Timing and executive resources: Dual-task interference patterns between temporal production and shifting, updating, and inhibition tasks

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 947-963

  Brown, Scott W ^a   Collier, Shawn A ^a   Night, Jill C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Dual task performance; Executive functions; Time perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEURAL INHIBITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887540191     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030484     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. Allan, L. G. (1992). The internal clock revisited. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, &W. J. Friedman (Eds.), Time, action, and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 191-202). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
6. Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory or working attention? In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control (pp. 152-170). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 5-28.
8. Baddeley, A., Chincotta, D., & Adlam, A. (2001). Working memory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 641-657.
9. Baddeley, A., & Della Sala, S. (1996). Working memory and executive control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 351, 1397-1403.
10. Baddeley, A. D., Emslie, H., Kolodny, J., & Duncan, J. (1998). Random generation and the executive control of working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51, 819-852
11. Baddeley, A. D., Logie, R., Bressi, S., Della Sala, S., & Spinnler, H.(1986). Dementia and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 38, 603-618
12. Banich, M. T. (2009). Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 89-94.
13. Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65-94.
14. Baudouin, A., Vanneste, S., Pouthas, V., & Isingrini, M. (2006). Agerelated changes in duration reproduction: Involvement of working memory processes. Brain and Cognition, 62, 17-23.
15. Bjork, R. A. (1978). The updating of human memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 12, pp. 235-259). New York, NY: Academic Press
16. Bjork, R. A., & Landauer, T. K. (1978). On keeping track of the present status of people and things. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 52-60). New York, NY: Academic Press
17. Block, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134, 330-343.
18. Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (2008). Timing and remembering the past, the present, and the future. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp367-394). Bingley, UK: Emerald
19. Bonnel, A.-M., Possamai, C.-A., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Early modulation of visual input: A study of attentional strategies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 39, 757-776
20. Bourke, P. A., Duncan, J., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1996). A general factor involved in dual-task performance decrement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 525-545
21. Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 115-124.
22. Brown, S. W. (1997). Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1118-1140.
23. Brown, S. W. (1998). Automaticity versus timesharing in timing and tracking dual-task performance. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 61, 71-81.
24. Brown, S. W. (2006). Timing and executive function: Bidirectional interference between concurrent temporal production and randomization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1464-1471.
25. Brown, S. W. (2008). Time and attention: Review of the literature. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 111-138). Bingley, UK: Emerald
26. Brown, S. W. (2010). Timing, resources, and interference: Attentional modulation of time perception. In K. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 107-122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Brown, S. W., & Boltz, M. G. (2002). Attentional processes in time perception: Effects of mental workload and event structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 600-615.
28. Brown, S. W., & Frieh, C. T. (2000). Information processing in the central executive: Effects of concurrent temporal production and memory updating tasks. In P. Desain & L. Windsor (Eds.), Rhythm perception and production (pp. 193-196). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger
29. Brown, S. W., & Merchant, S. M. (2007). Processing resources in timing and sequencing tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 439-449.
30. Brown, S. W., & West, A. N. (1990). Multiple timing and the allocation of attention. Acta Psychologica, 75, 103-121.
31. Burgess, P. W. (1997). Theory and methodology in executive function research. In P. Rabbit (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 81-116). Hove, UK: Psychology Press
32. Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Evans, J., Emslie, H., & Wilson, B. A.(1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 547-558.
33. Burle, B., & Casini, L. (2001). Dissociation between activation and attention effects in time estimation: Implications for internal clock models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 195-205.
34. Casini, L., & Macar, F. (1997). Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality. Memory & Cognition, 25, 812-818.
35. Casini, L., Macar, F., & Grondin, S. (1992). Time estimation and attentional sharing. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. J. Friedman (Eds.), Time, action, and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 177-180). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
36. Church, R. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.), Timing and time perception (pp. 566-582). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences
37. Coull, J. T., Vidal, F., Nazarian, B., & Macar, F. (2004). Functional anatomy of the attentional modulation of time estimation. Science, 303, 1506-1508.
38. Dagenbach, D., & Carr, T. H. (Eds.). (1994). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
39. de Frias, C. M., Dixon, R. A., & Strauss, E. (2006). Structure of four executive functioning tests in healthy older adults. Neuropsychology, 20, 206-214.
40. Doiseau, F., & Isingrini, M. (2005). Updating information in verbal working memory and executive functioning. Psychological Reports, 96, 67-76.
41. Doob, L. W. (1971). Patterning of time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
42. Dormal, V., Seron, X., & Pesenti, M. (2006). Numerosity-duration interference: A Stroop experiment. Acta Psychologica, 121, 109-124.
43. Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., & Freer, C. (1996).Intelligence and the frontal lobes: The organization of goal-directedbehavior. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 257-303.
44. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Chee, A. E. H. (2010).The components of working memory updating: An experimental decomposition and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 170-189.
45. Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004). Age-related impairment in executive functioning: Updating, shifting, and access. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 874-890.
46. Fortin, C. (1999). Short-term memory in time interval production. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 308-316.
47. Fortin, C., Duchet, M.-L., & Rousseau, R. (1996). Tapping sensitivity to processing in short-term memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 402-407.
48. Fortin, C., Schweickert, R., Gaudreault, R., & Viau-Quesnel, C. (2010).Timing is affected by demands in memory search but not by task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 580-595.
49. Fournier, S., Larigauderie, P., & Gaonac'h, D. (2004). Exploring how the central executive works: A search for independent components. Psychologica Belgica, 44, 159-188
50. Fournier-Vicente, S., Larigauderie, P., & Gaonac'h, D. (2008). More dissociations and interactions within central executive functioning: A comprehensive latent-variable analysis. Acta Psychologica, 129, 32-48
51. Franssen, V., & Vandierendonck, A. (2002). Time estimation: Does the reference memory mediate the effect of knowledge of results? Acta Psychologica, 109, 239-267.
52. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101-135.
53. Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 201-225.
54. Fuster, J. (2002). Physiology of executive functions: The perception-action cycle. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of the frontal lobe (pp. 96-108). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55. Gopher, D. (1986). In defence of resources: On structures, energies, pools and the allocation of attention. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Energetics and human information processing (pp. 353-371). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
56. Gorfein, D. S., & MacLeod, C. M. (Eds.). (2007). Inhibition in cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57. Grondin, S., & Macar, F. (1992). Dividing attention between temporal and nontemporal tasks: A performance operating characteristic-POC- Analysis. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W. J. Friedman (Eds.), Time, action, and cognition: Towards bridging the gap (pp. 119-128). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
58. Grondin, S., Meilleur-Wells, G., & Lachance, R. (1999). When to start explicit counting in a time-intervals discrimination task: A critical point in the timing process of humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 993-1004.
59. Grondin, S., Ouellet, B., & Roussel, M.-E. (2004). Benefits and limits of explicit counting for discriminating temporal intervals. Canadian Journalof Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 58, 1-12.
60. Halgren, E., Boujon, C., Clarke, J., Wang, C., & Chauvel, P. (2002). Rapid distributed fronto-parieto-occipital processing stages during working memory in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 710-728.
61. Hedden, T., & Yoon, C. (2006). Individual differences in executive processing predict susceptibility to interference in verbal working memory. Neuropsychology, 20, 511-528.
62. Hegarty, M., Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (2000). Constraints on using the dual-task methodology to specify the degree of central executive involvement in cognitive tasks. Memory & Cognition, 28, 376-385.
63. Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., Gaes, G., & Bierman, K. (1977). Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in-passing. The American Journal of Psychology, 90, 431-446.
64. Hinton, S. C., & Rao, S. M. (2004). "One-thousand one. one-thousand two.": Chronometric counting violates the scalar property in interval timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 24-30.
65. Hiscock, M., Cheesman, J., Inch, R., Chipuer, H. M., & Graff, L. A.(1989). Rate and variability of finger tapping as measures of lateralized concurrent task effects. Brain and Cognition, 10, 87-104.
66. Hitch, G. J. (1978). The role of short-term working memory in mental arithmetic. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 302-323.
67. Hockey, R., & Hamilton, P. (1977). The basis of the primacy effect: Some experiments with running memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 49-63.
68. Jurado, M. B., & Rosselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychology Review, 17, 213-233.
69. Kantowitz, B. H., & Knight, J. L. (1974). Testing tapping time-sharing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 331-336.
70. Kantowitz, B. H., & Knight, J. L. (1976). Testing tapping timesharing, II: Auditory secondary task. Acta Psychologica, 40, 343-362.
71. Kimberg, D. Y., D'Esposito, M., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Cognitive functions in the prefrontal cortex-Working memory and executive control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 185-192.
72. Kinchla, R. A. (1980). The measurement of attention. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 213-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
73. Klapp, S. T., Porter-Graham, K. A., & Hoifjeld, A. R. (1991). The relation of perception and motor action: Ideomotor compatibility and interference in divided attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 155-162
74. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1-14.
75. Lajoie, Y., Teasdale, N., Bard, C., & Fleury, M. (1993). Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Experimental Brain Research, 97, 139-144.
76. Larson, G. E., Merritt, C. R., & Williams, S. E. (1988). Information processing and intelligence: Some implications of task complexity Intelligence, 12, 131-147.
77. Lehto, J. (1996). Are executive function tests dependent on working memory capacity? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 29-50.
78. Lemaire, P., Abdi, H., & Fayol, M. (1996). The role of working memory resources in simple cognitive arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 73-104.
79. Logan, G. D. (1985). Executive control of thought and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193-210.
80. Logie, R. H., Cocchini, G., Della Sala, S., & Baddeley, A. D. (2004). Is there a specific executive capacity for dual task coordination? Evidence from Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology, 18, 504-513.
81. Macar, F., Grondin, S., & Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22, 673-686.
82. Macar, F., Lejeune, H., Bonnet, M., Ferrara, A., Pouthas, V., Vidal, F., & Maquet, P. (2002). Activation of the supplementary motor area and of attentional networks during temporal processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 475-485.
83. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
84. Marshall, M. J., & Wilsoncroft, W. E. (1989). Time perception and the Stroop task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1159-1162.
85. McFarland, K., & Ashton, R. (1978). The lateralized effects of concurrent cognitive and motor performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 344-349.
86. Michon, J. A. (1985). The compleat time experiencer. In J. A. Michon & J. L. Jackson (Eds.), Time, mind, and behavior (pp. 20-52). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
87. Milliken, B., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). Attention and inhibition. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 191-221). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press
88. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8-14.
89. Miyake, A., Friedman, P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
90. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition (pp. 93-148). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum
91. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
92. Mordkoff, J. T., & Egeth, H. E. (1993). Response time and accuracy revisited: Converging support for the interactive race model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 981-991.
93. Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 111-121.
94. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
95. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214-255.
96. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1980). Task difficulty, resources, and dual-task performance. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 297-315). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
97. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resourcelimited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
98. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed andautomatic control of behavior. In R. S. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18).New York, NY: Plenum Press
99. Ogden, R. S., Salominaite, E., Jones, L. A., Fisk, J. E., & Montgomery, C.(2011). The role of executive functions in human prospective interval timing. Acta Psychologica, 137, 352-358.
100. Packwood, S., Hodgetts, H. M., & Tremblay, S. (2011). A multisperspective approach to the conceptualization of executive functions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 456-470.
101. Parkin, A. J., & Java, R. I. (1999). Deterioration of frontal lobe function in normal aging: Influences of fluid intelligence versus perceptual speed. Neuropsychology, 13, 539-545.
102. Parkinson, S. R. (1980). Aging and amnesia: A running span analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 215-217
103. Penney, T. B., & Vaitilingam, L. (2008). Imaging time. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 261-294). Bingley, UK: Emerald
104. Phillips, L. H. (1997). Do "Frontal Tests" measure executive function? Issues of assessment and evidence from fluency tests. In P. Rabbit (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 191-213). Hove, UK: Psychology Press
105. Pollack, I., & Johnson, L. (1963). Continuing memory span for digits. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 731-734.
106. Pollack, I., Johnson, L. B., & Knaff, P. R. (1959). Running memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 137-146.
107. Rabbitt, P., & Lowe, C. (2000). Patterns of cognitive aging. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 63, 308-316.
108. Rattat, A.-C. (2010). Bidirectional interference between timing and concurrent memory processing in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 145-162.
109. Rattat, A.-C., & Droit-Volet, S. (2012). What is the best and easiest method of preventing counting in different temporal tasks? Behavior Research Methods, 44, 67-80.
110. Richelle, M., & Lejeune, H. (1980). Time in animal behavior. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press
111. Robbins, T. W., Anderson, E. J., Barker, D. R., Bradley, A. C., Fearnyhough, C., Henson, R., Hudson, S. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1996).Working memory in chess. Memory & Cognition, 24, 83-93.
112. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
113. Royall, D. R., & Mahurin, R. K. (1996). Neuroanatomy, measurement, and clinical significance of the executive cognitive functions. In L. J. Dickstein, M. B. Riba, & J. M. Oldham (Eds.), American Psychiatric Press Review of Psychiatry (Vol. 15, pp. 175-204). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press
114. Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., & Berish, D. E. (2003). Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 566-594.
115. Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489-501.
116. Sawyer, T. F., Meyers, P. J., & Huser, S. J. (1994). Contrasting task demands alter the perceived duration of brief time intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 649-657.
117. Sperling, G., & Melchner, M. J. (1978). The attention operating characteristic: Examples from visual search. Science, 202, 315-318.
118. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
119. Stuss, D. T., & Alexander, M. P. (2000). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A conceptual view. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 63, 289-298.
120. Teasdale, J. D., Dritschel, B. H., Taylor, M. J., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Baddeley, A. D. (1995). Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Memory & Cognition, 23, 551-559.
121. Thomas, E. A. C., & Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 363-367.
122. Towse, J. N., & Neil, D. (1998). Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 583-591.
123. Towse, J. N., & Valentine, J. D. (1997). Random generation of numbers: A search for underlying processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 381-400.
124. Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the "internal clock." Psychological Monographs, 77, 1-31
125. Tsang, P. S., Shaner, T. L., & Vidulich, M. A. (1995). Resource scarcity and outcome conflict in time-sharing performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 365-378.
126. Tulving, E. (2002). Chronesthesia: Conscious awareness of subjective time. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 311-325). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
127. Van der Linden, M., Bredart, S., & Beerten, A. (1994). Age-related differences in updating working memory. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 85, 145-152.
128. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626.
129. Waugh, N. C. (1960). Serial position and the memory span. The American Journal of Psychology, 73, 68-79.
130. Wearden, J. H., O'Rourke, S. C., Matchwick, C., Min, Z., & Maeers, S.(2010). Task switching and subjective duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 63, 531-543.
131. Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
132. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). New York, NY: Academic Press
133. Wickens, C. D. (1986). Gain and energetics in information processing. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Energetics and human information processing (pp. 373-389). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
134. Wickens, C. D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. In D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple-task performance (pp. 3-34). London, UK: Taylor & Francis
135. Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins
136. Wierwille, W. W., Rahimi, M., & Casali, J. G. (1985). Evaluation of 16 measures of mental workload using a simulated flight task emphasizing mediational activity. Human Factors, 27, 489-502
137. Yntema, D. B., & Mueser, G. E. (1962). Keeping track of variables that have few or many states. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 391-395.
138. Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective (pp. 365-397). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
139. Zakay, D. (1993). Time estimation methods-Do they influence prospective duration estimates? Perception, 22, 91-101.
140. Zakay, D. (1998). Attentional allocation policy influences prospective timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 114-118.
141. Zakay, D., & Block, R. A. (2004). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: An executive-control perspective. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 64, 319-328
142. Zakay, D., Block, R. A., & Tsal, Y. (1999). Prospective duration estimation and performance. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 557-580). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
143. Zakay, D., & Fallach, E. (1984). Immediate and remote time estimation- A comparison. Acta Psychologica, 57, 69-81.
144. Zakay, D., & Shub, J. (1998). Concurrent duration production as a workload measure. Ergonomics, 41, 1115-1128.
145. Zelazo, P.D., Carter, A., Reznick, J.S., & Frye, D. (1997). Early development of executive functions: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1, 198-226.