A hybrid approach based on fuzzy dea and simulation to measure the efficiency of agility in supply chain: Real case of dairy industry

International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 163-172

  Khalili Damghani, Kaveh ^a   Taghavifard, Mohammad ^a   Olfat, Laya ^a   Feizi, Kamran ^a  

^a ALLAMEH TABATABA'I UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Agile supply chain; Fuzzy data envelopment analysis; Iranian Dairy Industry; Supply chain management

Indexed keywords

EID: 83755176680     PISSN: 17509653     EISSN: 17509661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17509653.2011.10671160     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Angiz, L., Emrouznejad, A., and Mustafa, A., 2010. Fuzzy assessment of performance of a decision making units using DEA:A non-radial approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 37:5153–5157.
2. Banker, R., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W., 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30:1078–1092.
3. Bullinger, H., 1999. Turbulent time requires creative thinking:New European concepts in production management. International Journal of Production Economics, 60–61:9–27.
4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal Operational Research, 2:429–444.
5. Christopher, M., 2000. The Agile Supply Chain:Competing in Volatile Markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29:37–44.
6. Christopher, M., and Towill, D., 2000. Supply chain migration from lean and functional to agile and customized. Supply Chain Management, 5 (4):206–213.
7. Cook, W., and Seiford, L., 2009. Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192:1–17.
8. Cooper, M., and Ellram, L., 1993. Characteristics of Supply Chain Management and the Implication for purchasing and logistics strategies. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 4 (2):13–24.
9. Cooper, W., Seiford, L., and Tone, K., 2006. Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and its uses with DEA solver software and references, New York:Springer Science and Business Media.
10. Despotis, D., and Smirlis, Y., 2002. Data Envelopment Analysis with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research, 140:24–36.
11. Dove, R., 2001. Response ability:the language structure and culture of the agile enterprise, New York:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
12. Entani, T., Maeda, Y., and Tanaka, H., 2002. Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. European Journal of Operational Research, 136:32–45.
13. Finn, R., and Sarafoglou, N., 2002. On the Origins of Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17:23–40.
14. Goldman, S., Nagel, R., and Preiss, K., 1995. Agile competitors and virtual organizations:strategies for enriching the customer, New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
15. Gunasekaran, A., 1998. Agile manufacturing:enablers and implementation framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 36 (5):1223–1274.
16. Guo, P., and Tanaka, H., 2001. Fuzzy DEA:a perceptual evaluation method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 119:149–160.
17. Harrison, A., and Van Hoak, R., 2005. Logistic Management and Strategy, Prentice-Hall.
18. Hatami-Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., and Tavana, M., 2011. A Taxonomy and Review of the Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis Literature:Two Decades in the Making. European Journal of Operational Research, Doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.001
19. Hougaard, J., 1999. Fuzzy scores of technical efficiency. European Journal Operational Research, 115:529–541.
20. Hougaard, J., 2005. A simple approximation of productivity scores of fuzzy production plans. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 152:455–465.
21. Ismail, H., and Sharif, H., 2005. A balanced approach to building agile supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36 (6):431–444.
22. Jahanshahloo G., et al. Using Monte Carlo method for ranking interval data Applied Mathematics and Computations 2008 201 613 620
23. Jahanshahloo, G., Soleimani-damaneh, M., and Nasrabadi, E., 2004. Measure of efficiency in DEA with fuzzy input-output levels:a methodology for assessing ranking and imposing of weights restrictions. Applied Mathematics and Computations, 156:175–187.
24. Kao, C., and Liu, S., 2000. Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 113:27–437.
25. Kao, C., and Liu, S., 2003. A mathematical programming approach to fuzzy efficiency ranking. International Journal of Production Economics, 86:145–154.
26. Karsak, E., 2008. Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35:867–874.
27. Kidd, P., 1994. Agile manufacturing:Forging new frontiers, London:Addison-Wesley.
28. Leon T., et al. A fuzzy mathematical programming approach to the assessment of efficiency with DEA models Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2003 139 407 419
29. Lertworasirikul S., et al. Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA):a possibility approach Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2003 139 379 394
30. Lin, C., Chiu, H., and Chu, P., 2006. Agility index in supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 100 (2):285–299.
31. Liu, S., 2008. A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 54:66–76.
32. Liu, S., and Chuang, M., 2009. Fuzzy efficiency measures in fuzzy DEA/AR with application to university libraries. Expert Systems with Applications, 36:1105–1113.
33. Naylor, J., 1999. Leagility:Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62 (1-2):107–118.
34. Ovebye, E., Baharadwaj, A., and Sambamurthy, V., 2000. Enterprise Agility and the Enabling Role of information technology in organizations. Organization Science,:404–428.
35. Ross, T., 2004. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, 2nd, New York:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
36. Sambamurthy, V., Baharadwaj, A., and Grover, V., 2003. Shaping Agility through Digital options. MIS Quarterly, 27 (2):237–263.
37. Seiford, L., 1997. A bibliography for Data Envelopment Analysis. Annals Operations Research, 73:393–438.
38. Sharifi, H., and Zhang, Z., 1999. A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organization:An introduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 62 (1):7–22.
39. Sharp, J., Irani, Z., and Desai, S., 1999. Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 62 (1):155–169.
40. Stratton, R., and Warburton, R., 2003. The strategic integration of agile and lean supply. International Journal of Production Economics, 85:183–198.
41. Swafford, P., Ghosh, S., and Murthy, N., 2006. A framework for assessing value chain agility. International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 26 (2):118–140.
42. Van Hoak, R., 2005. “ Mitigating the Minefield of Pitfalls in Creating Agile Supply Chain ”. In International Conference of Agility In
43. White, A., Daniel, E., and Mohdzain, M., 2005. The role of emergent information technologies and systems in enabling supply chain agility. Information Management, 25 (5):394–410.
44. Yusuf, Y., and Gunasekaran, A., 1999. Agile manufacturing:the driver concepts and attributes. International Journal of production economics, 62:34–43.
45. Zadeh, L., 1978. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1:3–28.
46. Zhu, J., 2003. Imprecise data envelopment analysis:A review and improvement with an application. European Journal of Operational Research, 144:513–529.
47. Zimmermann, H., 1996. Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, 11–38. Boston, Dordrecht, London:Kluwer Academic Publishers.