Communicating listeners' auditory spatial experiences: A method for developing a descriptive language

Audio Engineering Society - 118th Convention Spring Preprints 2005

Volumn 4, Issue , 2005, Pages 1589-1603

  Ford, Natanya ^a   Rumsey, Francis ^a   Nind, Tim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b Harman Becker Automotive Systems   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESCRIPTORS; GRAPHICAL LANGUAGES; PROCESS MODEL; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS;

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

ENGINEERING;

EID: 84866479151     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Adams-Webber, J.R. Elicited versus Provided Constructs in Repertory Grid Technique: A Review. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 43, 1970, pp349-354
2. Banister, P. Burman, E. Parker, I. Taylor, M. and Tindall, C. Qualitative Methods in Psychology, A Research Guide. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 1994
3. th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction. 1999, pp 487 - 504
4. Berg, J. Systematic Evaluation of Perceived Spatial Quality in Surround Sound Systems. Doctoral Thesis, Luleå University of Technology Sweden, 2002.
5. Blauert, J. and Lindemann, W. Spatial Mapping of Intracranial Auditory Events for Various Degrees of Interaural Coherence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79(3), 1986, pp 806-813. (Pubitemid 16158454)
6. th Convention. 1998. Preprint 4730
7. Ford, N. Rumsey, F and de Bruyn, B. Graphical Elicitation Techniques for Subjective Assessment of the Spatial Attributes of Loudspeaker Reproduction - A Pilot Investigation. Audio Engineering Society 110th Convention. May 2001, Preprint 5388.
8. Ford, N, Rumsey, F and Nind, T. Subjective Evaluation of Perceived Spatial Differences in Car Audio Systems Using a Graphical Assessment Language. Audio Engineering Society 112th Convention. May 2002a, Preprint 5547.
9. Ford, N, Rumsey, F and Nind, T. Evaluating Influences of a Central Automotive Loudspeaker on Perceived Spatial Attributes using a Graphical Assessment Language. Audio Engineering Society 113th Convention. October 2002b, Preprint 5707.
10. th International Conference: Multichannel Audio The New Reality. June 2003a, pp171-183.
11. th Convention. October 2003b, Preprint 5907.
12. Guski, R. Psychological methods for evaluating sound quality and assessing acoustic information. Acustica. 83, 1997, pp 765-774
13. Haber, L. Haber, R. N. Penningroth, S. Novak, K. and Radgowski, H. Comparison of Nine Methods of Indicating the Direction to Objects: Data from Blind Adults, Perception. 22, 1993, pp35-47.
14. Hootman, R.C. (ed). Manual on Descriptive Analysis Testing for Sensory Evaluation. Baltimore: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 1992
15. Kelly, G.A. A Theory of Personality. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1963, (1955)
16. th Convention. 1998. Preprint 4685
17. th Convention. 2001, Preprint 5424
18. Köster, E.P. The Psychology of Food Choice: Some Often Encountered Fallacies Food Quality and Preference. 14, 2003, pp359-373 (Pubitemid 38351666)
19. Landfield, A.W. The Extremity Rating Revisited Within the Context of Personal Construct Theory. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 7, 1968, pp. 135-139.
20. Mason, R, Ford, N and de Bruyn, B. Verbal and Nonverbal Elicitation Techniques in the Subjective Assessment of Spatial Sound Reproduction. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 49 (5), 2001, pp366-384 (Pubitemid 32576786)
21. th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction. 1999, pp67 - 77.
22. th Convention. September 1999, Preprint 4994
23. rd Edition). Florida: CRC Press, 1999
24. nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1994
25. Montello, D.R. Richardson, A.E. Hegarty, M. and Provenza, M. A. Comparison of Methods for Estimating Directions in Egocentric Space, Perception, 28, 1999 pp981-1000.
26. Moustakas, C. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. 1994
27. Møller, H. Sørensen, M. F. Jensen, C.B. and Hammershøi, D. Binaural Technique: Do We Need Individual Recordings? J. Audio Eng. Soc. 44 (6), 1996, pp451-464 (Pubitemid 126513472)
28. Nielsen, S. H. Depth Perception - Finding a Design Goal for Sound Reproduction Systems. Audio Engineering Society 90th Convention. February 1991, Preprint 3069
29. th International Conference on Multichannel Audio the New Reality. 2003, pp 157-170
30. Usher, J. and Woszczyk, W. Visualizing Auditory Spatial Imagery of Multi-channel Audio. Audio Engineering Society 116th Convention. May 2004, Preprint 6054
31. Wenzel, E. M. Effect of Increasing System Latency on Localization of Virtual Sources. Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 16th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction. 1999, pp 42 - 50.
32. th Audio Engineering Society Conference on Surround Sound: Techniques, Technology and Perception. June 2001a, pp272 - 286
33. Zacharov, N and Koivuniemi, K. Unravelling the Perception of Spatial Sound Reproduction: Analysis and External Preference Mapping. Audio Engineering Society 111th Convention. 2001b, Preprint 5423