Additive particles and scalar endpoint marking

Belgian Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 119-134

  Schwenter, Scott A ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248726017     PISSN: 07745141     EISSN: 15699676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/bjl.16.09sch     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Briz, Antonio (ed.). 1995. La conversación coloquial (Materiales para su estudio) (Cuadernos de Filología 16). Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
2. Cano Aguilar, Rafael. 1982. “Sujeto con preposición en español y cuestiones conexas”. Revista de Filología Española 62: 211-258.
3. Corrales, Cristóbal. 1978. “Sobre el sujeto con preposición”. In Estudios ofrecidos a Emilio Alarcos Llorach, Oviedo: Universidad, 2: 65-78.
4. Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Dryer, Matthew S. 1996. “Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions”. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 475-523.
6. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975a. “Pragmatic scales and logical structure”. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353-375.
7. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975b. “Polarity and the scale principle”. CLS 11: 188-199.
8. Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Hoeksema, Jack, and Hotze Rullmann. 2001. “Scalarity and polarity: a study of scalar adverbs as polarity items”. In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullmann, V. Sánchez, and T. van der Wouden (eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 129-171.
10. Horn, Laurence R. 1996. “Presupposition and implicature”. In S. Lappin (ed.), Handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 299-319.
11. Iatridou, Sabine. 1994. “On the contribution of conditional then”. Natural Language Semantics 2: 171-199.
12. Kay, Paul. 1990. “Even”. Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 59-111.
13. König, Ekkehard. 1986. “Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: Areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization”. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. Snitzer Reilly, and C. A. Ferguson (eds.), On conditionals.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229-246.
14. König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles. London: Routledge.
15. Lee, Young-Suk and Laurence R. Horn. 1995. “Any as indefinite plus even”. Ms., Yale University.
16. Montolío, Estrella. 1999. “Las oraciones condicionales”. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 3642-3737.
17. Prince, Ellen F. 1992. “The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status”. In S. A. Thompson and W. Mann (eds.), Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fundraising text. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 295-325.
18. Sánchez López, Cristina C. 1999. “Los cuantificadores: clases de cuantificadores y estructuras cuantificativas”. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1025-1128.
19. Schwenter, Scott A. 1999. “Two types of scalar particles: Evidence from Spanish”. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach and F. Martínez-Gil (eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 546-561.
20. Schwenter, Scott A. 2000. “Lo relativo y lo absoluto de las partículas escalares incluso y hasta”. Oralia 3: 169-197.
21. Schwenter, Scott A., and Shravan Vasishth. 2001. “Absolute and relative scalar particles in Spanish and Hindi”. BLS 26: 225-233.