Fate of abstracts presented at an International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) congress - Followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals?

Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 461-465

  Rollin, Laetitia ^a   Darmoni, Stefan ^a   Caillard, Jean François ^a   Gehanno, Jean François ^a  

^a ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Peer review; Scientific meeting

Indexed keywords

HEALTH SURVEY; LITERATURE REVIEW; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PUBLISHING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH WORK;

ARTICLE; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; EMBASE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; BIBLIOMETRICS; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PUBLISHING; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TIME; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RANDOM SAMPLE; SAMPLE SIZE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; BIBLIOMETRICS; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLICATIONS; PUBLISHING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 73449109579     PISSN: 03553140     EISSN: 1795990X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1362     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Relman AS. News reports of medical meetings: how reliable are abstracts? N Engl J Med. 1980;303:277-278
2. Froom P, Froom J. Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:591-594
3. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:MR000005.
4. Carroll AE, Sox CM, Tarini BA, Ringold S, Christakis DA. Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies' annual meeting predict subsequent publication? Pediatrics. 2003;112:1238-1241
5. Peng PH, Wasserman JM, Rosenfeld RM. Factors influencing publication of abstracts presented at the AAO-HNS Annual Meeting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:197-203.
6. Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, De Sio M, Damiano R. Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals?: a critical analysis. Eur Urol. 2007;51:833-840
7. Gehanno JF, Paris C, Thirion B, Caillard JF. Assessment of bibliographic databases performance in information retrieval for occupational and environmental toxicology. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:562-566
8. Von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramèr MR. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:12.
9. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Deveraux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Dook DJ, et al. Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:158-163
10. Rubin HR, Redelmeier DA, Wu AW, Steinberg EP. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts?: looking back at the 1991 annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:255-258
11. Gehanno J-F, Takahashi K, Darmoni S, Weber J. Citation classics in occupational medicine journals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007;33(4):245-251
12. LaDou J. The rise and fall of occupational medicine in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:285-295
13. Hofman KJ, Kanyengo CW, Rapp BA, Kotzin S. Mapping the health research landscape in Sub-Saharan Africa: a study of trends in biomedical publications. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97:41-44