Risk ranking of chemical hazards in food-A case study on antibiotics in the Netherlands

Food Research International

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 1636-1642

  van Asselt, E D ^a   van der Spiegel, M ^a   Noordam, M Y ^a   Pikkemaat, M G ^a   van der Fels Klerx, H J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Antibiotics; Chemical hazards; Monitoring; Risk based sampling

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKES; ANTIBIOTIC RESIDUES; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCES; CHEMICAL FOOD SAFETIES; LITERATURE RESEARCHES; MONITORING PROGRAMS; OXYTETRACYCLINES (OTC); RISK-BASED;

ANTIBIOTICS; FOOD SAFETY; INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS; MONITORING; RESEARCH;

CHEMICAL HAZARDS;

EID: 84887006322     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.08.042     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson M., Jaykus L.-A., Beaulieu S., Dennis S. Pathogen-produce pair attribution risk ranking tool to prioritize fresh produce commodity and pathogen combinations for further evaluation (P3ARRT). Food Control 2011, 22(12):1865-1872.
2. Angulo F., Collignon P., Heuer O.W., Karunasagar I., Kruse H. Working group 3: Public health issues. Antimicrobial use in aquaculture and antimicrobial resistance 2006, 39-50. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. WHO (Ed.).
3. Baptista F.M., Alban L., Olsen A.M., Petersen J.V., Toft N. Evaluation of the antibacterial residue surveillance programme in Danish pigs using Bayesian methods. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2012, 106(3-4):308-314.
4. Beemer F., Zunderdorp M., Wesselink T., Van der Rijken T., Oud N., Krauss P., Schoneveld D.-J., De Blaay N. Naar een Nederlands Model - De positie van de dierenarts bij het verminderen van het gebruik van antibiotica in de veehouderij 2011, Berenschot, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 149 p. In Dutch.
5. Berg C. Amtliche Probenahme von Lebensmitteln auf Risikobasis. Archiv für Lebensmittelhygiene 2008, 59(4):130-136.
6. Bondt N., Jensen V.F., Puister-Jansen L.F., van Geijlswijk I.M. Comparing antimicrobial exposure based on sales data. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2013, 108(1):10-20.
7. Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products Sulphonamides: Summary report (2). London, UK (Available at:). http://www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Maximum_Residue_Limits_-_Report/2009/11/WC500015931.pdf.
8. Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products Sulphonamides: Summary report (1). London, UK (Available at:). http://www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Maximum_Residue_Limits_-_Report/2009/11/WC500015933.pdf.
9. DG SANCO Revision of Directive 96/23/EC on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products (Available at:). http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/planned_ia/docs/418_sanco_rev_dir_substances_animals_en.pdf.
10. EFSA Report for 2010 on the results from the monitoring of veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances in live animals and animal products. Report nr. Supporting Publications 2012, 212. (65 pp. Available at: www.efsa.europa.eu).
11. EFSA Scientific opinion on the development of a risk ranking framework on biological hazards. EFSA Journal 2012, 10(6):2724-2812.
12. EFSA Scientific opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (poultry). EFSA Journal 2012, 20(6):2741-2920.
13. EFSA Scientific opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (swine). EFSA Journal 2012, 20(6):2351-2549.
14. EU Notice to applicants and guideline - Veterinary medicinal products (78 p. Available at:). http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-8/pdf/vol8_10-2005_en.pdf.
15. FAVV Risico's van carcinogene en/of genotoxische stoffen in levensmiddelen: Milieucontaminanten (dossier Sci Com 2011/04: eigen initiatief). Report nr. ADVIES 01-2013 2012, (40 p. Available at: http://www.favv.be/wetenschappelijkcomite/adviezen/_documents/ADVIES01-2013_NL_DossierSciCom2011-04.pdf).
16. FIDIN (Available at:). http://www.fidin.nl/.
17. Food & Water Watch Suspicious shrimp - The health risks of industrialized shrimp production 2008, Food & Water Watch, Washington DC, USA, (24 pp. Available at: http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/reports/suspicious-shrimp/).
18. Gezondheidsraad Antibiotica in de veeteelt en resistente bacteriën bij mensen. Report nr. 2011/16 2011, Gezondheidsraad, The Hague, The Netherlands, (58 p. Available at: http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/201116.pdf).
19. Gould I.M., MacKenzie F.M. Antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for emergence of resistance: The influence of concentration. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2002, 92:78S-84S.
20. Gräslund S., Bengtsson B.-E. Chemicals and biological products used in south-east Asian shrimp farming, and their potential impact on the environment - A review. The Science of the Total Environment 2001, 280(1-3):93-131.
21. Holmström K., Gräslund S., Wahlström A., Poungshompoo S., Bengtsson B.-E., Kautsky N. Antibiotic use in shrimp farming and implications for environmental impacts and human health. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2003, 38(3):255-266.
22. Lenartowicz P., Michie N. Risk-based sampling of food. Risk assessment for sampling 2002, Vol. 1. Food Standards Agency, (16 p. Available at: http://www.testinginabox.co.uk/Documents/risk%20sampling.pdf).
23. MARAN Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic usage in animals in the Netherlands 2012, 44. (Report nr.), (p. Available at: http://www.maran.wur.nl).
24. Maudoux J.P., Saegerman C., Rettigner C., Houins G., Van Huffel X., Berkvens D. Food safety surveillance through a risk based control programme: Approach employed by the Belgian Federal Agency for the safety of the food chain. The Veterinary Quarterly 2006, 28(4):140-154.
25. NRA The NRA review of sulphonamides - Final report 2000, National Registration Authority For Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals, Canberra, Australia, (42 pp. Available at: http://www.apvma.gov.au/products/review/docs/sulphonamides.pdf).
26. Presi P., Stärk K., Knopf L., Breidenbach E., Sanaa M., Frey J., et al. Efficiency of risk-based vs. random sampling for the monitoring of tetracycline residues in slaughtered calves in Switzerland. Food Additives & Contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment 2008, 25(5):566-573.
27. Reist M., Jemmi T., Stärk K.D.C. Policy-driven development of cost-effective, risk-based surveillance strategies. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2012, 105(3):176-184.
28. Reybroeck W., Daeseleire E., De Brabander H.F., Herman L. Antimicrobials in beekeeping. Veterinary Microbiology 2012, 158(1-2):1-11.
29. Stärk K.D.C., Regula G., Hernandez J., Knopf L., Fuchs K., Morris R.S., et al. Concepts for risk-based surveillance in the field of veterinary medicine and veterinary public health: Review of current approaches. BMC Health Services Research 2006, 6.
30. van Asselt E.D., Sterrenburg P., Noordam M.Y., van der Fels-Klerx H.J. Overview of available methods for risk based control within the European Union. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2012, 23(1):51-58.
31. Van Rossum C.T.M., Fransen H.P., Verkaik-Kloosterman J., Buurma-Rethans E.J.M., Ocké M.C. Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007-2010. Report nr. 350050006/2011 2011, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands, (148 p. Available at: http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/350050006.pdf).
32. VRC Annual report on surveillance for veterinary residues in food in the UK 2010 2010, Veterinary Residues Committee, Surrey, UK, (51 pp. Available at: http://www.vmd.defra.gov.uk/VRC/pdf/reports/vrcar2010.pdf).
33. WHO Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine, 2nd revision 2009, 26. (Copenhagen, Denmark: Report nr.), (p. Available at: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/foodborne_disease/CIA_2nd_rev_2009.pdf).
34. WVAB Smal-, versus breedspectrum antibiotica en eerste, tweede en derde keuze op basis van Gezondheidsraad-advies 2011, KNMvD, Houten, The Netherlands, (7 pp. Available at: http://wvab.knmvd.nl/wvab/actueel/nieuwsberichten/nieuwe-richtlijn-veterinair-antibioticumbeleid).