When are implicit agents encoded? Evidence from cross-modal naming

Brain and Language

Volumn 68, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 185-191

  Melinger, Alissa ^a   Mauner, Gail ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Argument structure; Cross modal naming; Implicit agents; Lexical semantics; Sentence processing; Verb representations

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0033563749     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1999.2097     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Boland J. E. The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes. 12:1997;423-484.
2. Boland J. E., Tanenhaus M. K., Garnsey S. M., Carlson G. N. Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;774-806.
3. Forster K. I. Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. Cooper W. E., Walker E. C. T. Sentence processing: Studies presented to Merrill Garret. 1979;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
4. Jones C. Purpose clauses. 1991;Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
5. Mauner G., Tanenhaus M. K., Carlson G. N. Implicit arguments in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;357-382.
6. Mauner G., Koenig J. P. Linguistic vs. conceptual sources of implicit agents in sentence comprehension. 1999.
7. Mauner, G, Koenig, J. P, Melinger, A, &, Bienvenue, B. (forthcoming), The lexical source of unexpressed participants and their role in sentence and discourse understanding. In, P. Merlo & S. Stevenson, (Eds.), Sentence processing and the lexicon: Formal, computational, and experimental perspectives, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
8. McElree B., Griffith T. Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 21:1995;134-157.
9. Roeper T. Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation. Linguistic Inquiry. 18:1987;267-310.
10. Trueswell J. C., Tanenhaus M. K., Kello C. Verb specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 19:1993;528-553.
11. Tyler L. K., Marslen-Wilson W. D. The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 16:1977;683-692.