A new fuzzy network data envelopment analysis model for measuring the performance of agility in supply chains

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 69, Issue 1-4, 2013, Pages 291-318

  Khalili Damghani, Kaveh ^a   Tavana, Madjid ^b  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fuzzy DEA; Mathematical programming; Network DEA; Supply chain performance

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EFFICIENCY; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; SUPPLY CHAINS;

COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT; DECISION MAKING UNIT; FUZZY DEA; GLOBAL OPTIMUM SOLUTIONS; INTERVAL EFFICIENCY; NETWORK DEA; ORGANIZATIONAL UNITS; SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE;

FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 84887817162     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-5021-y     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abtahi AR, Khalili-Damghani K (2011) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis for measuring agility performance of supply chains. Int J Model Oper Manag 1(3):263-288
2. Amirteimoori A, Khoshandam L (2011) A data envelopment analysis approach to supply chain efficiency. Adv Decis Sci. doi: 10.1155/2011/608324, Article ID 608324, 8 pages
3. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078-1092
4. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429-444
5. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (1994) Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology, and application. Kluwer, Norwell
6. Chen Ch-M (2009) Evaluation and design of supply chain operations using DEA. PhD Thesis, ERIM PhD Series in Research in Management, 172, Reference number ERIM: EPS-2009-172-LIS
7. Chen C, Yan H (2011) Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 213:147-155
8. Chen Y, Zhu J (2004) Measuring information technology's indirect impact on firm performance. Inform Technol Manag J 5(1-2):9-22
9. Chen Y, Liang L, Yang F, Zhu J (2006) Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach. Comput Oper Res 33(5):1368-1379
10. Chen Y, Cook WD, Li N, Zhu J (2009) Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Eur J Oper Res 196:1170-1176
11. Christopher M (2000) The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Ind Mark Manag 29:37-44
12. Christopher M, Towill D (2000) Supply chain migration from lean and functional to agile and customized. Supply Chain Manag 5(4):206-213
13. Cook WD, Seiford LM (2009) Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - thirty years on. Eur J Oper Res 192:1-17
14. Cook WD, Liang L, Zhu J (2010) Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega 38:423-430
15. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006) Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses with DEA solver software and references. Springer Science and Business Media, New York
16. Despotis DK, Smirlis YG (2002) Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. Eur J Oper Res 140:24-36
17. Dong M, Zhi-Ping D (2006) DEA Analysis of Reverse Logistics of Supply Chain Integration Project Choice. J SystSci and Info 4:1-8
18. Dove R (2001) Response ability: the language structure and culture of the agile enterprise. Wiley, New York
19. Emrouznejad A, Parker BR, Tavares G (2008) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio Econ Plan Sci 42:151-157
20. Entani T, Maeda Y, Tanaka H (2002) Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. Eur J Oper Res 136:32-45
21. Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc 120:253-290
22. Goldman SL, Nagel RN, Preiss K (1995) Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
23. Gunasekaran A, Kobu B (2007) Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. Int J Prod Res 45:2819-2840
24. Gunasekaran A, Patel C, Tirtiroglu E (2001) Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int J Oper Prod Manage 21:71-87
25. Gunasekaran A, Patel C, McGaughey RE (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int J Prod Econ 87:333-347
26. Gunasekaran A (1998) Agile manufacturing: enablers and implementation framework. Int J Prod Econ 36(5):1223-1274
27. Günther H-O, Van Beek P (2003) Advanced planning and scheduling in process industry. In: Günther H-O, Van Beek P (eds) Advanced planning and scheduling solutions in process industry. Springer, Berlin, pp 1-7
28. Guo P, Tanaka H (2001) Fuzzy DEA: a perceptual evaluation method. Fuzzy Set Syst 119:149-160
29. Halkos G, Tzeremes N, Kourtzidis S (2011) The use of supply chain DEA models in operations management: A survey. Online at http://mpra.ub.uni- muenchen.de/31846/
30. Hatami-Marbini A, Emrouznejad A, Tavana M (2011) A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making. Eur J Oper Res 214:457-472
31. Hougaard JL (1999) Fuzzy scores of technical efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 115:529-541
32. Ismail HS, Sharifi H (2005) A balanced approach to building agile supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 36:431-444
33. Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Rezai Balf F, Zhiani Rezai H (2008) Using Monte Carlo method for ranking interval data. Appl Math Comput 201:613-620
34. Kao C, Hwang SN (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application on life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 185:418-429
35. Kao C, Liu ST (2000) Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Set Syst 113:427-437
36. Kao C, Liu ST (2003) A mathematical programming approach to fuzzy efficiency ranking. Int J Prod Econ 86:145-154
37. Kao C, Liu ST (2011) Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Set Syst 176:20-35
38. Karsak EE (2008) Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 35:867-874
39. Khalili-Damghani K, Taghavifard M, Olfat L, Feizi K (2011) A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEA and simulation to measure the efficiency of agility in supply chain: real case of dairy industry. Int J Manage Sci Eng Manage 6:163-172
40. Khalili-Damghani K, Taghavifard M (2012) A fuzzy two-stage DEA approach for performance measurement: real case of agility performance in dairy supply chains. Int J Appl Decis Sci 5(4):293-317
41. Khalili-Damghani K, Taghavifard M (2012) A three-stage fuzzy DEA approach to measure performance of a serial process including JIT practices, agility indices, and goals in supply chains. Int J Serv Oper Manag 13(2):147-188
42. Khalili-Damghani K, Taghavifard M, Olfat L, Feizi K (2012) Measuring agility performance in fresh food supply chains: an ordinal two-stage data envelopment analysis. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 4(3/4):206-231
43. Khalili-Damghani K, Taghavifard B (2013) Sensitivity and stability analysis in two-stage DEA models with fuzzy data. Int J Oper Res, Accepted Manuscript In Press
44. Kidd PT (1994) Agile manufacturing: forging new frontiers. Addison-Wesley, London
45. Lertworasirikul S, Fang SC, Joines JA, Nuttle HLW (2003) Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach. Fuzzy Set Syst 139:379-394
46. Lewis HF, Sexton TR (2004) Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Comput Oper Res 31:1365-1410
47. León T, Liern V, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2003) A fuzzy mathematical programming approach to the assessment of efficiency with DEA models. Fuzzy Set Syst 139:407-419
48. Liang L, Yang F, Cook WD, Zhu J (2006) DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Ann Oper Res 145:35-49
49. Liang L, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008) DEA Models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav Res Log 55:643-653
50. Lin C-T, Chiu H, Chu P-Y (2006) Agility index in supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 100:285-299
51. Mishra RK (2012) Measuring supply chain efficiency: a DEA approach. J Oper Supply Chain Manag 5(1):45-68
52. Naylor J (1999) Legality: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 62(1-2):107-118
53. Ovebye E, Baharadwaj A, Sambamurthy V (2000) Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11:404-428
54. Sambamurthy V, Baharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options. MIS Q 27(2):237-263
55. Saranga H, Moser R (2010) Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach. Eur J Oper Res 207:197-205
56. Seiford LM (1997) A bibliography for data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 73:393-438
57. Sharifi H, Zhang Z (1999) A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organization: an introduction. Int J Prod Econ 62(1):7-22
58. Sharp JM, Irani Z, Desai S (1999) Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry. Int J Prod Econ 62(1):155-169
59. Swafford PM, Ghosh S, Murthy N (2006) A framework for assessing value chain agility. Int J Oper Prod Manage 26(2):118-140
60. White A, Daniel EM, Mohdzain M (2005) The role of emergent information technologies and systems in enabling supply chain agility. Info Manage 25(5):394-410
61. Wang Y-M, Chin KS (2010) Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process. Expert Syst Appl 37:8799-8808
62. Wong W-P, Wong K-Y (2007) Supply chain performance measurement system using DEA modeling. Ind Manag Data Syst 107(3):361-381
63. Xu J, Li B, Wu D (2009) Rough data envelopment analysis and its application to supply chain performance evaluation. Int J Prod Econ 122:628-638
64. Yusuf Y, Gunasekaran A (1999) Agile manufacturing: the driver concepts and attributes. Int J Prod Econ 62:34-43
65. Yusuf Y, Gunasekaran A, Adeleye EO, Sivayoganathan K (2004) Agile supply chain capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur J Oper Res 159:379-392
66. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Set Syst 1:3-28
67. Zerafat Angiz L, Emrouznejad A, Mustafa A (2010) Fuzzy assessment of performance of a decision making units using DEA: a non-radial approach. Expert Syst Appl 37(7):5153-5157
68. Zhu J (2003) Imprecise data envelopment analysis: a review and improvement with an application. Eur J Oper Res 144:513-529
69. Zimmermann H-J (1996) Fuzzy set theory and its applications, 3rd edn. Kluwer, Boston