Can ECAP measures be used for totally objective programming of cochlear implants?

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 879-890

  McKay, Colette M ^a,b   Chandan, Kirpa ^a   Akhoun, Idrick ^a   Siciliano, Catherine ^a   Kluk, Karolina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Bionic Vision Australia   (Australia)

Author keywords

cochlear implant; ECAP; loudness; thresholds

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL PARAMETERS; ELECTRODE; EVOKED COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL; FORWARD MASKING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TELEMETRY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS;

EID: 84889082326     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: 14387573     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0417-9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, Firszt JB, Hughes ML, Hong SH, Staller SJ (1999) Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 20:45-59
2. Bonnet RM, Boermans PP, Avenarius OF, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH (2012) Effects of pulse width, pulse rate and paired electrode stimulation on psychophysical measures of dynamic range and speech recognition in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 33:489-496
3. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ (1990) Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 88:2205-2210
4. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Borland J, Bertschy MR (1996) Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. J Speech Hear Res 39:453-467
5. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz BJ (1998) Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol 19:320-327
6. Cafarelli Dees D et al (2005) Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol 10:105-116
7. Gordon KA, Ebinger KA, Gilden JE, Shapiro WH (2002) Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 189:42-48
8. Gordon K, Papsin BC, Harrison RV (2004a) Programming cochlear implant stimulation levels in infants and children with a combination of objective measures. Int J Audiol 43(Suppl 1):S28-S32
9. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV (2004b) Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear Hear 25:447-463
10. Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ (2005) An analysis of the impact of auditory-nerve adaptation on behavioral measures of temporal integration in cochlear implant recipients. J Acoust Soc Am 118:2444-2457
11. Hughes ML, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Wolaver AA, Gervais JP (2000) Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear 21:164-174
12. Kang SY, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Su GL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE (2010) Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 11:245-265
13. McKay CM, McDermott HJ (1998) Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals. J Acoust Soc Am 104:1061-1074
14. McKay CM, Henshall KR, Farrell RJ, McDermott HJ (2003) A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2054-2063
15. McKay CM, Fewster L, Dawson P (2005) A different approach to using neural response telemetry for automated cochlear implant processor programming. Ear Hear 26:38S-44S
16. McKay CM, Lim HH, Lenarz T (2013) Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 14:103-124
17. Middlebrooks JC (2004) Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 116:452-468
18. Oxenham AJ (2001) Forward masking: adaptation or integration? J Acoust Soc Am 109:732-741
19. Oxenham AJ, Moore BC (1994) Modeling the additivity of nonsimultaneous masking. Hear Res 80:105-118
20. Pfingst BE, Colesa DJ, Hembrador S, Kang SY, Middlebrooks JC, Raphael Y, Su GL (2011) Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health. J Acoust Soc Am 130:3954-3968
21. Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ, Drga V (2002) Linear and nonlinear processes in temporal masking. Acta Acust United Acust 88:348-358
22. Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA (2007) Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear 28:495-511
23. Prado-Guitierrez P, Fewster LM, Heasman JM, McKay CM, Shepherd RK (2006) Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival. Hear Res 215:47-55
24. Seyle K, Brown CJ (2002) Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear 23:72S-79S
25. Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, van Dijk JE (2002) Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neuro-Otol 7:335-347
26. Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, Boutitie F, Chanal JM, Cochard N, Piron JP, Ribas S, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Mondain M, Uziel A, Collet L (2004) Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2811-2824
27. Zhou N, Xu L, Pfingst BE (2012) Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users. Hear Res 284:25-32
28. Zimmerling MJ, Hochmair ES (2002) EAP recordings in Ineraid patients - correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting. Ear Hear 23:81-91