Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency

Language

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 575-603

  Giannakidou, Anastasia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646205389     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2006.0136     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ASHER, NICHOLAS. 1987. A typology of attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties. Linguistics and Philosophy 10.125-97.
2. ATLAS, JAY DAVID. 1984, Comparative adjectives and adverbials of degree. Linguistics and Philosophy 7.347-77.
3. ATLAS, JAY DAVID. 1991. Topic/comment, presupposition, logical form and focus stress implicatures: The case of focal particles only and also. Journal of Semantics 8.127-47.
4. ATLAS, JAY DAVID. 1993. The importance of being only: Testing the neo-Gricean versus neo-entailment paradigms. Journal of Semantics 10.301-18.
5. ATLAS, JAY DAVID. 1996. Only noun phrases, pseudo-negative quantifiers, negative polarity items, and monotonicity. Journal of Semantics 13.265-328.
6. BAKER, CARL LEROY. 1970. Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry 1.169-86.
7. BERNARDI, RAFFAELLA. 2002. Reasoning with polarity in categorical type logic. Utrecht: University of Utrecht dissertation.
8. BEAVER, DAVID, and BRADY CLARK. 2003. Always and only: Why not all focus sensitive operators are alike. Natural Language Semantics 11.323-62.
9. BORKIN, ANN. 1971. Polarity items in questions. Chicago Linguistic Society 7.53-62.
10. CHIERCHIA, GENNARO. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 39-103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. CLARK, BRADY. 2006. Polarity items and the interdefinability of universals and exclusives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Albuquerque, NM, January 2006.
12. DAYAL, VENEETA. 1995. Licensing any in non-negative/non-modal contexts. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 5.72-93.
13. DEN DIKKEN, MARCEL, and ANASTASIA GIANNAKIDOU. 2002. From hell to polarity: 'Aggressively non-d-linked' WH-phrases as polarity items. Linguistic Inquiry 33.31-61.
14. DOWTY, DAVID. 1994. The role of negative polarity and concord marking in natural language reasoning. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 4.32-49.
15. FARKAS, DONKA F. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. Romance languages and modern linguistic theory, ed. by Paul Hirschbühler and E. F. K. Koerner, 69-104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. GIANNAKIDOU, ANASTASIA. 1995. Subjunctive, habituality and negative polarity. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 5.94-112.
17. GIANNAKIDOU, ANASTASIA. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. GIANNAKIDOU, ANASTASIA. 1999. Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22.367-421.
19. GIANNAKIDOU, ANASTASIA. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24.659-735.
20. GIANNAKIDOU, ANASTASIA. 2002. Licensing and sensitivity in polarity items: From downward entailment to (non)veridicality. Chicago Linguistic Society 38.2.29-54.
21. HASPELMATH, MARTIN. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.
22. HEIM, IRENE, 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9.183-221.
23. HINTIKKA, JAAKO. 1962. Knowledge and belief: An introduction to the logic of the two notions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. HOEKSEMA, JACOB. 1986. Monotonie en superlatieven. Proeven van taalwetenschap, ed. by C. Hoppenbrouwers, Joop Houtman, Inneke Schuurman, and Frans Zwarts, 38-49. Groningen: Nederlands Instituut RUG.
25. HORN, LAURENCE R. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
26. HORN, LAURENCE R. 1996. Exclusive company: Only and the dynamics of vertical inference. Journal of Semantics 13.1-40.
27. HORN, LAURENCE R. 1997. All John's children are as bald as the king of France: Existential import and the geometry of opposition. Chicago Linguistic Society 33.155-79.
28. HORN, LAURENCE R. 2000. Pick a theory: Not just any theory. Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, ed. by Laurence Horn and Yasuhiko Kato, 147-92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. HORN, LAURENCE R. 2002. Assertoric inertia and NPI-licensing. Chicago Linguistic Society 38.2.55-82.
30. HORN, LAURENCE R. 2006. The boarder wars: A neo-Gricean perspective. Where semantics meets pragmatics: Current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface, vol. 16, ed. by Klaus von Heusinger and Ken Turner, 21-48. Oxford: Elsevier.
31. ISRAEL, MICHAEL. 1996. Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 19.619-66.
32. KADMON, NIRIT, and FRED LANDMAN. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16.353-422.
33. KARTTUNEN, LAURI, and STANLEY PETERS. 1979. Conventional implicature. Syntax and semantics 11: Presupposition, ed. by Choon-Kyu Oh and David A. Dinneen, 1-56. New York: Academic Press.
34. KAS, MARK. 1993. Essays on Boolean functions and negative polarity. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.
35. KEENAN, EDWARD L. 1996. The semantics of determiners. The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. by Shalom Lappin, 41-65. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. KEENAN, EDWARD, and LEONARD FALTZ. 1985. Boolean semantics or natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel.
37. KIPARSKY, PAUL, and CAROL KIPARSKY. 1971. Fact. Semantics, ed. by Danny Steinberg and Leon Jacobovits, 345-69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. KLIMA, EDWARD. 1964. Negation in English. The structure of language, ed. by Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold Katz, 246-323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39. KRIFKA, MANFRED. 2003. Polarity items in questions. Berlin: University of Berlin, MS.
40. KRIFKA, MANFRED; FRANCIS JEFFRY PELLETIER; GREG CARLSON; ALICE TER MEULEN; GENNARO CHIERCHIA; and GODEHARD LINK. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. The generic book, ed. by Gregory Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 1-124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. LADUSAW, WILLIAM A. 1979. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. New York: Garland.
42. LADUSAW, WILLIAM A. 2003. Framing the issues: The biasing effect of polarity items in questions. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz, MS.
43. LAHIRI, UTPAL, 1998. Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics 6.57-123.
44. LIN, JO-WANG. 1996. Polarity licensing and WH-phrase quantification in Chinese. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.
45. LINEBARGER, MARCIA. 1980. The grammar of negative polarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
46. MONTAGUE, RICHARD. 1969. On the nature of certain philosophical entities. The Monist 53.159-94.
47. [Reprinted in Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, ed. by Richard H. Thomason, 148-87. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.]
48. NATHAN, LANCE. 1999. Either: Negative polarity meets focus sensitivity. Providence, RI: Brown University honor's thesis.
49. PERELTSVAIG, ASYA. 2000. Monotonicity-based vs. veridicality-based approaches to negative polarity: Evidence from Russian. Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics, ed. by Tracy Holloway King and Anna Sekerina, 328-46. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publishers.
50. POSTAL, PAUL. 2000. The Ohio lectures on squat. New York: New York University, MS.
51. POTTS, CHRISTOPHER. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. PROGOVAC, LJILJANA. 1994. Positive and negative polarity: A binding approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. QUER, JOSEP. 1998. Mood at the interface. Utrecht: University of Utrecht dissertation.
54. QUER, JOSEP. 1999. Licensing free choice items in hostile environments: The role of aspect and mood. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, MS.
55. RULLMANN, HOTZE. 2003. Additive particles and polarity. Journal of Semantics 20.329-401.
56. SADOCK, JERROLD. 1981. Almost. Radical pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 257-72. New York: Academic Press.
57. STRAWSON, P. F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59.320-44.
58. SZABOLCSI, ANNA. 2004. Positive polarity-negative polarity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22.409-52.
59. TOVENA, LUCIA. 1997. The fine structure of polarity items. New York: Garland.
60. VAN DER WOUDEN, TON. 1994. Negative contexts. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.
61. VAN ROOY, ROBERT. 2003. Negative polarity items in questions: Strength as relevance. Journal of Semantics 20.239-73.
62. VON FINTEL, KAI. 1999. NPI-licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics 16.97-148.
63. YOSHIMURA, KEIKO. 2006. EVEN and ONLY: A study of focus particles in Japanese. Chicago: University of Chicago, MS.
64. ZWARTS, FRANS. 1986. Categoriale Grammatica en Algebraische Semantiek: Een Studie naar negatie en polariteit in het Nederlands. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.
65. ZWARTS, FRANS. 1995. Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25.286-312.
66. ZWARTS, FRANS. 1998. Three types of polarity. Plural quantification, ed. by Fritz Hamn and Erhard Hinrichs, 177-238. Dordrecht: Kluwer.