Fate of abstracts presented at the 2008 congress of the french physical and rehabilitation medicine society

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 56, Issue 7-8, 2013, Pages 492-502

  Allart, E ^a   Beaucamp, F ^a   Thevenon, A ^a  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Abstract; Congress; Physical and rehabilitation medicine; Publication rate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; DATA BASE; MEDLINE; ORGANIZATION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PUBLICATION; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SOCIETY; UNIVERSITY; WORKLOAD;

ABSTRACT; CONGRESS; CONGRÈS; MÉDECINE PHYSIQUE ET DE RÉADAPTATION; PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE; PUBLICATION RATE; RÉSUMÉ; TAUX DE PUBLICATION;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; FRANCE; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84887020463     PISSN: 18770657     EISSN: 18770665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2013.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cartwright R., Khoo A.K., Cardozo L. Publish or be damned? The fate of abstracts presented at the International Continence Society Meeting 2003. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:154-157.
2. Chand V., Rosenfeldt F.L., Pepe S. The Publication rate and impact of abstracts presented at the Cardiac society of Australia and New Zealand (1999-2005). Heart Lung Circ 2008, 17:375-379.
3. Dickersin K., Min Y.I. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993, 703:135-146.
4. Donegan D.J., Kim T.W., Lee G.C. Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the American academy of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:1428-1435.
5. von Elm E., Costanza M., Walder B., Tramèr M. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003, 3:12.
6. Goldman L., Loscalzo A. Fate of cardiology research originally published in abstract form. N Engl J Med 1980, 303:255-259.
7. Graham J.E., Karmarkar A.M., Ottenbacher K.J. Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: issues and methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 93:S111-S116.
8. Hart T., Bagiella E. Design and implementation of clinical trials in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 93:S117-S126.
9. Hoag C.C., Elterman D.S., Macneily A.E. Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. J Urol 2006, 176:2624-2629.
10. Kassirer J.P., Campion E.W. Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable. JAMA 1994, 272:96-97.
11. Kwong Y., Kwong F.N.K., Patel J. Publication rate of Trauma abstracts presented at an International Orthopaedic conference. Injury 2007, 38:745-749.
12. Oliveira L.R.S., Figueiredo A.A., Choi M., Ferrarez C.E.P.F., Bastos A.N., Netto J.M.B. The publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2003 urological Brazilian meeting. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009, 64:345-349.
13. Preston C.F., Bhandari M., Fulkerson E., Ginat D., Koval K.J., Egol K.A. Podium versus poster publication rates at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 260-264.
14. Rannou F. Speaking French: Will it be a shared opportunity for scientific communication in PMR?. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2013, 56:155-156.
15. Rollin L., Darmoni S., Caillard J.F., Gehanno J.F. Fate of abstracts presented at an International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) congress-followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals?. Scand J Work Environ Health 2009, 35:461-465.
16. Roukis T.S. Publication rates of manuscript presentations at the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Annual Scientific Conference between 1999 and 2008. J Foot Ankle Surg 2011, 50:416-419.
17. Sanossian N., Ohanian A.G., Saver J.L., Kim L.I., Ovbiagele B. Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature. Stroke 2006, 37:2588-2592.
18. Scherer R.W., Langenberg P., von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, MR000005.
19. Sivan M., Smith M., Bavikatte G., Bradley L. The academic value of rehabilitation medicine meetings. Disabil Rehabil 2010, 32:1894-1896.
20. Smith H.D., Bogenschutz E.D., Bayliss A.J., Altenburger P.A., Warden S.J. Full-text publication of abstract-presented work in physical therapy: do therapists publish what they preach?. Phys Ther 2011, 91:234-245.
21. Sprague S., Bhandari M., Devereaux P.J., et al. Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A:158-163.
22. Van der Steen L.P.E., Hage J.J., Loonen M.P.J., Kon M. Full publication of papers presented at the 1995 through 1999 European Association of Plastic Surgeons annual scientific meetings: a systemic bibliometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 114:113-120.
23. Thornton A., Lee P. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol 2000, 53:207-216.
24. Weale A.R., Edwards A.G., Lear P.A., Morgan J.D.T. From meeting presentation to peer-review publication-a UK review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006, 88:52-56.
25. Weber E.J., Callaham M.L., Wears R.L., Barton C., Young G. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish. JAMA 1998, 280:257-259.