Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning

Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-307

  Beaver, David I ^a   Clark, Brady Z ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889330155     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444304176     Document Type: Book

References (325)

1. Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Aloni, Maria. 2000. Quantification under Conceptual Covers. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.
3. Altham, James E. J., and Neil W. Tennant. 1975. Sortal Quantification. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language, ed. Edward L. Keenan, 46-58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Anderson, Stephen R. 1972. How to Get Even. Language 48, 893-906.
5. Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-Hui Audrey Li. 1993. Wh-elements in Situ: Syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry 24, 199-238.
6. Aristotle. 350 BC. On Sense and the Sensible. Translated by J. I. Beare. (Available on The Internet Classics Archive.)
7. Arnold, Jennifer. 1998. Reference Form and Discourse Patterns. Stanford University dissertation.
8. Asher, Nicholas. 2000. Truth Conditional Discourse Semantics for Parentheticals. Journal of Semantics 17, 31-50.
9. Asher, Nicholasand Alex Lascarides. 1998. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Presupposition. Journal of Semantics 15, 239-300.
10. Asher, Nicholasand Alex Lascarides 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press.
11. Atlas, Jay David. 1991. Topic/Comment, Presupposition, Logical Form and Focus Stress Implicatures: The Case of Focal Particles only and also. Journal of Semantics 8, 127-47.
12. Atlas, Jay David 1993. The Importance of Being "Only": Testing the Neo-Gricean Versus Neoentailment Paradigms. Journal of Semantics 10, 301-18.
13. Atlas, Jay David 1996. "Only" Noun Phrases, Pseudo-Negative Generalized Quantifiers, Negative Polarity Items, and Monotonicity. Journal of Semantics 13, 265-328.
14. Atlas, Jay David 2002. Negative Polarity Items and Overcoming Assertoric Inertia. A lecture given in the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, May 8 2002, ms.
15. Austen, Jane. 1811. Sense and Sensibility: A Novel. London: T. Egerton.
16. Austin, John L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. (G. J.Warnock, ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Austin, John L 1976. How to do Thingswith Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Bach, Emmon. 1981. On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics. In Radical Pragmatics, ed. Peter Cole, 62-81. New York: Academic Press.
19. Bach, Emmon. 1986. The Algebra of Events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5-16.
20. Barbiers, Sjef. 1995. The Syntax of Interpretation. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
21. Barker, Stephen. 1991. Even, Still and Counterfactuals. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 1-38.
22. Bartels, Christine. 1997. Acoustic Correlates of 'Second Occurrence' Focus: Towards an Experimental Investigation. In Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning (Proceedings of the workshops in Prague and Bad Teinach), ed. Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee, 11-30, University of Stuttgart. Institut fuer maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung.
23. Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159-219.
24. Bayer, Josef. 1999. Bound Focus or How can Association with Focus be Achieved without Going Semantically Astray. In The Grammar of Focus, ed.Georges Rebuschi and Laurice Tuller, 55-82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Beaver, David. 1997. Presupposition. In Handbook of Logic and Language, ed. Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Beaver, David 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
27. Beaver, David 2004. Five 'only' Pieces. Theoretical Linguistics 30, 45-64.
28. Beaver, David 2005. Accommodating Topics. In Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning, ed. Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee, 79-90. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. Beaver, David and Clark B. 2002a. Monotonicity and Focus Sensitivity. In SALT XII: Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory XII, ed. Brendan Jackson. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
30. Beaver, David and Clark B. 2002b. The Proper Treatments of Focus Sensitivity. In Proceedings of WCCFL XXI, ed. Christopher Potts and Line Mikkelsen, 15-28, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
31. Beaver, David and Clark B. 2003. Always and Only:Why not all Focus Sensitive Operators are Alike. Natural Language Semantics 11, 323-62.
32. Beaver, David Brady Clark, Edward Flemming, T. Florian Jaeger, and Maria Wolters. 2007. When Semantics meets Phonetics: Acoustical Studies of Second Occurrence Focus. Language 83.
33. Beaver, David and Emiel Krahmer. 2001. A Partial Account of Presupposition Projection. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 10, 147-82.
34. Beaver, David and Henk Zeevat. 2007. Accommodation. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. G. Ramchand and C. Reiss. Oxford University Press, 502-38.
35. Beckman, Mary, and Janet B. Pierrehumbert. 1986. Intonational Structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3, 15-70.
36. Bennett, Michael. 1980. Review article. Journal of Philosophical Logic 9, 103-32.
37. Berman, Stephen. 1991. On the Semantics and Logical Form of wh-clauses. University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.
38. Bernardi, Raffaella. 2002. Reasoning with Polarity in Categorial Type Logic. University of Utrecht dissertation.
39. Bolinger, Dwight. 1972a. Accent is Predictable (if you're a Mind-reader). Language 48, 633-44.
40. Bolinger, Dwight 1972b. Degree Words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
41. Bonomi, Andrea, and Paolo Casalegno. 1993. Only: Association with Focus in Event Semantics. Natural Language Semantics 2, 1-45.
42. Bowers, John. 1969. Surface Structure Interpretation in English Superlatives. MIT, ms.
43. Brenier, Jason, Ani Nenkova, Anubha Kothari, Laura Whitton, David Beaver, and Dan Jurafsky. 2006. The (Non)utility of Linguistic Features for Predicting Prominence in Spontaneous Speech. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACL 2006 Workshop on Spoken Language Technology.
44. Bresnan, Joan. 1971. Sentence Stress and Syntactic Transformations. Language 47, 257-80.
45. Brody, Michael. 1990. Some remarks on the Focus Field in Hungarian. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 201-25.
46. Büring D. 1996. AWeak Theory of Strong Readings. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 6, ed. Teresa Galloway and Justin Spence, 17-34, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
47. Büring D. 1997. The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent. London: Routledge.
48. Büring D. 1999. Topic. In Focus-Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, ed. Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, 142-65. Cambridge University Press.
49. Büring D. 2003. On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 511-45.
50. Büring D. 2005. Binding Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Büring D. 2006a. Focus Projection and Default Prominence. In The Architecture of Focus, ed. Valéria Molnár and Susanne Winkler, 321-46. Berlin:Mouton De Gruyter.
52. Büring D. 2006b. Towards a Typology of Focus Realization UCLA, ms.
53. Büring D. and Katharina Hartmann. 2001. The Syntax and Semantics of Focus-Sensitive Partiles in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 229-81.
54. Calcagno, Mike. 1996. Presupposition, Congruence, and Adverbs of Quantification. In OSU Working Papers in Linguistics vol. 49, papers in semantics, ed. Jae-Hak Toon and Andreas Kathol, 1-23. The Ohio State University.
55. Carlson, Gregory, and Francis Pelletier (eds.) 1995. The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press.
56. Carlson, Lauri W. 1985. Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
57. Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. University of Chicago Press.
58. Chierchia, Gennaro A. 1998. Reference to Kinds Across Languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339-405.
59. Chierchia, Gennaro A and Ray A. Turner. 1988. Semantics and Property Theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 261-302.
60. Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, chapter Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation, 62-119. The Hague: Mouton.
61. Chomsky, Noam 1977. Conditions on Rules of Grammar. In Essays on Form and Interpretation, 163-210. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
62. Chomsky, Noam 2000. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, chapter Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, 89-155. MIT Press.
63. Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
64. Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
65. Cohan, Jocelyn. 2000. The Realization and Function of Focus in Spoken English. University of Texas at Austin dissertation.
66. Cohen, Ariel. 1999. How are Alternatives Computed? Journal of Semantics 16, 43-65.
67. Cohen, Ariel 2001. Relative Readings of Many, Often, and Generics. Natural Language Semantics 9, 41-67.
68. Cooper, Robin, Elisabet Engdahl, Staffan Larsson, and Stina Ericsson. 2000. Accommodating Questions and the Nature of QUD. In Proceedings of Gotalog, 57-62.
69. Davidson, Donald. 1967. The Logical Form of Action Sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action, ed. N. Rescher, 81-95. Pittsburgh University Press.
70. DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information. Linguistic Typology 1, 33-52.
71. Diesing,Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Dretske, Fred I. 1972. Contrastive Statements. Philosophical Review 81, 411-37.
73. Drubig, Hans B. 1994. Island Constraints and the Syntactic Nature of Focus and Association with Focus. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340: Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen der Computerlinguistik 51.
74. Drubig, Hans B. 2000. Toward a Typology of Focus and Focus Constructions. University of Tübingen, ms. Version later appeared in Linguistics, 41:1, 1-50, 2003.
75. Dryer,Matthew S. 1994. The Pragmatics of Association with only. Paper presented at the 1994 Winter Meeting of the L.S.A. Boston, Massachusetts, ms.
76. Eckardt, Regine. 1999. Focus with Nominal Quantifiers. In Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, ed. Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, 166-86. Cambridge University Press.
77. Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford University dissertation.
78. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Polarity and the Scale Principle. In Chicago Linguistics Society 11, 188-99.
79. Fernando, Tim, and Hans Kamp. 1996. Expecting Many. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory 53-68.
80. Féry, Caroline, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici. 2006. Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci. Language 82, 131-50.
81. Von Fintel K.. 1994. Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.
82. Von Fintel K. 1995. A Minimal Theory of Adverbial Quantification. In Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning: Proceeding of the Workshops in Prague, February 1995, Bad Teinach, ed. Barbara Partee and Hans Kamp, 153-93.
83. Von Fintel K. 1997. Bare Plurals, Bare Conditionals, and Only. Journal of Semantics 14, 1-56.
84. Von Fintel K. 1999. NPI Licensing, Strawson Entailment. Journal of Semantics 16, 97-148.
85. Fischer, Susan, 1968. On Cleft Sentences and Contrastive Stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. Foolen, Ad. 1993. De Betekenis van Partikels. Een Dokumentatie van de Stand van het Onderzoek met Bijzondere Aandacht voor 'Maar'. [The Meaning of Particles: A Compendium of the State of the Art with Special Attention to theMeaning of 'maar' ("but").] Katholieke Universiteit van Nijmegen dissertation.
87. Frege, Gottlob. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. [The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number.]W. Koebner.
88. Fry, John, and Stefan Kaufmann. 1998. Information Packaging in Japanese. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Formal Grammar, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, and Categorial Grammar, ed. Gosse Bouma, Geert-Jan Kruijff, and Richard Oehrle, 55-65, Saarbr ücken, Germany.
89. Gajewski, Jon. 2002. L-analyticity in Natural Language. Cambridge,MA:MIT,ms.
90. Gajewski, Jon 2005. Only John vs. Nobody but John: A Solution. Poster presented at Polarity From Different Perspectives workshop, March 11-13, 2005, NYU, ms.
91. Gardent, Claire. 1991. Gapping and VP Ellipsis in a Unification-based Grammar. University of Edinburgh dissertation.
92. Gawron, Mark. 1992. Focus and Ellipsis in Comparatives and Superlatives: A Case Study. In Proceedings of SALT 2, ed. Chris Barker and David Dowty, 79-98, Columbus. Ohio State University Department of Linguistics.
93. Gawron, Mark. 1995. Comparatives, Superlatives, and Resolution. Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 333-80.
94. Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. NewYork: Academic Press.
95. Geach, Peter T. 1972. Logic Matters. University of California Press.
96. German, James, Janet B. Pierrehumbert, and Stefan Kaufmann. 2006. Evidence for Phonological Constraints on Nuclear Accent Placement. Language 82, 151-68.
97. Geurts, Bart, and David Beaver. 2007. Discourse Representation Theory. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. CSLI, Stanford University.
98. Geurts, Bart, and David Beaver and Rob van der Sandt. 1997. Presuppositions and Backgrounds. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. Paul Dekker and Martin Stokhof, 37-42. ILLC/University of Amsterdam.
99. Geurts, Bart, and David Beaver and Rob van der Sandt 1999. Domain Restriction. In Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, ed. Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, 268-92. Cambridge University Press.
100. Geurts, Bart, and David Beaver and Rob van der Sandt 2004. Interpreting Focus. Theoretical Linguistics 30, 1-44.
101. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Linguistik Aktuell (Linguistics Today), John Benjamins.
102. Giannakidou, Anastasia 1999. Affective Dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 367-421.
103. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2003. Polarity and the Presuppositions of EVEN. University of Chicago, ms.
104. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2005. The Landscape of EVEN Items. Workshop on Polarity from Different Perspectives, NYU.
105. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2006. Only, Emotive Factives, and the Dual Nature of Polarity Dependency. Language 82.
106. Ginzburg, Jonathan. 1995a. ResolvingQuestions, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 459-527.
107. Ginzburg, Jonathan 1995b. Resolving Questions, II. Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 567-609.
108. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative Investigations. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
109. Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, 41-58. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
110. Grice, Herbert Paul 1989. Further Notes on Logic and Conversation. In Studies in the Way of Words, 41-57. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
111. Groenendijk, Jeroen. 1999. The Logic of Interrogation. Proceedings of SALT IX 109-26.
112. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. University of Amsterdam dissertation.
113. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof 1991. Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39-100.
114. Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1983. Focus,Mode and Nucleus. Journal of Linguistics 19, 377-417.
115. Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1992. Sentence Accents and Argument Structure. In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, ed. Iggy M. Roca, 79-105. Berlin: Foris.
116. Gussenhoven, Carlos 1999. On the Limits of Focus Projection in English. In Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, ed. Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, 43-55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
117. Hajîcová, Eva, Barbara H. Partee, and Petr Sgall. 1998. Topic-focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
118. Halliday, Michael Alexander K. 1967. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English (part 2). Journal of Linguistics 3, 199-244.
119. Halliday, Michael Alexander K 1970. A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford University Press.
120. Hamblin, Charles L. 1971. Mathematical Models of Dialogue. Theoria 37, 130-55.
121. Hamblin, Charles L 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10, 41-53. 't Hart, Johan, and Rene Collier. 1975. Integrating Different Levels of Intonation Analysis. Journal of Phonetics 235-55.
122. Hausser, Roland. 1983. The Syntax and Semantics of English Mood. Questions and Answers, Dordrecht: Reidel.
123. Hedberg, Nancy. 2003. The Prosody of Contrastive Topic and Focus in Spoken English. In Pre-proceedings of the Workshop on Information Structure in Context, Stuttgart University, November 15-16, 141-52.
124. Hedberg, Nancy and Juan M. Sosa. 2001. The Prosodic Structure of Topic and Focus in Spontaneous English Dialogue. In Topic and Focus: A Workship on Intonation and Meaning. University of California, Santa Barbara, Linguistic Society of America, Institute of Linguistics.
125. Hedberg, Nancy and Juan M. Sosa 2002. The Prosody of Questions in Natural Discourse. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 (the First International Conference on Speech Prosody), 375-78, Aix-en-Provence, France.
126. Hedberg, Nancy and Juan M. Sosa 2003. Pitch Contours in Negative Sentences. Poster presented at the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, ms.
127. Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.
128. Heim, Irene 1985. Notes on Comparatives and RelatedMatters. University of Texas, Austin, ms.
129. Heim, Irene 1992. Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs. Journal of Semantics 9, 183-221.
130. Heim, Irene 1999. Notes on Superlatives. MIT, ms.
131. Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
132. Hendriks, Herman. 2002. Links without Locations. Information Packaging: from Cards to Boxes. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 10.
133. Hendriks, Petra, and Helen de Hoop. 2001. Optimality Theoretic Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 1-32.
134. Herburger, Elena. 1997. Focus and Weak Noun Phrases. Natural Language Semantics 5, 53-78.
135. Herburger, Elena 2000. What Counts: Focus and Quantification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
136. Herburger, Elena 2003. A Note on Spanish ni siquiera, even, and the Analysis of NPIs. Probus 15, 237-56.
137. Higginbotham, James. 1993. Interrogatives. In The view from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. K. Hale and S. J. Keyser, 195-227. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
138. Higginbotham, James 1996. The Semantics of Questions. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 361-83.
139. Hirschberg, Julia. 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. NewYork:Garland.
140. Hirschberg, Julia 1993. Pitch Accent in Context: Predicting Intonational Prominence from Text. Artificial Intelligence 63, 305-40.
141. Hoeksema, Jack, and Frans Zwarts. 1991. Some Remarks on Focus Adverbs. Journal of Semantics 8, 51-70.
142. Horn, Laurence R. 1969. A Presuppositional Analysis of only and even. In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 98-107.
143. Horn, Laurence R 1970. Ain't It Hard (Anymore). In CLS 6, 318-27.
144. Horn, Laurence R 1972/1976. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
145. Horn, Laurence R 1984. Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature. In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context, ed. Deborah Schiffrin. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
146. Horn, Laurence R 1992. The Said and the Unsaid. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, ed. Chris Barker and David Dowty, 163-92, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
147. Horn, Laurence R 1996. Exclusive Company: Only and the Dynamics of Vertical Inference. Journal of Semantics 13, 1-40.
148. Horn, Laurence R 2000. From if to iff: Conditional Perfection as Pragmatic Strengthening. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 289-326.
149. Horn, Laurence R 2002a. Assertoric Inertia and NPI Licensing. In CLS 38-2, The Panels, ed. Mary Andronis, Erin Debenport, Anne Pycha, and Keiko Yoshimura, 55-82.
150. Horn, Laurence R 2002b. Assertoric Inertia and NPI Licensing. In Chicago Linguistic Society 38, 55-82. University of Chicago.
151. Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 69-96.
152. Hornstein, Norbert 2000. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
153. Hurford, James R. 1994. Grammar: A Student's Guide. Cambridge University Press.
154. Ippolito, Michela. 2003. Presuppositions and Implicatures in Counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics 11, 145-86.
155. Ippolito, Michela 2006. The only Implicature. Boston University, ms.
156. Ishihara, Shinichiro, and Caroline Féry. 2006. Phonetic Correlates of Second Occurrence Focus. In Proceedings of NELS 36, Amherst, MA. GLSA.
157. Iten, Corinne. 2002. Even if and Even: The Case for an Inferential Scalar Account. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 119-56.
158. Ito, Rika, and Sali Tagliamonte. 2003. Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and Recycling in English Intensifiers. Language in Society 32, 257-79.
159. Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
160. Jackson, Eric. 1995. Weak and Strong Polarity Items: Licensing and Intervention. Linguistic Analysis 25, 181-208.
161. Jacobs, Joachim. 1983. Fokus und Skalen. [Focus and Scales.] Tübingen: Niemeyer.
162. Jacobs, Joachim 1991a. Focus Ambiguities. Journal of Semantics 8, 1-36.
163. Jacobs, Joachim 1991b. Negation. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research.] ed. Arnim von Stechow and DieterWunderlich, 560-96. Berlin: de Gruyter.
164. Jaeger, Florian. 2004. Only Always Associates Audibly. Even if Only is Repeated: The Prosodic Properties of Second Occurrence Focus. Stanford University.
165. Jaeger, Florian and Michael Wagner. 2003. Association with Focus and Linear Order in German. Stanford University.
166. Jäger, Gerhard. 1999. Focus without Variables: A Multi-modal Analysis. In Proceedings of WCCFL 17, ed. K. N. Shahin, S. Blake, and E. Kim, Stanford: CSLI Publications.
167. Kadmon, Nirit. 2001. Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition and Focus. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
168. Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353-422.
169. Kamp, Hans. 1981. A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. In Formal Methods in the Study of Language, part 1, ed. Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, volume 135, 277-322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts.
170. Reprinted in Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen and Martin Stokhof (eds.), 1984, Truth, Interpretation, and Information; Selected Papers from the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 1-41.
171. Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
172. Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presuppositions and Linguistic Context. Theoretical Linguistics 1, 181-94.
173. Karttunen, Lauri 1977. Syntax and Semantics of Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3-44.
174. Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional Implicatures in Montague Grammar. In Syntax and semantics 11: Presupposition, ed. Choon-Kyu Oh and David Dineen, 1-56. New York: Academic Press.
175. Kay, Paul. 1990. Even. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 59-111.
176. Kayne, Richard. 1998. Overt vs. Covert Movement. Syntax 1, 128-91.
177. Keenan, Edward L., and Jonathan Stavi. 1986. A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253-326.
178. Klima, Edward. 1964. Negation in English. In The Structure of Language. Readings in the Philosophy of Language, First edition, ed. Jerry A. Fodor and J. J. Katz. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 246-323.
179. Klinedinst, Nathan, 2004. Only Scalar only. Handout at Presupposition and Implicature Workshop, Paris.
180. König, Ekkehard. 1991. TheMeaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London, New York: Routledge.
181. Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What 'Must' and 'Can' Must and Can Mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 337-55.
182. Kratzer, Angelika 1991. The Representation of Focus. In Semantik, ed. Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich, 825-34. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
183. Kretzmann, Norman. 1968. William of Sherwood's Treatise on Syncategorematic Words. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
184. Krifka M.. 1989. Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, ed. Renata Bartsch, Johan van Benthem, and Peter von Emde Boas, volume 75, p. 115. Dordrecht: Foris.
185. Krifka M. 1990. 4000 Ships Passed through the Lock: Object-Induced Measure Functions on Events. Linguistics and Philosophy 13.
186. Krifka M. 1991. A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory I, ed. Steven Moore and Adam Zachary Wyner, 127-58, Cornell, NY. Cornell UniversityWorking Papers in Linguistics.
187. Krifka M. 1992a. A Framework for Focus-Sensitive Quantification. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory II, ed. Chris Barker and David Dowty, 215-36, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
188. Krifka M. 1992b. A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions. Informationsstruktur und Grammatik 4.
189. Krifka M. 1993a. Focus and Presupposition in Dynamic Interpretation. Journal of Semantics 10, 269-300.
190. Krifka M. 1993b. Review of E. König, The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. Language 69, 593-97.
191. Krifka M. 1995. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items. Linguistic Analysis 25, 1-49.
192. Krifka M. 1997. Focus and/or Context: A Second Look at Second Occurrence Expressions. In Context-dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning (Proceedings of the workshops in Prague and Bad Teinach), ed. Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee, 253-76, University of Stuttgart. Institut fuer maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung.
193. Krifka M. 1999. Additive Particles under Stress. In Proceedings of SALT 8, 111-28, Cornell: CLC Publications.
194. Krifka M. 2001. For a Structured Meaning Account of Questions and Answers. Audiatur Vox Sapientia. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow 52, 287-319.
195. Krifka M. 2004. The Semantics of Questions and the Focusation of Answers. Topic and Focus: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 139-51.
196. Krifka M. 2006. Association with Focus Phrases. In The architecture of Focus, ed.Valéria Molnár and Susanne Winkler, 105-36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
197. Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
198. Kripke, Saul 1991. Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem. Princeton University.
199. Van Kuppevelt J. 1994. Topic and Comment. R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 9, 4629-33.
200. Van Kuppevelt J. 1995. Discourse Structure, Topicality and Questioning. Journal of Linguistics 31, 109-47.
201. Van Kuppevelt J. 1996. Inferring from Topics. Scalar Implicatures as Topic-Dependent Inferences, L&P 19, 393-443.
202. Kuroda, Shige-Yuki. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. MIT dissertation.
203. Labov, William. 1985. Intensity. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. Deborah Schiffrin, 43-70. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
204. Ladd, D. Robert. 1980. The Structure of Intonational Meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
205. Ladd, D. Robert 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
206. Ladusaw, William A. 1979. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. University of Texas at Austin dissertation.
207. Ladusaw, William A 1980. On the Notion 'Affective' in the Analysis of Negative-polarity Items. Journal of Linguistic Research 12, 1-16.
208. Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press.
209. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
210. Levinson, Stephen C 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
211. Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
212. Lewis, David 1975. Adverbs of Quantification. In Formal Semantics of Natural Languages, ed. E. Keenan, 3-15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
213. Lewis, David 1979. Scorekeeping in a Language Game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339-59. Also in Rainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli and Arnim von Stechow (eds.) 1979, Semantics from Different Points of View, Berlin: Springer.
214. Liberman, Mark, and Ivan A. Sag. 1974. Prosodic Form and Discourse Function. In Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 416-27, Chicago: CLS.
215. Linebarger,Marcia C. 1987. Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 325-87.
216. Lycan, William G. 1991. Even and even if. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 115-50.
217. Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. University of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute.
218. Martí, Luisa. 2003. Contextual Variables. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.
219. McCawley J.D. 1981. Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic butWere Ashamed to Ask. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
220. McCawley, James D 1993. Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic but Were Ashamed to Ask (Second Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
221. McCawley, James D 1998. The Syntactic Phenomena of English (Second Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
222. Montague, Richard. 1973. The Proper Treatment of Quantification. In Approaches to Natural Language, ed. Jaakko Hintikka, Julius M. Moravcsik, and Patrick Suppes, 221-42. Dordrecht: Reidel.
223. Mullally, Joseph P. 1945. The Summulae Logicales of Peter of Spain. NotreDame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
224. Nathan, Lance. 1999. Either: Negative Polarity Meets Focus Sensitivity. Honors thesis, Brown University.
225. Nenkova, Ani, Jason Brenier, Anubha Kothari, Daniel Jurafsky, Sasha Calhoun, David Beaver, and Laura Whitton. 2007. To Memorize or to Predict: Prominence Labeling in Conversational Speech. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2007.
226. Nevalainen, Terttu. 1991. But, Only, Just: Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English 1500-1900. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
227. Oshima, David Y. 2002. Contrastive Topic as a Paradigmatic Operator. Workshop on Information Structure in Context, Stuttgart University.
228. Pan, Shimei, and KathleenMcKeown. 1999. Word Informativeness and Automatic Pitch Accent Modeling. In Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora.
229. Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
230. Partee, Barbara H. 1991. Topic, Focus, and Quantification. In Proceedings of SALT 1, ed. Steve Moore and Adam Z.Wyner, 159-87. CornellWorking Papers in Linguistics.
231. Partee, Barbara H 1999. Focus, Quantification, and Semantics-Pragmatics Issues. In Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, ed. Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, 213-31. Cambridge University Press.
232. Paul, Hermann. 1888. Principles of the History of Language. London: Swan Sonnenschein, Lowrey, & Company.
233. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Cambridge,MA: MIT dissertation.
234. Pierrehumbert, Janet B and Julia Hirschberg. 1990. TheMeaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse. In Intentions in Communication, ed. Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack, 271-311. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
235. Pierrehumbert, Janet B and Susan Steele. 1987. How Many rise-fall-rise Contours? In Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
236. Postal, Paul M. 1998. Three Investigations of Extraction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
237. Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford University Press.
238. Potts, Christopher 2007. The Expressive Dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165-97.
239. Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a Taxonomy ofGiven-newInformation. In Radical Pragmatics, ed. Peter Cole, 223-56. New York: Academic Press.
240. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. NewYork:Longman.
241. Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
242. Riester, Arndt. 2006. Only Scalar. In Proceedings of the 11th ESSLLI Student Session, ed. J. Huitink and S. Katrenko, Spain. University of Malaga.
243. Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49. Papers in Semantics.
244. Roberts, Craige 1998. Focus, the Flow of Information, and Universal Grammar. In The Limits of Syntax, ed. Peter Culicover and Louise McNally, 109-60. New York: Academic Press.
245. Roberts, Craige 2004. Context in Dynamic Interpretation. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. Laurence R. Horn and GregoryWard.Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
246. Laurence R 2006. Only and Conventional Presupposition. The Ohio State University, ms.
247. Rochemont, Michael S. 1986. Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
248. Rooij, Robert Van. 2001. Exhaustivity In Dynamic Semantics; Referential and Descriptive Pronouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 621-57.
249. Rooij, Robert Van 2002. Relevance Only. In Proceedings of Edilog 2002.
250. Rooij, Robert Van 2003. Questioning to Resolve Decision Problems. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 727-63.
251. Rooij, Robert Van 2004. Utility, Informativity and Protocols. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33, 389-419.
252. Rooij, Robert Van and Katrin Schulz. 2003. Exhaustification. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computational Semantics, ed. Harry Bunt, Ielka van der Sluis, and Roser Morante, 354-98, Tilburg: University of Tilburg.
253. Rooij, Robert Van and Katrin Schulz 2007. Only:Meaning and Implicatures. In Questions and Answers, ed. Maria Aloni, Alastair Butler, and Paul Dekker, 193-224. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
254. Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with Focus. University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
255. Rooth, Mats 1992. A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75-116.
256. Rooth, Mats 1995. Indefinites, Adverbs of Quantification, and Focus Semantics. In The Generic Book, ed. Gregory Carlson and Francis Pelletier, 265-99. University of Chicago Press.
257. Rooth, Mats 1996a. Focus. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, ed. Shalom Lappin, 271-97. London: Basil Blackwell.
258. Rooth, Mats 1996b. On the Interface Principles for Intonational Focus. In SALT VI, ed. Teresa Galloway and Justin Spence, 202-26, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
259. Rooth, Mats 1999. Association with Focus or Association with Presupposition? In Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, ed. Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, 232-44. Cambridge University Press.
260. Ross, John Robert. 1964. A Partial Grammar of English Superlatives. University of Pennsylvania: MA Thesis.
261. Ross, John Robert 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax.Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
262. Ross, John Robert and William E. Cooper. 1979. Like Syntax. In Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett, ed. William E. Cooper and Edward C. T. Walker, 343-418. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
263. Sandt, Rob A. van der. 1992. Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution. Journal of Semantics 9, 333-77.
264. Scha, Remko J. H. 1983. Logical Foundations for Question Answering. Rijksuniversiteit te Groningen dissertation.
265. Schubert, Lenhart K., and Francis Jeffry Pelletier. 1987. Problems in the Representation of the Logical Form of Generics, Plurals, and Mass Nouns. In New Directions in Semantics, ed. E. LePore, 385-451. London: Academic Press.
266. Schubert, Lenhart K., and Francis Jeffry Pelletier 1989. Generically Speaking, Or Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics. In Properties, Types and Meaning, ed. Gennaro A. Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee, and Raymond Turner, volume II, 193-268. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
267. Schwarz, Bernhard. 2005. Scalar Additive Particles in Negative Contexts. Natural Language Semantics 13, 125-68.
268. Schwarzschild, Roger, 1993. The Constrastiveness of Associated Foci. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
269. Schwarzschild, Roger 1997. Why Some Foci Must Associate. unpublished.
270. Schwarzschild, Roger 1999. Givenness, Avoidf and Other Constraints on the Placement of Accent. Natural Language Semantics 7, 141-77.
271. Schwenter, Scott A. 2002. Additive Particles and Scalar Endpoint Marking. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 16, 119-34.
272. Schwenter, Scott A and S. Vasishth. 2001. Absolute and Relative Scalar Particles in Spanish and Hindi. Berkeley Linguistics Society 26.
273. Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
274. Selkirk, Elisabeth O 1996. Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress, and Phrasing. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. John A. Goldsmith, 550-69. London: Basil Blackwell.
275. Sharma, Devyani. 2003. Nominal Clitics and ConstructiveMorphology in Hindi. In Nominals: Inside and Out, ed.Miriam Butt and Tracy Halloway King. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
276. Sharvit, Yael, and Penka Stateva. 2002. Superlative Expressions, Context, and Focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 453-505.
277. Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, and Alice E. Turk. 1996. A Prosody Tutorial for Investigators of Auditory Sentence Processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25, 193-247.
278. Sidner, Candace L. 1979. Toward a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English. Technical ReportNo. AI-TR-537, Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
279. Silverman, Kim, Mary Beckman, John Pitrelli, Mari Ostendorf, Colin Wightman, Patti Price, Janet B. Pierrehumbert, and Julia Hirschberg. 1992. ToBI: A Standard for Labelling English Prosody. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Vol. 2, 867-70, Banff.
280. Spector, Benjamin. 2007. Scalar Implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean reasoning? In Questions in Dynamic Semantics, ed. Maria Aloni, Alastair Butler, and Paul Dekker. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
281. Stalnaker, Robert. 1972. Pragmatics. In Semantics of Natural Language, ed. Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, 389-408. Reidel: Dordrecht. Reprinted in János Petöfiand Dorothea Franck (eds.) 1973, Präsuppositionen in Philosophie und Linguistik. [Presuppositions in Philosophy and Linguistics], Athanäum Verlag, Frankfurt. Page numbers in text refer to the 1973 version.
282. Stalnaker, Robert 1974. Pragmatic Presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, ed.MiltonMunitz and Peter Unger, 197-214. New York University Press.
283. Stalnaker, Robert 1978. Assertion. In Pragmatics, ed. Peter Cole, volume 9 of Syntax and Semantics, 315-22. New York: Academic Press.
284. Stateva, Penka. 2002. How Different are Different Degree Constructions? University of Connecticut dissertation.
285. von Stechow, Arnim. 1985/1989. Focusing and Backgrounding Operators. Technical report, Universität Konstanz.
286. von Stechow, Arnim 1991. Current Issues in the Theory of Focus. In Semantik, ed. Arnim von Stechow and DieterWunderlich, 804-25. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
287. Steedman, Mark. 2000. Information Structure and the Syntax-phonology Interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 649-89.
288. Stoffel, Cornelis. 1901. Intensives and Down-toners. Heidelberg: CarlWinter.
289. de Swart, Henriëtte. 1993. Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach. New York: Garland Publishing.
290. Swerts,Marc, and Emiel Krahmer. 2007. Meaning, Intonation and Negation. In ComputingMeaning (vol. 3), ed. H. Bunt and R. Muskens. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
291. Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. Comparative Superlatives. In Papers in Theoretical Linguistics. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 8, ed. Naoki Fukui, Tova R. Rapoport, and Elisabeth Sagey, 245-66. MIT.
292. Szendroi, Kriszta. 2001. Focus and the Syntax-Phonology Interface. University College London dissertation.
293. Szendroi, Kriszta 2003. A Stress-based Approach to the Syntax of Hungarian Focus. Linguistic Review 20, 37-78.
294. Taglicht, Josef. 1984. Message and Emphasis. London and New York: Longman.
295. Tancredi, Christopher D. 1990. Not only even, but even only. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
296. Tancredi, Christopher D 1997. Focus and Associative Operators. Yokohama National University.
297. Taylor, Paul. 2000. Analysis and Synthesis of Intonation Using the Tilt Model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107, 1697-714.
298. Tenny, Carol L. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
299. Tovena, Lucia M. 2005. Discourse and Addition. Workshop on Discourse Domains and Information Structure.
300. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language 65, 31-55.
301. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2006. The Semantic Development of Scalar Focus Modifiers. In The Handbook of the History of English, ed. Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los. Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.
302. Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2006. Phrasal Stress. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, ed. Keith Brown. Oxford: Elsevier.
303. Vallduví, Enric. 1990. Only and Focus. The Penn Review of Linguistics 14, 143-56.
304. Vallduví, Enric 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland Publishing.
305. Wagner, Michael. 2006a. NPI-Licensing and Focus Movement. In Proceedings of SALT XV, ed. EffiGeorgala and Jonathan Howell, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
306. Wagner, Michael 2006b. Association by Movement: Evidence from NPI-Licensing. Natural Language Semantics 14(4): 297-324.
307. van derWal, Sjoukje. 1996. Negative Polarity Items and Negation: Tandem Acquisition. University of Groningen dissertation.
308. Ward, Gregory L. 1988. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing. NewYork:Garland.
309. Ward, Gregory L and Julia Hirschberg. 1985. Implicating Uncertainty: The Pragmatics of Fall-Rise Intonation. Language 61, 747-76.
310. Ward, Gregory L and Julia Hirschberg 1988. Intonation and Propositional Attitude: The Pragmatics of L*+HLH%. In Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 512-22.
311. Ward, Gregory L and Julia Hirschberg and Ellen F. Prince. 1991. On the Topicalization of Indefinite NPs. Journal of Pragmatics 16, 167-77.
312. Ward, Gregory L and Julia Hirschberg Betty Birner, and Rodney Huddleston. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, chapter Information packaging, 1363-447. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
313. Westerst°ahl, Dag. 1985. Logical Constants in Quantifier Languages. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 387-413.
314. Westerst°ahl, Dag 2005. Generalized Quantifiers. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford University.
315. Wilkinson, Karina. 1996. The Scope of Even. Natural Language Semantics 4, 193-215.
316. Williams, Edwin. 1997. Blocking and Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 577-628.
317. Winkler, Susanne. 1997. Focus and Secondary Predication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
318. Wold, Dag. 1996. Long Distance Selective Binding: The Case of Focus. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VI, ed. Teresa Galloway and Justin Spence, Cornell CLC Publications.
319. Yuan, Jiahong, Jason Brenier, and Dan Jurafsky. 2005. Pitch Accent Prediction: Effects of Genre and Speaker. In Proceedings of Eurospeech-05.
320. Zaenen, Annie, Staan Larsson, Agnes Sandor, and David Traum. 2001. Information State Revision and Implicit Dialogue Moves in Instructional Texts. In The Trindi Book, ed. The Trindi Consortium, 261-96. University of Gothenburg.
321. Zeevat, Henk. 1994. Questions and Exhaustivity in Update Semantics. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Semantics, ed. R. M. Harry Bunt and G. Rentier, 211-21, Tilburg: Institute for Language Technology and Artificial Intelligence.
322. Zeevat, Henk 2007. Exhaustivity, Questions and Plurals in Update Semantics. In Questions in Dynamic Semantics, ed. Maria Aloni, Alastair Butler, and Paul Dekker, 161-92. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
323. Zwarts, Frans. 1995. Nonveridical Contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25, 286-312.
324. Zwarts, Frans 1998. Three Types of Polarity. In Plurality and Quantification, ed. FritzHamm and Erhard Hinrichs, 177-238. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
325. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1982. Stranded to and Phonological Phrasing in English. Linguistics 20, 3-57.