Evolutionary inferences from the analysis of exchangeability

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3429-3441

  Hendry, Andrew P ^a   Kaeuffer, Renaud ^a   Crispo, Erika ^b   Peichel, Catherine L ^c   Bolnick, Daniel I ^d  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b PACE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^d HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive radiation; Convergent evolution; Ecological speciation; Gasterosteus aculeatus; Natural selection; Parallel evolution

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; DIET; DIVERGENCE; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; PARALLEL EVOLUTION; POPULATION GENETICS; TELEOST;

GASTEROSTEUS; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION; ECOSYSTEM; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL SELECTION; PARALLEL EVOLUTION; SMEGMAMORPHA; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; NATURAL SELECTION; PARALLEL EVOLUTION;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC SPECIATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SMEGMAMORPHA;

EID: 84888818729     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12160     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Arendt, J., and Reznick, D. 2008. Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:26-32.
2. Berner, D., D. C., Adams, A.-C. Grandchamp, and A. P. Hendry . 2008. Natural selection drives patterns of lake-stream divergence in stickleback foraging morphology. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1653-1665.
3. Berner, D., A.-C. Grandchamp, and A. P. Hendry . 2009. Variable progress toward ecological speciation in parapatry: stickleback across eight lake-stream transitions. Evolution 63:1740-1753.
4. Bolnick, D. I., and M. S. Araújo . 2011. Partitioning the relative fitness effects of diet and trophic morphology in the threespine stickleback. Evol. Ecol. Res. 13:439-459.
5. Bolnick, D. I., and P. Nosil . 2007. Natural selection in populations subject to a migration load. Evolution 61:2229-2243.
6. Bolnick, D. I., R. Svanback, J. A. Fordyce, L. H. Yang, J. M. Davis, C. D. Hulsey, and M. L. Forister . 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161:1-28.
7. Bolnick, D. I., E. J. Caldera, and B. Matthews . 2008. Evidence for asymmetric migration load in a pair of ecologically divergent stickleback populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94:273-287.
8. Bolnick, D. I., L. K. Snowberg, C. Patenia, W. E. Stutz, T. Ingram, and O. L. Lau . 2009. Phenotype-dependent native habitat preference facilitates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback. Evolution 63:2004-2016.
9. Bolnick, D. I., P. Amarasekare, M. S. Araujo, R. Bürger, J. M. Levine, M. Novak, V. H. W. Rudolf, S. J. Schreiber, M. C. Urban, and D. A. Vasseur . 2011. Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:183-192.
10. Bond, J. E., and A. K. Stockman . 2008. An integrative method for delimiting cohesion species: finding the population-species interface in a group of Californian trapdoor spiders with extreme genetic divergence and geographic structuring. Sys. Biol. 57:628-646.
11. Cano, J. M., H. S. Mäkinen, T. Leinonen, J. Freyhof, and J. Merilä . 2008. Extreme neutral genetic and morphological divergence supports classification of Adriatic three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations as distinct conservation units. Biol. Cons. 141:1055-1066.
12. Castric, V., and L. Bernatchez . 2004. Individual assignment test reveals differential restriction to dispersal between two salmonids despite no increase of genetic differences with distance. Mol. Ecol. 13:1299-1312.
13. Crandall, K. A., O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, G. M. Mace, and R. K. Wayne . 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:290-295.
14. Crispo, E. 2008. Modifying effects of phenotypic plasticity in interactions among natural selection, adaptation and gene flow. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1460-1469.
15. Crispo, E., P. Bentzen, D.N. Reznick, M.T. Kinnison, and A.P. Hendry . 2006. The relative influence of natural selection and geography on gene flow in guppies. Mol. Ecol. 15:49-62.
16. Edelaar, P., A. M. Siepielski, and J. Clobert . 2008. Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evolution 62:2462-2472.
17. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
18. Ferrari, J., H. C. J. Godfray, A. S. Faulconbridge, K. Prior, and S. Via . 2006. Population differentiation and genetic variation in host choice among pea aphids from eight host plant genera. Evolution 60:1574-1584.
19. Funk, S. M., and J. E. Fa . 2006. Phylogeography of the endemic St. Lucia whiptail lizard Cnemidophorus vanzoi: conservation genetics at the species boundary. Cons. Genet. 7:651-663.
20. Futuyma, D. J. 2010. Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution 64:1865-1884.
21. Grant, P. R. 1999. Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
22. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant . 1994. Phenotypic and genetic effects of hybridization in Darwin's finches. Evolution 48:297-316.
23. Grant, P. R., B. R. Grant, J. A. Markert, L. F. Keller, and K. Petren . 2004. Convergent evolution of Darwin's finches caused by introgressive hybridization and selection. Evolution 58:1588-1599.
24. Hadfield, J. D., A. J. Wilson, D. Garant, B. C. Sheldon, and L. E. B. Kruuk . 2010. The misuse of BLUP in ecology and evolution. Am. Nat. 175:116-125.
25. Hansen, M. M., E. E. Nielsen, D. Bekkevold, and K. L. D. Mensberg . 2001. Admixture analysis and stocking impact assessment in brown trout (Salmo trutta), estimated with incomplete baseline data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58:1853-1860.
26. Hansen, T. F., A. J. R. Carter, and C. Pelabon . 2006. On adaptive accuracy and precision in natural populations. Am. Nat. 168:168-181.
27. Hauser, L., T. R. Seamons, M. Dauer, K. A. Naish, and T. P. Quinn . 2006. An empirical verification of population assignment methods by marking and parentage data: hatchery and wild steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Forks Creek, Washington, USA. Mol. Ecol. 15:3157-3173.
28. Hendry, A. P. 2009. Ecological speciation! Or the lack thereof? Can. J. Fish.Aquat. Sci. 66:1383-1398.
29. Hendry, A. P., and E. B. Taylor . 2004. How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? An evaluation using lake-stream stickleback pairs. Evolution 58:2319-2331.
30. Hendry, A. P., T. Day, and E. B. Taylor . 2001. Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests. Evolution 55: 459-466.
31. Hendry, A. P., E. B. Taylor, and J. D. McPhail . 2002. Adaptive divergence and the balance between selection and gene flow: lake and stream stickleback in the Misty system. Evolution 56: 1199-1216.
32. Hubisz, M. J., D. Falush, M. Stephens, and J. K. Pritchard . 2009. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol. Ecol. Resources 9:1322-1332.
33. Jombart, T., S. Devillard, and F. Balloux . 2010. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 11:94.
34. Kaeuffer, R., C. L. Peichel, D. I. Bolnick, and A. P. Hendry . 2012. Parallel and nonparallel aspects of ecological, phenotypic, and genetic divergence across replicate population pairs of lake and stream stickleback. Evolution 66:402-418.
35. Kruuk, L. E. B. 2004. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the 'animal model'. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 359:873-890.
36. Langerhans, R. B. 2008. Predictability of phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes. Integr. Comp. Biol. 48:750-768.
37. Langerhans, R. B., and T. J. DeWitt . 2004. Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification. Am. Nat. 164:335-349.
38. Lavin, P. A., and J. D. McPhail . 1993. Parapatric lake and stream sticklebacks on northern Vancouver Island: disjunct distribution or parallel evolution? Can. J. Zool. 71:11-17.
39. Losos, J. B. 2009. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of Anoles. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
40. Losos, J. B.. 2011. Convergence, adaptation, and constraint. Evolution 65:1827-1840.
41. MacColl, A. D. C. 2011. The ecological causes of evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:514-522.
42. Manel, S., O. E. Gaggiotti, and R. S. Waples . 2005. Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:136-142.
43. Matthews, B., K. B. Marchinko, D. I. Bolnick, and A. Mazumder . 2010. Specialization of trophic position and habitat use by sticklebacks in an adaptive radiation. Ecology 91:1025-1034.
44. Morjan, C. L., and L. H. Rieseberg . 2004. How species evolve collectively: implications of gene flow and selection for the spread of advantageous alleles. Mol. Ecol. 13:1341-1356.
45. Newsome, S. D., C. M. del Rio, S. Bearhop, and D. L. Phillips . 2007. A niche for isotopic ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5:429-436.
46. Nosil, P., and B. J. Crespi . 2004. Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks. Evolution 58:102-112.
47. Nosil, P., L. J. Harmon, and O. Seehausen . 2009. Ecological explanations for (incomplete) speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:145-156.
48. Petren, K., P. R. Grant, B. R. Grant, and L. F. Keller . 2005. Comparative landscape genetics and the adaptive radiation of Darwin's finches: the role of peripheral isolation. Mol. Ecol. 14:2943-2957.
49. Post, D. M. 2002. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703-718.
50. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly . 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 155:945-959.
51. Quinn, T. P., M. T. Kinnison, and M. J. Unwin . 2001. Evolution of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: pattern, rate, and process. Genetica 112:493-513.
52. Rader, R. B., M. C. Belk, D. K. Shiozawa, and K. A. Crandall . 2005. Empirical tests for ecological exchangeability. Anim. Cons. 8:239-247.
53. Räsänen, K., and A. P. Hendry . 2008. Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Ecol. Lett. 11:624-636.
54. Reimchen, T. E., T. Ingram, and S. C. Hansen . 2008. Assessing niche differences of sex, armour and asymmetry phenotypes using stable isotope analyses in Haida Gwaii sticklebacks. Behaviour 145:561-577.
55. Reznick, D. N., and H. A. Bryga . 1996. Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata: Poeciliidae). 5. Genetic basis of parallelism in life histories. Am. Nat. 147:339-359.
56. Reznick, D. N., F. H. Rodd, and M. Cardenas . 1996. Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata: Poeciliidae). 4. Parallelism in life-history phenotypes. Am. Nat. 147:319-338.
57. Roesti, M., A. P. Hendry, W. Salzburger, and D. Berner . 2012. Genome divergence during evolutionary diversification as revealed in replicate lake-stream stickleback population pairs. Mol. Ecol. 12:2852-2862.
58. Rohlf, F. J. 2005. tpsRelw. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
59. Rohlf, F. J.. 2006. tpsDIG2. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
60. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
61. Schluter, D., and J. D. McPhail . 1992. Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks. Am. Nat. 140:85-108.
62. Shine, R., G. P. Brown, and B. L. Phillips . 2011. An evolutionary process that assembles phenotypes through space rather than through time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:5708-5711.
63. Siwertsson, A., R. Knudsen, K. K. Kahilainen, K. Præbel, R. Primicerio, and P.-A. Amundsen . 2010. Sympatric diversification as influenced by ecological opportunity and historical contingency in a young species lineage of whitefish. Evol. Ecol. Res. 12:929-947.
64. Snowberg, L. K., and D. I. Bolnick . 2008. Assortative mating by diet in a phenotypically unimodal but ecologically variable population of stickleback. Am. Nat. 172:733-739.
65. Stockman, A. K., and J. E. Bond . 2007. Delimiting cohesion species: extreme population structuring and the role of ecological interchangeability. Mol. Ecol. 16:3374-3392.
66. Templeton, A. R. 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. Pp. 3-27 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
67. Templeton, A. R.. 2001. Using phylogeographic analyses of gene trees to test species status and processes. Mol. Ecol. 10:779-791.
68. Thibert-Plante, X., and A. P. Hendry . 2010. When can ecological speciation be detected with neutral loci? Mol. Ecol. 19:2301-2314.
69. Vonlanthen, P., D. Bittner, A. G. Hudson, K. A. Young, R. Müller, B. Lundsgaard-Hansen, D. Roy, S. Di Piazza, C. R. Largiader, and O. Seehausen . 2012. Eutrophication causes speciation reversal in whitefish adaptive radiations. Nature 482:357-362.
70. Wade, M. J., and S. Kalisz . 1990. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44:1947-1955.
71. Wake, D. B., M. H. Wake, and C. D. Specht . 2011. Homoplasy: from detecting pattern to determining process and mechanism of evolution. Science 331:1032-1035.
72. Waples, R. S., and O. Gaggiotti . 2006. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 15:1419-1439.
73. Yeaman, S., and F. Guillaume . 2009. Predicting adaptation under migration load: the role of genetic skew. Evolution 63:2926-2938.
74. Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, H. D. Sheets, and W. L. Fink . 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press, New York.
75. Zink, R. M. 2002. A new perspective on the evolutionary history of Darwin's finches. The Auk 119:864-871.