Metabolite profiling and network analysis reveal coordinated changes in grapevine water stress response

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Hochberg, Uri ^a   Degu, Asfaw ^a   Toubiana, David ^a   Gendler, Tanya ^a   Nikoloski, Zoran ^b   Rachmilevitch, Shimon ^a   Fait, Aaron ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Grapevine; Metabolite profiling; Stress physiology; Vitis vinifera; Water deficit response

Indexed keywords

ABSCISIC ACID; BENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; DEHYDRATION; DROUGHT; FRUIT; METABOLISM; VITIS;

ABSCISIC ACID; BENZOATES; DEHYDRATION; DROUGHTS; FRUIT; VITIS;

EID: 84887803648     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-184     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Flexas J, Galmés J, Gallé A, Gulias J, Pou A, Ribas-Carbo M, Tomàs M, Medrano H. Improving water use efficiency in grapevines: potential physiological targets for biotechnological improvement. Aust J Grape Wine Res 2010, 16(s1):106-121.
2. Gómez-del-Campo M, Ruiz C, Lissarrague JR. Effect of water stress on leaf area development, photosynthesis, and productivity in Chardonnay and Airén grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 2002, 53(2):138-143.
3. Escalona JM, Flexas J, Medrano H. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis under water stress in field-grown grapevines. Aust J Plant Physiol 1999, 26(5):421-434.
4. Downey MO, Dokoozlian NK, Krstic MP. Cultural practice and environmental impacts on the flavonoid composition of grapes and wine: a review of recent research. Am J Enol Vitic 2006, 57(3):257-268.
5. Lobell DB, Field CB, Cahill KN, Bonfils C. Impacts of future climate change on California perennial crop yields: model projections with climate and crop uncertainties. Agric For Meteorol 2006, 141(2):208-218.
6. Escalona J, Flexas J, Medrano H. Drought effects on water flow, photosynthesis and growth of potted grapevines. Vitis 2002, 41(2):57-62.
7. Chaves M, Santos T, Souza C, Ortuño M, Rodrigues M, Lopes C, Maroco J, Pereira J. Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water-use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality. Ann Appl Biol 2007, 150(2):237-252.
8. Costa JM, Ortuño MF, Chaves MM. Deficit irrigation as a strategy to save water: physiology and potential application to horticulture. J Integr Plant Biol 2007, 49(10):1421-1434.
9. Tarara JM, Lee J, Spayd SE, Scagel CF. Berry temperature and solar radiation alter acylation, proportion, and concentration of anthocyanin in merlot grapes. Am J Enol Vitic 2008, 59(3):235-247.
10. Vandeleur RK, Mayo G, Shelden MC, Gilliham M, Kaiser BN, Tyerman SD. The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Physiol 2009, 149(1):445. 10.1104/pp.108.128645, 2613730, 18987216.
11. Lovisolo C, Perrone I, Carra A, Ferrandino A, Flexas J, Medrano H, Schubert A. Drought-induced changes in development and function of grapevine (Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole-plant level: a physiological and molecular update. Funct Plant Biol 2010, 37(2):98-116.
12. Soar C, Speirs J, Maffei S, Penrose A, McCarthy M, Loveys B. Grape vine varieties Shiraz and Grenache differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue. Aust J Grape Wine Res 2006, 12(1):2-12.
13. Schultz H. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ 2003, 26(8):1393-1405.
14. Alsina M, De Herralde F, Aranda X, Save R, Biel C. Water relations and vulnerability to embolism are not related: experiments with eight grapevine cultivars. Vitis 2007, 46(1):1-6.
15. Chaves MM, Zarrouk O, Francisco R, Costa JM, Santos T, Regalado AP, Rodrigues ML, Lopes CM. Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann Bot 2010, 105(5):661-676. 10.1093/aob/mcq030, 2859908, 20299345.
16. Coupel-Ledru A, Doligez A, Hamard P, Pechier P, Moreno M, Sttichai S, Simonneau T, Christophe A, This P, Lebone E. Iso or anisohydry in a Syrah X Grenache progeny: do stomata matter? IX International symposium on grapevine physiology and biotechnology. Acta Horticult 2013, in press.
17. Vendruscolo ECG, Schuster I, Pileggi M, Scapim CA, Molinari HBC, Marur CJ, Vieira LGE. Stress-induced synthesis of proline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. J Plant Physiol 2007, 164(10):1367-1376. 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.001, 17604875.
18. Asada K. The role of ascorbate peroxidase and monodehydroascorbate reductase in H 2 O 2 scavenging in plants. Cold Spring Harbor Monogr Archive 1997, 34:715-735.
19. Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Plant Biol 2004, 55:373-399.
20. Cramer GR, Ergül A, Grimplet J, Tillett RL, Tattersall EAR, Bohlman MC, Vincent D, Sonderegger J, Evans J, Osborne C. Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Function Integr Genomics 2007, 7(2):111-134.
21. Cramer G. Abiotic stress and plant responses from the whole vine to the genes. Aust J Grape Wine Res 2010, 16:86-93.
22. Cramer GR, Van Sluyter SC, Hopper DW, Pascovici D, Keighley T, Haynes PA. Proteomic analysis indicates massive changes in metabolism prior to the inhibition of growth and photosynthesis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in response to water deficit. BMC Plant Biology 2013, 13(1):49. 10.1186/1471-2229-13-49, 3608200, 23514573.
23. Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na/H antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 1999, 285(5431):1256-1258. 10.1126/science.285.5431.1256, 10455050.
24. Maurel C. Aquaporins and water permeability of plant membranes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 1997, 48(1):399-429.
25. Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 2006, 45(4):523-539. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02593.x, 16441347.
26. Cramer GR, Urano K, Delrot S, Pezzotti M, Shinozaki K. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol 2011, 11(1):163. 10.1186/1471-2229-11-163, 3252258, 22094046.
27. Kreps JA, Wu Y, Chang HS, Zhu T, Wang X, Harper JF. Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol 2002, 130(4):2129-2141. 10.1104/pp.008532, 166725, 12481097.
28. Chen W, Provart NJ, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F, Chang HS, Eulgem T, Mauch F, Luan S, Zou G, Whitham SA. Expression profile matrix of Arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses. Plant Cell Online 2002, 14(3):559.
29. Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J, Nanjo T, Fujita M, Oono Y, Kamiya A, Nakajima M, Enju A, Sakurai T. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 2002, 31(3):279-292. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01359.x, 12164808.
30. Boss PK, Davies C, Robinson SP. Expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway genes in red and white grapes. Plant Mol Biol 1996, 32(3):565-569. 10.1007/BF00019111, 8980508.
31. Waters DLE, Holton TA, Ablett EM, Lee LS, Henry RJ. cDNA microarray analysis of developing grape (Vitis vinifera cv. Shiraz) berry skin. Function Integr Genomics 2005, 5(1):40-58.
32. Vincent D, Ergul A, Bohlman MC, Tattersall EAR, Tillett RL, Wheatley MD, Woolsey R, Quilici DR, Joets J, Schlauch K. Proteomic analysis reveals differences between vitis vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet sauvignon and their responses to water deficit and salinity. J Exp Bot 2007, 58(7):1873-1892. 10.1093/jxb/erm012, 17443017.
33. Grimplet J, Wheatley MD, Jouira HB, Deluc LG, Cramer GR, Cushman JC. Proteomic and selected metabolite analysis of grape berry tissues under well-watered and water-deficit stress conditions. Proteomics 2009, 9(9):2503-2528. 10.1002/pmic.200800158, 19343710.
34. Zamboni A, Di Carli M, Guzzo F, Stocchero M, Zenoni S, Ferrarini A, Tononi P, Toffali K, Desiderio A, Lilley KS. Identification of putative stage-specific grapevine berry biomarkers and omics data integration into networks. Plant Physiol 2010, 154(3):1439-1459. 10.1104/pp.110.160275, 2971619, 20826702.
35. Toubiana D, Fernie AR, Nikoloski Z, Fait A. Network analysis: tackling complex data to study plant metabolism. Trends Biotechnol 2012, 31(1):29-36.
36. Caldana C, Degenkolbe T, Cuadros-Inostroza A, Klie S, Sulpice R, Leisse A, Steinhauser D, Fernie AR, Willmitzer L, Hannah MA. High-density kinetic analysis of the metabolomic and transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis to eight environmental conditions. Plant J 2011, 67(5):869-884. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04640.x, 21575090.
37. Hirai MY, Klein M, Fujikawa Y, Yano M, Goodenowe DB, Yamazaki Y, Kanaya S, Nakamura Y, Kitayama M, Suzuki H. Elucidation of gene-to-gene and metabolite-to-gene networks in Arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics. J Biol Chem 2005, 280(27):25590-25595. 10.1074/jbc.M502332200, 15866872.
38. Chan EK, Rowe HC, Hansen BG, Kliebenstein DJ. The complex genetic architecture of the metabolome. PLoS genetics 2010, 6(11):e1001198. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001198, 2973833, 21079692.
39. Schauer N, Semel Y, Balbo I, Steinfath M, Repsilber D, Selbig J, Pleban T, Zamir D, Fernie AR. Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. Plant Cell Online 2008, 20(3):509-523.
40. Hochberg U, Degu A, Fait A, Rachmilevitch S. Near isohydric grapevine cultivar displays higher photosynthetic efficiency and photorespiration rates under drought stress as compared with near anisohydric grapevine cultivar. Physiol Plant 2012, 147(4):443-453.
41. Humphreys JM, Chapple C. Rewriting the lignin roadmap. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2002, 5(3):224-229. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00257-1, 11960740.
42. Spagou K, Wilson ID, Masson P, Theodoridis G, Raikos N, Coen M, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Plumb RS, Nicholson JK. HILIC-UPLC-MS for exploratory urinary metabolic profiling in toxicological studies. Anal Chem 2011, 83(1):382-390. 10.1021/ac102523q, 21142126.
43. Urano K, Kurihara Y, Seki M, Shinozaki K. 'Omics' analyses of regulatory networks in plant abiotic stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010, 13(2):132-138. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.006, 20080055.
44. Good AG, Zaplachinski ST. The effects of drought stress on free amino acid accumulation and protein synthesis in Brassica napus. Physiol Plant 1994, 90(1):9-14.
45. Yancey PH, Clark ME, Hand SC, Bowlus RD, Somero GN. Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science 1982, 217(4566):1214-1222. 10.1126/science.7112124, 7112124.
46. Delauney AJ, Verma DPS. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J 1993, 4(2):215-223.
47. Szabados L, Savouré A. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 2010, 15(2):89-97. 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009, 20036181.
48. Patakas A, Nikolaou N, Zioziou E, Radoglou K, Noitsakis B. The role of organic solute and ion accumulation in osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed grapevines. Plant Sci 2002, 163(2):361-367.
49. Warren CR, Aranda I, Cano FJ. Metabolomics demonstrates divergent responses of two Eucalyptus species to water stress. Metabolomics 2012, 8(2):186-200.
50. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Novoa I, Lu PD, Calfon M, Sadri N, Yun C, Popko B, Paules R. An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol Cell 2003, 11(3):619-633. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00105-9, 12667446.
51. Kempa S, Krasensky J, Dal Santo S, Kopka J, Jonak C. A central role of abscisic acid in stress-regulated carbohydrate metabolism. PLoS One 2008, 3(12):e3935. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003935, 2593778, 19081841.
52. Less H, Galili G. Principal transcriptional programs regulating plant amino acid metabolism in response to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol 2008, 147(1):316-330. 10.1104/pp.108.115733, 2330312, 18375600.
53. Rachmilevitch S, Cousins AB, Bloom AJ. Nitrate assimilation in plant shoots depends on photorespiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101(31):11506-11510. 10.1073/pnas.0404388101, 509230, 15272076.
54. Bloom AJ, Burger M, Asensio JSR, Cousins AB. Carbon dioxide enrichment inhibits nitrate assimilation in wheat and Arabidopsis. Science 2010, 328(5980):899-903. 10.1126/science.1186440, 20466933.
55. Lillo C. Light regulation of nitrate uptake, assimilation and metabolism. Ecophysiology 2004, 3:149-184.
56. Ferrario-Méry S, Valadier MH, Foyer CH. Overexpression of nitrate reductase in tobacco delays drought-induced decreases in nitrate reductase activity and mRNA. Plant Physiol 1998, 117(1):293-302. 10.1104/pp.117.1.293, 35015, 9576799.
57. Medrano H, Eescalona JM, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J. Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot 2002, 89(7):895-905. 10.1093/aob/mcf079, 12102515.
58. Shatil-Cohen A, Attia Z, Moshelion M. Bundle-sheath cell regulation of xylem-mesophyll water transport via aquaporins under drought stress: a target of xylem-borne ABA?. Plant J 2011, 67(1):72-80. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04576.x, 21401747.
59. Pantin F, Monnet F, Jannaud D, Costa JM, Renaud J, Muller B, Simonneau T, Genty B. The dual effect of abscisic acid on stomata. New Phytol 2013, 197(1):65-72. 10.1111/nph.12013, 23106390.
60. Sreenivasulu N, Harshavardhan VT, Govind G, Seiler C, Kohli A. Contrapuntal role of ABA: Does it mediate stress tolerance or plant growth retardation under long-term drought stress?. Gene 2012, 506(2):265-273. 10.1016/j.gene.2012.06.076, 22771691.
61. Liu L, Cang J, Yu J, Wang X, Huang R, Wang J, Lu B. Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on carbohydrate metabolism and the expression levels of correlative key enzymes in winter wheat under low temperature. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2013, 77(3):516-525.
62. Lecourieux F, Lecourieux D, Vignault C, Delrot S. A sugar-inducible protein kinase, VvSK1, regulates hexose transport and sugar accumulation in grapevine cells. Plant Physiol 2010, 152(2):1096-1106. 10.1104/pp.109.149138, 2815899, 19923236.
63. Pou A, Medrano H, Flexas J, Tyerman SD. A putative role for TIP and PIP aquaporins in dynamics of leaf hydraulic and stomatal conductances in grapevine under water stress and re-watering. Plant Cell Environ 2012, 359:335-349.
64. Pollard M, Beisson F, Li Y, Ohlrogge JB. Building lipid barriers: biosynthesis of cutin and suberin. Trends Plant Sci 2008, 13(5):236-246. 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.003, 18440267.
65. De Simone O, Haase K, Müller E, Junk WJ, Hartmann K, Schreiber L, Schmidt W. Apoplasmic barriers and oxygen transport properties of hypodermal cell walls in roots from four Amazonian tree species. Plant Physiol 2003, 132(1):206-217. 10.1104/pp.102.014902, 166966, 12746526.
66. Graça J. Hydroxycinnamates in suberin formation. Phytochem Rev 2010, 9(1):85-91.
67. Solecka D. Role of phenylpropanoid compounds in plant responses to different stress factors. Acta Physiol Plant 1997, 19(3):257-268.
68. Fukumoto L, Mazza G. Assessing antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem 2000, 48(8):3597-3604. 10.1021/jf000220w, 10956156.
69. Vogt T. Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Mol Plant 2010, 3(1):2-20. 10.1093/mp/ssp106, 20035037.
70. Szalay MS, Kovács IA, Korcsmáros T, Böde C, Csermely P. Stress-induced rearrangements of cellular networks: consequences for protection and drug design. FEBS Lett 2007, 581(19):3675-3680. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.083, 17433306.
71. Sanchez DH, Pieckenstain FL, Szymanski J, Erban A, Bromke M, Hannah MA, Kraemer U, Kopka J, Udvardi MK. Comparative functional genomics of salt stress in related model and cultivated plants identifies and overcomes limitations to translational genomics. PloS one 2011, 6(2):e17094. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017094, 3038935, 21347266.
72. Flexas J, Bota J, Escalona JM, Sampol B, Medrano H. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Funct Plant Biol 2002, 29(4):461-471.
73. Brundrett MC, Enstone DE, Peterson CA. A berberine-aniline blue fluorescent staining procedure for suberin, lignin, and callose in plant tissue. Protoplasma 1988, 146(2):133-142.
74. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with Image J. Biophoton Int 2004, 11(7):36-42.
75. Fernie AR, Aharoni A, Willmitzer L, Stitt M, Tohge T, Kopka J, Carroll AJ, Saito K, Fraser PD, DeLuca V. Recommendations for reporting metabolite data. Plant Cell Online 2011, 23(7):2477-2482.
76. Weckwerth W, Wenzel K, Fiehn O. Process for the integrated extraction, identification and quantification of metabolites, proteins and RNA to reveal their co-regulation in biochemical networks. Proteomics 2004, 4(1):78-83. 10.1002/pmic.200200500, 14730673.
77. Lisec J, Schauer N, Kopka J, Willmitzer L, Fernie AR. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat Protoc 2006, 1(1):387-396. 10.1038/nprot.2006.59, 17406261.
78. Beis A, Zotos A, Patakas A. Influence of sampling time and sap extraction methodology on xylem pH values in two grapevine varieties grown under drought conditions. Environ Exp Bot 2009, 67(2):305-311.
79. Roessner U, Luedemann A, Brust D, Fiehn O, Linke T, Willmitzer L, Fernie AR. Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell Online 2001, 13(1):11-29.
80. Kopka J, Fernie A, Weckwerth W, Gibon Y, Stitt M. Metabolite profiling in plant biology: platforms and destinations. Genome Biol 2004, 5(6):109. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-6-109, 463050, 15186482.
81. Saeed AI, Bhagabati NK, Braisted JC, Liang W, Sharov V, Howe EA, Li J, Thiagarajan M, White JA, Quackenbush J. [9] TM4 Microarray software suite. Meth Enzymol 2006, 411:134-193.
82. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003, 13(11):2498-2504. 10.1101/gr.1239303, 403769, 14597658.
83. Barabási A, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5(2):101-113. 10.1038/nrg1272, 14735121.