Maturity models in the age of digital diversity: Beyond the Layne & Lee legacy

Innovation and the Public Sector

Volumn 19, Issue , 2012, Pages 205-220

  Andersen, Kim Normann ^a   Henriksen, Helle Zinner ^a   Medaglia, Rony ^a  

^a Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

E government; Layne and Lee; maturity models; PPR; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888082064     PISSN: 18711073     EISSN: 09289038     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-137-3-205     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Layne, K. & Lee, J.W. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model, in: Government Information Quarterly, 18: 122-136
2. Andersen, K. (2004). E-government and public sector process rebuilding. Amsterdam: Kluwer
3. Andersen, K. & Henriksen, H.Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model, in: Government Information Quarterly, 23: 236-248
4. Fountain, J. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
5. Van De Ven, A.H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. USA: Oxford University Press
6. Bretschneider, S. (2003). Information technology, e-government, and institutional change, in: Public Administration Review, 63: 738-744
7. Kraemer, K.L. & King, J.L. (2003). Information technology and administrative reform: Will the time after e-government be different? Irvine, CA: University of California, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations
8. Thomas, J.C. & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13: 83-102
9. Grant, G. & Chao, D. (2005). Developing a generic framework for e-government, in: Journal of Global Information Management, 13: 1-30
10. Reddick, C.G. (2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities, in: Government Information Quarterly, 21: 51-64
11. Yang, K. (2003). Neoinstitutionalism and e-government: Beyond Jane Fountain, in: Social Science Computer Review, 21: 432-442
12. Bloomfield, B.P. & Hayes, N. (2009). Power and organizational transformation through technology: Hybrids of electronic government, in: Organization Studies, 30: 461-487
13. Kearns, I. (2004). Public value and e-government. London: Institute for Public Policy Research
14. Osimo, D. (2010). Government 2.0-Hype, hope, or reality?, in: European Journal of ePractice, 9: 2-4
15. Rosacker, K.N. & Olson, D.L. (2008). Public sector information system critical success factors, in: Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2: 60-70
16. Scott, M., DeLone, W. & Golden, W. (2009). Understanding net benefits: A citizen-based perspective on eGovernment success. ICIS 2009 Proceedings
17. Wang, Y. & Liao, Y. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success, in; Government Information Quarterly, 25: 717-733
18. Danziger, J.N. & Andersen, K. (2002). Impacts of IT on politics and the public sector: Methodological, epistemological, and substantive evidence from the Golden Age of transformation, in: International Journal of Public Administration, 25: 591-627
19. Marcus, L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation, in: Communications of the ACM, 26: 430-444
20. Orlikowsky, W.J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective, in: Information Systems Research, 7: 63-92
21. Piccoli, G. & Ives, B. (2000). Virtual teams: Managerial behavior control's impact on team effectiveness. Brisbane, Australia: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 575-580
22. Kling, R. (1996). Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
23. Andersen, K. & Henriksen, H.Z. (2005). The first leg of e-government research: Domains and application areas 1998-2003, in: International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1: 26-44
24. Traunmüller, R. & Lenk, K. (2002). Electronic government. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA). September 2-6. Aix-en Provence, Springer Verlag, France
25. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B & Weber, C.V. (1991). Capability maturity model for software, Technical Report CMU/SEI-91-TR-24. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University
26. Lancaster, G. & Massingham, L. (1993). Marketing management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company
27. Robson, W. (1997). Strategic management and information systems. London: Pitman Publishing
28. Galliers, R.D. & Sutherland, A.R. (1991). Information systems management and strategy formulation: The Stages of Growth model revisited, in: Journal of Information Systems, 1: 89-114
29. King, J.L. & Kraemer, K.L. (1984). Evolution and organizational information systems: An assessment of Nolan's stage model, in: Communications of the ACM, 27: 466-475
30. Baum, C. & Di Maio, A. (2000). Gartner's four phases of e-government model. Gartner Group Report No. COM-12-6173
31. Deloitte & Touche (2001). The citizen as customer. CMA Management, 74(10): 58
32. Hiller, J. & Bélanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. Arlington, VA: Pricewaterhouse Coopers Endowment for the business of Government
33. United Nations Public Administration Network. (2010). E-government survey 2010: Leveraging egovernment at a time of financial and economic crisis. New York: United Nations
34. OECD (2003). The eGovernment imperative: Main findings. Paris: OECD
35. OECD (2009). Rethinking e-government services: User-centred approaches. Paris: OECD
36. Moon, M.J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?, in: Public Administration Review, 62: 424-433
37. Stamoulis, D.G., Georgiadis, P. & Markatos, D. (2001). Revisiting public information management for effective e-government services, in: Information Management & Computer Security, 9: 146-153
38. Siau, K. & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models-A meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach, in: Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105: 443-458
39. Sørum, H., Medaglia, R. & Andersen, K. (2009). Assessment of website quality: Scandinavian web awards right on track?, in: Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5693(224998): 198-209
40. Sørum, H., Andersen, K., Medaglia, R. & Berntzen, L. (2009). Going backstage: Public web awards assessment ceremonies. eChallenges e-2009 Conference Proceedings
41. Andersen, K., Sørum, H. & Medaglia, R. (2009). E-government awards: Five propositions on advancing their value. In J. Gøtze & C.B. Pedersen (Eds.), State of the eUnion: Government 2.0 and Onwards (pp. 290-302). 21Gov.net
42. World Bank (2003). A definition of e-government. Washington, DC: The World Bank
43. United Nations (2003). World public sector report: E-government at the crossroads. New York, NY: United Nations
44. Heeks, R. & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice, in: Government Information Quarterly, 24(2): 243-265
45. Halaris, C., Magoutas, B., Papadomichelaki, X. & Mentzas, G. (2007). Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e-government services, in; Internet Services, 17: 378-401
46. Titah, R. & Barki, H. (2006). E-government adoption and acceptance: A literature review, in: International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2: 23-57
47. Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward, in: Government Information Quarterly, 24: 646-665
48. Teicher, J., Hughes, O. & Dow, N. (2002). E-government: A new route to public sector quality, in: Managing Service Quality, 12: 384-393
49. Clark, E. (2003). Managing the transformation to e-government: An Australian perspective, in: Thunderbird International Business Review, 45: 377-397
50. Andersen, K. & Medaglia, R. (2009). Online health consultations: Demand and channel management. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 36
51. Andersen, K., Henriksen, H.Z. & Rasmussen, E.B. (2007). Re-organizing government using IT: The Danish model. In P.G. Nixon & V.N. Koutrakou (Eds.), E-government in Europe: Re-booting the state (pp. 103-118). London: Routledge
52. The Economist Intelligence Unit (2009). E-readiness rankings 2009: The usage imperative. London, New York, Hong Kong: The Economist