Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 495-511

  Potts, Lisa G ^a   Skinner, Margaret W ^a   Gotter, Brenda D ^a   Strube, Michael J ^b   Brenner, Chris A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; RECIPIENT; RELIABILITY; TELEMETRY; VISION;

ADULT; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TELEMETRY;

EID: 34347376361     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc16e     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Shallop, J. K., Firszt, J. B., Hughes, M. L., Hong, S. H., Staller, S. J. (1999). Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear and Hearing, 20, 45-59.
2. Bredberg, G. (1968). Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human Organ of Corti. Acta Oto-laryngologica Supplementum, 236, 1-135.
3. Brown, C. J. (2003). The electrically evoked whole nerve action potential. In Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. (Ed: H. E. Cullington). London: Whurr Publishers, 96-129.
4. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Gantz, B. J. (1990). Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials. I. Data from Symbion cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1385-1391.
5. Brown, C. J., Hughes, M. L., Luk, B., Abbas, P. J., Wolaver, A. A., Gervais, J. P. (2000). The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults. Ear and Hearing, 21, 151-163.
6. Charlet de Sauvage, R., Cazals, Y., Effe, J. P., Aran, J. M. (1983). Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: An estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 616-627.
7. Dillier, N., Lai, W. K., Almqvist, B., Frohne, C., Muller-Deile, J., Stecker, M., von Wallenberg, E. (2002). Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 111, 407-414.
8. Firszt, J. B., Holden, L. K., Skinner, M. W., Tobey, E. A., Peterson, A., Gaggl, W., Runge-Samuelson, C. L., Wackym, P. A. (2004). Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear and Hearing, 25, 375-387.
9. Franck, K. H., Norton, S. J. (2001). Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear and Hearing, 22, 289-299.
10. Hay-McCutcheon, M. J., Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J. (2005). An analysis of the impact of auditory-nerve adaptation on behavioral measures of temporal integration in cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 118, 2444-2457.
11. Holden, L. K., Skinner, M. W., Holden, T. A., Demorest, M. E. (2002). Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy. Ear and Hearing, 23, 463-476.
12. Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Wolaver, A. A., Gervais, J. P. (2000). The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from children. Ear and Hearing, 21, 164-174.
13. Kreft, H. A., Donaldson, G. S., Nelson, D. A. (2004). Effects of pulse rate on threshold and dynamic range in Clarion cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 1885-1888.
14. Miller, C. A., Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J. (2000). An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential. Ear and Hearing, 21, 280-290.
15. Mueller, H. G., Killion, M. C.. (1990). An easy method for calculating the articulation index. Hearing Journal, 49:1-4.
16. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Socitey of America, 95, 1085-1099.
17. Otte, J., Schuknecht, H. F., Kerr, A. G. (1978). Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochlea: implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 88, 1231-1246.
18. Peterson, G. E., Lehiste, I. (1962). Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27, 62-70.
19. Seyle, K., Brown, C. J. (2002). Speech perception based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear and Hearing 23:72S-79S.
20. Shannon, R. V. (1985). Thresholds and loudness functions for pulsatile electrical stimulation of cochlear implants. Hearing Research, 18, 135-143.
21. Shannon, R. V. A model of threshold for pulsatile electrical stimulation of cochlear implants. Hearing Research, 1989;40, 197-204.
22. Skinner, M. W. (2003). Optimizing cochlear implant speech performance. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 112(Suppl. 191): 4-13.
23. Skinner, M. W., Arndt, P. L., Staller, S. J. (2002a).Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference. Ear and Hearing, 23, 2S-17S.
24. Skinner, M. W., Holden, L. K., Demorest, M. E., Holden, T. A. (1995). Use of test-retest measures to evaluate performance stability in adults with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 16, 187-197.
25. Skinner, M. W., Holden, L. K., Holden, T. A., Demorest, M. E. (1999). Comparison of two methods for selecting minimum stimulation levels used in programming the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 42, 814-828.
26. Skinner, M. W., Holden, L. K., Holden, T. A., Demorest, M. E. (2000). Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant recipients' thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels. Journal of the American Academy Audiology, 11, 203-213.
27. Skinner, M. W., Holden, L. K., Whitford, L. A., Plant, K. L., Psarros, C., Holden, T. A. (2002b). Speech recognition with the Nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults. Ear and Hearing, 23, 207-223.
28. Smoorenburg, G. F., Willeboer, C., van Dijk, J. E. (2002). Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiology and Neurootology, 7, 335-347.
29. Sun, J. C., Skinner, M. W., Liu, S. Y., Wang, F. N. M., Huang, T. S., Lin, T. (1998). Optimization of speech processor fitting strategies for Chinese-speaking cochlear implantees. Laryngoscope, 108, 560-568.
30. Vandali, A. E., Whitford, L. A., Plant, K. L., Clark, G. M. (2000). Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing, 21, 608-624.
31. Zimmerling, M. J., Hochmair, E. S. (2002). EAP recordings in Ineraid patients: Correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting. Ear and Hearing, 23, 81-91.
32. Arndt, P. L., Staller, S., Arcaroli, J., Ebinger, K. (1999). Within-subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 Contour cochlear implant. Englewood, CO: Cochlear Corporation.
33. Cafarelli Dees, D., Dillier, N., Lai, W., von Wallenberg, E., van Dijk, B., Smoorenburg, G. (2003). Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measurements using the neural response telemetry (NRT) of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Poster presented at the 2003 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prosthesis in Pacific Grove, CA, page 189.
34. Holstad, B. A., Sonneveldt, V. G., Davidson, L. S., Fears, B. T., Aaron, R. J., Richter, M., Matusofsky, M., Brenner, C. S., Strube, M. S., Skinner, M. W. (2006). Comparison of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Measured using Neural Response Telemetry with Well-Fit Cochlear Implant MAP T- and C-Levels in Children. Manuscript submitted.
35. McKay, C. M., Fewster, L. M. (2004). Effect of inter-phase gap and pulse-duration on evoked-potential amplitudes and loudness in cochlear implantees. Poster presented at the VIII International Cochlear Implant Symposium in Indianapolis, IN, page 78.
36. McKay, C. M., Fewster, L. M., Dawson, P. M. (2004). A different approach to using NRT for automated processor programming. Poster presented at the VIII International Cochlear Implant Symposium in Indianapolis, IN, page 78.