Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 656-663

  Hayashi, Tsuyoshi ^a   Ishiwatari, Hirotoshi ^a   Yoshida, Makoto ^a   Ono, Michihiro ^a   Sato, Tsutomu ^a   Miyanishi, Koji ^a   Sato, Yasushi ^a   Kobune, Masayoshi ^a   Takimoto, Rishu ^a   Mitsuhashi, Tomoko ^b   Asanuma, Hiroko ^a   Ogino, Jiro ^a   Hasegawa, Tadashi ^a   Sonoda, Tomoko ^a   Kato, Junji ^a  

^a SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration; Pancreatic solid mass; Rapid on site evaluation by endosonographer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOLIC PANCREATITIS; ARTICLE; AUTOIMMUNE PANCREATITIS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY; ENDOSONOGRAPHER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS TUMOR; KNOWLEDGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PANCREAS DUCT CARCINOMA; PANCREAS METASTASIS; PANCREAS TUMOR; PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 84875633168     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: 14401746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12122     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M etal. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1087-1095.
2. Rösch T. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Br. J. Surg. 1997; 84: 1329-1331.
3. Williams DB, Sahai AV, Aabacken L etal. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut 1999; 44: 720-726.
4. O'Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotcarena R etal. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 53: 470-474.
5. Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS etal. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 70: 1093-1097.
6. Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS etal. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 1739-1745.
7. Yusuf TE, Ho S, Pavey DA etal. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multi-center experience. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 445-448.
8. Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros SN etal. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study. Cytopathology 2006; 17: 27-33.
9. Aithal GP, Anagnostopoulos GK, Tam W etal. EUS-guided tissue sampling: comparison of "dual sampling" (Trucut biopsy plus FNA) with "sequential sampling" (Trucut biopsy and then FNA as required). Endoscopy 2007; 39: 725-730.
10. Kipp BR, Pereira TC, Souza PC etal. Comparison of EUS-guided FNA and Trucut biopsy for diagnosing and staging abdominal and mediastinal neoplasms. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2009; 37: 549-556.
11. Gerke H, Rizk MK, Vanderheyden AD etal. Randomized study comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy and fine needle aspiration with high suction. Cytopathology 2010; 21: 44-51.
12. Larghi A, Noffsinger A, Dye C etal. EUS-guided fine needle tissue acquisition by using high negative pressure suction for the evaluation of solid masses: a pilot study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 62: 768-774.
13. Layfield LJ, Bentz JS, Gopez EV. Immediate on-site interpretation of fine-needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis. Cancer 2001; 93: 319-322.
14. Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE etal. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003; 98: 1289-1294.
15. Chang KJ, Nguyen P, Erickson RA etal. The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1997; 45: 387-393.
16. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I etal. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 106: 1705-1710.
17. Hikichi T, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS etal. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists. J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 44: 322-328.
18. Savoy AD, Raimondo M, Woodward TA etal. Can endosonographers evaluate on-site cytologic adequacy? A comparison with cytotechnologists. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65: 953-957.
19. Lin F, Staerkel G. Cytologic criteria for well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Cancer 2003; 99: 44-50.
20. Harewood GC, Wiersema LM, Halling AC etal. Influence of EUS training and pathology interpretation on accuracy of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 55: 669-673.