A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 103, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 295-302

  Wadhwani, Chandur ^a   Hess, Timothy ^a   Faber, Thomas ^a   Piñeyro, Alfonso ^b   Chen, Curtis S K ^a  

^a Department of Restorative Dentistry ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DYCAL; FLECKS; GLASS IONOMER; IMPROV; MINERAL; RELY X UNICEM; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TEMPBOND NE; TOOTH CEMENT; VITREMER; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; RADIATION DOSE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; COMPOSITE RESINS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MINERALS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RESIN CEMENTS; SOFTWARE; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 77950918774     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60062-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. De Rouck T., Collys K., and Cosyn J. Single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla by means of immediate implantation and provisionalization: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23 (2008) 897-904
2. Hebel K.S., and Gajjar R. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 28-35
3. Weber H.P., Kim D.M., Ng M.W., Hwang J.W., and Fiorellini J.P. Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: a multi-center, 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 17 (2006) 375-379
4. Pauletto N., Lahiffe B.J., and Walton J.N. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 (1999) 865-868
5. Gapski R., Neugeboren N., Pomeranz A.Z., and Reissner M.W. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23 (2008) 943-946
6. Thomas G.W. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 80 (2009) 1388-1392
7. Dumbrigue H.B., Abanomi A.A., and Cheng L.L. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 87 (2002) 112-114
8. Schwedhelm E.R., Lepe X., and Aw T.C. A crown venting technique for the cementation of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 89-90
9. Wadhwani C.P., and Piñeyro A. Technique for controlling the cement for an implant crown. J Prosthet Dent 102 (2009) 57-58
10. O'Rourke B., Walls A.W., and Wassell R.W. Radiographic detection of overhangs formed by resin composite luting agents. J Dent 23 (1995) 353-357
11. Soares C.J., Santana F.R., Fonseca R.B., Martins L.R., and Neto F.H. In vitro analysis of the radiodensity of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems and its influence on the detection of cement overhangs. Clin Oral Investig 11 (2007) 331-336
12. Fonseca R.B., Branco C.A., Soares P.V., Correr-Sobrinho L., Haiter-Neto F., Fernandes-Neto A.J., et al. Radiodensity of base, liner and luting dental materials. Clin Oral Investig 10 (2006) 114-118
13. Devito K.L., Ortega A.I., and Haiter-Neto F. Radiopacity of calcium hydroxide cement compared with human tooth structure. J Appl Oral Sci 12 (2004) 290-293
14. Gu S., Rasimick B.J., Deutsch A.S., and Musikant B.L. Radiopacity of dental materials using a digital X-ray system. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 765-770
15. Rosenstiel S.F., Land M.F., and Crispin B.J. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 280-301
16. Michalakis K.X., Pissiotis A.L., and Hirayama H. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 (2000) 545-549
17. Sheets J.L., Wilcox C., and Wilwerding T. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants. J Prosthodont 17 (2008) 92-96
18. Mansour A., Ercoli C., Graser G., Tallents R., and Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 343-348
19. Pan Y.H., Ramp L.C., Lin C.K., and Liu P.R. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil 34 (2007) 206-212
20. Fraga R.C., Luca-Fraga L.R., and Pimenta L.A. Physical properties of resinous cements: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 27 (2000) 1064-1067
21. Agar J.R., Cameron S.M., Hughbanks J.C., and Parker M.H. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 43-47
22. Begoña Ormaechea M.B., Millstein P., and Hirayama H. Tube angulation effect on radiographic analysis of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1 (1999) 77-85
23. Chen S.K., Hollender L., and Omnell K.A. Detection of small differences in mass using a direct digital dental X-ray system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26 (1997) 63-66
24. Svenson B., Gröndahl H.G., Petersson A., and Olving A. Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds. Swed Dent J 9 (1985) 37-43
25. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049:2009. Dentistry - polymer-based restorative materials (2009), ISO, Geneva. Available at: http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/ISOstore/store.html Accessed September 16, 2009.
26. th ed: principles and interpretation (2009), Elsevier, St. Louis 59-60 152-3.
27. American Dental Association. ADA/FDA guide to patient selection for dental radiographs (2004), ADA, Chicago. Available at: http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/topics/radiography.asp#radiograph Accessed September 9, 2009.