Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 872-882

  Schmidt, Robert L ^a,b   Witt, Benjamin L ^a,b   Matynia, Anna P ^a,b   Barraza, Gonzalo ^a,b   Layfield, Lester J ^a,b   Adler, Douglas G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ARUP LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Adequacy; Diagnostic yield; Endoscopy; Fine needle aspiration; Meta analysis; Pancreas

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; CYTOTECHNOLOGIST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PANCREAS DISEASE; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAPID ON SITE EVALUATION; RAPID TEST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; HUMANS; PANCREATIC DISEASES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84876685164     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: 15732568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2411-1     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739-1745.
2. Oppong K, Raine D, Nayar M, Wadehra V, Ramakrishnan S, Charnley RM. EUS-FNA versus biliary brushings and assessment of simultaneous performance in jaundiced patients with suspected malignant obstruction. JOP. 2010;11:560-567.
3. Hunerbein M, Dohmoto M, Haensch W, Schlag PM. Endosonography-guided biopsy of mediastinal and pancreatic tumors. Endoscopy. 1998;30:32-36.
4. Kida M, Araki M, Miyazawa S, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in the same patients. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011;1:102-107.
5. Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Kakutani H, et al. A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2009.
6. Papanikolaou IS, Adler A, Wegener K, et al. Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20:342-348.
7. Schmidt RL, Factor RE, Affolter KE, et al. Methods specification for diagnostic test accuracy studies in fine-needle aspiration cytology: a survey of reporting practice. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137(1):132-141.
8. Harewood GC, Wiersema LM, Halling AC, Keeney GL, Salamao DR, Wiersema MJ. Influence of EUS training and pathology interpretation on accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:669-673.
9. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:700-708.
10. Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:33-37.
11. Moller K, Papanikolaou IS, Toermer T, et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: high yield of 2 passes with combined histologic-cytologic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:60-69.
12. Cleveland P, Gill KRS, Coe SG, et al. An evaluation of risk factors for inadequate cytology in EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tumors and lymph nodes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1194-1199.
13. LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:475-481.
14. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:384-390.
15. Iqbal S, Mir RN, Sohn W. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22- and 25-gauge needles alternately. Endoscopy. 2009;41:E87.
16. Siddiqui AA, Lyles T, Avula H, Davila R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic masses in a veteran population: comparison of results with 22- and 25-gauge needles. Pancreas. 2010;39:685-686.
17. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705-1710.
18. Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, Waxman I. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1289-1294.
19. Deeks JJ BP, Gatsonis C (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2009.
20. Alsohaibani F, Girgis S, Sandha GS. Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23:26-30.
21. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539-1558.
22. Schmidt RL, Adler DG. EUS-guided FNA of solid masses with or without on-site cytological evaluation: no paradox. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 (in press).
23. Nguyen NQ, Binmoeller KF, Shah JN, et al. The impact of on-site cytopathology on the clinical evaluation and management of patients who undergo EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:A267.
24. Cermak TS, Wang B, Debrito P, Carroll J, Haddad N, Sidawy MK. Does on-site adequacy evaluation reduce the nondiagnostic rate in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions? Cancer Cytopathol. (2012).
25. Nguyen NQ, Binmoeller KF, Shah JN, Leong RW, Merrett N, Biankin AV. The impact of on-site cytopathology on the clinical evaluation and management of patients who undergo EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:AB110.
26. Saleh HA, Khatib G. Positive economic and diagnostic accuracy impacts of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration biopsies by pathologists. Acta Cytologica. 1996;40:1227-1230.
27. Iglesias Garcia J, Larino Noia J, Dominguez Munoz JE. Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2009;101:631-638.
28. Binmoeller KF, Thul R, Rathod V, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided, 18-gauge, fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas using a 2.8 mm channel convex array echoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:121-127.
29. Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739-1745.
30. Hwang CY, Lee SS, Song TJ, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: a single center experience in Korea. Gut Liver. 2009;3:116-121.
31. Alsibai KD, Denis B, Bottlaender J, Kleinclaus I, Straub P, Fabre M. Impact of cytopathologist expert on diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic lesions in current clinical practice. A series of 106 endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations. Cytopathology. 2006;17:18-26.
32. Ramirez-Luna MA, Zepeda-Gomez S, Chavez-Tapia NC, Tellez-Avila FI. Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of fine-needle aspiration biopsies guided by endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic lesions. Rev Invest Clin. 2008;60:11-14.
33. Mortensen MB, Pless T, Durup J, Ainsworth AP, Plagborg GJ, Hovendal C. Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A prospective study. Endoscopy. 2001;33:478-483.
34. Wegener M, Adamek R. Puncture of submucosal and extrinsic tumors: is there a clinical need? Puncture techniques and their accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;5:615-623.
35. Touchefeu Y, Le Rhun M, Coron E, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: the impact on patient-management strategy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1070-1077.
36. Fritscher-Ravens A, Topalidis T, Bobrowski C, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in focal pancreatic lesions: a prospective intraindividual comparison of two needle assemblies. Endoscopy. 2001;33:484-490.
37. Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L, Knofel WT, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2768-2775.
38. Kopelman Y, Marmor S, Ashkenazi I, Fireman Z. Value of EUS-FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours. Cytopathology. 2011;22:174-178.
39. Ylagan LR, Edmundowicz S, Kasal K, Walsh D, Lu DW. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic carcinoma: a 3-year experience and review of the literature. Cancer. 2002;96:362-369.
40. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz E, Lozano-Leon A, et al. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:289-293.
41. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz E, Lozano-Leon A, et al. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:289-293.
42. Erturk SM, Mortelé KJ, Tuncali K, Saltzman JR, Lao R, Silverman SG. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: comparison of CT endoscopic sonography guidance. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1531-1535.
43. Giovannini M, Seitz JF, Monges G, Perrier H, Rabbia I. Fine-needle aspiration cytology guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: results in 141 patients. Endoscopy. 1995;27:171-177.
44. Aithal GP, Anagnostopoulos GK, Tam W, et al. EUS-guided tissue sampling: comparison of "dual sampling" (Trucut biopsy plus FNA) with "sequential sampling" (Trucut biopsy and then FNA as required). Endoscopy. 2007;39:725-730.
45. Raab SS, Grzybicki DM, Sudilovsky D, Balassanian R, Janosky JE, Vrbin CM. Effectiveness of Toyota process redesign in reducing thyroid gland fine-needle aspiration error. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126:585-592.