The dual effect of abscisic acid on stomata

New Phytologist

Volumn 197, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 65-72

  Pantin, Florent ^a   Monnet, Fabien ^b,c,d,e   Jannaud, Dorothée ^b,c,d   Costa, Joaquim Miguel ^b,c,d   Renaud, Jeanne ^a   Muller, Bertrand ^a   Simonneau, Thierry ^a   Genty, Bernard ^b,c,d  

^a UMR 759 LEPSE   (France)

^b IRFM   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AVIGNON   (France)

Author keywords

ABA; Aquaporin (PIP); Arabidopsis thaliana; Isohydric anisohydric; Leaf hydraulic conductance (Kleaf); Stomatal conductance (gs); Transpiration

Indexed keywords

ABI1 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; ABI2 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; ABSCISIC ACID; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; ARGON; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASE; WATER;

ARGON; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CELL ORGANELLE; EPIDEMIC; GRAVIMETRY; HERB; HORMONE; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MUTATION; PERMEABILITY; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TRANSPIRATION; WATER VAPOR;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; DROUGHT; DRUG EFFECT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PLANT CELL; PLANT EPIDERMIS; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STOMA; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL;

ABSCISIC ACID; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; ARGON; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; DROUGHTS; MUTATION; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASES; PLANT CELLS; PLANT EPIDERMIS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; WATER;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 84870248820     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12013     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ache P, Bauer H, Kollist H, Al-Rasheid KAS, Lautner S, Hartung W, Hedrich R. 2010. Stomatal action directly feeds back on leaf turgor: new insights into the regulation of the plant water status from non-invasive pressure probe measurements. The Plant Journal 62: 1072-1082.
2. Assmann SM, Snyder JA, Lee Y-RJ. 2000. ABA-deficient (aba1) and ABA-insensitive (abi1-1, abi2-1) mutants of Arabidopsis have a wild-type stomatal response to humidity. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 387-395.
3. Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ. 2011. Water supply and demand remain balanced during leaf acclimation of Nothofagus cunninghamii trees. New Phytologist 192: 437-448.
4. Buckley TN. 2005. The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytologist 168: 275-292.
5. Buckley TN, Mott KA. 2002. Dynamics of stomatal water relations during the humidity response: implications of two hypothetical mechanisms. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 407-419.
6. Buckley TN, Mott KA, Farquhar GD. 2003. A hydromechanical and biochemical model of stomatal conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 1767-1785.
7. Buckley TN, Sack L, Gilbert ME. 2011. The role of bundle sheath extensions and life form in stomatal responses to leaf water status. Plant Physiology 156: 962-973.
8. Christmann A, Hoffmann T, Teplova I, Grill E, Müller A. 2005. Generation of active pools of abscisic acid revealed by in vivo imaging of water-stressed Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 137: 209-219.
9. Christmann A, Weiler EW, Steudle E, Grill E. 2007. A hydraulic signal in root-to-shoot signalling of water shortage. The Plant Journal 52: 167-174.
10. Davies WJ, Zhang J. 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42: 55-76.
11. Dewar RC. 2002. The Ball-Berry-Leuning and Tardieu-Davies stomatal models: synthesis and extension within a spatially aggregated picture of guard cell function. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 1383-1398.
12. Endo A, Sawada Y, Takahashi H, Okamoto M, Ikegami K, Koiwai H, Seo M, Toyomasu T, Mitsuhashi W, Shinozaki K et al. 2008. Drought induction of Arabidopsis 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase occurs in vascular parenchyma cells. Plant Physiology 147: 1984-1993.
13. Farquhar GD, Raschke K. 1978. On the resistance to transpiration of the sites of evaporation within the leaf. Plant Physiology 61: 1000-1005.
14. Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. 1998. A study of stomatal mechanics using the cell pressure probe. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 94-100.
15. Galvez-Valdivieso G, Fryer MJ, Lawson T, Slattery K, Truman W, Smirnoff N, Asami T, Davies WJ, Jones AM, Baker NR et al. 2009. The high light response in Arabidopsis involves ABA signaling between vascular and bundle sheath cells. The Plant Cell 21: 2143-2162.
16. Gollan T, Passioura JB, Munns R. 1986. Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13: 459-464.
17. Hose E, Steudle E, Hartung W. 2000. Abscisic acid and hydraulic conductivity of maize roots: a study using cell- and root-pressure probes. Planta 211: 874-882.
18. + channel GORK is involved in regulation of stomatal movements and plant transpiration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 5549-5554.
19. Hummel I, Pantin F, Sulpice R, Piques M, Rolland G, Dauzat M, Christophe A, Pervent M, Bouteillé M, Stitt M et al. 2010. Arabidopsis plants acclimate to water deficit at low cost through changes of carbon usage: an integrated perspective using growth, metabolite, enzyme, and gene expression analysis. Plant Physiology 154: 357-372.
20. 2+ signaling. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61: 561-591.
21. Koiwai H, Nakaminami K, Seo M, Mitsuhashi W, Toyomasu T, Koshiba T. 2004. Tissue-specific localization of an abscisic acid biosynthetic enzyme, AAO3, in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 134: 1697-1707.
22. Koornneef M, Reuling G, Karssen CM. 1984. The isolation and characterization of abscisic acid-insensitive mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiologia Plantarum 61: 377-383.
23. Lebaudy A, Vavasseur A, Hosy E, Dreyer I, Leonhardt N, Thibaud J-B, Véry A-A, Simonneau T, Sentenac H. 2008. Plant adaptation to fluctuating environment and biomass production are strongly dependent on guard cell potassium channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 5271-5276.
24. Leung J, Merlot S, Giraudat J. 1997. The Arabidopsis ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE2 (ABI2) and ABI1 genes encode homologous protein phosphatases 2C involved in abscisic acid signal transduction. The Plant Cell 9: 759-771.
25. 2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25: 785-791.
26. Ludewig M, Dörffling K, Seifert H. 1988. Abscisic acid and water transport in sunflowers. Planta 175: 325-333.
27. Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu D-T, Santoni V. 2008. Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59: 595-624.
28. Merlot S, Gosti F, Guerrier D, Vavasseur A, Giraudat J. 2001. The ABI1 and ABI2 protein phosphatases 2C act in a negative feedback regulatory loop of the abscisic acid signalling pathway. The Plant Journal 25: 295-303.
29. +-ATPase prevents abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure. The EMBO Journal 26: 3216-3226.
30. Merlot S, Mustilli A-C, Genty B, North HM, Lefebvre V, Sotta B, Vavasseur A, Giraudat J. 2002. Use of infrared thermal imaging to isolate Arabidopsis mutants defective in stomatal regulation. The Plant Journal 30: 601-609.
31. Monteith JL. 1995. A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 357-364.
32. Moreshet S, Stanhill G, Koller D. 1968. A radioactive tracer technique for the direct measurement of the diffusion resistance of stomata. Journal of Experimental Botany 19: 460-467.
33. 2 depend on the mesophyll. Plant, Cell & Environment 32: 1479-1486.
34. 2. Plant, Cell & Environment 31: 1299-1306.
35. 2 regulator SLAC1 and its homologues are essential for anion homeostasis in plant cells. Nature 452: 483-486.
36. Okamoto M, Tanaka Y, Abrams SR, Kamiya Y, Seki M, Nambara E. 2009. High humidity induces abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylase in stomata and vasculature to regulate local and systemic abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 149: 825-834.
37. Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schäfer KVR. 1999. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 1515-1526.
38. Pantin F, Simonneau T, Muller B. 2012. Coming of leaf age: control of growth by hydraulics and metabolics during leaf ontogeny. New Phytologist 196: 349-366.
39. Pantin F, Simonneau T, Rolland G, Dauzat M, Muller B. 2011. Control of leaf expansion: a developmental switch from metabolics to hydraulics. Plant Physiology 156: 803-815.
40. Parent B, Hachez C, Redondo E, Simonneau T, Chaumont F, Tardieu F. 2009. Drought and ABA effects on aquaporin content translate into changes in hydraulic conductivity and leaf growth rate: a trans-scale approach. Plant Physiology 149: 2000-2012.
41. Peak D, Mott KA. 2011. A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment 34: 162-178.
42. R Development Core Team. 2008 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
43. Rasband WS. 2009 ImageJ. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Institutes of Health.
44. Sack L, Holbrook NM. 2006. Leaf hydraulics. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57: 361-381.
45. Sack L, Melcher PJ, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM. 2002. The hydraulic conductance of the angiosperm leaf lamina: a comparison of three measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 2177-2184.
46. Sade N, Vinocur BJ, Diber A, Shatil A, Ronen G, Nissan H, Wallach R, Karchi H, Moshelion M. 2009. Improving plant stress tolerance and yield production: is the tonoplast aquaporin SlTIP2;2 a key to isohydric to anisohydric conversion? New Phytologist 181: 651-661.
47. Shatil-Cohen A, Attia Z, Moshelion M. 2011. Bundle-sheath cell regulation of xylem-mesophyll water transport via aquaporins under drought stress: a target of xylem-borne ABA? The Plant Journal 67: 72-80.
48. Shope JC, Peak D, Mott KA. 2008. Stomatal responses to humidity in isolated epidermes. Plant, Cell & Environment 31: 1290-1298.
49. Sibbernsen ED, Mott KA. 2010. Stomatal responses to flooding of the intercellular air spaces suggest a vapor-phase signal between the mesophyll and the guard cells. Plant Physiology 153: 1435-1442.
50. Simonneau T, Barrieu P, Tardieu F. 1998. Accumulation rate of ABA in detached maize roots correlates with root water potential regardless of age and branching order. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 1113-1122.
51. Tardieu F, Davies WJ. 1992. Stomatal response to abscisic acid is a function of current plant water status. Plant Physiology 98: 540-545.
52. Tardieu F, Davies WJ. 1993. Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 16: 341-349.
53. Tardieu F, Simonneau T. 1998. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 419-432.
54. Thompson AJ, Andrews J, Mulholland BJ, McKee JMT, Hilton HW, Horridge JS, Farquhar GD, Smeeton RC, Smillie IRA, Black CR et al. 2007. Overproduction of abscisic acid in tomato increases transpiration efficiency and root hydraulic conductivity and influences leaf expansion. Plant Physiology 143: 1905-1917.
55. Trejo CL, Clephan AL, Davies WJ. 1995. How do stomata read abscisic acid signals? Plant Physiology 109: 803-811.
56. Trejo CL, Davies WJ, Ruiz LMP. 1993. Sensitivity of stomata to abscisic acid. An effect of the mesophyll. Plant Physiology 102: 497-502.
57. Vahisalu T, Kollist H, Wang Y-F, Nishimura N, Chan W-Y, Valerio G, Lamminmäki A, Brosche M, Moldau H, Desikan R et al. 2008. SLAC1 is required for plant guard cell S-type anion channel function in stomatal signalling. Nature 452: 487-491.
58. Vandeleur RK, Mayo G, Shelden MC, Gilliham M, Kaiser BN, Tyerman SD. 2009. The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Physiology 149: 445-460.
59. 2. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 411-422.
60. Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 2002. ABA-based chemical signalling: the co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 195-210.
61. Xie X, Wang Y, Williamson L, Holroyd GH, Tagliavia CPP, Murchie E, Theobald J, Knight MR, Davies WJ, Leyser HMO et al. 2006. The identification of genes involved in the stomatal response to reduced atmospheric relative humidity. Current Biology 16: 882-887.
62. Zhang J, Zhang X, Liang J. 1995. Exudation rate and hydraulic conductivity of maize roots are enhanced by soil drying and abscisic acid treatment. New Phytologist 131: 329-336.
63. Zhu C, Schraut D, Hartung W, Schäffner AR. 2005. Differential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 2971-2981.