Abstracts Presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: Determinants of Subsequent Peer Reviewed Publication

Journal of Urology

Volumn 176, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 2624-2629

  Hoag, Chris C ^a   Elterman, Dean S ^a   MacNeily, Andrew E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

meeting abstracts publication type ; peer review; periodicals; publishing; urology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDLINE; PEER REVIEW; PEER REVIEW ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; UROLOGY;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; CONGRESSES; HUMANS; MEDLINE; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES; UROLOGY;

EID: 33750511710     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Urological Association. Available at http://www.auanet.org. Accessed March 1, 2005
2. Riordan F.A. Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published?. Arch Dis Child 83 (2000) 524
3. Carroll A.E., Sox C.M., Tarini B.A., Ringold S., and Christakis D.A. Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies' annual meeting predict subsequent publication?. Pediatrics 112 (2003) 1238
4. Scherer R.W., Dickersin K., and Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 272 (1994) 158
5. Hashkes P., and Uziel Y. The publication rate of abstracts from the 4th Park City Pediatric Rheumatology meeting in peer-reviewed journals: what factors influenced publication?. J Rheumatol 30 (2003) 597
6. Roy D., Sankar V., Hughes J.P., Jones A., and Fenton J.E. Publication rates of scientific papers presented at the Otorhinolarygological Research Society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 26 (2001) 253
7. Eloubeidi M.A., Wade S.B., and Provenzale D. Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form. Gastrointest Endosc 53 (2001) 275
8. Bagheri S.C., Lenox N., Verschueren D.S., Holmgren E., Kademani D., Bell R.B., et al. Abstracts from the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons annual scientific meeting: proportion published and time to publication. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 (2005) 838
9. Klassen T.P., Wiebe N., Russell K., Stevens K., Hartling L., Craig W.R., et al. Abstracts of randomized controlled trials presented at the society for pediatric research meeting: an example of publication bias. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 156 (2002) 474
10. Callaham M.L., Wears R.L., Weber E.J., Barton C., and Young G. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 280 (1998) 254
11. PubMed. A service of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi. Accessed June 2004 to March 1, 2005
12. AUA. AUA 95th Annual Meeting. J Urol 163 (2000) 1
13. Journal Citation Report. Thompson Scientific ISI Web of Knowledge. Available at http://scientific.thompson.com/webofknowledge/. Accessed June 2004 to March 1, 2005
14. Timmer A., Hilsden R.J., Cole J., Hailey D., and Sutherland L.R. Publication bias in gastroenterological research-a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. BMC Med Res Methodol 2 (2002) 7
15. Weber E.J., Callaham M.L., Wears R.L., Barton C., and Young G. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish. JAMA 280 (1998) 257
16. Dirk L. Incidence of acceptance, rejection, resubmission, and nonpublication of full reports of research presented at academic meetings (1993) Presented at the Second International Congress on Peer Review, Chicago, Illinois, September 10