Rough data envelopment analysis and its application to supply chain performance evaluation

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 628-638

  Xu, Jiuping ^a   Li, Bin ^a   Wu, Desheng ^b,c  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b REYKJAVIK UNIVERSITY   (Iceland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Performance evaluation; Rough data envelopment analysis (RDEA); Rough programming; Supply chain management

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX DECISION; DEA MODELS; EVALUATION PROCESS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ROUGH DATA; ROUGH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (RDEA); ROUGH PROGRAMMING; SOLUTION APPROACH; SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORK; SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY FACTORS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FURNITURE MANUFACTURE; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; ROUGH SET THEORY; SUPPLY CHAINS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 70350575202     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.026     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Amirteimoori A., Jahanshahloo G.R., and Kordrostami S. Ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis: a distancebased approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation 171 1 (2005) 122-135
2. Azoulay-Schwartz R., Kraus S., and Wilkenfeld J. Exploitation vs. exploration: choosing a supplier in an environment of incomplete information. Decision Support Systems 38 1 (2004) 1-18
3. Barbarosoglu G., and Yazgac T. An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Production and Inventory Management Journal 38 1 (1997) 14-21
4. Cebi F., and Bayraktar D. An integrated approach for supplier selection. Logistics Information Management 16 6 (2003) 395-400
5. Chan F.T.S. Performance measurement in a supply chain. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 21 7 (2003) 534-548 (Springer, London)
6. Charnes A., et al. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 26 (1978)
7. Chow G., Heaver T.D., and Henriksson L.E. Logistics performance: definition and measurement. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 24 1 (1994) 17-28
8. Easton L., Murphy D.J., and Pearson J.N. Purchasing performance evaluation: with data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 8 (2002) 123-134
9. Haung Z., and Li S.X. Stochastic DEA models with different types of input-output disturbances. Journal of Productivity Analysis 15 2 (2001) 95-113
10. Hill R.P., and Nydick R.J. Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 28 2 (1992) 31-36
11. Jahanshahloo G.R., Pourkarimi L., and Zarepisheh M. Modified MAJ model for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation 174 2 (2006) 1054-1059
12. Kleinsorge I.K. Data envelopment analysis for monitoring customer-supplier relationships. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 114 (1992) 357-372
13. Kumar M., Vrat P., and Shankar R. A fuzzy goal programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. Computers &Industrial Engineering 46 1 (2004) 69-85
14. Liu B.D. Uncertain Theory: An Introduction to its Axiomatic Foundation (2004), Springer, Berlin
15. Lummus R.R., Vokurka R.J., and Alber K.L. Strategic supply chain planning. Production and Inventory Management Journal 3 (1998) 49-58
16. Ma S.H. Supply Chain Management (2000), China Machine Press, (in chinese)
17. Martin D. Sensitivity analysis of complex models. Biological Conservation 86 (1998) 401-412
18. Narasimhan R., Talluri S., and Mendez D. Supplier evaluation and rationalization via data envelopment analysis: an empirical examination. Journal of Supply Chain Management 37 3 (2001) 28-37
19. Ohdar R., and Ray P.K. Performance measurement and evaluation of suppliers in supply chain: an evolutionary fuzzy-based approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 15 8 (2004) 723-734
20. PRTM. Scor model [EB/OL]. 〈http://www.supply-chain.org/html/scor/overview〉, cfn, May 2000.
21. Quariguasi Frota Neto J. A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks. European Journal of Operational Research (2007) 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.056
22. Ross A., and Droge C. An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling. Journal of Operations Management 20 (2002) 19-32
23. Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., and Hadad Y. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. International Transactions in Operational Research 7 2 (2000) 109-124
24. Talluria S., Narasimhana R., and Nairb A. Vendor performance with supply risk: a chance-constrained DEA approach. International Journal of Production Economics 100 (2006) 212-222
25. Wang Y.M., Greatbanks R., and Yang J.B. Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 153 3 (2005) 347-370
26. Weber C.A., and Desai A. Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research 108 (1998) 208-223
27. Wu D. Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research 194 (2009) 227-235
28. WU D.S., and Olson D.L. A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation. International Journal of Production Research (2007) 1-15
29. Wu D., and Olson D.L. Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection. International Journal of Production Economics 114 (2008) 645-655
30. Wu, D., Zhang, Y., Wu, D., Olson, D.L., 2009. Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach. European Journal of Operational Research, in press.
31. Xu J.P., and Liu Q. A class of multi-objective supply chain networks optimal model under random fuzzy environment and its application to the industry of Chinese liquor. Information Sciences 178 (2008) 2022-2043
32. Xu J.P., and Zhao L.H. A class of fuzzy rough expected value multi-objective decision making model and its application to inventory problems. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 56 (2008) 2107-2119