Elevated Rad53 kinase activity influences formation and interhomolog repair of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks in budding yeast

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Volumn 441, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 593-599

  Usui, Takehiko ^a   Kanehara, Yoshiki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Budding yeast; DNA damage checkpoint; DNA double strand breaks; Meiosis; Rad53; Recombination

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BUDDING; CELL CYCLE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVATION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MEIOSIS; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; YEAST;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

4′,6-DIAMIDINO-2-PHENYLINDOLE; BUDDING YEAST; CO; CROSSOVER; DAPI; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; DSBS; IN SITU AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION; ISA; KD; KINASE DEAD; MEIOSIS; MEIOSIS I; MEIOSIS II; MI; MII; NCO; NON-CROSSOVER; RAD53; RECOMBINATION; TCA; TRICHLOROACETIC ACID; UNTRANSLATED REGION; UTR;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; MEIOSIS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84888286670     PISSN: 0006291X     EISSN: 10902104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.111     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Keeney S., Giroux C.N., Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 1997, 88:375-384.
2. Shinohara A., Ogawa H., Ogawa T. Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell 1992, 69:457-470.
3. Bishop D.K., Park D., Xu L., Kleckner N. DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 1992, 69:439-456.
4. Neale M.J., Keeney S. Clarifying the mechanics of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination. Nature 2006, 442:153-158.
5. Moynahan M.E., Jasin M. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:196-207.
6. Nyberg K.A., Michelson R.J., Putnam C.W., Weinert T.A. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2002, 36:617-656.
7. MacQueen A.J., Hochwagen A. Checkpoint mechanisms: the puppet masters of meiotic prophase. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:393-400.
8. Zou L., Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003, 300:1542-1548.
9. Majka J., Niedziela-Majka A., Burgers P.M. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:891-901.
10. Pellicioli A., Lee S.E., Lucca C., Foiani M., Haber J.E. Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:293-300.
11. Cartagena-Lirola H., Guerini I., Manfrini N., Lucchini G., Longhese M.P. Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 checkpoint kinase in signaling double-strand breaks during the meiotic cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:4480-4493.
12. Xu L., Weiner B.M., Kleckner N. Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev. 1997, 11:106-118.
13. Carballo J.A., Johnson A.L., Sedgwick S.G., Cha R.S. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 2008, 132:758-770.
14. Kim K.P., Weiner B.M., Zhang L., Jordan A., Dekker J., Kleckner N. Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 2010, 143:924-937.
15. Hong S., Sung Y., Yu M., Lee M., Kleckner N., Kim K.P. The logic and mechanism of homologous recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell 2013, 51:440-453.
16. Pan J., Sasaki M., Kniewel R., Murakami H., Blitzblau H.G., Tischfield S.E., Zhu X., Neale M.J., Jasin M., Socci N.D., Hochwagen A., Keeney S. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 2011, 144:719-731.
17. Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 1997, 90:1123-1135.
18. Arbel A., Zenvirth D., Simchen G. Sister chromatid-based DNA repair is mediated by RAD54, not by DMC1 or TID1. EMBO J. 1999, 18:2648-2658.
19. Longtine M.S., McKenzie A., Demarini D.J., Shah N.G., Wach A., Brachat A., Philippsen P., Pringle J.R. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998, 14:953-961.
20. Bishop D.K. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 1994, 79:1081-1092.
21. Shinohara A., Gasior S., Ogawa T., Kleckner N., Bishop D.K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae recA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 have both distinct and overlapping roles in meiotic recombination. Genes Cells 1997, 2:615-629.
22. Shinohara M., Gasior S.L., Bishop D.K., Shinohara A. Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of Rad51 and Dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2000, 97:10814-10819.
23. Storlazzi A., Xu L., Cao L., Kleckner N. Crossover and noncrossover recombination during meiosis: timing and pathway relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 1995, 92:8512-8516.
24. Petukhova G., Stratton S., Sung P. Catalysis of homologous DNA pairing by yeast Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. Nature 1998, 393:91-94.
25. Tsubouchi H., Roeder G.S. The importance of genetic recombination for fidelity of chromosome pairing in meiosis. Dev. Cell 2003, 5:915-925.
26. Shinohara M., Sakai K., Shinohara A., Bishop D.K. Crossover interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-dependent pathway. Genetics 2003, 163:1273-1286.
27. Bishop D.K., Nikolski Y., Oshiro J., Chon J., Shinohara M., Chen X. High copy number suppression of the meiotic arrest caused by a dmc1 mutation: REC114 imposes an early recombination block and RAD54 promotes a DMC1-independent DSB repair pathway. Genes Cells 1999, 4:425-444.
28. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 2004, 118:699-713.
29. Gilbert C.S., Green C.M., Lowndes N.F. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol. Cell 2001, 8:129-136.
30. Lee S.J., Duong J.K., Stern D.F. A Ddc2-Rad53 fusion protein can bypass the requirements for RAD9 and MRC1 in Rad53 activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:5443-5455.
31. Borde V., Goldman A.S., Lichten M. Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science 2000, 290:806-809.
32. Zegerman P., Diffley J.F. Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation. Nature 2010, 467:474-478.
33. Lopez-Mosqueda J., Maas N.L., Jonsson Z.O., Defazio-Eli L.G., Wohlschlegel J., Toczyski D.P. Damage-induced phosphorylation of Sld3 is important to block late origin firing. Nature 2010, 467:479-483.
34. Panizza S., Mendoza M.A., Berlinger M., Huang L., Nicolas A., Shirahige K., Klein F. Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 2011, 146:372-383.
35. Sasanuma H., Hirota K., Fukuda T., Kakusho N., Kugou K., Kawasaki Y., Shibata T., Masai H., Ohta K. Cdc7-dependent phosphorylation of Mer2 facilitates initiation of yeast meiotic recombination. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:398-410.
36. Ogino K., Masai H. Rad3-Cds1 mediates coupling of initiation of meiotic recombination with DNA replication. Mei4-dependent transcription as a potential target of meiotic checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:1338-1344.
37. Miyoshi T., Ito M., Kugou K., Yamada S., Furuichi M., Oda A., Yamada T., Hirota K., Masai H., Ohta K. A central coupler for recombination initiation linking chromosome architecture to S phase checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2012, 47:722-733.
38. Bugreev D.V., Pezza R.J., Mazina O.M., Voloshin O.N., Camerini-Otero R.D., Mazin A.V. The resistance of DMC1 D-loops to dissociation may account for the DMC1 requirement in meiosis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:56-60.
39. Klapholz S., Esposito R.E. Recombination and chromosome segregation during the single division meiosis in SPO12-1 and SPO13-1 diploids. Genetics 1980, 96:589-611.
40. Niu H., Wan L., Baumgartner B., Schaefer D., Loidl J., Hollingsworth N.M. Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:5804-5818.
41. Zanders S., Brown M.S., Chen C., Alani E. Pch2 modulates chromatid partner choice during meiotic double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2011, 188:511-521.