Corporate business model transformation and inter-organizational cognition: The case of nokia

Long Range Planning

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 459-474

  Aspara, Jaakko ^a   Lamberg, Juha Antti ^b   Laukia, Arjo ^c   Tikkanen, Henrikki ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS FAILURE; BUSINESS MODELING; BUSINESS MODELS; BUSINESS UNITS; COGNITIVE PROCESS; INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL; SELECTION CRITERIA; TOP MANAGERS;

INDUSTRY; MANAGERS; PLANT SHUTDOWNS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; CORPORATE STRATEGY; MOBILE COMMUNICATION; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84887192514     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2011.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Amit R., Zott C. Value creation in E-business. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22(6-7):493-520.
2. Ansoff H.I. Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review 1957, 35(5):113-124.
3. Ansoff H.I. The New Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion 1965, McGraw Hill, New York. 1st ed.
4. Baden-Fuller C., Morgan M.S. Business models as models. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2-3):156-171.
5. Balmer J.M.T., Greyser S.A. Managing the multiple identities of the corporation. California Management Review 2002, 44(3):72-86.
6. Barabba V., Huber C., Cooke F., Pudar N., Smith J., Paich M. Amultimethod approach for creating new business models: the General Motors OnStar project. Interfaces 2002, 32(1):20-34.
7. Barnes J.H. Cognitive biases and their impact on strategic planning. Strategic Management Journal 1984, 5:129-137.
8. Barr P., Stimpert J., Huff A. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal 1992, 13:15-36.
9. Bogner W., Barr P. Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: a cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organization Science 2000, 11(2):212-226.
10. Bossidy L., Charan R. Confronting Reality: Doing What Matters to Get Things Right 2004, Crown Business, New York, NY.
11. Brown T.J., Dacin P.A., Pratt M.G., Whetten D.A. Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: an interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2006, 34(2):99-106.
12. Casadesus-Masanell R., Ricart J.E. Competing through business models. Working paper WP 713 2007, IESE Business School, University of Navarra.
13. Chandler A.D. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business 1977, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom R.S. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from xerox corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 2002, 11(3):529-555.
15. Chesbrough H. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape 2006, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Chesbrough H. Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2-3):354-363.
17. Chun R. Corporate reputation: meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews 2005, 7(2):91-109.
18. Cornelissen J.P., Haslam S.A., Balmer J.M.T. Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: towards an integrated understanding of processes. British Journal of Management 2007, 18:S1-S16.
19. Cyert R., March J. ABehavioral Theory of the Firm 1963, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20. Daft R., Weick K. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review 1984, 9(2):284-295.
21. Davis G.F., Diekmann K.A., Tinsley C.H. The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: the deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review 1994, 59:547-570.
22. Doz Y., Kosonen M. The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia's rollercoaster experience. California Management Review 2008, 50(3):95-118.
23. Doz Y.L., Kosonen M. Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2):370-382.
24. Dutton J., Fahey L., Narayanan V. Towards understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal 1983, 4(4):307-323.
25. Dutton J., Jackson S. Categorizing strategic issues - links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review 1987, 12(1):76-90.
26. Fahey L., Narayanan V.K. Linking changes in revealed causal maps and environmental change: an empirical study. Journal of Management Studies 1989, 26:361-378.
27. Fiol C. Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organization Science 1994, 5(3):403-420.
28. Fligstein N., Markowitz L. Financial reorganization of American corporations in the 1980s. Sociology and the Public Agenda Sage 1993, 185-206. Newbury Park. W.J. Wilson (Ed.).
29. Fombrun C. Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image 1996, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
30. Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
31. Ginsberg A. Construing the business portfolio - a cognitive model of diversification. Journal of Management Studies 1989, 26(4):417-438.
32. Ginzburg C. Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method 1989, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
33. Gioia D.G., Schulz M., Corley K.G. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review 2000, 25(1):63-81.
34. Grinyer P.H., Spender J.C. Recipes, crises, and adaptation in mature businesses. International Studies of Management & Organization 1979, 9(3):113-133.
35. Häikiö M. Sturm und Drang. Suurkaupoilla eurooppalaiseksi elektroniikkayritykseksi 1983-1991 2001, Edita, Helsinki, Finland.
36. Häikiö M. Globalisaatio. Telekommunikaation maailmanvalloitus 1992-2000 2001, Edita, Helsinki, Finland.
37. Häikiö M. Nokia: The Inside Story 2002, Financial Times Prentice Hall.
38. Huff A. Industry influences on strategy reformulation. Strategic Management Journal 1982, 3(2):119-131.
39. Itami H., Nishino K. Killing two birds with one stone: profit for now and learning for the future. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2-3):364-369.
40. Kolehmainen K. Dynamic strategic performance measurement systems: balancing empowerment and alignment. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(4):527-554.
41. Kuisma M. Metsässä syntynyt, puusta pudottautunut. Miksi Nokia 1996, WSOY, Juva, Finland, (1996). T. Lemola, R. Lovio (Eds.).
42. Lamberg J.-A., Tikkanen H., Nokelainen T., Suur-Inkeroinen H. Competitive dynamics, strategic consistency and organizational survival. Strategic Management Journal 2009, 30(1):45-60.
43. Linder J.C., Cantrell S. Five business-model myths that hold companies back. Strategy & Leadership 2001, 29(6):13-18.
44. Lohrke F., Bedeian A., Palmer T. The role of top management teams in formulating and implementing turnaround strategies: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 2004, 5(2):63-90.
45. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2-3). Special Issue on Business Models.
46. Lyles M., Schwenk C. Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. Journal of Management Studies 1992, 29(2):155-174.
47. March J.G., Simon H.A. Organizations 1958, Wiley, New York, NY.
48. McGrath R.G. Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2-3):347-361.
49. van der Meer H. Open innovation the Dutch treat: challenges in thinking in business models. Creativityand Innovation Management 2007, 16(2):192-202.
50. Miller D., Friesen P.H. Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal 1980, 23(4):591-614.
51. Morris M., Schindehutte M., Allen J. The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research 2005, 58(6):726-735.
52. Osterwalder A. 2004. The Business Model Ontology: A Proposition in a Design Science Approach. Universite de Lausanne: Doctoral dissertation, Lausanne, France.
53. Pehrsson A. Business relatedness and performance: a study of managerial perceptions. Strategic Management Journal 2006, 27(3):265-282.
54. Porac J., Thomas H. Managing cognition and strategy: issues, trends and future directions. Handbook of Strategy and Management 2002, Sage, London. A.M. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, R. Whittington (Eds.).
55. Porac J., Ventresca M., Mishna Y. Interorganizational cognition and interpretation. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations 2002, 579-598. Blackwell, Malden, MA. J.A.C. Baum (Ed.).
56. Porter M.E. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industry and Competitors 1980, Free Press, New York.
57. Prahalad C., Bettis R. The dominant logic - a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal. 1986, 7(6):485-501.
58. Pratt M.G., Foreman P.O. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review 2000, 25(1):18-42.
59. Rhee M., Valdez M.E. Contextual factors surrounding reputational damage with potential implications for reputation repair. Academy of Management Review 2009, 34(1):146-168.
60. Rumelt R.P. Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance 1974, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge,MA.
61. Saari M. Rahat ja henki - Ahti Hirvosen elämäntase Gummerus 2007, Finland, Helsinki.
62. Schwenk C. Information, cognitive biases, and commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review 1986, 11(2):298-310.
63. Schwenk C.R. The cognitive perspective on strategic decision-making. Decision Making for Business: A Reader 2002, Sage, London. G. Salaman (Ed.).
64. Schwenk C., Thomas H. Formulating the mess - the role of decision aids in problem formulation. Omega 1983, 11(3):239-252.
65. Siggelkow N. Evolution toward fit. Administrative Science Quarterly 2002, 47:125-159.
66. Simon H.A. Abehavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1955, 69(1):99-118.
67. Smith W., Binns A., Tushman M. Complex business models: managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2-3):448-461.
68. Spender J.C. Industry recipes 1990, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
69. Staw B., Sandelands L., Dutton J. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational-behavior - a multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 1981, 26(4):501-524.
70. Stubbart C. Managerial cognition - a missing link in strategic management research. Journal of Management Studies 1989, 26(4):325-347.
71. Szulanski G., Jensen R.J. Overcoming stickiness: an empirical investigation of the role of the template in the replication of organizational routines. Managerial and Decision Economics 2004, 25(67):347-363.
72. Szulanski G., Jensen R.J. Growing through copying: the negative consequences of innovation on franchise network growth. Research Policy 2008, 37(10):1732-1741.
73. Teece D.J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2-3):172-194.
74. Tikkanen H., Lamberg J.-A., Parvinen P., Kallunki J. Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm. Management Decision 2005, 43(6):789-809.
75. Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21(10-11):1147-1161.
76. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 1982, Cambridge University Press, New York. A. Tversky, P. Slovic, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
77. Walsh J. Managerial and organizational cognition - notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science 1995, 6(3):280-321.
78. Winter S.G., Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organization Science 2001, 12(6):730-743.
79. Zorn D., Dobbin F., Dierkes J., Kwok M.S. Cui bono: Institutional Investors, Securities Analysts, Agents, and the Shareholder Value Myth. Paper Presented at New Public and Private Models of Management: Sensemaking and Institutions May 2005, Copenhagen Business School.
80. Zott C., Amit R. Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Planning 2010, 43(2):216-226.
81. Zuckerman E.W. Focusing the corporate product: securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly 2000, 45(3):591-619.