacoustic model. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 50, 10 (October 2002), 765-778.
42. Begault, D. R. 3-D Sound for Virtual Reality and Multimedia. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994.
43. Benjamin, E. Characteristics of musical signals. In Proceedings of the 97th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (San Francisco, CA, USA, November 1994).
44. Benjamin, E. Signal characteristics of matrix and discrete multichannel recordings. In Proceedings of the 105th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (San Francisco, CA, USA, September 1998).
45. Benjamin, E. Preferred listening levels and acceptance windows for dialog reproduction in the domestic environment. In Proceedings of the 117th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (San Francisco, CA, USA, October 2004).
46. Benjamin, E. and Gannon, B. The effect of room acoustics on subwoofer performance and level setting. In Proceedings of the 109th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (San Francisco, CA, USA, September 2000).
47. Beranek, L. L. Acoustical Measurements, revised ed. Acoustical Society of America, 1988.
48. Berg, J. Systematic Evaluation of Perceived Spatial Quality in Surround Sound Systems. PhD thesis, School of Music, Lule°a University of Technology, May 2002.
49. Berg, J. OPAQUE-a tool for the elicitation and grading of audio quality attributes. In Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Barcelona, Spain, May 2005).
50. Berg, J. and Rumsey, F. Identification of perceived spatial attributes of recordings by repertory grid technique and other methods. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 106th International Convention (Munich, Germany, May 1999).
51. Berg, J. and Rumsey, F. Spatial attribute identification and scaling by repertory grid technique and other methods. In Proceeding of the Audio Engineering Society 16th International Conference (Munich, Germany, May 1999), Audio Engineering Society.
52. Berg, J. and Rumsey, F. Correlation between emotive, descriptive and naturalness attributes in subjective data relating to spatial sound reproduction. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 109th International Convention (Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sept. 2000).
53. Berg, J. and Rumsey, F. In search of the spatial dimensions of reproduced sound: Verbal protocol analysis and cluster analysis of scaled verbal descriptors. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 108th International Convention (Paris, France, Feb. 2000).
54. Bernstein, I. H. Applied Multivariate Analysis. Springer, New York, 1988.
55. Bies, D. A. and Hansen, C. H. Engineering Noise Control, 2nd ed. E & FN Spon, 1996.
56. Blauert, J. Spatial Hearing. The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localisation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997.
57. Blauert, J., Brueggen, M., Bronkhorst, A. W., Drullman, R., Reynaud, G., Pellieux, L., Krebber, W., and Sottek, R. The AUDIS catalog of human HRTFs. Information from: http://www.eaa-fenestra.org/Products/Documenta/Publications/09-de2, 1998.
58. Block, M. G., Killion, M. C., and Tillman, T. W. The ''missing 6 dB'' of Tillman, Johnson and Olsen was found-30 years ago. Seminars in Hearing 25, 1 (2004), 7-16.
59. Bolia, R. S., Nelson, W. T., Ericson, M. A., and Simpson, B. D. A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107, 2 (February 2000), 1065-1066.
60. Borenius, J. Perceptibility of direction and time delay errors in subwoofer reproduction. In Proceedings of the 79th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (New York, USA, October 1985).
61. Borg, I. and Groenen, P. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.
62. Bosi, M., Brandenburg, K., Quackenbush, S., Fielder, L., Akagiri, K., Fuchs, H., and Dietz, M. ISO/IEC MPEG-2 advanced audio coding. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 45, 10 (October 1997), 789-814.
63. Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. Statistics for Experimenters.Wiley, 1978.
64. Brandenburg, K. and Bosi, M. Overview of MPEG audio: Current and future standards for low bit-rate audio coding. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 45, 1/2 (January/February 1997), 4-21.
65. Brandt, M. A., Skinner, E. Z., and Coleman, J. A. Texture profile method. Journal of Food Science 28 (1963), 404-409.
66. Bregman, A. S. and Ahad, P. Demonstrations of auditory scene analysis. Compact Disc available from http://www.psych. mcgill.ca/labs/auditory/home.html, 1995.
67. Brixen, E. B. Spectral ear training. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 94th International Convention (Berlin, Germany, March 1993).
68. Brixen, E. B. and Søndergaard, M. Rapport vedrørende: niveauopfattelse i hovedtelefoner (in Danish). Technical Report KKDK 068-1-ebb-1, Delta Akustik and Vibration, Denmark, 2001.
69. Brockhoff, P. Statistical Analysis of Sensory Data. PhD thesis, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University Copenhagen, 1994.
70. Brockhoff, P. M. Assessor modeling. Food Quality and Preference 9, 3 (1998), 87-89.
71. Brockhoff, P. M. Statistical testing of individual differences in sensory profiling. Food Quality and Preference 14, 5-6 (2003), 425-434.
72. Brockhoff, P. M. and Skovgaard, I. M. Modelling individual differences between assessors in sensory evaluations. Food Quality and Preference 5 (1994), 215-224.
73. Brookes, T., Kassier, R., andRumsey, F. Asimplified scene-based paradigm for use in spatial audio listener training applications. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 117th International Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 2004).
74. Brown, H. and Prescott, R. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine. Wiley, London, 1999.
75. Brungart, D. S. Evaluation of speech intelligibility with the coordinate response measure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109, 5 (May 2001), 2276-2279.
76. BSI. BS 5969: Specification for Sound LevelMeters. British Standards Institute, 1981.
77. Bunning, H. and Wilkens, H. Mehrdimensionale Verknüpfung der Höreindrücke von Lautsprechern mit deren physikalischen Daten. Abschlussbericht Bo 421/7, Heinrich-Hertz-Institut für Nachrichtentechnik Berlin GmbH, 1979.
78. Butler, D. Musician's Guide to Perception and Cognition. Schirmer Books, 1992.
79. Cabot, R. C. Fundamentals of modern audio measurement. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 47, 9 (September 1999), 738-744, 746-762.
80. Canèvet, G. An auditory test battery for professional screening. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 85, 5 (1999), 667-673.
81. Cardozo, B. L. Adjusting the method of adjustment: SD vs DL. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 37, 5 (1965), 786-792.
82. Carroll, J. D. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Vol. 1. Seminar Press, New York, 1972, pp. 105-155.
83. Carroll, J. D. and Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of ''Eckart-Young'' decomposition. Psychometrika 35 (1970), 283-319.
84. CCITT. Handbook of Telephonometry. International Telecommunications Union, 1992.
85. Civille, G. V. and Liska, I. H. Modifications and applications to foods of the general foods sensory texture profile technique. Journal of Texture Studies 6 (1975), 19-31.
86. Chalupper, H. and Fastl, H. Dynamic loudness model (DLM) for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 88, 3 (May/June 2002), 378-386.
87. Chapman, P. J. Programme material analysis. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 100th International Convention (Copenhagen, Denmark, May 1996).
88. Choisel, S. Pointing technique with visual feedback for sound source localization experiments. In Proceedings of the 115th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (New York, NY, USA, October 2003).
89. Choisel, C. and Wickelmaier, F. Extraction of auditory features and elicitation of attributes for the assessment of multichannel reproduced sound. In Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Barcelona, Spain, May 2005).
90. Choisel, S. and Wickelmaier, F. Scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference of multichannel reproduced sound. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2006), submitted.
91. Chouard, N. Perception of Overall Loudness and Unpleasantness. PhD thesis, Universitè du Maine, 1998.
92. Chouard, N. Perception of overall loudness and unpleasantness. In Proceedings of Internoise Conference (Christchurch, New Zealand, November 1998).
93. Cochran, W. G. Some consequences when the assumptions for the analysis of variance are not satisfied. Biometrics 3, 1 (1947), 22-38.
94. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. Experimental Design, 2nd ed. Wiley, 1992.
95. Communications Research Center of Canada. CRCSEAQ: System for the evaluation of audio quality. http://www.crc.ca/en/html/aas/home/products/products#CRC_SEAQ, 2005.
96. Condamines, R. Relationship between the passband and the preferred listening level for music. EBU Review Part A 139 (June 1973), 124-127.
97. Cooper, B. A., Nelson, D. A., and Danielson, R. W. Auditory demonstrations II: Challenges to speech communication and music listening. In Noise-Con (Baltimore, MD, USA, 2004), Noise-Con.
98. Coren, S. Most comfortable listening level as a function of age. Ergonomics 37, 7 (1994), 1269-1274.
99. Corey, J. An ear training system for identifying parameters of artificial reverberation in multichannel audio. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 117st International Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 2004).
100. Cowles, M. and Davis, C. On the origins of the .05 level of statistical significance. American Psychologist 37 (1982), 553-558.
101. Database of HRTFs. Available from: http://www.ais.riec.tohoku.ac.jp/lab/db-hrtf/, 2001.
102. de Bruijn, W. P. J. and Boone, M. M. Subjective experiments on the effects of combining spatialized audio and 2D video projection in audio-visual systems. In Proceedings of the 112th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Munich, Germany, May 2002).
103. Delarue, J. and Sieffermann, J. M. Sensory mapping using flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavour of fruit dairy products. Food Quality and Preference 15, 4 (June 2004), 383-392.
104. Delta. Hør engang! Compact Disc, 1998.
105. Deutsch, D. Musical illusions and paradoxes. Compact Disc available from http://www.philomel.com, 1995.
106. Deutsch, D. Phantom words and other curiosities. CompactDisc available from http://www.philomel.com, 2003.
107. Dijksterhuis, G. Procrustes analysis in sensory research. Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science, Vol. 16 of Data Handling in Science and Technology [314]. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996, ch. 7, pp. 185-217.
108. Dunn, J. Digital-to-analog converter measurements. Available from: http://www.audioprecision.com/index.php?page=resources/&id=1000000161, 2001.
109. Dunn, J. Measurement Techniques for Digital Audio. Audio Precision Inc., 2004.
110. EBU. Sound Quality Assessment Material, (recordings for subjective tests). No. 422 204-2. 1988.
111. EBU. Technical Document Tech 3286-Assessment Methods for the Subjective Evaluation of the Quality of Sound Programme Material-Music. European Broadcast Union, August 1997.
112. EBU. Technical Document Tech 3276-Listening Conditions for the Assessment of Sound Programme Material: Monophonic and Two-Channel Stereophonic, 2nd ed. European Broadcast Union, May 1998.
113. EBU. Technical Document Tech 3276: Supplement 1-Listening Conditions for the Assessment of Sound Programme Material: Multichannel Sound. European Broadcast Union, February 1999.
114. EBU. Technical Document Tech 3286: Supplement 1-Assessment Methods for the Subjective Evaluation of the Quality of Sound Programme Material-Multichannel. European Broadcast Union, July 2000.
115. Ekman, G. and Sjöberg, L. Scaling. Annual Review of Psychology 16 (1965), 451-474.
116. Ellermeier, W. and Zimmer, K. Using psychological choice models to investigate overall sound quality. In Proceedings of the First ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Auditory Quality of Systems (Germany, Bochum, April 23-25 2003), Acadamie Mont-Cenis.
117. Engeldrum, P. G. Psychometric Scaling: A Toolkit for Imaging Systems Development. Imcotek Press, Winchester, MA, USA, 2000.
118. European Union. Directive 2003/10/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise). Official Journal of the European Union (2003), Vol. L42, pp. 38-44.
119. Exner, S. Zur Lehre von den Gehörsempfindungen. Pflügers Archiv 13 (1876), 228-253.
120. Fastl, H. Loudness evaluation by subjects and by a loudness meter. In Sensory Research, Multimodal Perspectives (Hillsdale NJ, USA, 1993), R. T. Verrillo, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 199-210.
121. Fause, K. R. Fundamentals of grounding, shielding, and interconnection. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 6 (1995), 498-516.
122. Fielder, L. D. and Benjamin, E. M. Subwoofer performance for accurate reproduction of music. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 36, 8 (June 1988), 443-457.
123. Fjelland, R. and Gjengedal, E. Videnskab p°a egne praemisser. Videnskabsteori og etik for sundhedspersonale, 1st ed. Munksgaard, 1996.
124. Ford, N. Developing a Graphical Language to Represent Listeners' Experiences of Spatial Attributes in Reproduced Sound. PhD thesis, University of Surrey, Department of Music & Sound Recording, School of Performing Arts, Surrey, GB, 2005.
125. Ford, N., Rumsey, F., and de Bruyn, B. Graphical elicitation techniques for subjective assessment of the spatial attributes of loudspeaker reproduction-a pilot investigation. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 110th International Convention (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 2001).
126. Ford, N., Rumsey, F., and Nind, T. Evaluating influences of a central automotive loudspeaker on perceived spatial attributes using a graphical assessment language. In Proceedings of theAudio Engineering Society 113th International Convention (Los Angeles, CA, USA, Oct. 2002).
127. Ford, N., Rumsey, F., and Nind, T. Subjective evaluation of perceived spatial differences in car audio systems using a graphical assessment language. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 112th International Convention (Munich, Germany, May 2002).
128. Ford, N., Rumsey, F., and Nind, T. Evaluating spatial attributes of reproduced audio events using a graphical assessment language-understanding differences in listener depictions. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 24th International Conference (2003), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 171-183.
129. Ford, N., Rumsey, F., and Nind, T. Communicating listeners' auditory spatial experiences: A method for developing a descriptive language. In Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Barcelona, Spain, May 2005).
130. Foxlin, E. Motion Tracking Requirements and Technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2002, pp. 163-210.
131. Frank, T., Durrant, J. D., and Lovrinic, J. H. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. American Journal of Audiology 2, 1 (1993), 414-422.
132. Gabrielsson, A. Dimension analyses of perceived quality of sound reproduction systems. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 20 (1979), 159-169.
133. Gabrielsson, A. Statistical treatment of data for listening tests on sound reproduction systems. Technical Report TA 92, Department of Technical Audiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 1979.
134. Gabrielsson, A., Hagerman, B., Bech-Kristensen, T., and Lundberg, G. Perceived sound quality of reproduction with different frequency responses and sound levels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88 (1990), 1359-1366.
135. Gabrielsson, A. and Lindström, B. Perceived sound quality of high-fidelity loudspeakers. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 33, 1/2 (January/February 1985), 33-53.
136. Gabrielsson, A., Rosenberg, V., and Sjögren, H. Judgement and dimension analyses of perceived sound quality of sound reproducing systems. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 55, April (1974), 854-861.
137. Gabrielsson, A. and Sjögren, H. Perceived sound quality of sound-reproduction systems. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65, 4 (1979), 1019-1033.
138. Gaito, J. and Yokubynas, R. An empirical basis for the statement that measurement scale properties (and meaning) are irrelevant in statistical analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24, 6 (1986), 449-450.
139. Gardner, W. G. 3-D Audio Using Loudspeakers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1998.
140. Gardner, M. J. and Altman, D. G., Eds. Statistics with Confidence-Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. Universities Press, Great Britain, United Kingdom, 1998.
141. Gardner, B. and Martin, K. HRTF measurements of a KEMAR dummy-head microphone. http://sound.media. mit.edu/KEMAR.html, 2000.
142. Gehörschutz-Das Gehörschützen. Fachausschuss Persönliche Schutzausrüstung, Arbeitskreis Gehörschutz, Nürnberg Fa. Hamann Consult, Dresden, 1992.
143. Gescheider, G. A. Psychophysics. Method, Theory, and Application. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985.
144. Gescheider, G. A. Psychophysics: The Fundamentals, 3rd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, 1997.
145. Ghani, J., Ellermeier, W., and Zimmer, K. A test battery measuring auditory capabilities of listening panels. In Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum 2005 Congress (Budapest, Hungary, 2005).
146. Glasberg, B. R. and Moore, B. C. J. A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 50, 5 (May 2002), 331-342.
147. Gleiss, N. Preferred listening levels in telephony. TELE, English Edition, 2 (1974), 24-27.
148. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Peninsula Publishing, 1988.
149. Greenhouse, S. W. and Geisser, S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrica 24 (1959), 95-112.
150. Grey, J. M. Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61, 5 (1977), 1270-1277.
151. Griesinger, D. Spaciousness and envelopment in musical acoustics. In Proceedings of the 101st Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Los Angeles, CA, USA, November 1996).
152. Griesinger, D. Spatial impression and envelopment in small rooms. In Proceedings of the 103rd Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (New York, USA, September 1997).
153. Griesinger, D. Objective measures of spaciousness and envelopment. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 16th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction (1999), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 27-41.
154. Guastavino, C. and Katz, B. F. G. Perceptual evaluation ofmultidimensional spatial audio reproduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 2 (August 2004), 1105-1115.
155. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice-Hall International Inc., London, 1998.
156. Hammershøi, D. and Møller, H. Binaural Technique-Basic Methods for Recording, Synthesis, and Reproduction. Springer, 2005, ch. 9, pp. 223-254.
157. Hansen, V. Establishing a panel of listeners at Bang&Olufsen: A report. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Perception of Reproduced Sound (Gammel Avernæs, Denmark, 1987), 89-90.
158. Hansen, V. and Munch, G. Making recordings for simulation tests in the Archimedes project. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 39 (1991), 768-774.
159. Härmä, A. HUT ear matlab toolbox version 2.0. http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/software/HUTear/HUTear.html, 2000.
160. Hassall, J. R. and Zavari, K. Acoustic Noise Measurement. Brüel and Kjær, 1979.
161. Hellman, R. and Zwicker, E. Why can a decrease in dB(A) produce an increase in loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82, 5 (November 1987), 1700-1705.
162. Hicks, C. R. Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, USA, 1973.
163. Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J. W. Fundamentals of Exploratory Analysis of Variance.Wiley, 1991.
164. Hofer, B. Measuring switch-mode power amplifiers. Technical Report, Audio Precision Inc., Beaverton, OR, USA, 2003.
165. Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. A. Nonparametrical Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. Wiley, 1999.
166. Holman, T. 5.1 Surround Sound up and Running. Focal press, Boston, MA, 2000.
167. Holman, T. LFE level setting. Surround Professional 3, 7 (August 2000), 43-47.
168. Holman, T. The number of loudspeaker channels. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Audio Engineering Society (Schloss Elmau, Germany, May 2001).
169. Holman, T. Setting up multichannel systems. You've got questions, we've got answers.... Surround Professional. Available from http://surroundpro.com/articles/publish/inside_surround/article_30.shtm%l, 2003.
170. Hoth, D. F. Room noise spectra at subscribers' telephone locations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 12 (1941), 499-504.
171. Houtsma, A. J. M., Rossing, T. D., Wagenaars, W. M. Auditory Demonstrations. Audio CD, Philips/Acoustical Society of America, 1987.
172. Hugonnet, C. and Walder, P. Stereophonic Sound Recording-Theory and Practice. Wiley, Chichester, England and New York, 1998.
173. Hunter, E. A. Experimental design. Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science, Vol. 16 of Data handling in science and technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996, ch. 2, pp. 37-69.
174. Huynh, H. and Feldt, L. S. Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom in the randomised block and split plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics 1 (1976), 69-82.
175. Hynninen, J. A Software-Based System for Listening Tests. Master's thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland, May 2001. http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/publications/files/theses/hynninen_mst.pdf.
176. Hynninen, J. and Zacharov, N. Guinea Pig-A generic subjective test system for multichannel audio. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 106th International Convention (Munich, Germany, May 1999).
177. IEC. 60318, An IEC Artificial Ear, of Wideband Type, for the Calibration of Earphones Used in Audiometry. International Electrotechnical Commission, 1970.
178. IEC. 60537, Frequency Weighting for Measurement of Aircraft Noise (D-Weighting). International Electrotechnical Commission, 1976, withdrawn.
179. IEC. 61672-1, Electroacoustics. Sound levelmeters. Specifications. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2003
180. IEC. 60711, Occluded-Ear Simulator for the Measurement of Earphones Coupled to the Ear and Ear Inserts. International Electrotechnical Commission, 1981.
181. IEC. 60581-10, High Fidelity Audio Equipment and Systems; Minimum Performance Requirements. Part 10: Headphones. International Electrotechnical Commission, 1986.
182. IEC. 60959, Provisional Head and Torso Simulator for Acoustic Measurements and air Conduction Hearing Aids. International Electrotechnical Commission, 1990.
183. IEC. 60268-7, Sound System Equipment-Part 7: Headphones and Earphones. International Electrotechnical Commission, 1996.
184. IEC. 60268-13, Sound System Equipment-Part 13: Listening Tests on Loudspeakers. International Electrotechnical Commission, 1998.
185. IEC. 60268-3, Sound System Equipment-Part 3: Amplifiers. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2001.
186. Illènyi, A. and Korpàssy, P. Correlation between loudness and quality. Acustica 49 (1981), 334-336.
187. Isherwood, D., Lorho, G., Mattila, V-V., and Zacharov, N. Augmentation, application and verification of the generalized listener selection procedure. In Proceedings of the 115th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2003).
188. ISO. 532, Acoustics-Method for Calculating Loudness Levels. International Organization for Standards, 1975.
189. ISO. 6189. Acoustics-Pure Tone Conduction Threshold Audiometry for Hearing Conservation Purposes. International Organization for Standards, 1983.
190. ISO. 7029. Acoustics-Threshold of Hearing by Air Conduction as a Function of Age and Sex for Otologically Normal Persons. International Organization for Standards, 1984.
191. ISO. 1999. Acoustics-Determination ofOccupationalNoise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment. International Organization for Standards, 1990.
192. ISO. 8586-1. Sensory Analysis-General Guidance for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Assessors-Part 1: Selected Assessors. International Organization for Standards, 1993.
193. ISO. 11035. Sensory Analysis-Identification and Selection of Descriptors for Establishing a Sensory Profile by a Multidimensional Approach. International Organization for Standards, 1994.
194. ISO. 8586-2. Sensory Analysis-General Guidance for the Selection, Training andMonitoring of Assessors-Part 2: Experts. International Organization for Standards, 1994.
195. ISO. 717-1. Acoustics-Rating of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements-Part 1: Airborne Sound Insulation. International Organization for Standards, 1996.
196. ISO. 3382. Acoustics-Measurement of Reverberation Time of Rooms with Reference to Other Acoustics Parameters. International Organization for Standards, 1997.
197. ISO. 3745. Acoustics-Determination of Sound Power Levels of Noise Sources. Precision Methods for Anechoic and Semi-Anechoic Rooms. International Organization for Standards, 1997.
198. ISO. 140-4. Acoustics-Measurement of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements-Part 4: Field Measurements of Airborne Sound Insulation Between Rooms. International Organization for Standards, 1998.
199. ISO. 389-1. Acoustics-Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment-Part 1: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Supra-Aural Earphones. International Organization for Standards, 1998.
200. ISO. 3741. Acoustics-Determination of Sound Power Levels of Noise Sources. Precision Methods for Reverberation Rooms. International Organization for Standards, 1999.
201. ISO. 13300-1. Sensory Analysis-General Guidance for the Staff of a Sensory Evaluation Laboratory-Part 1: Staff Responsibilities. International Organization for Standards, 2002.
202. ISO. 13300-2. Sensory Analysis-General Guidance for the Staff of a Sensory Evaluation Laboratory-Part 2: Recruitment and Training of Panel Leaders. International Organization for Standards, 2002.
203. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.562-3, Subjective Assessment of Sound Quality. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1990.
204. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.708, Determination of the Electro-Acoustical Properties of Studio Monitor Headphones. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1990.
205. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.775-1, Multichannel Stereophonic Sound Systems with and without Accompanying Picture. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1994.
206. ITU-R. Recommendation BT.811, The Subjective Assessment of Enhanced PAL and SECAM Systems. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1994.
207. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.1116-1, Methods for the Subjective Assessment of Small Impairments in Audio Systems Including Multichannel Sound Systems. International TelecommunicationsUnion Radiocommunication Assembly, 1997.
208. ITU-R. Recommendation BT.1128, Subjective Assessment of Conventional Television Systems. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1997.
209. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.1283, Subjective Assessment of Sound Quality-A Guide to Existing Recommendations. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1998.
210. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.1284, Methods for the Subjective Assessment of Sound Quality-General Requirements. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1998.
211. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.1285, Pre-selection methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1998.
212. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.1286, Methods for the subjective assessment of audio systems with accompanying picture. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1998.
213. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.1387, Method for Objective Measurement of Perceived Audio Quality. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1998.
214. ITU-R. Recommendation BT.1129-2, Subjective Assessment of Standard Definition Digital Television (SDTV) Systems. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1998.
215. ITU-R. Recommendation BT.710-4, Subjective Assessment Methods for Image Quality in High-Definition Television. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 1998.
216. ITU-R. Recommendation BT.500-11, Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 2002.
217. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.1534-1, Method for the Subjective Assessment of Intermediate Quality Level of Coding Systems. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 2003.
218. ITU-R. Recommendation BS.1679, Subjective assessment of the quality of audio in large screen digital imagery applications intended for presentation in a theatrical environment. International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Assembly, 2004.
219. ITU-T. Recommendation P.48, Specification for an Intermediate Reference System. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1993.
220. ITU-T. Recommendation P.56, Telephone Transmission Quality. Objective Measuring Apparatus. Objective Measurement of Active Speech Level. International TelecommunicationsUnion, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1993.
221. ITU-T. Recommendation P.84, Subjective Listening Test Method for Evaluating Digital Circuit Multiplication and Packetized Voice Systems-Telephone Transmission Quality Subjective Opinion Tests. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1993.
222. ITU-T. Recommendation P.85, A method for subjective performance assessment of the quality of speech voice output devices. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1994.
223. ITU-T. Recommendation P.58, Head and Torso Simulator for Telephonometry. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1996.
224. ITU-T. Recommendation P.800, Methods for Subjective Determination of Transmission Quality. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1996.
225. ITU-T. Recommendation P.810, Telephone Transmission Quality. Methods for Objective and Subjective Assessment of Quality; Modulated Noise Reference Unit (MNRU). International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1996.
226. ITU-T. Recommendation P.830, Subjective Performance Assessment of Telephone-Band and Wideband Digital Codecs. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1996.
227. ITU-T. Recommendation P.910, SubjectiveVideo Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1996.
228. ITU-T. Recommendation P.920, Interactive Test Methods for Audiovisual Communications. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1996.
229. ITU-T. Recommendation P.10, Vocabulary of Terms on Telephone Transmission Quality and Telephone Sets. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1998.
230. ITU-T. Recommendation P.341, Transmission Characteristics For Wideband (150-7000 Hz) Digital Hands Free Telephony Terminals. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1998.
231. ITU-T. Recommendation P.831, Subjective Performance Evaluation of Network Echo Cancellers. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1998.
232. ITU-T. Recommendation P.911, Subjective Audiovisual Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1998.
233. ITU-T. Supplement 23, ITU-T Coded Speech Database. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 1998.
234. ITU-T. Recommendation P.501, Test Signals for Use in Telephonometry. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2000.
235. ITU-T. Recommendation P.832, Subjective Performance Evaluation of Handsfree Terminals. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2000.
236. ITU-T. Recommendation P.862, Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), an ObjectiveMethod for End-to-End Speech Quality Assessment of Narrow-Band Telephone Networks and Speech Codecs. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2001.
237. ITU-T. Recommendation P.57, Telephone Transmission Quality. ObjectiveMeasuring Apparatus.Artificial Ears. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2002.
238. ITU-T. Recommendation P.800.1, Mean Opinion Score (MOS) Terminology. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2003.
239. ITU-T. Recommendation P.835, Subjective Test Methodology for Evaluating Speech Communication Systems that Include Noise Suppression Algorithm. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2003.
240. ITU-T. Recommendation P.840, Subjective Listening Test Method for Evaluating Circuit Multiplication Equipment. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2003.
241. ITU-T. Recommendation P.851, Subjective Quality Evaluation of Telephone Services Based on Spoken Dialogue Systems. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2003.
242. ITU-T. Recommendation P.862.1, Mapping Function for Transforming P.862 raw Result Scores to MOS-LQO. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2003.
243. ITU-T. Recommendation P.563, Single Ended Method for Objective Speech Quality Assessment in Narrow-Band Telephony Applications. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2004.
244. ITU-T. Recommendation P.880, Continuous Evaluation of TimeVarying Speech Quality. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2004.
245. ITU-T. Recommendation P.862.2, Wideband Extension to Recommendation P.862 for the Assessment of Wideband Telephone Networks and Speech Codecs. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2005.
246. ITU-T. Recommendation P.862.3, Application Guide for Objective Quality Measurement Based on Recommendations P.862, P.862.1 and P.862.2. International Telecommunications Union, Telecommunications Standardization Sector, 2005.
247. Järvinen, A. Design of a reference listening room-a case study. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 103rd International Convention (New York, NY, USA, Sept. 1997).
248. Johansson, I. and Lynoe, N. Medicin og Filosofi. En Introduktion, 2nd ed. FADL, 1999.
249. Kabel, P. An examination and interpretation of ITU-R BS.1387: perceptual evaluation of audio quality. Technical Report, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 2003.
250. Kaplan, H., Gladstone, V. S., and Lloyd, L. L. Audiometric Interpretation: A Manual of Basic Audiometry, 2nd ed. Allyn & Bacon, 1993.
251. Kelly, G. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York, 1955.
252. Kelly, M. C. and Tew, A. I. A novel method for the efficient comparison of spatialization conditions. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 114th International Convention (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 2003).
253. Keppel, G. andWickens, T. D. Design and Analysis. A Researcher's Handbook, 4th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
254. Killion, M. C. Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: Where is the 'missing 6 dB'. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63 (1978), 1501-1510.
255. Kirby, D. G. ISO/MPEG subjective tests on multichannel audio systems. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 99th International Convention (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 1995).
256. Kirk, R. E. Learning, a major factor influencing preferences for high-fidelity reproducing systems. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28 (1956), 1113-1116.
257. Kish, L., Ed. Statistical Design for Research. Wiley Interscience, 2004.
258. Kohlrausch, A. G. and van de Par, S. L. J. Auditory-visual interaction: From fundamental research in cognitive psychology to (possible) applications. In Proceedings of SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IV (San Jose, CA, USA, January 1999).
259. Koivuniemi, K. and Zacharov, N. Unravelling the perception of spatial sound reproduction: Language development, verbal protocol analysis and listener training. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 111th InternationalConvention (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2001).
260. Kramer, G., Ed. Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces. AddisonWesley Publishing Company, 1993.
261. Kreiman, J., Garratt, B. R., Precoda, K., and Berke, G. S. Individual differences in voice quality perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35 (June 1992), 512-520.
262. Krueger, A. B. PCABX. http://www.pcabx.com, 2003.
263. Kügler, C. and Theile, G. Loudspeaker reproduction: study on the subwoofer concept. In Proceedings of the 92nd Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Vienna, Austria, March 1992).
264. Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
265. Kylliäinen, M., Helimki, H., Zacharov, N., and Cozens, J. Compact high performance listening spaces. In Proceedings of Euronoise (2003), Euronoise.
266. Langron, S. P. The application of Procrustes statistics to sensory profiling. Sensory Quality in Foods and Beverages: Definition, Measurement and Control. Horwood, Chichester,UK, 1983, pp. 89-95.
267. Lärmund Gehörschutz. Ein Lehr-und Lernprogramm auf Audio-CD. Fachausschuss Personliche Schutzausrustung, Arbeitskreis gehorschutz, Nurnberg Fa. Hamann Consult, Dresden, 1995.
268. Lawless, H. T. and Heyman, H. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Chapman & Hall, 1998.
269. Letowski, T. Development of technical skills: Timbre solfeggio. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 33 (1985), 240-243.
270. Levene, H. Robust tests for equality of variance. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press, 1960.
271. Leventhal, L. Type 1 and Type 2 error in the statistical analysis of listening tests. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 34, 6 (1986), 437-453.
272. Levitt, H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 2, part 2 (1971), 467-477.
273. Listen HRTF database. http://recherche.ircam.fr/equipes/salles/listen/, 2002-2003.
274. Lorho, G. Evaluation of spatial enhancement systems for stereo headphone reproduction by preference and attribute rating. In Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Barcelona, Spain, May 2005).
275. Lorho, G. Individual vocabulary profiling of spatial enhancement systems for stereo headphone reproduction. In Proceedings of the 119th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (New York, USA, October 2005).
276. Luce, R. D. Sound and Hearing Demonstration. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1992.
277. Macatee, S. R. Considerations in grounding and shielding audio devices. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 6 (1995), 472-483.
278. Marchall, R. J. and Kirby, S. P. J. Sensory measurement of food texture by free-choice profiling. Journal of Sensory Studies 3 (1988), 63-80.
279. Martens, W. L. The impact of decorrelated low-frequency reproduction on auditory spatial imagery: Are two subwoofers better than one. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 16th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction (1999), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 67-77.
280. Martens, W. L., Braasch, J., and Ryan, T. J. Spatial auditory display using multiple subwoofers in two different reverberant reproduction environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (Limerick, Ireland, 2005), ICAD.
281. Martens, W. L. and Zacharov, N. Multidimensional perceptual unfolding of spatially processed speech I: Deriving stimulus space using INDSCAL. In Proceedings of the 109th Convention of the Audio Engineering Societ (Los Angeles, CA, USA, September 22-25 2000).
282. Martin, G. and Bech, S. Attribute identification and quantification in automotive audio-part 1: Introduction to the descriptive analysis technique. In Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Barcelona, Spain, May 2005).
283. Mason, R., Ford, N., Rumsey, F., and Bryun, B. Verbal and non-verbal elicitation techniques in the subjective assessment of spatial sound reproduction. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 49, 5 (2001), 366-384.
284. Mathers, C. D. and Lansdowne, K. F. L. Hearing risk to wearers of circumaural headphones: an investigation. Technical Report BBCRD1979/3, The British Broadcasting Corporation, Research Department, 1979.
285. Mattila, V-V. Descriptive analysis of speech quality in mobile communications: Descriptive language development and external preference mapping. In Proceedings of the 111th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2001).
286. Mattila, V-V. Perceptual Analysis of Speech Quality in Mobile Communications. PhD thesis, TampereUniversity of Technology, Tampere, Finland, October 2001.
287. Mattila, V-V. Descriptive analysis and ideal point modelling of speech quality in mobile communications. In Proceedings of the 113th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Los Angeles, CA, USA, Oct. 2002).
288. Mattila, V-V. Semantic analysis of speech quality inmobile communications: descriptive language development and mapping to acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 14, 441-453 (2003).
289. Mattila, V-V. and Kurittu, A. Practical issues in objective speech quality assessment with ITU-T P.862. In Proceedings of the 117th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 2004).
290. Mattila, V-V. and Zacharov, N. Generalized listener selection (GLS) procedure. In Proceedings of the 110th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001).
291. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. V., and Carr, B. T. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. CRC Press, 1991.
292. Merimaa, J. and Hess, W. Training of listeners for evaluation of spatial attributes of sound. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 117th International Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 2004).
293. Metzler, B. Audio Measurement Handbook. Audio Precision Inc., 1993.
294. Michaelson, H. How an author can avoid the pitfalls of practical ethics. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 33, 2 (June 1990), 58-61.
295. Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63, 2 (1956), 81-97.
296. Miller, R. G. Texts in statistical scienc. Beyond ANOVA. Basics of Applied Statistics, 1st ed. Chapman & Hall, 1997.
297. Miskiewicz, A. Timbre solfege: A course in technical listening for sound engineers. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 40 (1992), 621-625.
298. Møller, H., Hammershøi, D., Jensen, C. B., and Sørensen, M. F. Transfer characteristics of headphones measured on human ears. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 4 (April 1995), 203-217.
299. Møller, H., Jensen, C. B., Hammershøi, D., and Sørensen, M. F. Design criteria for headphones. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 4 (1995), 218-232.
300. Montgomery, D. Design and Analysis of Experiments.Wiley, 2000.
301. Moore, B. C. J. Compact Disc with Book: Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. Oxford University Press, 1995.
302. Moore, B. C. J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 4th ed. Academic Press, 1997.
303. Moore, B. C. J. and Glasberg, B. R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neuroscience 3 (1997), 289-311.
304. Moore, B. C. J. and Glasberg, B. R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. http://hearing.psychol.cam.ac.uk/Demos/ansloud.zip, 1997.
305. Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., and Baer, T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 45 (1997), 224-239.
306. Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., and Baer, T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness. Available from: http://hearing.psychol.cam.ac.uk/Demos/aesloud.zip, 1997.
307. Moore, B. C. J., Peters, R. W., and Glasberg, B. R. A revision of Zwicker's loudness model. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 82 (1996), 335-345.
308. Moreno, A., Lindberg, B., Draxler, C., Richard, G., Choukri, K., Euler, S., and Allen, J. Speech databases recorded in vehicles. http://www.speechdat.com/SP-CAR/, 1999.
309. Moreno, A., Lindberg, B., Draxler, C., Richard, G., Choukri, K., Euler, S., and Allen, J. SpeechDat-Car A large speech database for automotive environments. In 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Athens, 2000).
310. Moulton, D. Golden ears. http://www.moultonlabs.com/gold.htm, 2002.
311. Muncy, N. Noise susceptibility in analog and digital signal processing systems. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 6 (1995), 435-453.
312. Munson, W. A. and Weiner, F. M. In search of the missing 6 dB. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24 (1952), 498-501.
313. Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product OptimizationUsing Designed Experiments, Series in Probability and Statistics, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, 2002.
314. Næs, T. and Risvik, E. MultivariateAnalysis ofData in Sensory Science, Vol. 16 of Data Handling in Science and Technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996.
315. Nakajima, Y., Sasaki, T., and Ten Hoopen, G. Demonstrations of auditory illusions and tricks. Compact Disc available from http://www.kyushu-id.ac.jp/950ynhome/ENG/Demo/illusions2nd.html, 2000.
316. NASA. Auditory demonstrations II: Challenges to speech communication and music listening. Compact Disc available from http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/AcousticalTest/HearingConservation/Resource%s/Auditory_Demonstrations2.html, 2004.
317. National Advisory Board on Research Ethics, Finland. Good scientific practise and procedures for handling misconduct and fraud in science. http://pro.tsv.fi/tenk/htkoengl.pdf, 2002.
318. Neher, T. Towards a Spatial Ear Trainer. PhD thesis, Institute of Sound Recording, University of Surrey, Great Britain, United Kingdom, 2004.
319. Neher, T., Brookes, T., and Rumsey, F. J. Unidimensional simulation of the spatial attribute 'ensemble width' for training purposes. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 24th International Conference (2003), Audio Engineering Society.
320. Neher, T., Rumsey, F. J., and Brookes, T. Training of listeners for the evaluation of spatial sound reproduction. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 112th International Convention (Munich, Germany, May 2002).
321. Neher, T., Rumsey, F. J., Brookes, T., and Craven, P. Unidimensional simulation of the spatial attribute 'ensemble width' for training purposes. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 114th International Convention (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 2003).
322. Nelson, L. S. Evaluating overlapping confidence intervals. Journal of Quality Technology 21, 2 (April 1989), 140-141.
323. Nelson, D. A. and Cooper, B. A. Auditory demonstrations in acoustics and hearing conservation. Noise-Con. Noise-Control Foundation, 1998.
324. Nelson, D., and Taylor, A. Auditory demonstrations in acoustics and hearing conservation. Compact Disc available from http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/AcousticalTest/HearingConservation/Resource%s/Auditory_Demonstrations1.html, 1998.
325. Nijenhuis, M. Sampling and Interpolation of Static Images: a Perceptual View. PhD thesis, Institute of Perception Research (IPO), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1993.
326. Noble, A. C., Arnold, R. A., Buechsenstein, J., Leach, E. J., Schmidt, J. O., and Stern, P. M. Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma technology. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 38, 2 (1987), 143-146.
327. Nousaine, T. Multiple subwoofers for home theater. In Proceedings of the 103rd Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (New York, NY, USA, Sept. 1997).
328. Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1994.
329. Olive, S. E. A method of training of listeners and selecting program material for listening tests. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 97th International Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 1994).
330. Olive, S. E. A new listener training software application. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 110th International Convention (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 2001).
331. Olive, S. Differences in performance and preference of trained versus untrained listeners in loudspeaker tests: A case study. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 51, 9 (2003), 806-825.
332. Olive, S. E., Castro, B., and Toole, F. E. A new laboratory for evaluating multichannel audio components and systems. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 105th International Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, Sept. 1998).
333. Olive, S. E., Schuck, P. L., Sally, S. L., and Bonneville, M. E. The effects of loudspeaker placement on listener preference ratings. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 42, 12 (1994), 651-668.
334. Olive, S. E., Schuck, P. L., Sally, S. L., and Bonneville, M. The variability of loudspeaker sound quality among four domesticsized rooms. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 99th International Convention (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 1995).
335. Olive, S. E. and Toole, F. E. The detection of reflections in typical rooms. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 37, 7/8 (1989), 539-553.
336. Patterson, R. D., Allerhand, M. H., and Giguere, C. Timedomain modelling of peripheral auditory processing: Amodular architecture and a software platform. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98 (1995), 1890-1894.
337. Pearson, K. S., Bennett, R. L., and Fidell, S. Speech levels in various noise environments. Technical Report EPA-600/1-77-025, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, May 1977.
338. Pedersen, T.H. and Fog, C. L. Optimisation of perceived product quality. In Euronoise II (1998), pp. 633-638.
339. Pedersen, J. A. and Mäkivirta, A. Requirements for lowfrequency sound reproduction, part II: Generation of stimuli and listening system equalization. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 50, 7/8 (July/August 2002), 581-593.
340. Perkins, C. Automated test and measurement of common impedance coupling in audio system shield terminations. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 6 (1995), 488-497.
341. Pernaux, J.-M., Emerit, M., and Nicol, R. Perceptual evaluation of binaural sound synthesis: The problem of reporting localization judgments. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 114th International Convention (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 2003).
342. Peryam, D. R. and Girardot, N. F. Advanced taste test method. Food Engineering 24, 194 (1952), 58-61.
343. Petrinovich, L. F. and Hardyck, C. D. Error rates for multiple comparison methods: Some evidence concerning the frequency of erroneous conclusion. Psychological Bulletin 71 (1969), 43-54.
344. Piggott, J. R. Selection of terms for descriptive analysis. Sensory Science Theory and Applications in Foods. Dekker, New York, 1991.
345. Plack, C. J. and Carlyon, R. P. Loudness perception and intensity coding. Hearing. Handbook of Perception and Cognition. Academic Press, 1995, ch. 4, pp. 123-205.
346. Plomp, R. Aspects of Tone Sensation: a Psychophysical Study. Academic Press, London, 1976.
347. Plomp, R. Hoe wij horen. over de toon die de muziek maakt. (in Dutch: How we hear. on the tone that makes music), 1998.
348. Poldy, C. A. Philosophy of modern headphone design. Australian Sound and Recording 3 (1981), 31-36.
349. Poldy, C. A. Headphones, 4th ed. Butterwoths, 1988, ch. 12, pp. 466-548.
350. Popper, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, 1992.
351. Poulton, E. C. Bias in Quantifying Judgements. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.
352. Powers, D. A. and Xie, Y. Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. Academic Press, 2000.
353. Precoda, K. and Meng, T. H. Listener differences in audio compression evaluations. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 45, 9 (1997), 708-715.
354. Quesnel, R. Timbral ear trainer: Adaptive, interactive training of listening skills for evaluation of timbre difference. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 98th International Convention (Paris, France, Feb. 1996).
355. Quesnel, R. A Computer-Assisted Method for Training and Researching Timbre Memory and Evaluation Skills. PhD thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 2002.
356. Quesnel, R. and Woszczyk, W. R. A computer-aided system for timbral ear training. In Proceedings of theAudio Engineering Society 96th International Convention (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Feb. 1994).
357. Reiner, R. This is Spinal Tap. DVD, 1984.
358. Rhenius, V. Kopfhörer: Messverfahren im Vergleich: Wer hat das richtige Maß. Funkschau 17 (1983), pp. 44-46.
359. Riederer, K. A. J. Head-related transfer function measurements. Master's thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Acoustics and Audio Signal Processing, 1998.
360. Riederer, K. A. J. Repeatability analysis of head-related transfer function measurement. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 105th International Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, Sept. 1998).
361. Riederer, K. A. J. HRTF Analysis: Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Measured Head-Related Transfer Functions. PhD thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, 2005.
362. Rioux, V. LISE-Listening interface for sound experiments. http://www.ta.chalmers.se/homepages/vincent/doc/lise/lise.html, 2000.
363. Rix, A. W., Hollier, M. P., Hekstra, A. P., and Beerends, J. G. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ). The new ITU standard for end-to-end speech quality assessment part I-timedelay compensation. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 50, 10 (October 2002), 755-764.
364. Robinson, D. W. and Whittle, L. S. The loudness of directional sound fields. Acustica 10 (1960), 74-80.
365. Roessler, E. B., Pangborn, R. M., Sidel, J. L., and Stone, H. Expanded statistical tables for estimating statistical significance in paired-preference, paired-difference, duo-trio and triangle tests. Journal of Food Science 43 (1978), 940-947.
366. Rumsey, F. Spatial Audio. Focal Press, 2001.
367. Rumsey, F. Spatial quality evaluation for reproduced sound: terminology, meaning and a scene-based paradigm. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 50 (2002), 651-666.
368. Rumsey, F. J., Neher, T., and Brookes, T. Unidimensional simulation of the spatial attribute 'ensemble depth' for training purposes-part 2: Creation and validation of reference stimuli. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 116th International Convention (Berlin, Germany, May 2004).
369. Ryan, T. A. Multiple comparisons in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin 56 (1959), 26-47.
370. Salava, T. Low-frequency performance of listening rooms for steady-state and transient signals. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 39, 11 (November 1991), 853-863.
371. Salava, T. Subwoofers in small listening rooms. In Proceedings of the 106th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Munich, Germany, May 1999).
372. Samoylenko, E., McAdams, S., and Nosulenko, V. Systematic analysis of verbalisations produced in comparing musical timbres. International Journal of Psychology 31, 6 (1996), 255-278.
373. Schlich, P. GRAPES: A method and SAS program for graphical representation of assessor performance. Journal of Sensory Science 9 (1994), 157-169.
374. Schonemann, P. H. A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika 31 (1966), 1-10.
375. Shanefield, D., Clark, D., and Nousaine, T. Comments on ''Type 1 and Type 2 error in the statistical analysis of listening tests''. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 35, 7/8 (1987), 567-572.
376. Shiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., and Young, F. W. Introduction of Multidimensional Scaling. Academic Press, 1981.
377. Shively, R. E. and House, W. N. Listener training and repeatability for automobiles. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 104th International Convention (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 1998).
378. Shlien, S. Auditory models for gifted listeners. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 48, 11 (November 2000), 1032-1044.
379. Shlien, S. and Soulodre, G. Measuring the characteristics of ''expert'' listeners. In Proceedings of the 101st Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Los Angeles, CA, USA, November 1996).
380. Sieffermann, J. M. Flash profiling. a new method of sensory descriptive analysis. In AIFST Proceedings, 35th Conventio (Sidney, Australia, July 21-24 2002).
381. Sivian, L. J. and White, S. D. On minimum audible sound fields. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 4 (1933), 288-321.
382. Sivonen, V. P. and Ellermeier, W. Directional loudness measured in a real sound field: Implications for sound quality evaluation. In The 33rd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (Prague, Czech Republic, 2004).
383. Sivonen, V. P., Minnaar, P., and Ellermeier,W. Effect of direction on loudness in individual binaural synthesis. In Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Barcelona, Spain, May 2005).
384. Skovenborg, E. and Nielsen, S. H. Evaluation of different loudness modelswithmusic and speechmaterial. In Proceedings of the 117th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 2004).
385. Skovenborg, E., Quesnel, R., and Nielsen, S.H. Loudness assessment of music and speech. In Proceedings of the 116th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Berlin, Germany, May 2004).
386. Slaney, M. Auditory toolbox. http://rvl4.ecn.purdue.edu/950malcolm/interval/1998-010/, 1998.
387. SMPTE. ForMotion-Pictures-Dubbing Theatres, Review Rooms and Indoor Theatres-B-Chain Electroacoustic Response. No. RP 202M-1998, The Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, 1998.
388. SMPTE. Relative and Absolute Sound Pressure Levels for Motion Picture Sound Systems-Application for Analog Photographic Film Audio, Digital Photographic Film Audio and D-Cinema. No. RP 200-2002, The Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, 2002.
389. Sørensen, M. F., Lydolf, M., Frandsen, P. C., and Møller, H. Directional dependence of loudness cues and binaural summation. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Acoustics 3 (1995), 293-296.
390. Soulodre, G. A. Evaluation of objective loudness meters. In Proceedings of the 116th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Berlin, Germany, May 2004).
391. Soulodre, G. A., and Norcross, S. G. Objective measures of loudness. In Proceedings of the 115th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2003).
392. Soulodre, G. A. and Lavoie, M. C. Subjective evaluation of MPEG layer II with spectral band replication. In Presented at the 117th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (San Francisco, CA, USA, October 2004).
393. Spikofski, G. The diffuse field probe transfer function of studioquality headphones. EBU Technical Review 229, EBU, 1988, pp. 111-126.
394. Spreen, O. and Strauss, E. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
395. Sprent, P. AppliedNonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, 1993.
396. SPSS. SPSS Base 10.0 Applications Guide. SPSS, 1999.
397. SPSS. SPSS 13 Base Users Guide. SPSS, 2004.
398. Staffeldt, H. Correlation between subjective and objective data for quality loudspeakers. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 22, 6 (July-August 1974), 402-415.
399. Staffeldt, H. Difference in the perceived quality of loudspeaker sound reproduction caused by loudspeaker-room-listener interactions. In Proceedings of the 90th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Paris, France, February 1991).
400. Steinke, G. Surround sound: Relations of listening and viewing configurations-the useful assignment of loudspeaker basis width to video picture dimension. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 116th International Convention (Berlin, Germany, May 2004).
401. Stevens, S. S. A scale for the measurement of a psychological magnitude: loudness. Psychological Review 43 (1936), 405-416.
402. Stevens, S. S. Calculation of the loudness of complex noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28 (1956), 807-832.
403. Stevens, S. S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review 64 (1957), 153-181.
404. Stevens, S. S. Ratio scales, partition scales and confusion scales. Psychological Scaling: Theory and Applications. Wiley, New York, 1960.
405. Stevens, S. S. Procedure for calculating loudness: Mark VII. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33 (1961), 1577-1585.
406. Stevens, S. S. The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics. American Psychologist 17 (1962), 29-39.
407. Stone, M. A., Moore, B. C. J., and Glasberg, B. R. A realtime DSP based loudness meter. In Proceedings of the Seventh Oldenburg Symposium on PsychologicalAcoustics (Germany, 1997), pp. 587-601.
408. Stone, H. and Sidel, J. L. Sensory Evaluation Practices, 2nd ed. Academic Press, 1993.
409. Stonehouse, J. M. and Forrester, G. J. Robustness of the t and u tests under combined assumption violations. Journal of Applied Statistics 25, 1 (1998), 63-74.
410. Suokuisma, P., Zacharov, N., and Bech, S. Multichannel level alignment, part I: signals andmethods. In Proceedings of theAudio Engineering Society 105th International Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, Sept. 1998).
411. Technical Recommendation N 12-A-Sound Control Rooms and Listening Room, 2nd ed. The Nordic Public Broadcasting Corporations, August 1992.
412. Terhardt, E. Compact Disc with Book: Akustische Kommunikation. Springer, New York, 1998.
413. Teunissen, K. The validity of quality indicators along a graphical scale. Report 1077, Institute of Perception Research, Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1995.
414. The database of head related transfer functions. Available from: http://www.itakura.nuee.nagoya-u.ac.jp/HRTF/, 1999.
415. Theile, G. On the standardisation of the frequency response of high-quality studio headphones. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 34 (1986), 956-969.
416. Thiede, T., Treurniet,W. C., Bitto, R., Schmidmer, C., Sporer, T., Beerends, J. G., and Colomes, C. PEAQ-the ITU standard for objective measurement of perceived audio quality. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 48, 1/2 (Jan-Feb 2000), 3-29.
417. Thomas, L. and Krebs, C. J. Areview of statistical power analysis software. Ecological Society of America 78, 2 (April 1997), 126-139.
418. Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 34 (1927), 273-286.
419. Thurstone, L. L. Psychophysical analysis. American Journal of Psychology 38 (1927), 368-369.
420. Tillman, T. W., Johnson, R. M., and Olsen, W. O. Earphone versus sound-field threshold sound-pressure levels for spondee words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39 (1966), 125-133.
421. Toole, F. E. Listening tests-turning opinion into fact. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 30, 6 (1982), pp. 431-445.
422. Toole, F. E. Subjective measurements of loudspeaker sound quality and listener performance. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 33, 1/2 (1985), pp. 2-32.
423. Toole, F. E. Loudspeaker measurements and their relationship to listener preferences: Part 1. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 34, 4 (1986), pp. 227-235.
424. Toole, F. E. Subjective evaluation: Identifying and controlling the variables. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 8th International Conference (1990), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 95-100.
425. Toole, F. Hearing is believing vs. believing is hearing: blind vs. sighted listening tests, and other interesting things. In Proceedings of the 97th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct. 1994).
426. Toole, F. The acoustics and psychoacoustics of loudspeakers and rooms-the stereo past and the multichannel future. In Proceedings of the 109th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Los Angeles, CA, USA, Sept. 2000).
427. Treurnietand, W. C. and Soulodre, G. A. Evaluation of the ITUR objective audio quality measurement method. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 48, 3 (March 2000), 164-173.
428. Tuffy, M. A. Establishing a reference playback level for video games. In Proceedings of the 117th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (San Francisco, CA, USA, October 2004).
429. Tuomi, O. and Zacharov, N. A real-time binaural loudness model. In Presented at the 139th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America (Atlanta, USA, May/June 2000).
430. University of Chicago Press Staff. The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th ed. University Of Chicago Press, 2003.
431. Usher, J. and Woszczyk, W. Design and testing of a graphical mapping tool for analyzing spatial audio scenes. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 24th International Conference (2003), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 157-170.
432. Usher, J. andWoszczyk, W. Visualizing auditory spatial imagery of multi-channel audio. In Proceedings of the 116th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Berlin, Germany, May 2004).
433. Vainio, M., Suni, A., Järvelinen, H., Järvikivi, and Mattila, V-V. Developing a speech intelligibility test based on measuring speech reception thresholds in noise for English and Finnish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118, 3 (September 2005), 1742-1750.
434. van Belle, G. Statistical Rules of Thumb. Wiley, New York, USA, 2002.
435. Ventry, I. M. and Woods, R. W. Most comfortable loudness for pure tones, noise and speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 6, part 2 (1971), 1805-1813.
436. Vincent, E. MUSHRAM-A Matlab interface for MUSHRA listening tests. http://www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/digitalmusic/downloads/#mushram, 2005.
437. Walker, R. Low frequency room response: part 1-background and qualitative consideration. ResearchDepartment Report BBC RD 1992/8, The British Broadcasting Corporation, 1992.
438. Walker, R. Low frequency room response: part 1-calculation methods and experimental results. ResearchDepartment Report BBC RD 1992/9, The British Broadcasting Corporation, 1992.
439. Walker, R. Optimum dimension ratios for studios, control rooms and listening rooms. Research Department Report BBC RD 1993/8, The British Broadcasting Corporation, 1993.
440. Walker, R. Optimum dimension ratios for small rooms. In Proceedings of the 100th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Copenhagen, Denmark, May 1996).
441. Walker, R. A controlled reflection listening room for multichannel audio. In Proceedings of the 104th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 1998).
442. Walker, R. Equalisation of room acoustics and adaptive systems in the equalisation of small room acoustics. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 15th International Conference (1998), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 32-47.
443. Warrem, R. M. Compact Disc with Book: Auditory Perception. A New Analysis and Synthesis. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
444. Welti, T. How many subwoofers are enough? In Proceedings of the 112th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Munich, Germany, May 2002).
445. Whitlock, B. Balanced lines in audio systems: Fact, fiction, and transformers. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 6 (1995), 454-464.
446. Wickelmaier, F. and Choisel, S. Selecting participants for listening tests of multichannel reproduced sound. In Proceedings of the 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Barcelona, Spain, May 2005).
447. Wickelmaier, F. and Ellermeier, W. Deriving auditory features from triadic comparisons. Perception and Psychophysics (2006). Is accepted for publication.
448. Wickelmaier, F. and Schmid, C. A Matlab function to estimate choice-model parameters from paired-comparison data. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36(1), (2004), 29-40.
449. Wilkens, H. Mehrdimensionale Beschreibung subjektiver Beurteilungen der Akustik von Konzertsälen. PhD thesis, TU Berlin, 1975.
450. Wilksinson, A. M. The Scientist's Handbook forWriting Papers and Dissertations. Prentice Hall, 1991.
451. Williams, A. A. and Arnold, G. M. A comparison of the aromas of six coffees characterised by conventional profiling, free-choice profiling and similarity scaling methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36 (1985), 204-214.
452. Williams, A. A. and Langron, S. P. The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports. Journal of Food an Agriculture 35 (1984), 558-568.
453. Wilson, W. A note on the inconsistency inherent in the necessity to performmultiple comparisons. Psychological Bulletin 59 (1962), 296-300.
454. Windt, J. An easily implemented procedure for identifying potential electromagnetic compatibility problems in new equipment and existing systems: The hummer test. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 43, 6 (1995), 484-487.
455. Wischgolf, K. J. Der halboffene stereokopfhörer. Funkschau 4 (1981), 73-74.
456. Yendrikhovskij, S. N. Color Reproduction and the Naturalness Constraint. PhD thesis, Institute of Perception Research (IPO), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1998.
457. Zacharov, N. Subjective Testing of Loudspeaker Directivity forMultichannel Audio. Master's thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Acoustics and Audio Signal Processing, 1997.
458. Zacharov, N. An overview of multichannel level alignment. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 15th International Conference (1998), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 174-186.
459. Zacharov, N. Subjective appraisal of loudspeaker directivity for multichannel reproduction. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 46, 4 (1998), 288-303.
460. Zacharov,N. Perceptual Studies on Spatial Sound Reproduction Systems. PhD thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland, December 2000.
461. Zacharov,N. and Bech, S. Multichannel level alignment, part IV: The correlation between physical measures and subjective level calibration. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 109th International Convention (Los Angeles, CA, USA Sept. 2000).
462. Zacharov, N., Bech, S., and Meares, D. The use of subwoofers in the context of multichannel surround sound reproduction. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 46, 4 (1998), 276-287.
463. Zacharov, N., Bech, S., and Suokuisma, P. Multichannel level alignment, part II: The influence of signals and loudspeaker placement. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 105th International Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, Sept. 1998).
464. Zacharov,N., Huopaniemi, J., andHämäläinen,M. Round robin subjective evaluation of virtual home theatre sound systems at the AES 16th international conference. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 16th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction (1999), Audio Engineering Society, pp. 544-556.
465. Zacharov,N. and Koivuniemi, K. Perceptual audio profiling and mapping of spatial sound displays. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (2001), ICAD, pp. 95-104.
466. Zacharov, N. and Koivuniemi, K. Unravelling the perception of spatial sound reproduction: Analysis & external preference mapping. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 111th International Convention (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2001).
467. Zacharov, N. and Koivuniemi, K. Unravelling the perception of spatial sound reproduction: Techniques and experimental design. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 19th International Conference on Surround Sound (2001), Audio Engineering Society.
468. Zacharov, N. and Lorho, G. Sensory analysis of sound (in telecommunications). In European Sensory Network Conference (Madrid, Spain, 2005), ESN.
469. Zacharov, N., Tuomi, O., and Lorho, G. Auditory periphery, HRTFs and directional loudness perception. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 110th International Convention (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 2001).
470. Zielinski, S. K., Rumsey, F., and Bech, S. Subjective audio quality trade-offs in consumer multichannel audio-visual delivery systems. part I: Effects of high frequency limitation. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 112th International Convention (Munich, Germany, May 2002).
471. Zielinski, S. K., Rumsey, F., and Bech, S. Comparison of quality degradation effects caused by limitation of bandwidth and by down-mix algorithms in consumer multichannel audio delivery systems. In Proceedings of the 114th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 2003).
472. Zwicker, E. Über psychologische und methodische Grundlagen der Lautheit. Acustica 8 (1958), 237-258.
473. Zwicker, E. Ein Verfahren zur Berechnung der Lautstärke. Acustica 10 (1960), 74-80.
474. Zwicker, E. Temporal effects in simultaneousmasking by whitenoise burst. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 37 (1965), 653-663.
475. Zwicker, E. Procedure for calculating loudness of temporally variable sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62 (1977), 675-682.
476. Zwicker, E. and Fastl, H. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1990.
477. Zwicker, E., Fastl, H., and Dallmayr, C. BASIC-program for calculating the loudness of sound from their 1/3-oct band spectra according to ISO 532B. Acustica 55 (1984), 63-67.
478. Zwicker, E. and Scharf, B. A model of loudness summation. Psychological Review 72 (1965), 3-26.