Radiographic appearance of commonly used cements in implant dentistry

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 61-68

  Pette, Gregory A ^a,b   Ganeles, Jeffrey ^a,b   Norkin, Frederic J ^a,b  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GLASS IONOMER; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; URETHAN; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; DEVICES;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; COMPOSITE RESINS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENTAL CEMENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; URETHANE; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 84888194809     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: 19453388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/prd.1466     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 719-728.
2. Bernal G, Okamura M, Muñoz CA. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations J Prosthodont 2003; 12: 111-115.
3. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 537-552.
4. Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 865-868.
5. Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, Reissner MW. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: A clinical case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 943-946.
6. Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 43-47.
7. Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cementretained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1379-1384.
8. Taylor TD, Belser U, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic considerations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11(suppl): 101-107.
9. Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study [epub ahead of print 8 Apr 2012]. Clin Oral Implants Res doi: 10.1111/j/1600-0501.2012.02453.x.
10. Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 112-114.
11. Wadhwani CPK, Piñeyro A, Akimoto K. An introduction to the implant crown with an esthetic adhesive margin (ICEAM). J Esthet Restor Dent 2012; 24: 246-254.
12. Giannopoulou C, Bernard JP, Buser D, Carrel A, Belser UC. Effect of intracrevicular restoration margins on peri-implant health: Clinical, biochemical, and microbiologic findings around esthetic implants up to 9 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 8: 173-181.
13. Waerhaug J. The effects of rough surfaces upon gingival tissue. J Dent Res 1956; 35: 323-325.
14. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 563-578.
15. Chee WWL, Torbati A, Albozy JP. Retrievable cemented implant restorations. J Prosthodont 1998; 7: 120-125.
16. Callan DP, Cobb CM. Excess cement and peri-implant disease. J Implant Adv Clin Dent 2009; 1: 61-68.
17. Wilson T. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: A prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1388-1392.
18. Gu S, Rasimick BJ, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Radiopacity of dental materials using a digital X-ray system. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 765-770.
19. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 127-134.
20. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 280-301.
21. Wadhwani C, Hess T, Faber T, Piñeyro A, Chen CSK. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 295-302.
22. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higgenbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implantogingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 186-198.
23. Listgarten MA, Buser D, Steinemann SG, Donath K, Lang NP, Weber HP. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titanium-coated epoxy resin implants and bone or gingiva. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 364-371 [erratum 1992; 71: 1267].
24. Schou S, Holmstrup P, Stoltze K, Hjørting-Hansen E, Fiehn NE, Skovgaard LT. Probing around implants and teeth with healthy or inflamed peri-implant mucosa/ gingiva. A histologic comparison in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 113-126.
25. Mombelli A, Mühle T, Brägger U, Lang NP, Bürgin WB. Comparison of periodontal and peri-implant probing by depth-force pattern analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 448-454.
26. Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Probing depth at implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20: 623-627.
27. Dmytryk JJ, Fox SC, Moriarty JD. The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments on cell attachment. J Periodontol 1990; 61: 491-496.
28. Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A. Technique for controlling the cement for an implant crown. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102: 57-58.
29. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 343-348.
30. Wolfart M, Wolfart S, Kern M. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 519-525.
31. Froum SJ, Froum SH, Rosen PS. Successful management of peri-implantitis with a regenerative approach: A consecutive series of 51 treated implants with 3-to 7.5-year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012; 32: 11-20.
32. Froum S (ed). Dental Implant Complications: Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment. Ames, IA: Blackwell, 2010.
33. Lindhe J, Meyle J. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35(suppl): 282-285.