OPAQUE - A tool for the elicitation and grading of audio quality attributes

Audio Engineering Society - 118th Convention Spring Preprints 2005

Volumn 4, Issue , 2005, Pages 1665-1672

  Berg, Jan ^a,b  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b INTERACTIVE INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIO QUALITY; EVALUATION RESULTS; LISTENING TESTS; PILOT EXPERIMENT; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; REPERTORY GRID TECHNIQUE; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPES;

SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84866488191     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. ITU-R (1996): Recommendation BS. 1116, Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems. International Telecommunication Union.
2. ITU-R (2003) Recommendation BS.1534-1. Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality levels of coding systems. International Telecommunication Union.
3. Grewin, C., Bergman, S. and Kejving, O. (1986): A listening test system for evaluation of audio equipment. Presented at AES 80th Convention. Preprint 2335. Audio Engineering Society.
4. Rydén, T. (1996): Using listening tests to assess audio codecs. In Gilchrist, N. and Grewin, C. (Eds.): Collected papers on digital audio bit-rate reduction, pp 115-125. Audio Engineering Society.
5. Koivuniemi, K. and Zacharov, N. (2001): Unravelling the perception of spatial sound reproduction: Language development, verbal protocol analysis and listener training. Presented at AES 111th Convention, New York. Preprint 5424. Audio Engineering Society.
6. Bech, S. (1999): Methods for subjective evaluation of spatial characteristics of sound. In Proceedings of the AES 16th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction, pp 487-504. Audio Engineering Society.
7. Olive, S. (2001): Evaluation of five commercial stereo enhancement 3D audio software plug-ins. Presented at AES 110th Convention, Amsterdam. Preprint 5386. Audio Engineering Society.
8. Gabrielsson, A. (1979): Dimension analyses of perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 20, pp 159-169. (Pubitemid 10225955)
9. Berg, J. (2002): Systematic evaluation of perceived spatial quality in surround sound systems. Doctoral thesis, 2002:17. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
10. Kelly, G. (1955): The psychology of personal constructs. Norton. New York.
11. th International Conference on Spatial Sound Reproduction, 10-12 Apr. pp 51-66. Audio Engineering Society.
12. Shaw, M. and Gaines, B. (1995): Comparing conceptual structures: consensus, conflict, correspondence and contrast. Knowledge Science Institute, University of Calgary.
13. Little, A.D., Mershon, D.H., and Cox, P.H. (1992). Spectral content as a cue to perceived auditory distance. Perception, 21, pp 405-416.
14. Berg, J. and Rumsey, F. (2001) Verification and correlation of attributes used for describing the spatial quality of reproduced sound. In Proceedings of the AES 19th International Conference on Surround Sound, 21-24 Jun. pp 233-251. Audio Engineering Society
15. Toole, F. (1985): Subjective measurements of loudspeaker sound quality and listener performance. J. Audio Engineering Society. 33, pp 2-32. (Pubitemid 15527538)