Parameter and rating curve uncertainty propagation analysis of the SWAT model for two small Mediterranean catchments;Analyse de la propagation des incertitudes de la courbe de tarage et des paramètres du modèle SWAT pour deux petits bassins versants de la région méditerranéenne

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1635-1657

  Sellami, Haykel ^a   La Jeunesse, Isabelle ^b   Benabdallah, Sihem ^c   Vanclooster, Marnik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^c University of Carthage   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Mediterranean catchments; model calibration; parameter uncertainty; rating curve uncertainty; SWAT; uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

MEDITERRANEAN CATCHMENT; MODEL CALIBRATION; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; RATING CURVE; SWAT;

CALIBRATION; CATCHMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; RATING; REACTOR CORES; RUNOFF; STREAM FLOW; FORECASTING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CALIBRATION; CATCHMENT; DISCHARGE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; RATING CURVE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREAMFLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; WATERSHED;

FRANCE; MEDITERRANEAN REGION;

EID: 84887117650     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2013.837222     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abbaspour, K.C., Johnson, C.A., and van Genuchten, M.T., 2004. Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone Journal, 3 (4), 1340-1352.
2. Abbaspour, K.C., et al., 2007. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333 (2-4), 413-430.
3. Afinowicz, J.D., Munster, C.L., and Wilcox, B.P., 2005. Modelling effects of brush management on the rangeland water budget: Edwards Plateau, Texas. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41 (1), 181-193.
4. Ajami, N.K., Duan, Q., and Sorooshian, S., 2007. An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction. Water Resources Research, 43 (1), W01403.
5. Ajami, N.K., Duan, X.G., and Sorooshian, S., 2005. Multi-model combination techniques for hydrologic forecasting: application to distributed model intercomparison project results. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 7 (4), 755-768.
6. Andersson, J.C.M., et al., 2009. Water availability, demand and reliability of in situ water harvesting in smallholder rain-fed agriculture in the Thukela River Basin, South Africa. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13 (12), 2329-2347.
7. Arabi, M., Govindaraju, R.S., and Hantush, M.M., 2007. A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices. Journal of Hydrology, 333 (2-4), 459-471.
8. Arnold, J.G., et al., 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment. Part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34 (1), 73-89.
9. Aronica, G.T., et al., 2006. Influence of rating curve uncertainty on daily rainfall-runoff model predictions. In: M. Sivapalan, et al., eds. Predictions in ungauged basins: promise and progress. Wallingford: IAHS Press, IAHS Publ. 303, 116-124.
10. Baffaut, C. and Benson, V.W., 2009. Modelling flow and pollutant transport in a karst watershed with SWAT. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 52, 469-479.
11. Bastola, S., Ishidaira, H., and Takeuchi, K., 2008. Regionalisation of hydrological model parameters under parameter uncertainty: a case study involving TOPMODEL and basins across the globe. Journal of Hydrology, 357 (3-4), 188-206.
12. Benham, B.L., et al., 2006. Modelling bacteria fate and transport in watersheds to support TMDLS. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 49 (4), 987-1002.
13. Beven, K., 2006. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology, 320 (1-2), 18-36.
14. Beven, K. and Binley, A., 1992. The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes, 6 (3), 279-298.
15. Beven, K. and Freer, J., 2001. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology, 249 (1-4), 11-29.
16. Blasone, R.-S., Madsen, H., and Rosbjerg, D., 2008. Uncertainty assessment of integrated distributed hydrological models using GLUE with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. Journal of Hydrology, 353 (1-2), 18-32.
17. Butts, M.B., et al., 2004. An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 298 (1-4), 242-266.
18. Chahinian, N., et al., 2011. Flow and nutrient transport in intermittent rivers: a modelling case-study on the Vène River using SWAT 2005. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (2), 268-287.
19. Clarke, R.T., Mendiondo, E.M., and Brusa, L.C., 2000. Uncertainties in mean discharges from two large South American rivers due to rating curve variability. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 45 (2), 221-236.
20. Coffey, M.E., et al., 2004. Statistical procedures for evaluating daily and monthly hydrologic model predictions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 47 (1), 59-68.
21. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V., 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research, 28 (4), 1015-1031.
22. Eckhardt, K., Fohrer, N., and Frede, H.-G., 2005. Automatic model calibration. Hydrological Processes, 19 (3), 651-658.
23. Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B, 1996. Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resources Research, 32 (7), 2161-2173.
24. Freer, J.E., et al., 2004. Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures. Journal of Hydrology, 291 (3-4), 254-277.
25. Freni, G. and Mannina, G., 2010. Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in water quality modelling: the influence of prior distribution. Journal of Hydrology, 392 (1-2), 31-39.
26. Gallart, F., et al., 2008. Investigating hydrological regimes and processes in a set of catchments with temporary waters in Mediterranean Europe. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (3), 618-628.
27. Gassman, P.W., et al., 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications and future research directions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50 (4), 1211-1250.
28. Georgekakos, K.P., et al., 2004. Characterizing streamflow simulation uncertainty through multi-model ensembles. Journal of Hydrology, 298 (1-4), 222-241.
29. Gong, Y., et al., 2011. Parameter uncertainty analysis in watershed total phosphorus modelling using the GLUE methodology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 142 (3-4), 246-255.
30. Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P.O., 1998. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resources Research, 34 (4), 751-763.
31. Jin, X., et al., 2010. Parameter and modelling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology, 383 (3-4), 147-155.
32. Li, L., et al., 2010. Evaluation of the subjective factors of the GLUE method and comparison with the formal Bayesian method in uncertainty assessment of hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 390 (3-4), 210-221.
33. McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J., and Conover, W.J., 2000. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 42 (1), 55-61.
34. McMillan, H., et al., 2010. Impacts of uncertain river flow data on rainfall-runoff model calibration and discharge predictions. Hydrological Processes, 24 (10), 1270-1284.
35. Montanari, A., 2004. An attempt to quantify uncertainty in observed river flows: effect on parameterisation and performance evaluation of rainfall-runoff models. In: Incorporating observational uncertainties into the evaluation of hydrological models I. Proceedings, American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting, H11 G-03, 13-17 December, San Francisco, CA.
36. Montanari, A., 2005. Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resources Research, 41 (8), W08406.
37. Morris, M.D., 1991. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 33 (2), 161-174.
38. Muleta, M.K. and Nicklow, J.W., 2005. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model. Journal of Hydrology, 306 (1-4), 127-145.
39. Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I-a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282-290.
40. Neitsch, S.L., et al., 2005. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2005. Temple, TX: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
41. Perrin, J.-L. and Tournoud, M.-G., 2009. Hydrological processes controlling flow generation in a small Mediterranean catchment under karstic influence. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54 (6), 1125-1140.
42. Petersen-Øverleir, A. and Reitan, T., 2005. Objective segmentation in compound rating curves. Journal of Hydrology, 311 (1-4), 188-201.
43. Plus, M., et al., 2006. Modelling water discharges and nitrogen inputs into a Mediterranean lagoonImpact on the primary production. Ecological Modelling, 193 (1-2), 69-89.
44. Schuol, J. and Abbaspour, K.C., 2006. Calibration and uncertainty issues of a hydrological model (SWAT) applied to West Africa. Advances in Geosciences, 9, 137-143.
45. Setegn, S.G., et al., 2009. SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrological Processes, 24 (3), 357-367.
46. Shen, Z.Y., Chen, L., and Chen, T., 2012. Analysis of parameter uncertainty in hydrological and sediment modelling using GLUE method: a case study of SWAT model applied to Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16 (1), 121-132.
47. Spruill, C.A., Workman, R.S., and Taraba, J. L., 2000. Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 43 (6), 1431-1439.
48. van Griensven, A., et al., 2006. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. Journal of Hydrology, 324 (1-4), 10-23.
49. van Griensven, A. and Meixner, T., 2007. A global and efficient multi-objective auto-calibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 9 (4), 277-291.
50. Viola, F., et al., 2009. Daily streamflow prediction with uncertainty in ephemeral catchments using the GLUE methodology. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 34 (10-12), 701-706.
51. Vrugt, J.A., et al., 2003. A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resources Research, 39 (8), 1201, WR 001642.
52. Vrugt, J.A., et al., 2005. Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modelling: combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation. Water Resources Research, 41 (1), W01017.
53. Vrugt, J.A. and Robinson, B.A., 2007. Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging. Water Resources Research, 43 (1), W01411.
54. Yang, J., et al., 2008. Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe basin in China. Journal of Hydrology, 358 (1-2), 1-23.