Deconstructing the english passive

Deconstructing the English Passive

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-230

  Wanner, Anja ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887422671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (234)

1. Aarts, Bas 1992 SmallClauses in English: TheNonverbalTypes. (Topics in English Linguistics 8). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Abraham,Werner 2003 Ergative diagnostics: temptatio redux. Linguistik Online 13. http://www.linguistik-online.de/1301/abraham.html. Last accessed April 15, 2009.
3. Ackema, Peter and Maaike Schoorlemmer 1995 Middles and nonmovement. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 173-197.
4. Åfarli, Tor 1989 Passive in Norwegian and English. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 101-108.
5. Alley, Michael 1996 The Craft of Scientific Writing. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
6. Anderson, Mona 1978 NP-preposing in noun phrases. Proceedings of the 8th AnnualMeeting of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society: 12-21.
7. APA (ed.) 2001 Publication Manual. Washington: American Psychological Association.
8. Arce-Arenales,Manuel, Melissa Axelrod and Barbara Fox 1994 Active voice and middle diathesis. In: Barbara Fox and Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice. Form and Function, 1-21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Aronoff, Mark 1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
10. Atkinson, Dwight 1992 The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985. Applied Linguistics 13: 337-374.
11. Atkinson, Dwight 1996 The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25: 333-371.
12. Aue-Apaikul, Panida 2006 Transitivized intransitives: Syntactic, semantic and constructional issues. Ph.D. Dissertation, University ofWisconsin, Madison.
13. Azvedo,Milton Mariano 1980 Passive Sentences in English and Portuguese. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
14. Baker, Mark 1988a Incorporation. A Theory of Grammatical FunctionChanging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Baker, Mark 1988b Morphology and syntax: An interlocking independence. In: Martin Everaert, A. Evers, M. Huybregts and M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and Modularity, 9-32.
16. Baker,Mark, Kyle Johnson and Ian Roberts 1989 Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219-251.
17. Balcom, Patricia 1997 Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research 13: 1-9.
18. Baron, Dennis 1989 DecliningGrammar. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
19. Baxter, Charles 1998 Dysfunctional narratives, or 'Mistakes were made'. In: Charles Baxter (ed.), Burning Down the House. Essays on Fiction, 1-26. St. Paul: Graywolf.
20. Bazerman, Charles 1988 ShapingWrittenKnowledge:The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science.Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
21. Belletti, Adriana 1988 The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1-34. Bhatt, Rajesh and Roumyana Pancheva 2001 Implicit arguments. Ms. University of Texas, Austin/Santa Cruz.
22. Bhatt, Rajesh and Roumyana Pancheva 2001 Implicit arguments. Ms. University of Texas, Austin/Santa Cruz
23. Biber, Douglas 1988 Variation across Speech andWriting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad and Randi Reppen 1998 Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan and Dwight Atkinson 1994 ARCHER and its challenges: Compiling and exploring a representative corpus of historical English registers. In: Udo Fries,Gunnel Tottie and Peter Schneider (eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English LanguageResearch onComputerizedCorpora,Zürich 1993, 1-13. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
26. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan 1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
27. Booij, Geert 1992 Morphology, semantics and argument structure. In: I.M. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, 47-64. Berlin/New York: Foris.
28. Borer, Hagit 1994 The projection of arguments. In: E. Benedicto and J. Runner (eds.), FunctionalProjections:University ofMassachusetts OccasionalPapers 17, Amherst, MA: GLSA.
29. Borer, Hagit 1998 Deriving passives without theta roles. In: Steven Lapointe, Diane Brentari and Patrick Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, 60-99. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
30. Borer, Hagit and KennethWexler 1987 The maturation of syntax. In: Thomas Roeper and Edward Williams (eds.), Parameter Setting, 123-172. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
31. Borer, Hagit and KennethWexler 1992 Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 147-189.
32. Bresnan, Joan 1982 The passive in lexical theory. In: Joan Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Theories, 3-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Broder, John M. 2007 Familiar fallback for officials: 'Mistakes were made'. The New York Times,March 14, 2007.
34. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson 1978 Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In: Esther Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56-289. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson 1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Budwig, Nancy 1990 The linguistic marking of nonprototypical agency: An exploration into children's use of passives. Linguistics 28: 1221-1252.
37. Burzio, Luigi 1986 Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
38. Burzio, Luigi 2000 Anatomy of a generalization. In: Eric Reuland (ed.), Arguments and Case. Explaining Burzio's Generalization., Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Bußmann, Hadumod 2002 Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kröner. Bybee, Joan and Paul Hopper 2001 Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structures. In: Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structures, 1-23. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40. Carnie, Andrew 2007 Syntax. A Generative Introduction. Malden,MA: Blackwell.
41. Carter, Ronald and MichaelMcCarthy 1999 TheEnglish get-passive in spoken discourse:Description and implications for an interpersonal grammar. English Language and Linguistics 3: 41-48.
42. Cassidy, Frederic (ed.) 1985 Dictionary of American Regional English. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
43. Chappell, Hilary 1980 Is the get-passive adversative? International Journal of Human Communication 13: 411-452.
44. Chomsky, Noam 1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
45. Chomsky, Noam 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
46. Chomsky, Noam 1970 Remarks on nominalization. In: Noam Chomsky (ed.), Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, 11-61. The Hague:Mouton.
47. Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language.Westport: Praeger.
48. Chomsky, Noam 1995 TheMinimalist Program. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
49. Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik 1993 The theory of principles and parameters. In: Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow,Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 506-569. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
50. Collins, Peter 1996 Get-passives in English. World Englishes 15: 43-56.
51. Comrie, Bernard 1988 Passive and voice. In: Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice, 9-23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Cornelis, Louise 1996 English and Dutch: The passive difference. Language Sciences 18: 247-264.
53. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth 1979 The Prepositional Passive in English: A Semantic-Syntactic Analysis, with a Lexicon of Prepositional Verbs. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
54. Croft, William 2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Crystal, David 1998 English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Czepluch, Hartmut 1982 Case theory and the dative construction. The Linguistic Review 2: 1-38.
57. Davies, William and Stanley Dubinksy 2004 The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell.
58. Denison, David 1993 English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London/New York: Longman.
59. DiSciullo, Anna-Maria and EdwinWilliams 1987 On the Definition ofWord. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
60. Dixon, R. and Alexandra Aikhenvald 1997 A typology of argument-determined constructions. In: Joan Bybee, John Haiman and Sandra Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type, 73-113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61. Donadio, Rachel. 2006 Dumbing up. The New York Times, Sep. 24, 2006.
62. Dorgeloh, Heidrun and Anja Wanner 2003 Too abstract for agents? The syntax and semantics of agentivity in English research articles. In: Holden Härtl and Heike Tappe (eds.), Mediating between Concepts and Grammar, 433-453. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
63. Dorgeloh, Heidrun and Anja Wanner 2009 Formulaic argumentation in scientific discourse. In: Roberta Corrigan, Edith Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali and Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Formulaic Language. (Vol. 2: Acquisition, Loss, PsychologicalReality, and FunctionalExplanations), 523-544. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
64. Dowty, David 1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Dowty, David 1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547-619.
65. Dryer, Matthew 1982 In defense of a universal passive. Linguistic Analysis 10: 53-60.
66. Fabb, Nigel 1984 Syntactic affixation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
67. Fagan, Sarah 1988 The English middle. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 181-203.
68. Fagan, Sarah 1992 The Syntax and Semantics ofMiddle Constructions. A Study with Special Reference to German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Felser, Claudia 1999 Verbal Complement Clauses. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
70. Felser, Claudia and Anja Wanner 2001 The syntax of cognate and other unselected objects. In: Nicole Dehé and AnjaWanner (eds.), Structural Aspects of Semantically Complex Verbs, 105-130. Frankfurt/Berlin: Peter Lang.
71. Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade,Willem Koopman and Wim van derWurff 2000 The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Garces-Conejos, Pilar and Antonia Sanchez-Maccaro 1998 Scientific discourse as interaction: Scientific articles vs. popularisations. In: Antonia Sanchez-Maccaro and Ronald Carter (eds.), Linguistic Choice across Genres: Variation in Spoken andWritten English, 173-190. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
73. Gívon, Talmy 1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
74. Gívon, Talmy 1993 English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
75. Gívon, Talmy and Lynne Yang 1994 The rise of the English get-passive. In: Barbara Fox and Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice. Form and Function, 119-149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
76. Goldberg, Adele 1995 Constructions: A Construction GrammarApproach toArgument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77. Goldberg, Adele 2002 Surface generalization. An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics 13: 327-356.
78. Goldberg, Adele and Farrell Ackerman 2001 The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77: 798-814.
79. Goodall, Grant 1993 On case and the passive morpheme. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 31-44.
80. Grimshaw, Jane 1986 Unaccusatives: An overview. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society: 244-258.
81. Grimshaw, Jane 1990 Argument Structure. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
82. Grimshaw, Jane and Sten Vikner 1991 Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events.Ms. Brandeis University, Waltham,MA.
83. Grimshaw, Jane and Sten Vikner 1993 Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events. In: Eric Reuland and Werner Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and Language, 143-156. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
84. Gronemeyer, Claire 1999 On deriving complex polysemy: The grammaticalization of get. English Language and Linguistics 3: 1-39.
85. Gross, Alan, Joseph Harmon and Michael Reidy 2002 Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. Guasti, Maria Teresa 2002 Language Acquisition. The Growth of Grammar. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
87. Haegeman, Liliane 1985 The get-passive and Burzio's generalization. Lingua 66: 53-77. Haegeman, Liliane 1994 Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
88. Haegeman, Liliane 1994 Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell
89. Haegeman, Liliane 2006 Thinking Syntactically. A Guide to Argumentation and Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
90. Haegeman, Liliane and Jacqueline Guéron 1999 English Grammar. A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
91. Hale, Ken and Samuel J. Keyser 1993 On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In: KenHale and Samuel J.Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53-110. Cambridge, MA:MIT
92. Halpers, Aaron 1998 Clitics. In: Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky (eds.), TheHandbook ofMorphology, 101-122. Oxford: Blackwell.
93. Han, Zhao-Hong 2000 Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: The case of the pseudopassive. Applied Linguistics 21: 78-105.
94. Hansen, Kristine 1998 A Rhetoric for the Social Sciences. A Guide to Academic and Professional Communication. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
95. Haspelmath, Martin 1990 The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14: 25-72.
96. Hawkins, John 1986 A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. London: Croom Helm.
97. Herold, R. 1986 A quantitative study of the alternation between the be- and the getpassives. Paper presented at the 15thNWAV (NewWays ofAnalyzing Variation) Conference. Stanford University.
98. Hoekstra, Teun 2000 The nature of verbs and Burzio's Generalization. In: Eric Reuland (ed.), Arguments and Case. Explaining Burzio's Generalization, 57-78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
99. Hopper, Paul and Sandra Thompson 1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language Sciences 56: 251- 299.
100. Horgan, Diane 1978 The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language 5: 65- 80.
101. Hornstein, Norbert 2000 Control in GB and minimalism. In: Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (eds.), The First GLOT State-of-the-Article Book, 27-45. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
102. Hornstein, Norbert and Amy Weinberg 1981 Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 55-91.
103. Huang, James 1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531-574.
104. Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey Pullum 2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey Pullum 2005 A Student's Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Hust, Joel 1977 The syntax of the unpassive construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 31-63.
107. Institute for Scientific Information 2007 Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition. ISIWeb of Knowledge.
108. Iwakura, Kunihiro 1987 A government approach to double object constructions. Linguistic Analysis 17: 78-98.
109. Iwata, Seizi 1999 On the status of implicit arguments in middles. Journal of Linguistics 35: 527-553.
110. Jackendoff, Ray 1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
111. Jackendoff, Ray 1983 Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
112. Jackendoff, Ray 1987 The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369-411.
113. Jackendoff, Ray 1990 Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
114. Jackendoff, Ray 1992 Babe Ruth homered his way into the hearts of America. In: Tim Stowell and EricWehrli (eds.), Syntax and the Lexicon, 155-178. San Diego: Academic Press.
115. Jaeggli, Osvaldo 1986 Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587-622.
116. Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Ken Safir 1989 Introduction: The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In: Osvaldo Jaeggli and Ken Safir (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter, 1- 44. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
117. Jespersen, Otto 1924 The Philosophy of Grammar. New York: Holt & Co.
118. Jespersen, Otto 1927 AModern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Reprinted 1954. London: Bradford & Dickens.
119. Johansson, Stig and Signe Oksefjell 1996 Towards a unified account of the syntax and semantics of GET. In: Jenny Thomas and Mick Short (eds.), Using Corpora for Language Research, 57-75. London/New York: Longman.
120. Jones, Charles 1988 Thematic relations in control. In: WendyWilkins (ed.), Thematic Relations, 75-89. San Diego: Academic Press.
121. Ju, Min Kyong 2000 Overpassivization errors by second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 85-111.
122. Keyser, Samuel and Thomas. Roeper 1984 On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381-416.
123. Kirkman, John 1996 First, teach the teachers. Nature 384: 20.
124. Kratzer, Angelika 1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. In: Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
125. Lakoff, Robin 1971 Passive resistance. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 149-162.
126. Lambrecht, Knud 1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and theMental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
127. Larson, Richard K. 1988 On the double-object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391.
128. Larson, Richard K. 1991 Promise and the theory of control. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 103-139.
129. Leather, Simon 1996 The case for the passive voice. Nature 381: 467
130. Levin, Beth 1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
131. Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport 1986 The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623-661.
132. Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav 1995 Unaccusativity. At the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
133. Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav 1998 Morphology and lexical semantics. In: Arnold Zwicky and Andrew Spencer (eds.), Handbook of Morphology, 248-271. Oxford: Blackwell.
134. Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav 2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135. Li, Charles and Thompson, Sandra 1976 Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In: Charles Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 457-489. New York: Academic Press.
136. Lipson, Mimi 2000 Co-variance of form and meaning in the loss of auxiliary selection in English. In: RegineEckardt andKlaus vonHeusinger (eds.),Meaning Variation - Meaning Change, 111-122. Working Papers of the Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft 106, University of Konstanz.
137. Mair, Christian and Geoffrey Leech 2006 Current changes in English syntax. In: Bas Aarts and April McMahon (eds.), Handbook of English Linguistics, 318-342. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
138. Manzini, Maria Rita 1983 On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421-446. Maratsos, M., D. Fox, J. Becker and M. Chalkley 1985 Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition 19: 167-191.
139. Maratsos, M., D. Fox, J. Becker and M. Chalkley 1985 Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition 19: 167-191
140. Marin-Arrese, Juana, ElenaMartinez-Caro and Soledad Perez de Ayala Becerril 2001 A corpus study of impersonalization strategies in English and Spanish. In: PaulRayson, AndrewWilson, TonyMcEnery,Andrew Hardie and Shereen Khoja (eds.), Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001, 369-377. Lancaster: UCREL (Technical Papers Vol. 13).
141. Mauner, Gail and Jean-Pierre Koenig 1999 Lexical encoding of event participant information. Brain and Language 68: 178-184.
142. Mauner, Gail, Michael Tanenhaus and Greg Carlson 1995 Implicit arguments in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 357-382.
143. Meints, Kerstin 2003 To get or to be? Use and acquisition of get- versus be-passives: Evidence from children and adults. In: Hubert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, René Dirven and Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in Language. Studies in Honor of Günter Radden, 123-150. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
144. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Melinger, Alissa and GailMauner 1999 When are implicit agents encoded? Evidence from cross-modal naming. Brain and Language 68: 185-191.
145. Meyer, Charles F. 2002 English Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Myers, Greg 1985 Text as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biology articles. Social Studies of Science 15: 593-630.
147. Myers, Greg 1989 The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10: 1-35.
148. Myers, Greg 1992 "In this paper we report": Speech acts and scientific facts. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 295-313.
149. Newmeyer, Frederick 1998 Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
150. O'Grady, William 1997 Syntactic Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
151. Oehrle, Richard 1976 The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Ph.D. Disssertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
152. Oosten, Jeanne van 1986 The nature of subjects, topics and agents: A cognitive explanation. Ms. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
153. Orasan, Constantin 2001 Patterns in scientific abstracts. In: Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson,Tony McEnery, Andrew Hardie and Shereen Khoja (eds.), Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001, 433-442. Lancaster: UCREL (Technical Papers Vol. 13).
154. Oshita, Hiroyuki 2000 What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of 'passive' unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research 16: 293-324.
155. Penrose, Ann and Steven Katz 1998 Writing in the Sciences. Exploring Conventions of Scientific Discourse. New York: St. Martin's Press.
156. Perlman, Alan 1996 Passive voice. Nature 382: 108.
157. Perlmutter, David 1978 Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the AnnualMeeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 4: 157-189.
158. Pinker, Steven 1989 Learnability and Cognition. The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambrige,MA: MIT Press.
159. Pinker, Steven, David Lebeaux and Loren Frost 1987 Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition 26: 195-267.
160. Pullum, Geoffrey 2008 Some egg preceded every chicken. Language Log. http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/005431.html. Last accessed August 24, 2008.
161. Pustejovsky, James 1991 The syntax of event structure. In: Beth Levin and Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical and Conceptual Semantics, 47-81. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
162. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
163. Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin 1998 Building verb meanings. In:Miriam Butt andWilhelmGeuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, 97- 134. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
164. Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin 2001 An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77: 766- 797.
165. Rappaport, Malka and Beth Levin 1988 What to do with theta-roles. In:WendyWilkins (ed.), Thematic Relations, 7-36. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
166. Reinhart, Tanja 2000 The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts.OTSWorking Papers in Linguistics, Utrecht University.
167. Reuland, Eric 2000 Explaining Burzio's Generalization. In: Eric Reuland (ed.), Arguments and Case, 1-9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
168. Ritter, Elizabeth and Sara Thomas Rosen 2000 Event structure and ergativity. In:Carol Tenny and JamesPustejovsky (eds.), Events as Grammatical Objects, 187-238. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
169. Roberts, Ian 1987 The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects.Dordrecht: Foris.
170. Roeper, Thomas 1984 Implicit arguments. Ms. University ofMassachusetts, Amherst.
171. Roeper, Thomas 1987 Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 267-310.
172. Rosen, Sara Thomas 2003 The syntactic representation of linguistic events. In: Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (eds.), The Second GLOT International State-of-the- Article Book, 323-365. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
173. Rudwick, Martin 1985 The Great Devonian Controversy. The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge amongGentlemanlySpecialists. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
174. Safire, William 2003 On language. The New York TimesMagazine, November 2, 2003.
175. Science (ed.) 2007 Some notes on Science style. ScienceMagazine. http://www.sciencemag.org/about/authors/prep/res/style.dtl. Last accessed June 20, 2007.
176. Selkirk, Elisabeth 1982 The Syntax ofWords. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
177. Seoane, Elena 2006 Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English. In: Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt and Herbert Schendel (eds.), Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500-2000, Bern: Peter Lang.
178. Shibatani, Masayoshi 1985a Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language Sciences 61: 821-848.
179. Shibatani, Masayoshi 1985b Voice in Philippine languages. In: Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice, 85-142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
180. Siewierska, Anna 1984 The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.
181. Simpson, John and Edmund Weiner (eds.) 1989 The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
182. Slobin, Dan 1966 Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5: 219-227.
183. Speas, Margaret 1990 Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
184. Stein, Gabriele 1979 Studies in the Function of the Passive. Tübingen: Narr.
185. Stowell, Tim and Eric Wehrli 1992 Syntax and the Lexicon. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
186. Stroik, Thomas 1992 Middles and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 127-137.
187. Sussex, Roland 1982 A note on the get-passive construction. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 83-92.
188. Svartvik, Jan 1966 On Voice in the English Verb. The Hague:Mouton.
189. Swales, John 1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
190. Swales, John 2001 EAP-related linguistic research: An intellectual history. In: John Flowerdew andMatthew Peacock (eds.), Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes, 42-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
191. Taranto, Gina 2002 An event-structure analysis of causative and passive get. Ms.University of California, San Diego.
192. Tenny, Carol 1994 Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer.
193. Thompson, Sandra 1978 Modern English from a typological point of view: Some implications of the function of word order. Linguistische Berichte 54: 19-35.
194. Thompson, Sandra 1987 The passive in English: A discourse perspective. In: Robert Channon and Linda Shockey (eds.), In Honor of Ilse Lehiste, 497-511. Dordrecht: Foris.
195. Tomasello, Michael 2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
196. Traugott, Elizabeth 1972 A History of English Syntax. A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
197. Traugott, Elizabeth and Bernd Heine 1991 Introduction. In: Elizabeth Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2, 1-14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
198. Trumble, William R. and Angus Stevenson (eds.) 2002 Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 5th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
199. Turner, E. and R. Rommetveit 1967 The acquisition of sentence voice and reversibility. Child Development 38: 649-660.
200. Vendler, Zeno 1967 Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NewYork: Cornell University Press.
201. Verkuyl, Henk J. 1993 A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
202. Verrips, Maike 2000 Passives and implicit arguments in child language. In:CatherineHowell, Sarah Fish and SarahKeith Lucas (eds.), BUCLD24: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 749-760. Boston: Somerville,MA: Cascadilla Press.
203. Wanner, Anja 1999 Verbklassifizierung und aspektuelle Alternationen im Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
204. Wasow, Thomas 1977 Transformations and the lexicon. In: Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow andAdrianAkmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 327-360. NewYork: Academic Press.
205. Wegener, Heide 1985 "Er bekommtwidersprochen" - Argumente für die Existenz eines Dativpassivs im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 96: 127-139.
206. Williams, Edwin 1981a Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81- 114.
207. Williams, Edwin 1981b On the notions 'lexically related' and 'head of a word'. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245-274.
208. Williams, Edwin 1987 Implicit arguments, the binding theory, and control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 151-180.
209. Williams, Joseph 1999 Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. New York: Longman.
210. Wood, Alistair 2001 International scientific English: The language of research scientists around the world. In: John Flowerdew and Matthew Peacock (eds.), Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes, 71-83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
211. Wunderlich, Dieter 1997 Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27-68.
212. Wyngaerd, Guido vanden 1988 Passive and the analysis of auxiliary verbs. Linguistics in the Netherlands 19 (= AVT Publications 4): 159-168.
213. Xiao, Richard, Tony McEnery and Yufang Qian 2006 Passive constructions in English and Chinese: A corpus-based contrastive study. Languages in Contrast 6: 109-149.
214. Yakhontova, Tatyana 2002 Titles of conference presentation abstracts: A cross-cultural perspective. In: Eija Ventola, Celia Shalom and Susan Thompson (ed.), The Language of Conferencing, 301-313. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
215. Zaenen, Annie 1993 Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In: James Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon, 129-161. Dordrecht/ Boston: Kluwer.
216. Zandvoort, Reinard 1957 A Handbook of English Grammar. London: Longman.
217. Zobl, Helmut 1989 Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In: Susan Gass and Jacqueline Schachter (eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on SecondLanguageAcquisition, 203-221.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
218. Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa 1985 The relation between morphophonology and morphosyntax. The case of Roman causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 695-727.
219. Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa 1998 Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
220. Zwicky,Arnold 2006 How long have we been avoiding the passive, and why?Language Log. http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/%7Emyl/languagelog/archives/003380.html. Last accessed October 29, 2007.
221. Austen, Jane (1985): Emma. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Original work published 1816)
222. Austen, Jane (1985): MansfieldPark. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Originalwork published 1814)
223. Brontë,Emily (1985):WutheringHeights. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Originalwork published 1847)
224. Bacon, Charlotte (2002): Lost Biography. New York: Picador.
225. Davis, William (1994): A Government of Our Own: TheMaking of the Confederacy. New York: Free Press
226. Fielding, Helen (1996): Bridget Jones's Diary. London: Picador.
227. Fielding, Helen (1999): Bridget Jones-The Edge of Reason. London: Picador.
228. Hitchens,Christopher: "Stenographer to the Stars." Retrieved January 1, 2008, from http://www.salon.com/weekly/woodward960701.html.
229. Taylor, Alan (Director) and Liz Tuccillo (Writer) (2003): The post-it always sticks twice [Television series episode]. Michael Patrick King (Producer), Sex and the City. NewYork: Home BoxOffice.
230. Klemperer,Viktor (1995): Ich willZeugnis ablegen bis zum letzten [I will bear witness until the end]. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.
231. Leduff, Charlie (2003, February 1): A wanderer for peace has run out of road. The New York Times. Retrieved January 1, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/01/us/a-wanderer-for-peace-has-run-out-ofroad. html
232. Obama, Barack (2009, January 20): Inaugural Address. Retrieved January 22, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/us/politics/20text-obama.html.
233. Reagan,Ronald (1986,December 6):RadioAddress to theNation on the Iran Arms and Contra Aid Controversy. Retrieved January 1, 2008, from http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1986/120686a.htm.
234. Penchaszade,Analia: 'El Desaperecido' as a Terror Tactic that Lasts Past State Terrorism. Retrieved January 1, 2008, from http://www.iisd.org/YOUTH/ysbk047a.htm.