How enablers for lean product development motivate engineers

International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1117-1127

  Ringen, Geir ^a   Holtskog, Halvor ^b  

^a Sintef Raufoss Manufacturing   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

lean product development; motivation; performance

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERS; MOTIVATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIERS; CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS; CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAMS; CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; LEAN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL STATE;

LEAN PRODUCTION;

EID: 84887418891     PISSN: 0951192X     EISSN: 13623052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0951192X.2011.593046     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andersen, B., 2007. Business process improvement toolbox. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.
2. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y., 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (Spring), 74-94.
3. Bessant, J., Caffyn, S., and Gallagher, M., 2001. An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour. Technovation, 21, 67-77. (Pubitemid 32030323)
4. Brennan, L., 2001. Total quality management in a research and development environment. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12 (2), 94-102. (Pubitemid 32761034)
5. Caffyn, S., 1997. Extending continuous improvement to the new product development process. R&D management, 27 (3), 253-267. (Pubitemid 127650935)
6. Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T., 1991. Product development performance: strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M., 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
8. Drucker, P. F., 2008. Management. New York: Harper Collins.
9. Ekvall, G., 2000. Management and organizational philosophies and practices as stimulants or blocks to creative behavior: a study of engineers. Creativity and Innovations Management, 9, 94-99.
10. Feyzioglu,O. and Biiyiikcjzkan, G., 2008. An integrated group decision-making approach for new product development. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 21 (4), 366-375.
11. Filson, A. and Lewis, A., 2000. Cultural issues in implementing changes to new product development process in a small to medium sized enterprise (SME). Journal of Engineering Design, 11 (2), 149-157.
12. Finsrud, H. D., 2009. Den Norske Modellen og Regionaliser-ing av Forskningen: Et Nytt Utviklingstrinn eller Styrt Avvikling? Sosiologi i Dag, 39 (1), 63-94.
13. Fitzgerald, B., 1997. The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study. Info Systems Journal, 7, 201-212. (Pubitemid 127468509)
14. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research,18 (February), 39-50.
15. Gustafsen, B., 2005. Innovation and action research. International Journal ofAction Research, 1 (3), 267-289.
16. Hackman, J. R. and Oldham, G. R., 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
17. Hair, J. F., et al., 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
18. Herbst, P. G., 1974. Socio-technical design: strategies in multi-disciplinary research. London: Tavistock Publications.
19. Herzberg, F., 2007. The motivation-hygiene theory. In: D. S. Pugh, ed. Organization theory: selected classical readings. London: Penguin Group, 369-386.
20. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., and Snyderman, B. B., 1959. The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Ho, S. K. M., 1995. Is the ISO 9000 series for total quality management. International Journal ofPhysical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25 (1), 51-66.
22. Horie, T., Inuzuka, A., and Ikawa, Y., 2008. Managing individual autonomy to increase intrinsic motivation within a new product development organization in Japan. In: PICMET. Cape Town, South Africa: PICMET, 19051910.
23. Hulin, C. L., 1971. Individual differences and job enrichment. In: J. R. Maher, ed. New perspectives in job enrichment. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 159-191.
24. Imai, M., 1986. Kaizen. New York: Random House.
25. Jacobsen, D. I. and Thorsvik, J., 2007. Hvordan Organisasjo-nen Fungerer. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
26. Kartha, C. P., 2004. TQM Implementation: a comparison of ISO 9000:2000 quality systems standards QS 9000, ISO/TS 16949 and Baldrige criteria. The TQM Magazine, 16, 331-340.
27. Kennedy, M. N., 2003. Product development for the lean enterprise, why Toyota's system is four times more productive and how you can implement it. Richmond: The Oaklea Press.
28. Kiella, M. L. and Golhar, D. Y., 1997. Total quality management in an R&D Environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17 (2), 184-198. (Pubitemid 39026030)
29. Liker, J. K. and Hoseus, M., 2008. Toyota culture, the heart and soul ofthe toyota way. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Liker, J. K., et al., 1996. Involving suppliers in product development in the United States; and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43 (2), 165-178. (Pubitemid 126779979)
31. Lillrank, P., 2003. The quality standard, routine and nonroutine processes. Organization Studies, 24, 215-233. (Pubitemid 36932006)
32. Lillrank, P., Shani, A. B. R., and Lindberg, P., 2001. Continuous improvement: exploring alternative organizational designs. Total Quality Management, 12 (1), 41-55. (Pubitemid 33695463)
33. Ljungstrom, M. and Klefsjo, B., 2002. Implementation obstacles for a workdevelopment-oriented TQM strategy. Total Quality Management, 13 (5), 621-634.
34. Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P., 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
35. Lopez-Mesa, B. and Thompson, G., 2006. On the significance of cognitive style and the selection of appropriate design methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 17 (4), 371-386. (Pubitemid 43841683)
36. Luethge, D. J. and Byosieere, P., 2009. Honda: serendipity or strategy from 1997-2007. In: M. Freyssenet, ed. The second automobile revolution. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 112-128.
37. March, J. and Simon, H., 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
38. Mintzberg, H., 1979. The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
39. Moene, K. O. and Wallerstein, M., 2006. The Scandinavian model and economic development. Development Outreach, February, 18-35.
40. Morgan, J. M. and Liker, J. K., 2006. The Toyota product development system, integrating people, process and technology. New York: Productivity Press.
41. Nilsson-Witell, L., Antoni, M., and Dahlgaard, J. J., 2005. Continuous improvement in product development. The International Journal ofQuality & Reliability Management, 22, 753-768.
42. Olin, T And Wickenberg, J., 2001. Rule Breaking in New Product Development-crime or Necessity? Creativity and Innovation Management, 10 (1), 15-25. (Pubitemid 33349750)
43. Pawlowsky, P., 2001. The treatment of organizational learning in management science. In: M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, and I. Nonaka, eds. Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 61-88.
44. Perrow, C., 1979. Complex organizations: a critical essay. Foresman: Scott.
45. Powell, T. C., 1995. Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Strategy Management Journal, 16, 15-37.
46. Reinertsen, D. G., 1997. Managing the design factory. New York: The Free Press.
47. Repenning, N. P., 2001. Understanding fire fighting in new product development. The Journal ofProduct Innovation Management, 18, 285-300. (Pubitemid 32903555)
48. Sandstrom, J. and Toivanen, J., 2002. The problem of managing product development engineers: can the balanced scorecard be an answer? International Journal ofProduction Economics, 78, 79-90. (Pubitemid 34532504)
49. Shook, J., 2008. Managing to learn: using A3 management process to solve problems, gain agreement, mentor, & lead. Cambridge: Lean Enterprise Institute.
50. Shook, R. L., 1988. Honda, an American success story-revolutionizing the art of management. New York: Prentice Hall Press.
51. Singh, A., 2000. Motivational assessment of construction engineers. In: K. D. Walsh, ed. Building together for a better tomorrow in an increasingly complex world, construction Congress VI. Orlando, Florida: Amer Society of Civil Engineers, 554-563.
52. Sobek, D. K. and Smalley, A., 2008. Understanding A3 thinking, a critical component ofToyota's PDCA management system. New York: Productivity Press.
53. Ward, A. C., 2007. Lean product and process development. Cambridge: Lean Enterprise Institute.
54. Ward, A. C., et al., 1995. The second toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review, 36 (3), 43-61.
55. Yong, J. and Wilkinson, A., 2001. Rethinking total quality management. Total Quality Management, 12 (2), 247258.