An integrated group decision-making approach for new product development

International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 366-375

  Feyzioglu O ^a   Buyukozkan G ^a  

^a GALATASARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Choquet integral; Fuzzy sets; Group decision making; Multiple preference format; Quality function deployment

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BENCHMARKING; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION THEORY; FUZZY SETS; GROUP TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCTION CONTROL; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; SET THEORY;

CHOQUET INTEGRALS; COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM); COMPETING SYSTEMS; CUSTOMER NEEDS; FUZZY SET THEORY (FST); GROUP DECISION MAKING (GDM); GROUP DECISIONS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (NPD); NEW PRODUCTS; PLANNING METHODOLOGY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CYCLES; PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD); SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT; VOICE OF THE CUSTOMER;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 47749150318     PISSN: 0951192X     EISSN: 13623052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09511920701575195     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bouchereau, V. and Rowlands, H., Methods and techniques help quality function deployment (QFD). Benchmarking: An Int. J., 2000, 7, 8-20.
2. Büyüközkan, G., Mauris, G., Feyzioǧlu, O. and Berrah, L., Providing elucidations of web site evaluation based on a multi-criteria aggregation with the Choquet integral. Proceedings of 10th IFSA World Congress (IFSA03), Istanbul, Turkey, 2003, pp. 131-134.
3. Buyukozkan, G. and Feyzioǧlu, O., Group decision-making to better respond customer needs in software development. Comput. Ind. Engng, 2005, 48, 427-441.
4. Chan, L.K. and Wu, M.L., Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur. J. Op. Res., 2002, 143, 463-497.
5. Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F. and Alonso, S., Induced ordered weighted geometric operators and their use in the aggregation of multiplicative preference relations. Int. J. Intell. Systems, 2004, 19, 233-255.
6. Dubois, D. and Prade, H., On the use of aggregation operations in information fusion processes. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2004, 142, 143-161.
7. Erol, I. and Ferrell, W.G., A methodology for selection problems with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2003, 86, 187-199.
8. Grabisch, M., The application of fuzzy integrals in multi-criteria decision-making. Eur. J. Opl Res., 1996, 89, 445-456.
9. Grabisch, M., k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1997, 92, 167-189.
10. Hales, R., Adapting QFD to the US. IIE Solutions, 1995, 27, 15-18.
11. Harding, J.A., Popplewell, K., Fung, R.Y.K. and Omar, A.R., An intelligent information framework relating customer requirements and product characteristics. Comput. Ind., 2001, 44, 51-65.
12. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Chiclana, F., Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations. Eur. J. Opl Res., 2001, 129, 372-385.
13. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F. and Luque, M., Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur. J. Opl Res., 2004, 154, 98-109.
14. Ho, E.S.S.A., Lai, Y.J. and Chang, S.I., An integrated group decision-making approach to quality function deployment. IIE Trans, 1999, 31, 553-567.
15. Lai, Y.J., Ho, E.S.S.A. and Chang, S.I., Identifying customer preferences in quality function deployment using group decision-making techniques.
16. In Integrated Product and Process Development: Methods, Tools, and Technologies, edited by J.M. Usher, U. Roy and H.R. Parsaei, 1998, Chapter 1, pp. 1-28 (Wiley: New York).
17. Lee, J.W. and Kim, S.H., Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Comput. Ops Res., 2000, 27, 367-382.
18. Liu, X.F., Jia, R.Q. and Viswanathan, R., An intelligent tool for analysis of imprecise software quality requirements from different perspectives. Concurrent Engng - Res. Applic., 1998, 6, 207-223.
19. Marichal, J.-L. and Roubens, M., Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. Eur. J. Opl Res., 2000, 124, 641-650.
20. Masud, A.S.M. and Dean, E.B., Using fuzzy sets in quality function deployment. Proceedings of the 2nd Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Los Angeles, CA, 1993, pp. 270-274.
21. QFD Capture, International TechneGroup Inc., 1998 (Milford: USA).
22. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1980 (McGraw Hill Company).
23. Sivaloganathan, S. and Evbuomwan, N.F.O., Quality function deployment - the technique: State of the art and future directions. Concurrent Engng, Res. Applic., 1997, 5, 171-180.
24. Verma, D., Smith, C. and Fabrycky, W., Fuzzy set based multi-attribute conceptual design evaluation. Systems Engng, 1999, 2, 187-197.
25. Xu, Z., A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision-making with linguistic preference relations. Inf. Sci., 2004, 166, 19-30.
26. Yager, R.R., On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision-making. IEEE Trans Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1988, 18, 183-190.
27. Zadeh, L.A., Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control, 1965, 8, 338-353.
28. Zhang, Q., Chena, J.C.H. and Chong, P.P., Decision consolidation: criteria weight determination using multiple preference formats. Dec. Support Systems, 2004, 38, 247-258.