Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity

Psychophysiology

Volumn 50, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1263-1274

  Yurgil, Kate A ^a,b,c   Golob, Edward J ^c,d  

^a VA CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR STRESS AND MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c Tulane University   (United States)

^d TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; EEG; N100; P300; P3a; Perceptual load

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SHORT TERM MEMORY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887409696     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12140     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Alho, K., Woods, D. L., Algazi, A., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 356-368. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90005-3
2. Arlinger, S., Lunner, T., Lyxell, B., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2009). The emergence of cognitive hearing science. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 371-384. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00753.x
3. Azizian, A., Freitas, A. L., Watson, T. D., & Squires, N. K. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity. Biological Psychology, 71, 278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.05.002
4. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-87). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. Barceló, F., Suwazono, S., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 399-403. doi: 10.1038/73975
6. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and "choking under pressure" in math. Psychological Science, 16, 101-105. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00789.x
7. Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
8. Brumback, C. R., Low, K. A., Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2004). Sensory ERPs predict differences in working memory span and fluid intelligence. NeuroReport, 15, 373-376. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200402090-00032
9. Brumback, C. R., Low, K. A., Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2005). Putting things into perspective: Individual differences in working-memory span and the integration of information. Experimental Psychology, 52, 21-30. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.1.21
10. Cohen, J. D., Botvinick, M., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: Who's in control? Nature Neuroscience, 3, 421-423. doi: 10.1038/74783
11. Colflesh, G. J. H., & Conway, A. R. A. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 699-703. doi: 10.3758/BF03196824
12. Combs, L. A., & Polich, J. (2006). P3a from auditory white noise stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 1106-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.023
13. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24-30. doi: 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00033-1
14. Conley, E. M., Michalewski, H. J., & Starr, A. (1999). The N100 auditory cortical evoked potential indexes scanning of auditory short-term memory. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 2086-2093. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00183-2
15. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331-335. doi: 10.3758/BF03196169
16. Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (2007) Variation in working memory: An introduction. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 3-20). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786. doi: 10.3758/BF03196772
18. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90003-6
19. Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake, & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62-101). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
20. Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001
21. Crowley, K. E., & Colrain, I. M. (2004). A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: Age, sleep and modality. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 732-744. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.021
22. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
23. Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 13494-13499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13494
24. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
25. Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise! ... Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493-513. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x
26. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Brain Behavioral Science, 11, 357-374. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00058027
27. Donchin, E., Kramer, A. F., & Wickens, C. D. (1986). Applications of event related brain potentials to problems in engineering psychology. In M. G. H. Coles, E. Donchin, & S. W. Porges (Eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, processes, and applications (pp. 702-718). New York, NY: Guilford.
28. Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.272
29. Duncan, J. (1998). Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 353, 1307-1317. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0285
30. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation in event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456-467. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1977.tb01312.x
31. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1982). The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biological Psychology, 14, 1-52. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(82)90016-3
32. Elward, R. L., & Wilding, E. L. (2010). Working memory capacity is related to variations in the magnitude of an electrophysiological marker of recollection. Brain Research, 1342, 55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.040
33. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00160
34. Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2003). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 145-199. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44005-X
35. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., Tuholski, S. W., Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake, & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102-134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007
36. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5, 151-166. doi: 10.1159/000013877
37. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447-455. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9
38. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51, 87-107. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00031-9
39. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1999). ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 101, 267-291. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00008-6
40. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 1033-1044. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
41. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-329. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.317
42. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00019-7
43. Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8726-8733. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2145-09.2009
44. Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2011). Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture. Psychological Science, 22, 361-368. doi: 10.1177/0956797611398493
45. Frank, D. W., Yee, R. B., & Polich, J. (2012). P3a from white noise. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85, 236-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.04.005
46. Gaál, Z. A., Csuhaj, R., & Molnár, M. (2007). Age-dependent changes of auditory evoked potentials-effect of task difficulty. Biological Psychology, 76, 196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.07.009
47. Golob, E. J., & Holmes, J. L. (2011). Cortical mechanisms of auditory spatial attention in a target detection task. Brain Research, 1384, 128-139. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00713-1
48. Golob, E. J., Irimajiri, R., & Starr, A. (2007). Auditory cortical activity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Relationship to subtype and conversion to dementia. Brain, 130, 740-752. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl375
49. Golob, E. J., Johnson, J. K., & Starr, A. (2002). Auditory event-related potentials during target detection are abnormal in mild cognitive impairment. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 151-161. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00713-1
50. Golob, E. J., & Starr, A. (2000). Age-related qualitative differences in auditory cortical responses during short-term memory. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 2234-2244. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00468-5
51. Golob, E. J., & Starr, A. (2004). Serial position effects in auditory event-related potential during working memory retrieval. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 40-52.
52. Goodin, D. S., Squires, K. C., Henderson, B. H., & Starr, A. (1978). Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 44, 447-458. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90029-9
53. Harmony, T., Bernal, J., Fernández, T., Silva-Pereyra, J., Fernández-Bouzas, A., Marosi, E., ... Reyes, A. (2000). Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 53-60. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00044-0
54. Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182, 177-180. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4108.177
55. Jeon, Y. W., & Polich, J. (2003). Meta-analysis of P300 schizophrenia studies: Patients, paradigms and practical implications. Psychophysiology, 40, 684-701. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00070
56. Johnsen, A. M., & Briggs, G. E. (1973). On the locus of display load effects in choice reactions. Experimental Psychology, 99, 266-271. doi: 10.1037/h0034632
57. Johnson, M. K., McMahon, R. P., Robinson, B. M., Harvey, A. N., Hahn, B., Leonard, C. J., ... Gold, J. M. (2013). The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 27, 220-229. doi: 10.1037/a0032060
58. Johnson, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00649.x
59. Johnson, R. (1993). On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology, 30, 90-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03208.x
60. Johnson, R., & Donchin, E. (1982). Sequential expectancies and decision-making in a changing environment: An electrophysiological approach. Psychophysiology, 19, 183-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1982.tb02545.x
61. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169-183. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169
62. Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614-621. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x
63. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 336-358. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.336
64. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.336
65. Kerr, B. (1973). Processing demands during mental operations. Memory & Cognition, 1, 401-412. doi: 10.3758/BF03208899
66. Knight, R. T. (1990). Neural mechanisms of event-related potentials: Evidence from human lesion studies. In J. Rohbraugh, R. Parasuraman, & R. Johnson (Eds.), Event-related brain potentials: Basic issues and applications (pp. 3-18). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67. Knight, R. T. (1997). Distributed cortical network for visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 75-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.1.75
68. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451
69. Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science, 8, 395-398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00432.x
70. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339
71. McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A., Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: Evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24, 222-243. doi: 10.1037/a0017619
72. Mesulam, M. M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Annals of Neurology, 28, 597-613. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280502
73. Miller, A. E., Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2012). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict action monitoring and the error-related negativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 757-763. doi: 10.1037/a0026595
74. Muller-Gass, A. (2002). Event-related potential measures of the inhibition of information processing: I. Selective attention in the waking state. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46, 177-195. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00111-3
75. Muller-Gass, A., & Schröger, E. (2007). Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction. Brain Research, 1136, 169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.020
76. Näätänen, R. (1991). Mismatch negativity outside strong attentional focus: A commentary on Woldorff etal. (1991). Psychophysiology, 28, 478-484. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb00735.x
77. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x
78. Nakano, H., Saron, C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2010). Speech and span: Working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2886-2898. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21400
79. Navon, D. (1989). The locus of attentional selection: Is it early, late, or neither? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 47-68. doi: 10.1080/09541448908403071
80. Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2009). Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? Brain Research, 1291, 92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.042
81. Peltz, C. B., Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2011). Age-related changes in electrophysiological and neuropsychological indices of working memory, attention control, and cognitive flexibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-12.
82. Picton, T. W., Hillyard, S. A., Krausz, H. I., & Galambos, R. (1974). Human auditory evoked potentials. I: Evaluation of components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 36, 179-190. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(74)90155-2
83. Polich, J. (1991). P300 in the evaluation of aging and dementia. In C. H. M. Brunia, G. Mulder, & M. N. Verbaten (Eds.), Event-related brain potential research (EEG Suppl) (pp. 304-323), Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
84. Polich, J. (1996). Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies. Psychophysiology, 33, 334-353. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01058.x
85. Polich, J. (2003). Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In J. Polich (Ed.) Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings (pp. 83-98), Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0294-4_5
86. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
87. Polich, J. (2012). Neuropsychology of P300. In S. J. Luck, & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), Handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 159-188), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88. Polich, J., & Criado, J. R. (2006). Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 172-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.12.012
89. Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (1998). Attention, self-regulation and consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 353, 1915-1927. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0344
90. Reynolds, J. H., & Desimone, R. (1999). The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron, 24, 19-29. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80819-3
91. Ross, B., Hillyard, S. A., & Picton, T. W. (2010). Temporal dynamics of selective attention during dichotic listening. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1360-1371. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp201
92. Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Canoune, H., & Ritter, W. (1990). Short-term memory storage and retention: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 76, 419-439. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90096-3
93. Shelton, J. T., Elliott, E. M., Matthews, R. A., Hill, B. D., & Gouvier, W. D. (2010). The relationship of working memory, secondary memory, and general fluid intelligence: Working memory is special. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 813-820. doi: 10.1037/a0019046
94. Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628-654. doi: 10.1037/a0027473
95. Sörqvist, P., Stenfelt, S., & Rönnberg, J. (2012). Working memory capacity and visual-verbal cognitive load modulate auditory-sensory gating in the brainstem: Toward a unified view of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 2147-2154. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00275
96. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (2001). Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology, 38, 343-358. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3820343
97. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90263-1
98. Starr, A., & Golob, E. J. (2006). Cognitive factors modulating auditory cortical potentials. In R. Burkard, M. Don, & J. J. Eggermont (Eds.), Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application (pp. 508-525). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
99. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
100. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104-132. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
101. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498-505. doi: 10.3758/BF03192720
102. Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1302-1321. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1302
103. Vaughan, H. G., Arezzo, J. C., & Picton, T. W. (1988). The neural basis of event-related potentials. In T. W. Picton (Ed.), Human event-related potentials (pp. 45-96). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
104. Vaughan, H. G., Ritter, W., & Simson, R. (1980). Topographic analysis of auditory event-related potentials. Progress in Brain Research, 54, 279-285. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61635-0
105. Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1993). Facts and fiction about memory aging: A quantitative integration of research findings. Journal of Gerontology, 48, 157-171. doi: 10.1093/geronj/48.4.P157
106. Verkindt, C., Bertrand, O., Perrin, F., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1995). Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex: N100 topography and multiple dipole model analysis. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials Section, 96, 143-156. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)00242-7
107. Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751. doi: 10.1038/nature02447
108. Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51-79. doi: 10.1080/027249896392801
109. Watson, J. M., Lambert, A. E., Miller, A. E., & Strayer, D. L. (2011). The magical letters P, F, C, and sometimes U: The rise and fall of executive attention with the development of prefrontal cortex. In K. Fingerman, C. Berg, J. Smith, & T. Antonucci (Eds.), Handbook of lifespan psychology (pp. 407-436). New York, NY: Springer.
110. Woolsey, C. N., & Walzl, E. M. (1942). Topical projection of nerve fibres from local regions of the cochlea to the cerebral cortex of the cat. Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin, 71, 315-344.
111. Yurgil, K. A., & Golob, E. J. (2010). Neural activity before and after conscious perception in dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2952-2958. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.004
112. Zouridakis, G., Simos, P. G., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (1998). Multiple bilaterally asymmetric cortical sources account for the auditory N1m component. Brain Topography, 10, 183-189. doi: 10.1023/A:1022246825461