The publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2003 urological Brazilian meeting

Clinics

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 345-349

  Oliveira, Leonardo Resende Sousa ^a   Figueiredo, André Avarese ^a   Choi, Mauro ^a   Ferrarez, Carlos Eduardo Prata Fernandes ^a   Bastos, Andre Netto ^a   Netto, Jose Murillo Bastos ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF JUIZ DE FORA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Congresses; Information dissemination; Meeting abstracts; Peer review; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; BRAZIL; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STATISTICS; UROLOGY;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; BIBLIOMETRICS; BRAZIL; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; UROLOGY;

EID: 67650603372     PISSN: 18075932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000400013     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Byerly WG, Rheney CC, Connelly JF, Verzino KC. Publication rates of abstracts from two pharmacy meetings. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:1123-7.
2. Falagas ME, Rosmarakis ES. Clinical decision-making based on findings presented in conference abstracts: is it safe for our patients? Eur Heart J. 2006; 27:2038-9.
3. Cartwright R, Khoo AK, Cardozo L. Publish or be damned? The fate of abstracts presented at the International Continence Society Meeting 2003. Neurourol Urodynam. 2007;26:154-7.
4. Arrive L, Boelle P, Dono P, Lewin M, Monnier-Cholley L, Tubiana J. Subsequent publication of orally presented original studies within 5 years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Radiology. 2004;232:101-6.
5. Juzych MS, Shin DH, Coffey J, Juzych L, Shin D. Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association for research in vision and ophthalmology? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1879-82.
6. Papagikos MA, Rossi PJ, Lee WR. Publication rate of abstracts from the annual ASTRO meeting: comparison with other organizations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:72-5.
7. Carroll AE, Sox CM, Tarini BA, Ringold S, Christakis DA. Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies' annual meeting predict subsequent publication? Pediatrics. 2003;112:1238-41.
8. Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, De Sio M, Damiano R. Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer- reviewed journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol. 2007;51:833-40.
9. Hoag CC, Elterman DS, Macneily AE. Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. J Urol. 2006;176:2624-9.
10. Fernandes FA, Ventura DE, Grande JC. Índice de publicação dos trabalhos apresentados no XXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia 2003. Rev Col Bras Cir;30:392-5.
11. Castillo J, Garcia-Guasch R, Cifuentes I. Fate of abstracts from the Paris 1995 European Society of Anaesthesiologists meeting. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002;19:888-93.
12. Weber EJ, Callaham ML, Wears RL, Barton C, Young G. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting. Why investigators fail to publish. JAMA. 1998;280:257-9.
13. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, et al. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:615- 21.
14. Dickersin K, Min YI. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;703:135-46.