On the status of an implicit arguments in middles

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 527-553

  Iwata, Seizi ^a  

^a GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042751244     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226799007914     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ackema, P. & Schoorlemmer, M. (1994). The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface. Lingua 93. 59-90.
2. Ackema, P. & Schoorlemmer, M. (1995). Middles and non-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 173-197.
3. Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych-verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 291-352.
4. Bouchard, D. (1995). The semantics of syntax: a Minimalist approach to grammar. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
5. Cinque, G. (1988). On si constructions and the theory of arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 521-581.
6. Culicover, P. & Jackendoff, R. (1995). Something else for the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 249-275.
7. Dinsmore, J. (1981). Pragmatics, formal theory, and the analysis of presupposition. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
8. Dixon, R. (1991). A new approach to grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Ernst, T. (1984). Towards an integrated theory of adverb position in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
10. Ernst, T. (1998). Review of Pesetsky (1995): Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades. Journal of Linguistics 34. 265-270.
11. Fagan, S. (1992). The syntax and semantics of middle constructions: a study with special reference to German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fellbaum, C. (1985). Adverbs in agentless actives and passives. In Eilfort, W., Kroeber, P. & Peters, K. (eds.), CLS 21, Part 2: Papers from the parasession on causatives and agentivity. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago. 21-31.
13. Fellbaum, C. (1986). On the middle construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
14. Fujita, K. (1994). Double objects, causatives, and derivational economy. Linguistics Inquiry 27. 146-173.
15. Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (1987). A view from the middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers 10. Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
17. Iwata, S. (1993). Three types of passives for psych-verbs. English Linguistics 10. 160-183.
18. Iwata, S. (1995). The distinctive character of psych-verbs as causatives. Linguistic Analysis 25. 95-120.
19. Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Jackendoff, R. (1987a). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 369-411.
21. Jackendoff, R. (1987b). Adjuncts. Ms., Brandeis University.
22. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Jackendoff, R., Maling, J. & Zaenen, A. (1993). Home is subject to principle A. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 173-177.
24. Keyser, J. & Roeper, T. (1984). On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 381-416.
25. Levin, L. (1982). Sluicing: a lexical interpretation procedure. In Bresnan, J. (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 509-654.
26. Levin, B. & Rappaport, M. H. (1995). Unaccusativity: at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Massam, D. (1992). Null objects and non-thematic subjects. Journal of Linguistics 28. 115-137.
28. Noguchi, T. (1989). Morphologically-related predicates: ergatives and middles in English. English Linguistics 6. 150-167.
29. Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Rappaport, M. & Levin, B. (1988). What to do with theta-roles. In Wilkins, W. (ed.), Syntax and semantics 21: Thematic relations. New York: Academic Press. 7-36.
31. Roberts, I. (1985). The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
32. Roeper, T. (1993). Explicit syntax in the lexicon: The representation of nominalization. In Pustejovsky, J. (ed.), Semantics and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 185-220.
33. Rosta, A. (1995). 'How does this sentence interpret?' The semantics of English mediopassives. In Aarts, B. & Meyer, C. F. (eds.), The verb in contemporary English: theory and description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 123-144.
34. Safir, K. (1991). Evaluative predicates and the representation of implicit arguments. In Freidin, R. (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 99-131.
35. Stroik, T. (1992). Middles and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 127-137.
36. Stroik, T. (1994). On middle formation: A reply to Zribi-Hertz. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 165-171.
37. van Oosten, J. (1977). Subjects and agenthood in English. In Beach, W., Fox, S. & Philosoph, S. (eds.), CLS 13: Papers from the Regional Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago. 459-471.
38. van Oosten, J. (1986). The nature of subjects, topics and agents: a cognitive explanation. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
39. Vinet, M.-T. (1986). Remarques sur deux hypothèses paramétriques. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique 15. 279-287.
40. Vinet, M.-T. (1987). Implicit arguments and control in middles and passives. In Birdsong, D. & Montreuil, J. P. (eds.), Advances in romance linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris. 427-437.
41. Williams, E. (1987). Implicit arguments, the binding theory, and control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5. 151-180.
42. Williams, E. (1994). Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1993). On Stroik's analysis of English middle constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 583-589.
44. Zubizarreta, M. (1987). Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.