Beyond tokenistic participation: Using representational artefacts to enable meaningful public participation in health service design

Health Policy

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 179-186

  Morrison, Cecily ^a   Dearden, Andy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health services; Older people; Participatory design; Public participation (PPI); Representational artefacts

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; AUDIOVISUAL AID; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; OUTPATIENT CARE; PAPER; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PROFESSIONALISM; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REINFORCEMENT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION;

HEALTH SERVICES; OLDER PEOPLE; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (PPI); REPRESENTATIONAL ARTEFACTS;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84887120666     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: 18726054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Boote J., Telford R., Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2002, 61:213-236.
2. Department of Health Creating a patient-led NHS 2005.
3. UK Parliament National Health Service Act 2006 2006, c41. HSMO, London.
4. Löfgren H., Leeuw E.De., Leahy M. Democratizing health consumer groups in the policy process 2011, 272. Edward Elgar Publishing.
5. Ward P.R., Thompson J., Barber R., Armitage C.J., Boote J.D., Cooper C.L., Jones G.L. Critical perspectives on consumer involvement in health research: epistemological dissonance and the know-do gap. Journal of Sociology 2009, 46:63-82.
6. Rose D., Fleischmann P., Tonkiss F., Campbell P., Wykes T. User and carer involvement in change management in a mental health context: review of the literature. Report to the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organization R&D 2002, Service User Research Enterprise, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London.
7. Dyer S. Rationalising public participation in the health service: the case of research ethics committees. Health & Place 2004, 10:339-348.
8. Carrick R., Mitchell A., Lloyd K. User involvement in research: power and compromise. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 2001, 11:217-225.
9. Beresford P. User involvement in research: exploring the challenges. Journal of Research in Nursing 2003, 8:36-46.
10. Barnes M. Power, participation, and political renewal: theoretical perspectives on public participation under new labour in Britain. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2004, 11:267-279.
11. Investing in Engagement. http://www.investinengagement.info/SiteGuidetop.
12. Gibson A., Britten N., Lynch J. Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement. Health (London, England: 1997) 2012, 16:531-547.
13. Oliver S.R., Rees R.W., Clarke-Jones L., Milne R., Oakley A.R., Gabbay J., Stein K., Buchanan P., Gyte G. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expectations 2008, 11:72-84.
14. Fudge N., Wolfe C.D.A., McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. British Medical Journal 2008, 336:313-317.
15. Crawford M.J., Rutter D., Manley C., Weaver T., Bhui K., Fulop N., Tyrer P. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. British Medical Journal 2002, 325:1263.
16. Arnstein S. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 1969, 35:216-224.
17. Tritter J.Q., McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 2006, 76:156-168.
18. Attree P., Morris S., Payne S., Vaughan S., Hinder S. Exploring the influence of service user involvement on health and social care services for cancer. Health Expectations 2011, 14:48-58.
19. Richardson A., Sitzia J., Cotterell P. Working the system. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups. Health Expectations 2005, 8:210-220.
20. Santry C. FT staff governors lack skills to take on boards 2009, 11. Health Service Journal.
21. Thompson J., Bissell P., Cooper C., Armitage C.J., Barber R. Credibility and the professionalized lay expert: reflections on the dilemmas and opportunities of public involvement in health research. Health (London, England: 1997) 2012.
22. Lockey R., Sitzia J., Gillingham T., Millyard J., Miller C., Ahmed S., Beales A., Bennett C., Parfoot S., Sigrist G., Sigrist J. Training for service user involvement in health and social care research: a study of training provision and participants' experiences 2004, Worthing and Southlands Hospitals NHS TrustWorthing, Worthing, (The TRUE Project).
23. Greenbaum J.M., Kyng M. Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems 1991.
24. Ehn P., Kyng M. Cardboard computers: mocking-it-up or hands-on the future 1992, 169-196.
25. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations 1953, 592. John Wiley & Sons.
26. Bråten S. Model monopoly and communications systems theoretical notes on democratization. Acta Sociologica: Journal of the Scandinavian Sociological Association 1973, 16:98-107.
27. Ehn P. Scandinavian design: on participation and skill in participatory design: principles and practices 1993, 41-78. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. D. Schuler, K. Namioka (Eds.).
28. Roth W.-M., McGinn M.K., Woszczyna C., Boutonné S. Differential participation during science conversations: the interaction of focal artifacts, social configurations, and physical arrangements 2007.
29. Broberg O., Andersen V., Seim R. Participatory ergonomics in design processes: the role of boundary objects. Applied Ergonomics 2011, 42:464-472.
30. Star S.L., Griesemer J.R. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 1989, 19:387-420.
31. Fischer G. Social creativity: turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design. Proceedings of the eighth conference on participatory design. Artful Integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - PDC 04 2004, 152-161.
32. Moffatt K., McGrenere J., Purves B., Klawe M. The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia 2004, 407-414. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
33. Wu M., Richards B., Baecker R. Participatory design with individuals who have amnesia. Proceedings of the eighth conference on participatory design. Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - PDC 04, vol. 1 2004, 214. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
34. Hayes G.R., Hirano S., Marcu G., Monibi M., Nguyen D.H., Yeganyan M. Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2010, 14:663-680.
35. Wolstenholme D., Cobb M., Bowen S., Wright P., Dearden A. Design led service improvement for older people. Australasian Medical Journal 2010, 3:465-470.
36. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. The EBD approach: guide and tools. Coventry; 2009.
37. Sacks H., Schegloff E., Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 1974, 50:696-735.
38. Berk L., Winsler A. Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. NAEYC research into practice series 1995, 7.
39. Elberse J.E., Caron-Flinterman J.F., Broerse J.E.W. Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives. Health Expectations 2011, 14:225-239.
40. Floyd C., Mehl W-M., Resin F-M., Schmidt G., Wolf G. Out of Scandinavia: alternative approaches to software design and system development. Human-Computer Interaction 1989, 4:253-350.
41. Tenbensel T. Interpreting public input into priority-setting: the role of mediating institutions. Health Policy 2002, 62:173-194.