Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 519-525

  Wolfart, Mona ^a,b   Wolfart, Stefan ^a   Kern, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b Christian Albrechts University at Kiel ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Cement retained prostheses; Dental implants; Fixed partial dentures; Retention force; Seating discrepancy

Indexed keywords

TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 33748494008     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: Which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-141.
2. Singer A, Serfaty V. Cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures: A 6-month to 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:645-649.
3. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto Study. Part II: The prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:53-61.
4. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.
5. Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:43-47.
6. Chee WW, Torbati A, Albouy JP. Retrievable cemented implant restorations. J Prosthodont 1998;7:120-125.
7. Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:344-348.
8. Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:343-348.
9. Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:793-798.
10. Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:660-665.
11. Akca K, Iplikcioglu H, Cehreli MC. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:536-542.
12. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. 1992;68:737-741.
13. Bresciano M, Schierano G, Manzella C, Screti A, Bignardi C, Preti G. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:594-598.
14. Juntavee N, Millstein PL. Effect of surface roughness and cement space on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:482-486.
15. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:885-890.
16. Tuntiprawon M. Effect of tooth surface roughness on marginal seating and retention of complete metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:142-147.
17. Øilo G, Jørgensen KD. The influence of surface roughness on the retentive ability of two dental luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:377-389.
18. Jørgensen KD. The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 1955;13:35-40.
19. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. St Louis: Mosby YearBook, 1993.
20. Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, Breeding LC, Barber LL. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-514.