Neural activity before and after conscious perception in dichotic listening

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2952-2958

  Yurgil, Kate A ^a   Golob, Edward J ^a,b,c  

^a Tulane University   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory event related potentials; Dichotic listening; EEG; Multistable perception; P50

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NERVE CONDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955268880     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ahonniska J., Cantell M., Tolvanen A., Lyytinen Speech perception and brain laterality: The effect of ear advantage on auditory event-related potentials. Brain and Language 1993, 45:127-146.
2. Arieli A., Sterkin A., Grinvald A., Aertsen A. Dynamics of ongoing activity: Explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science 1996, 273:1868-1871.
3. Balaban M.T., Anderson L.M., Wisniewski A.B. Lateral asymmetries in infant melody perception. Developmental Psychology 1998, 34:39-48.
4. Barry R.J., Kirkaikul S., Hodder D. EEG alpha activity and the ERP to target stimuli in an auditory oddball paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2000, 39:39-50.
5. Bramon E., Rabe-Hesketh S., Sham P., Murray R.M., Frangou S. Meta-analysis of the P300 and P50 waveforms in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 2004, 70:315-329.
6. Brancucci A., San Martini P. Laterality in the perception of temporal cues of musical timbre. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:1445-1451.
7. Brandt M.E., Jansen B.H. The relationship between prestimulus alpha amplitude and visual evoked potential amplitude. International Journal of Neuroscience 1991, 61(3-4):261-268.
8. Broadbent D.E. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1954, 47:191-196.
9. Cancelli I., Cadore I.P., Merlino G., Valentinis L., Moratti P.U., Bergonzi G.L.G., Valente M. Sensory gating deficit assessed by P50/Pb middle latency event related potential in Alzheimer's disease. Clinical Neurophysiology 2006, 23:421-425.
10. Chong S.C., Blake R. Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research 2006, 46:1794-1803.
11. Cobb W.A., Morton H.B. Cerebral potential evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry. Nature 1967, 216:1123-1125.
12. Eichele T., Nordby H., Rimol L., Hugdahl K. Asymmetry of evoked potential latency to speech sounds predicts the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 24(3):405-412.
13. Erwin R.J., Buchwald J.S. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: Differential recovery cycle characteristics. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1986, 64:417-423.
14. Erwin R.J., Buchwald J.S. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: Differential effects of sleep in the human. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1986, 65:383-392.
15. Fitch R.H., Miller S., Tallal P. Neurobiology of speech perception. Annual Review Neuroscience 1997, 20:331-353.
16. Foundas A.L., Corey D.M., Hurley M.M., Heilman K.M. Verbal dichotic listening in right and left-handed adults: Laterality effects of directed attention. Cortex 2006, 42:79-86.
17. Foundas A.L., Corey D.M., Hurley M.M., Heilman K.M. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering. Cognitive Behavioral Neurology 2004, 17(4):224-232.
18. Golob E.J., Johnston J.K., Starr A. Auditory event-related potentials during target detection are abnormal in mild cognitive impairment. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001, 113:151-161.
19. Golob E.J., Ovasapyan V., Starr A. Event-related potentials accompanying motor preparation and stimulus expectancy in the young, young-old and oldest-old. Neurobiology of Aging 2005, 26:531-542.
20. Gómez C.M., Flores A., Ledesman A. Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contingent negative variation period. Brain Research Bulletin 2006, 73:40-47.
21. Gómez C.M., Marco J., Grau C. Visuo-motor cortical network of the contingent negative variation. Neuroimage 2006, 20:216-226.
22. Green M.F., Hugdahl K., Mitchell S. Dichotic listening during auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 1994, 151:357-362.
23. Hiscock M., Stewart C. The effect of asymmetrically focused attention upon subsequent ear differences in dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia 1984, 22(3):337-351.
24. Hugdahl K. Dichotic listening in the study of auditory laterality. The asymmetrical brain 2003, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. K. Hugdahl, R.J. Davidson (Eds.).
25. Jessen F., Kucharsk I.C., Fries T., Papassotiropoulos A., Hoenig K., Maier W., et al. Sensory gating deficit expressed by a disturbed suppression of the P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Psychiatry 2001, 158:1319-1321.
26. Kimura D. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1961, 15:156-165.
27. Kimura D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 1967, 3:163-168.
28. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologia 1970, 33:193-201.
29. Kraus N., McGee T., Littman T., Nicol T. Reticular formation influences on primary and non-primary auditory pathways as reflected by the middle latency response. Brain Research 1992, 587:186-194.
30. Landis T., Buttet J., Assal G., Graves R. Dissociation of ear preference in monaural word and voice recognition. Neuropsychologia 1982, 20:501-504.
31. Lansing R.W. Electroencephalographic correlates of binocular rivalry in man. Science 1964, 146:1325-1327.
32. Lee Y.S., Lueders H., Dinner D.S., Lesser R.P., Hauhn J., Klem G. Recording of auditory evoked potentials in man using chronic subdural electrodes. Brain 1984, 107:115-131.
33. Leopold D.A., Logothetis N.K. Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(7):254-264.
34. Levelt W.J.M. The alternation process in binocular rivalry. British Journal of Psychology 1966, 57(3-4):225-238.
35. Liang H., Bressler S.L., Ding M., Truccolo W.A., Nakamura R. Synchronized activity in prefrontal cortex during anticipation of visuomotor processing. NeuroReport 2002, 13:2011-2015.
36. Liegeois-Chauvel C., Musolino A., Badler J.M. Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: Evaluation and topography of middle latency components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994, 92(3):204-214.
37. Makela J.P., Hamalainen M., Hari R., McEvoy L. Whole-head mapping of middle-latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994, 92:414-421.
38. McKinnon M.C., Schellenberg E.G. A left-ear advantage for forced-choice judgements of melodic contour. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1997, 51:171-175.
39. Meng M., Tong F. Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision 2004, 4:539-551.
40. Milner B., Taylor L., Sperry R.W. Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science 1968, 161:184-186.
41. Morais J. Monaural ear differences for same-different reaction times to speech with prior knowledge of ear stimulated. Perception and Motor Skills 1975, 41:829-830.
42. Ofek E., Pratt H. Ear advantage and attention: An ERP study of auditory cued attention. Hearing Research 2004, 189:107-118.
43. Parvizi J., Damasio A. Consciousness and the brainstem. Cognition 2001, 79:135-159.
44. Pendse S.G. Hemispheric asymmetry in making absolute judgments of monaurally presented pure tones. Perception and Motor Skills 1977, 44:923-928.
45. Picton T., Hillyard S., Krausz H., Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1974, 36:179-190.
46. Pelizzone M., Hari R., Makela J.P., Huttunen J., Ahlfors S., Hamalainen M. Cortical origin of middle-latency auditory evoked responses in man. Neuroscience Letters 1987, 82:302-307.
47. Pfurtscheller G., Lopes da Silva F.H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 110:1842-1857.
48. Pfurtscheller G., Stancack A. Event-related synchronization (ERS) in the alpha band-An electrophysiological correlate of cortical idling: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1996, 24:39-46.
49. Polyakov A., Pratt H. Three-channel Lissajous' trajectory of human middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Ear Hearing 1994, 15:390-399.
50. Rock I., Palmer S. The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Scientific American 1990, 263(6):84-90.
51. Sininger Y.S., Cone-Wesson B. Lateral asymmetry in the ABR of neonates: Evidence and mechanisms. Hearing Research 2006, 212:203-211.
52. Smith P.L., Ratcliff R. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neurosciences 2004, 27(3):161-168.
53. Srinivasan R. Internal and external neural synchronization during conscious perception. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 2004, 14(2):825-842.
54. Sterzer P., Kleinschmidt A., Rees G. The neural bases of multistable perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:310-318.
55. Timsit-Berthier M.H., Mantanus M., Ansseau A., Doumont V. CNV and functional state changes during long-lasting and repetitive recording sessions. Motivation, motor and sensory processes of the brain: Electrical potentials, behavior and clinical use 1980, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 673-681. H.H. Kornhuber, L. Deecke (Eds.).
56. Tong F., Meing M., Blake R. Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:502-511.
57. Usher M., McClelland J.L. The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review 2001, 108(3):550-592.
58. Vaughan H.G., Arezzo J.C. The neural basis of event-related potentials. Human event related potentials: Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 1988, Vol. III:45-96. Elsiever, Amsterdam.
59. Walker P. Binocular rivalry: Central or peripheral selective processes?. Psychological Bulletin 1978, 85:376-389.
60. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C. Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203:380-384.
61. Weisser R., Weisbrod M., Roehrig M., Rupp A., Schroeder J., Scherg M. Is frontal lobe involved in the generation of auditory evoked P50?. Neurophysiology, Basic and Clinical 2001, 12(15):3303-3307.
62. Yoshiura T., Ueno S., Iramina K., Masuda K. Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. Brain Research 1995, 703:139-144.