On deriving complex polysemy: The grammaticalization of get

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-39

  Gronemeyer, Claire ^a,b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248757891     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674399000118     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andersen, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Language 49: 765-93
2. Austin, F. (1998). Points of Modern English usage LXXIV. English Studies 79: 73-5
3. Baron, N. S. (1977). Language acquisition and historical change. Amsterdam: North-Holland
4. Benveniste, E. (1960). 'Etre' et 'avoir' dans leur fonctions linguistiques. Paris: Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris LV
5. Brinton, L. (1988). The development of English aspectual systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca (1994). The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
7. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
8. Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
9. Craig, C. (1991). Ways to go in Rama. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 455-92
10. Croft, W. (1995). Bringing chaos into order: mechanisms for the actuation of language change. Talk given at ICHL 95
11. Denison, D. (1993). English historical syntax. London: Longman
12. Disterheft, D. (1977). The syntax of the infinitive in Indo-European: evidence from Indo-Iranian, Celtic and Hittite. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA
13. Duffley, P. (1992). The English infinitive. London and New York: Longman
14. Español-Echevarria, M. & A. Mahajan (1995). Infinitives as datives. Workshop on Clausal Architecture: Temporal, Aspectual and Verbal Projections, University of Bergamo, Italy
15. Fischer, O. (1994). The development of quasi-auxiliaries in English and changes in word order. Neophilologus 78: 137-64
16. Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
17. Freeze, R. (1992). Existentials and other locatives. Language 68: 553-95
18. Fujita, K. (1996). Double objects, causatives, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 146-73
19. Gronemeyer, C. (1997). A syntactic and semantic approach to the polysemy in get. MS Lund University
20. Gronemeyer, C. (1998). Deontic uses of get. Talk given at the Conference on Modal Verbs in Romance and Germanic in Antwerp
21. Guéron, J. & T. Hoekstra (1995). The temporal interpretation of predication. In A. Cardinaletti & M. T. Guasti (eds.), Small clauses. Syntax and semantics, vol. 28. San Diego: Academic Press. 77-107
22. Haegeman, L. (1985). The get-passive and Burzio's generalization. Lingua 66: 53-77
23. Hale, K. & J. Keyser (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale & J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: a festschrift for Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 53-108
24. Heine, B. (1995). Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality. In J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (eds.), Modality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 17-53
25. Heine, B. (1996). Some principles of grammaticalization. Plenary Talk given at XVIth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Turku, Finland
26. Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer (1991). Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: Chicago University Press
27. Hoekstra, T. (1984). Krijgen. In H. Bennis & W. U. S. van Lessen Kloeke (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris. 65-72
28. Hoekstra, T. (1994). Categories and arguments. MS, University of Leiden
29. Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30. Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
31. Jespersen, O. (1909-49). A modern English grammar on historical principles. Heidelberg/Copenhagen: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung/ Ejnar Munksgaard. Reprinted London: 1961
32. Johansson, S. & S. Oksefjell (1996). Towards a unified account of the syntax and semantics of GET. In J. Thomas & M. Short (eds.), Using corpora for language research. London: Longman. 57-75
33. Kayne, R. (1993). Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47: 3-25
34. Kimball (1973). Get. In Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 2. New York: Ablex. 205-15
35. Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
36. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport (1986). The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623-66
37. ter Meulen, A. (1995). Representing time in natural language: the dynamic interpretation of tense and aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
38. Miller, J. (1985). Semantics and syntax: parallels and connections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
39. Myhill, J. (1995). Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33: 157-211
40. Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: Bradford
41. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, & J. Svartvik (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman
42. Ritter, E. & S. T. Rosen (1993). Deriving causation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 519-55
43. Roberts, I. (1993). A formal account of grammaticalization in the history of Romance futures. Folia Linguistica Historica 13: 219-58
44. Stowell, T. (1982). The tense of infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 561-70
45. Sweetser, E. E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
46. Taraldsen, K. T. (1995). Participle-based small clause complements of få 'get' in Norwegian. In A. Cardinaletti & M. T. Guasti (eds.), Small clauses. Syntax and semantics, vol. 28. San Diego: Academic Press. 207-33
47. Traugott, E. C. & B. Heine (1991). Introduction. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1-14
48. Ultan, R. (1978). Towards a typology of substantival possession. In J. H. Greenberg (eds.), Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 11-49
49. Visser, F. T. (1963). An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: E. J. Brill
50. Weiner, E. J. & W. Labov (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19: 29-58
51. Weinreich, U. (1953/1968). Languages in contact: findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton
52. Weinreich, U., W. Labov & M. Herzog (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 95-195
53. Wekker, H. Chr. (1985). Points of Modern English syntax LXVII. English Studies 66: 456-9