Divisible Transition Systems and Multiplanar Dependency Parsing

Computational Linguistics

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 799-845

  Gómez Rodríguez, Carlos ^a   Nivre, Joakim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY;

COMPLEX TRANSITIONS; DEPENDENCY GRAPHS; DEPENDENCY PARSING; DEPENDENCY TREES; ELEMENTARY TRANSITION; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; MULTIPLE STACKS; TRANSITION SYSTEM;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 84888117621     PISSN: 08912017     EISSN: 15309312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/COLI_a_00150     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Afonso, Susana, Eckhard Bick, Renato Haber, and Diana Santos. 2002. "Floresta sintá(c)tica": A treebank for Portuguese. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002), pages 1,968-1,703, Paris.
2. Atalay, Nart B., Kemal Oflazer, and Bilge Say. 2003. The annotation process in the Turkish treebank. In Proceedings of EACL Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC-03), pages 243-246, Morristown, NJ.
3. Attardi, Giuseppe. 2006. Experiments with a multilanguage non-projective dependency parser. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 166-170, New York, NY.
4. Bikel, Daniel M. and Vittorio Castelli. 2008. Event matching using the transitive closure of dependency relations. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, Short Papers, pages 145-148, Columbus, OH.
5. Bodirsky, Manuel, Marco Kuhlmann, and Mattias Möhl. 2005. Well-nested drawings as models of syntactic structure. In Proceedings of FG-MoL 2005: The 10th Conference on Formal Grammar, pages 195-203, Edinburgh.
6. Böhmová, Alena, Jan Hajič, Eva Hajičová, and Barbora Hladká. 2003. The Prague Dependency Treebank: A three-level annotation scenario. In Anne Abeillé, editor, Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Kluwer, pages 103-127.
7. Brants, Sabine, Stefanie Dipper, Silvia Hansen, Wolfgang Lezius, and George Smith. 2002. TIGER treebank. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 24-42, Sozopol.
8. Buchholz, Sabine and Erwin Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 149-164, New York, NY.
9. Buyko, Ekaterina and Udo Hahn. 2010. Evaluating the impact of alternative dependency graph encodings on solving event extraction tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 982-992, Cambridge, MA.
10. Carreras, Xavier. 2007. Experiments with a higher-order projective dependency parser. In Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pages 957-961, Prague.
11. Cohen, Shay B., Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez, and Giorgio Satta. 2011. Exact inference for generative probabilistic non-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2011), pages 1,234-1,245, Edinburgh.
12. Cormen, Thomas H., Charles E. Leiserson, and Ronald L. Rivest. 1990. Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press.
13. Covington, Michael A. 2001. A fundamental algorithm for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Southeast Conference, pages 95-102, Athens, GA.
14. Culotta, Aron and Jeffery Sorensen. 2004. Dependency tree kernels for relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 423-429, Barcelona.
15. Eisner, Jason M. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 340-345, Copenhagen.
16. Goldberg, Yoav and Michael Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algorithm for easy-first non-directional dependency parsing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL HLT), pages 742-750, Los Angeles, CA.
17. Gómez-Rodríguez, Carlos, John Carroll, and David Weir. 2011. Dependency parsing schemata and mildly non-projective dependency parsing. Computational Linguistics, 37(3):541-586.
18. Gómez-Rodríguez, Carlos and Joakim Nivre. 2010. A transition-based parser for 2-planar dependency structures. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 1,492-1,501, Uppsala.
19. Gómez-Rodríguez, Carlos, David Weir, and John Carroll. 2009. Parsing mildly non-projective dependency structures. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pages 291-299, Athens.
20. Hajič, Jan, Jarmila Panevová, Eva Hajičová, Jarmila Panevová, Petr Sgall, Petr Pajas, Jan Štěpánek, Jiří Havelka, and Marie Mikulová. 2006. Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0. CDROM CAT: LDC2006T01, ISBN 1-58563-370-4. Linguistic Data Consortium.
21. Hajič, Jan, Otakar Smrž, Petr Zemánek, Jan Šnaidauf, and Emanuel Beška. 2004. Prague Arabic Dependency Treebank: Development in data and tools. In Proceedings of the NEMLAR International Conference on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, pages 110-117, Cairo.
22. Hajič, Jan, Barbora Vidova Hladka, Jarmila Panevová, Eva Hajičová, Petr Sgall, and Petr Pajas. 2001. Prague Dependency Treebank 1.0. LDC, 2001T10.
23. Havelka, Jiri. 2007. Beyond projectivity: Multilingual evaluation of constraints and measures on non-projective structures. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 608-615, Prague.
24. Huang, Liang, Wenbin Jiang, and Qun Liu. 2009. Bilingually-constrained (monolingual) shift-reduce parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1,222-1,231, Suntec.
25. Huang, Liang and Kenji Sagae. 2010. Dynamic programming for linear-time incremental parsing. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 1,077-1,086, Uppsala.
26. Hudson, Richard A. 1990. English Word Grammar. Blackwell.
27. Johansson, Richard and Pierre Nugues. 2006. Investigating multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 206-210, New York, NY.
28. Kahane, Sylvain, Alexis Nasr, and Owen Rambow. 1998. Pseudo-projectivity: A polynomially parsable non-projective dependency grammar. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) and the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 646-652, Montréal.
29. Karp, Richard M. 1972. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In R. Miller and J. Thatcher, editors, Complexity of Computer Computations. Plenum Press, pages 85-103.
30. Koo, Terry and Michael Collins. 2010. Efficient third-order dependency parsers. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 1-11, Uppsala.
31. Koo, Terry, Alexander M. Rush, Michael Collins, Tommi Jaakkola, and David Sontag. 2010. Dual decomposition for parsing with non-projective head automata. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1,288-1,298, Cambridge, MA.
32. Kromann, Matthias Trautner. 2003. The Danish Dependency Treebank and the DTAG treebank tool. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 217-220, Växjö.
33. Kuhlmann, Marco. 2010. Dependency Structures and Lexicalized Grammars: An Algebraic Approach, volume 6270 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer.
34. Kuhlmann, Marco, Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez, and Giorgio Satta. 2011. Dynamic programming algorithms for transition-based dependency parsers. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 673-682, Portland, OR.
35. Kuhlmann, Marco and Mathias Möhl. 2007. Mildly context-sensitive dependency languages. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 160-167, Prague.
36. Kuhlmann, Marco and Joakim Nivre. 2006. Mildly non-projective dependency structures. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions, pages 507-514, Sydney.
37. Kuhlmann, Marco and Giorgio Satta. 2009. Treebank grammar techniques for non-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pages 478-486, Athens.
38. Maier, Wolfgang and Timm Lichte. 2009. Characterizing discontinuity in constituent treebanks. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Formal Grammar, pages 164-179, Opole.
39. Marcus, Mitchell P., Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313-330.
40. Marcus, Mitchell P., Beatrice Santorini, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, Robert MacIntyre, Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, and Britta Schasberger. 1994. The Penn Treebank: Annotating predicate-argument structure. In Proceedings of the ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, pages 114-119, Plainsboro, NJ.
41. Martins, Andre, Noah Smith, and Eric Xing. 2009. Concise integer linear programming formulations for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP (ACL-IJCNLP), pages 342-350, Suntec.
42. Martins, Andre, Noah Smith, Eric Xing, Pedro Aguiar, and Mario Figueiredo. 2010. Turbo parsers: Dependency parsing by approximate variational inference. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 34-44, Cambridge, MA.
43. McDonald, Ryan, Koby Crammer, and Fernando Pereira. 2005. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 91-98, Ann Arbor, MI.
44. McDonald, Ryan and Joakim Nivre. 2007. Characterizing the errors of data-driven dependency parsing models. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pages 122-131, Prague.
45. McDonald, Ryan and Fernando Pereira. 2006. Online learning of approximate dependency parsing algorithms. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pages 81-88, Trento.
46. McDonald, Ryan and Giorgio Satta. 2007. On the complexity of non-projective data-driven dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 122-131, Prague.
47. Mel'čuk, Igor. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press.
48. Nakagawa, Tetsuji. 2007. Multilingual dependency parsing using global features. In Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pages 952-956, Prague.
49. Nilsson, Jens, Johan Hall, and Joakim Nivre. 2005. MAMBA meets TIGER: Reconstructing a Swedish treebank from Antiquity. In Proceedings of the NODALIDA Special Session on Treebanks, pages 121-132, Joensuu.
50. Nivre, Joakim. 2003. An efficient algorithm for projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 149-160, Nancy.
51. Nivre, Joakim. 2004. Incrementality in deterministic dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Incremental Parsing: Bringing Engineering and Cognition Together (ACL), pages 50-57, Barcelona.
52. Nivre, Joakim. 2006a. Constraints on non-projective dependency graphs. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pages 73-80, Trento.
53. Nivre, Joakim. 2006b. Inductive Dependency Parsing. Springer.
54. Nivre, Joakim. 2007. Incremental non-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL HLT), pages 396-403, Rochester, NY.
55. Nivre, Joakim. 2008. Algorithms for deterministic incremental dependency parsing. Computational Linguistics, 34:513-553.
56. Nivre, Joakim. 2009. Non-projective dependency parsing in expected linear time. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP (ACL-IJCNLP), pages 351-359, Suntec.
57. Nivre, Joakim, Johan Hall, and Jens Nilsson. 2004. Memory-based dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 49-56, Boston, MA.
58. Nivre, Joakim, Johan Hall, and Jens Nilsson. 2006. Maltparser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 2,216-2,219, Genoa.
59. Nivre, Joakim, Johan Hall, Jens Nilsson, Gülsen Eryiǧit, and Svetoslav Marinov. 2006. Labeled pseudo-projective dependency parsing with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 221-225, New York, NY.
60. Nivre, Joakim and Jens Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 99-106, Ann Arbor, MI.
61. Oflazer, Kemal, Bilge Say, Dilek Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, and Gökhan Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. In Anne Abeillé, editor, Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Kluwer, pages 261-277.
62. Quirk, Chris, Arul Menezes, and Colin Cherry. 2005. Dependency treelet translation: Syntactically informed phrasal SMT. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 271-279, Ann Arbor, MI.
63. Riedel, Sebastian and James Clarke. 2006. Incremental integer linear programming for non-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 129-137, Sydney.
64. Sagae, Kenji and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2008. Shift-reduce dependency DAG parsing. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 753-760, Manchester.
65. Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajičová, and Jarmila Panevová. 1986. The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Pragmatic Aspects. Reidel.
66. Shen, Dan and Dietrich Klakow. 2006. Exploring correlation of dependency relation paths for answer extraction. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 889-896, Sydney.
67. Shieber, Stuart M., Yves Schabes, and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 1995. Principles and implementation of deductive parsing. Journal of Logic Programming, 24:3-36.
68. Smith, David and Jason Eisner. 2008. Dependency parsing by belief propagation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 145-156, Waikiki, HI.
69. Stevenson, Mark and Mark A. Greenwood. 2006. Comparing information extraction pattern models. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Extraction Beyond The Document, pages 12-19, Sydney.
70. Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Editions Klincksieck.
71. Titov, Ivan and James Henderson. 2007. A latent variable model for generative dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 144-155, Prague.
72. Tratz, Stephen and Eduard Hovy. 2011. A fast, accurate, non-projective, semantically-enriched parser. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1,257-1,268, Edinburgh.
73. Van der Beek, Leonoor, Gosse Bouma, Robert Malouf, and Gertjan Van Noord. 2002. The Alpino dependency treebank. In Mariet Theune, Anton Nijholt, and Hendri Hondorp, editors, Language and Computers, Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001. Selected Papers from the Twelfth CLIN Meeting, pages 8-22, Rodopi.
74. Xu, Peng, Jaeho Kang, Michael Ringgaard, and Franz Och. 2009. Using a dependency parser to improve SMT for subject-object-verb languages. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL HLT), pages 245-253, Boulder, CO.
75. Yamada, Hiroyasu and Yuji Matsumoto. 2003. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 195-206, Nancy.
76. Yli-Jyrä, Anssi. 2003. Multiplanarity-a model for dependency structures in treebanks. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 189-200, Växjö.
77. Zhang, Yue and Stephen Clark. 2008. A tale of two parsers: Investigating and combining graph-based and transition-based dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 562-571, Waikiki, HI.
78. Zhang, Yue and Joakim Nivre. 2011. Transition-based parsing with rich non-local features. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 188-193, Portland, OR.