Self-assembled carbohydrate hydrogels for prolonged pain management

Pharmaceutical Development and Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 990-1004

  Kamel, R ^a   Abbas, H A ^b  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Egypt)

^b GERMAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Chitosan; Complexation; Hydrogel; Polyelectrolyte; Tramadol

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBOHYDRATE HYDROGEL; POLYELECTROLYTE; TRAMADOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADHESION; ALLERGENICITY; ANALGESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG SOLUBILITY; EDEMA; ERYTHEMA; EX VIVO STUDY; HYDROGEL; HYDROGEN BOND; IN VITRO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SKIN ABSORPTION; SKIN TOXICITY; STATIC ELECTRICITY; VISCOSITY; WATER ABSORPTION; WATER TRANSPORT; WETTABILITY;

ANIMALS; CARBOHYDRATES; CARRAGEENAN; CHITOSAN; DRUG CARRIERS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HYDROGELS; MALE; MICE; PAIN; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PERMEABILITY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYETHYLENEIMINE; POLYMERS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SKIN; SWINE; TABLETS;

EID: 84887430264     PISSN: 10837450     EISSN: 10979867     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10837450.2011.609992     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Godin B, Touitou E. Transdermal skin delivery: Predictions for humans from in vivo, ex vivo and animal models. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59:1152-1161.
2. Cevc G, Vierl U. Nanotechnology and the transdermal route: A state of the art review and critical appraisal. J Control Release 2010;141:277-299.
3. Changez M, Koul V, Krishna B, Dinda AK, Choudhary V. Studies on biodegradation and release of gentamicin sulphate from interpenetrating network hydrogels based on poly(acrylic acid) and gelatin: In vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2004;25:139-146.
4. Hamidi M, Azadi A, Rafei P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60:1638-1649.
5. Kogan A, Garti N. Microemulsions as transdermal drug delivery vehicles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2006;123-126:369-385.
6. Sun W, Mao S, Mei D, Kissel T. Self-assembled polyelectrolyte nanocomplexes between chitosan derivatives and enoxaparin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008;69:417-425.
7. Bhattarai N, Gunn J, Zhang M. Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010;62:83-99.
8. Peh K, Khan T, Ch'ng H. Mechanical, bioadhesive strength and biological evaluations of chitosan flms for wound dressing. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2000;3:303-311.
9. Sudhakar Y, Kuotsu K, Bandyopadhyay AK. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery-a promising option for orally less efcient drugs. J Control Release 2006;114:15-40.
10. Valenta C. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in vaginal delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57:1692-1712.
11. Katz WA, Barkin RL. Dilemmas in chronic/persistent pain management. Am J Ter 2008;15:256-264.
12. Katz WA. Use of nonopioid analgesics and adjunctive agents in the management of pain in rheumatic diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;14:63-71.
13. Olin BR. Drug facts and comparisons. 54th Edn, 2000, Wolters Kluwer: St. Louis. pp. 817-818.
14. Ammar HO, Ghorab M, El-Nahhas SA, Kamel R. Polymeric matrix system for prolonged delivery of tramadol hydrochloride, part I: Physicochemical evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2009;10:7-20.
15. Kashyap N, Viswanad B, Sharma G, Bhardwaj V, Ramarao P, Ravi Kumar MN. Design and evaluation of biodegradable, biosensitive in situ gelling system for pulsatile delivery of insulin. Biomaterials 2007;28:2051-2060.
16. Zhang L, Parsons DL, Navarre C, Kompella UB. Development and in-vitro evaluation of sustained release poloxamer 407 (P407) gel formulations of ceftiofur. J Control Release 2002;85:73-81.
17. Rodríguez R, Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Concheiro A. Interactions of ibuprofen with cationic polysaccharides in aqueous dispersions and hydrogels. Rheological and difusional implications. Eur J Pharm Sci 2003;20:429-438.
18. Bonacucina G, Martelli S, Palmieri GF. Rheological, mucoadhesive and release properties of Carbopol gels in hydrophilic cosolvents. Int J Pharm 2004;282:115-130.
19. Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000;50:27-46.
20. Kof AA, Agnely F, Ponchel G, Grossiord JL. Modulation of the rheological and mucoadhesive properties of thermosensitive poloxamer-based hydrogels intended for the rectal administration of quinine. Eur J Pharm Sci 2006;27:328-335.
21. Friggeri A, Feringa BL, van Esch J. Entrapment and release of quinoline derivatives using a hydrogel of a low molecular weight gelator. J Control Release 2004;97:241-248.
22. Ammar HO, Ghorab M, El-Nahhas SA, Kamel R. Design of a transdermal delivery system for aspirin as an antithrombotic drug. Int J Pharm 2006;327:81-88.
23. Panchagnula R, Bokalial R, Sharma P, Khandavilli S. Transdermal delivery of naloxone: Skin permeation, pharmacokinetic, irritancy and stability studies. Int J Pharm 2005;293:213-223.
24. Lopez VC, Hadgraft J, Snowden MJ. The use of colloidal microgels as a (trans)dermal drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 2005;292:137-147.
25. Draize J, Woodward G, Calvery H. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ter 1944;82:377-379.
26. Ubaidulla U, Reddy MV, Ruckmani K, Ahmad FJ, Khar RK. Transdermal therapeutic system of carvedilol: Effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic matrix on in vitro and in vivo characteristics. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8:2.
27. Ghafari A, Navaee K, Oskoui M, Bayati K, Rafee-Tehrani M. Preparation and characterization of free mixed-flm of pectin/chitosan/Eudragit RS intended for sigmoidal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;67:175-186.
28. Dolz-Planas M, Roldan-Garcia C, Herraez-Dominguez JV, Belda-Maximino R. Tixotropy of diferent concentrations of microcrystalline cellulose:sodium carboxymethyl cellulose gels. J Pharm Sci 1991;80:75-79.
29. Bentley M V, Marchetti JM, Ricardo N, Ali-Abi Z, Collett JH. Infuence of lecithin on some physical chemical properties of poloxamer gels: Rheological, microscopic and in vitro permeation studies. Int J Pharm 1999;193:49-55.
30. Needleman IG, Smales FC. In vitro assessment of bioadhesion for periodontal and buccal drug delivery. Biomaterials 1995;16: 617-624.
31. Sathirakul K, SWF Chan S. Application of chitin and chitosan bandages for wound healing. Adv Chitin Sci 1996;1:490-492.
32. Cafaggi S, Leardi R, Parodi B, Caviglioli G, Russo E, Bignardi G. Preparation and evaluation of a chitosan salt-poloxamer 407 based matrix for buccal drug delivery. J Control Release 2005;102:159-169.
33. Mitsumata T, Suemitsu Y, Fujii K, Fujii T, Taniguchi T, Koyama K. pH-response of chitosan, k-carrageenan, carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt complex hydrogels. Polymer 2003;44:7103-7111.
34. Varshosaz J, Tavakoli N, Kheirolahi F. Use of hydrophilic natural gums in formulation of sustained-release matrix tablets of tramadol hydrochloride. AAPS PharmSciTech 2006;7:E24.
35. Zaki NM, Awad GA, Mortada ND, Abd Elhady SS. Enhanced bioavailability of metoclopramide HCl by intranasal administration of a mucoadhesive in situ gel with modulated rheological and mucociliary transport properties. Eur J Pharm Sci 2007;32:296-307.
36. Costa P, Sousa Lobo JM. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profles. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;13:123-133.
37. Macleod GS, Collett JH, Fell JT. The potential use of mixed flms of pectin, chitosan and HPMC for bimodal drug release. J Control Release 1999;58:303-310.
38. Rao PR, Reddy MN, Ramakrishna S, Diwan PV. Comparative in vivo evaluation of propranolol hydrochloride after oral and transdermal administration in rabbits. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003;56:81-85.
39. Karatas A, Baykara T. Studies on indomethacin inserts prepared by water-soluble polymers. II. The relation between dissolution rate and swelling behaviour. Farmaco 2001;56:197-202.
40. Senel S, Kremer MJ, Kas S, Wertz PW, Hincal AA, Squier CA. Enhancing effect of chitosan on peptide drug delivery across buccal mucosa. Biomaterials 2000;21:2067-2071.
41. Lim F, Moss RD. Microencapsulation of living cells and tissues. J Pharm Sci 1981;70:351-354.
42. Gaumet M, Vargas A, Gurny R, Delie F. Nanoparticles for drug delivery: The need for precision in reporting particle size parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008;69:1-9.