Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement

Health (United Kingdom)

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 531-547

  Gibson, Andy ^a   Britten, Nicky ^a   Lynch, James ^a  

^a PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bourdieu; Fraser; Habermas; health policy; new knowledge spaces; patient and public involvement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLICY; POLITICS; SOCIAL WELFARE; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; ENGLAND; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLITICS; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL WELFARE;

EID: 84864803127     PISSN: 13634593     EISSN: 14617196     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1363459312438563     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arnstein SR.A ladder of citizen participation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969;35:216-224.
2. Baggott R,Allsop J,Jones KSpeaking for Patients and Carers: Health Consumer Groups and Policy Process. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan; 2005:.
3. Barnes MThe People's Health Service?. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Health Services Management Centre; 1997:.
4. Beresford P.User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation?.Social Policy & Society. 2002;1:95-105.
5. Bourdieu PDistinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge; 1984:.
6. Bourdieu P.What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups.Berkeley Journal of Sociology. 1987;32:1-17.
7. Bourdieu PThe Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990:.
8. Cook D.The sundered totality of system and lifeworld.Historical Materialism. 2005;13 (4): 55-78.
9. Curtice J,Jowell RBritish Social Attitudes: The 12th Report. Jowell RCurtice JPark ABrook LAhrendt D, ed. Aldershot: Dartmouth; 1995:.
10. Davies JS.The limits of partnership: An exit-action strategy for local democratic inclusion.Political Studies. 2007;55:779-800.
11. Working for Patients. London: HMSO; 1989:.
12. The Patient's Charter. London: HMSO; 1991:.
13. Learning from Bristol: Report of the Public Inquiry into Children's Heart Surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. London: HMSO; 2002:.
14. High Quality Care for All. London: HMSO; 2008a:.
15. NHS Constitution. London: HMSO; 2008b:.
16. Real Accountability. London: HMSO; 2009a:.
17. The NHS Constitution, State of Readiness Group. London: HMSO; 2009b:.
18. Commissioning, Analysis and Intelligence Team, LINks Annual Reports 2008-9. London: HMSO; 2009c:.
19. Thome DC,Alberti GMid Staffordhire NHS Foundation Trust: A Review of Lessons Learnt for Commissioners and Performance Managers Following the Healthcare Commission Investigation. London: HMSO; 2009:.
20. Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: HMSO; 2010:.
21. Elliott E,Williams G.Developing public sociology through health impact assessment.Sociology of Health and Illness. 2008;30:1101-1116.
22. Forrester J,Potts L,Rosen P.Creating science's new social contract. Paper presented at the conference of the European Association for the Study of Science and Technology; 2002York; 2002.
23. Fraser NUnruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1989:.
24. Fraser NJustice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the 'Postsocialist' Condition. Fraser N, ed. London: Routledge; 1997:.
25. Habermas JLegitimation Crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon; 1973:.
26. Habermas JThe Theory of Communicative Action (Volume 2: Lifeworld and System). Cambridge: Polity Press; 1987:.
27. Habermas JOn the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:.
28. London: HMSO; 2001:.
29. Jasanoff SDesigns on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005:.
30. Getting to the Heart of Local Accountability. London: HMSO; 2008:.
31. London: HMSO; 2007:.
32. Milewa T,Harrison S,Ahmad W,Tovey P.Citizens' participation in primary healthcare planning: Innovative citizenship practice in empirical perspective.Critical Public Health. 2002;12:39-53.
33. Mullen P,Murray-Sykes K,Kearns W.Community health council representation on planning teams: a question of politics.Public Health. 1984;98:143-151.
34. London: HMSO; 2006:.
35. Oliver S,Rees R,Clarke-Jones L, et al.A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.Health Expectations. 2008;11:72-84.
36. Pickin C,Popay J,Staley K, et al.Developing a model to enhance the capacity of statutory organizations to engage with lay communities.Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2002;1:34-42.
37. Popay J,Williams G.Public health research and lay knowledge.Social Science & Medicine. 1996;42:759-768.
38. Popay J,Williams G,Thomas C,Gatrell A.Theorising inequalities in health: The place of lay knowledge.Sociology of Health & Illness. 1998;20 (5): 619-644.
39. Pugh J.Hansard. 2009;:.
40. Rowe R,Shephard M.Public participation in the new NHS: No closer to citizen control?.Social Policy and Administration. 2002;36:275-290.
41. Scambler GSociological Theory and Medical Sociology. Scambler G, ed. London: Tavistock; 1987:.
42. Sitzia J,Cotterill P,Richardson A.Interprofessional collaboration with service users in the development of cancer services: The Cancer Partnership Project.Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2006;20:60-74.
43. Tritter JQ.Revolution or evolution: The challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world.Health Expectations. 2009;12:275-287.
44. Tritter JQ,McCallum A.The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein.Health Policy. 2006;76:156-168.
45. Wakefield EL,Poland B.Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development.Social Science & Medicine. 2005;60:2819-2832.