Full publication of papers presented at the 1995 through 1999 European Association of Plastic Surgeons Annual Scientific Meetings: A systemic bibliometric analysis

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 113-120

  Van Der Steen, Lydia P E ^a   Hage, J Joris ^a,b   Loonen, Martijn P J ^a   Kon, Moshe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; BIBLIOMETRICS; EUROPE; ORGANIZATION; PUBLISHING; TIME;

BIBLIOMETRICS; CONGRESSES; EUROPE; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 3142777928     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000127804.00139.58     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Wang, J. C., Yoo, S., and Delamarter, R. B. The publication rates of presentations at major spine specialty society meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS). Spine 24: 425, 1999.
2. Daluiski, A., Kuhns, C. A., Jackson, K. R., and Liebermanm, J. R. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. J. Orthop. Res. 16: 645, 1998.
3. Bhandari, M., Devereaux, P. J., Guyatt, G. H., et al. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am.) 84: 615, 2002.
4. Helfet, D. L. The scientific sessions at the OTA annual meeting (Editorial). J. Orthop. Trauma 12: 456, 1998.
5. Castillo, J., Garcia-Guasch, R., and Cifuentes, I. Fate of abstracts from the Paris 1995 European Society of Anaesthesiologists meeting. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 19: 888, 2002.
6. Callaham, M., Wears, R. L., and Weber, E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. J.A.M.A. 287: 2847, 2002.
7. von Elm, B. J., Poglia, G., Walder, B., and Tramèr, M. R. Fate of abstracts submitted to biomedical meetings: A systemic review. Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/prc_program2001.htm. Accessed April 2003.
8. Scherer, R. W., and Langenberg, P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (Cochrane methodology review). In The Cochrane Library, issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
9. Http://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/PubMed. Accessed February 2003.
10. Http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00238/index.htm. Accessed February 2003.
11. Hamlet, W. P., Fletcher, A., and Meals, R. A. Publication patterns of papers presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am.) 79: 1138, 1997.
12. Dellon, A. L., Scally, A. L., and Kuhlemeier, K. V. Impact of the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 90: 717, 1992.
13. Hecht, F., Hecht, B. K., and Sandberg, A. A. The journal "impact factor": A misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 104: 77, 1998.
14. Dudley, H. A. F. Surgical research: Master and servant. Am. J. Surg. 135: 458, 1978.
15. Gavazza, J. B., Foulkes, G. D., and Meals, R. A. Publication pattern of papers presented at the American Society of Surgery of the Hand annual meeting. J. Hand Surg. (Am.) 21: 742, 1996.
16. Nguyen, V., Tornetta, P., III, and Bkaric, M. Publication rates for the scientific sessions of the OTA. J. Orthop. Trauma 12: 457, 1998.
17. Murrey, D. B., Wright, R. W., Seiler, J. G., III, Day, T. E., and Schwartz, H. S. Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 1993 annual academy meeting. Clin. Orthop. 359: 247, 1999.
18. Bowrey, D. J., Morris-Stiff, G. J., Clark, G. W. B., Carey, P. D., and Mansel, R. E. Peer-reviewed publication following presentation at a regional surgical meeting. Med. Educ. 33: 212, 1999.
19. Jackson, K. R., Daluiski, A., and Kay, R. M. Publication of abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 20: 2, 2000.
20. Scherer, R. W., Dickersin, K., and Langenberg, P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: A meta-analysis. J.A.M.A. 272: 158, 1994.
21. Marx, W. F., Cloft, H. J., Do, H. M., and Kallmes, D. F. The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: Rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. Am. J. Neuroradiol 20: 1173, 1999.
22. Shubert, A., and Braun, T. Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 36: 311, 1996.
23. van Raan, A. J. F. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics 36: 379, 1996.
24. Seglen, P. O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Br. Med. J. 314: 498, 1997.
25. Callaham, M. L., Wears, R. L., Weber, E. J., Barton, C., and Young, G. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. J.A.M.A. 280: 254, 1998.
26. Rubin, H. R., Redelmeier, D. A., Wu, A. W., and Steinberg, E. P. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 8: 255, 1993.
27. van der Steen, L. P. E., Hage, J. J., Kon, M., and Mazzola, R. Reliability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for a plastic surgical scientific meeting. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111: 2215, 2003.
28. van der Steen, L. P. E., Hage, J. J., Kon, M., and Monstrey, S. J. Validity of a structured method of selecting abstracts for a plastic surgical scientific meeting. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 113: 353, 2004.
29. Neuberger, J., and Councell, C. Impact factors: Uses and abuses. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14: 209, 2002.
30. Lee, K. P., Schotland, M., Bacchetti, P., and Bero, L. A. Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. J.A.M.A. 287: 2805, 2002.
31. Saha, S., Saint, S., and Christakis, D. A. Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 91: 42, 2003.
32. Garfield, E. The quality and influence of JAMA. J.A.M.A. 259: 1946, 1988.
33. Frank, E. Authors' criteria for selecting journals. J.A.M.A. 272: 163, 1994.