Concepts for risk-based surveillance in the field of veterinary medicine and veterinary public health: Review of current approaches

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Stärk, Katharina D C ^a   Regula, Gertraud ^a   Hernandez, Jorge ^b   Knopf, Lea ^a   Fuchs, Klemens ^c   Morris, Roger S ^d   Davies, Peter ^e  

^a SWISS FEDERAL VETERINARY OFFICE   (Switzerland)

^b University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine   (United States)

^c Institute of Applied Statistics   (Austria)

^d MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^e Department of Veterinary Population Medicine ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; CONSUMER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FOOD SAFETY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LIVESTOCK; POPULATION; POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; VETERINARY MEDICINE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASES; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NEW ZEALAND; ORGANIZATION; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM; ZOONOSES;

ANIMAL DISEASES; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; ENGLAND; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; NEW ZEALAND; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; VETERINARY MEDICINE; WALES; ZOONOSES;

EID: 33645313205     PISSN: 14726963     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-20     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Anoymous: Veterinary surveillance in England and Wales: A review. In Report Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London; 2000.
2. Anoymous: Partnership, priorities and professionalism: A strategy for enhancing veterinary surveillance in the UK. In Report Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London; 2003.
3. Audigé L, Beckett S: A quantitative assessment of the validity of animal-health surveys using stochastic modelling. Prev Vet Med 1999, 38:259-276.
4. Besage JE: Spatial interaction and the spatial analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1974, 36:192-225.
5. Breidenbach E, Sievi M, Weber U, Heiz H, Stärk KDC: Fundamental principles for risk-based planning of random sampling to trace hazard in imported meat. Proceedings 5th World Congress Foodborne Infections and Intoxications; 7 - 11 June 2004; Berlin 2004 in press.
6. Brülisauer F, Berger T, Klein B, Danuser J: Risk based surveillance of milk and dairy products. Proceedings International ConferenceVeterinary Public Health and Food Safety - Towards a Risk based Chain Control: 22-23 October 2004; Rome. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana 2004:50-51.
7. Cameron AR, Baldock FC: Two-stage sampling in surveys to substantiate freedom from disease. Prev Vet Med 1998, 34:19-30.
8. Cameron AR, Baldock FC: A new probability formula for surveys to substantiate freedom from disease. Prev Vet Med 1998, 34:1-17.
9. Cameron A, Gardner I, Doherr MG, Wagner B: Sampling considerations in surveys and monitoring and surveillance systems. In Animal disease surveillance and survey systems - methods and applications Edited by: Salman MD. Ames: Iowa State Press; 2003:47-66.
10. Cannon RM: Sense and sensitivity-designing surveys based on an imperfect test. Prev Vet Med 2001, 49:141-163.
11. Cressie NAC: Statistics for Spatial Data New York, Chichester. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons; 1991.
12. Dargatz DA, Hill GW: Analysis of survey data. Prev Vet Med 1996, 28:225-237.
13. Diggle PJ: Point pattern analysis London: Academic Press; 1983.
14. Doherr MG, Heim D, Fatzer R, Cohen CH, Vandevelde M, Zurbriggen A: Targeted screening of high-risk cattle populations for BSE to augment mandatory reporting of clinical suspects. Prev Vet Med 2001, 51:3-16.
15. Doherr MG, Hett AR, Cohen CH, Fatzer R, Rufenacht J, Zurbriggen A, Heim D: Trends in prevalence of BSE in Switzerland based on fallen stock and slaughter surveillance. Vet Rec 2002, 150:347-348.
16. Doherr MG, Audigé L: Monitoring and surveillance for rare health-related events: a review from the veterinary perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001, 356:1097-1106.
17. Ducrot C, Roy P, Morignat E, Baron T, Calavas D: How the surveillance system may bias the results of analytical epidemiological studies on BSE: prevalence among dairy versus beef suckler cattle breeds in France. Vet Res 2003, 32:185-192.
18. EPA: Use of risk-based decision-making in UST Corrective Action Programs. Report 1995 [http://www.epa.gov]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) Directive 9610.17. Environmental Protection Agency
19. Ericson JE, Gonzalez EJ: Hierarchical sampling of multiple strata: an innovative technique in exposure characterization. Environ Res 2003, 92:221-231.
20. Foran J, Brosnan T, Connor M, Delfino J, DePinto J, Dickson K, Humphrey H, Novotny V, Smith R, Sobsey M, Stehman S: A Framework for Comprehensive, Integrated, Watershed Monitoring in New York City. Environ Monit Assess 2000, 62:147-167.
21. Franco G, Cella MT, Tuccillo E, Ferrari F, Minisci E, Fusetti L: From risk-based health surveillance to health promotion: an evidence-based experience in a health care setting. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2002, 15:117-120.
22. Fuchs K, Deutz A, Wagner P, Köfer J: Spatial point pattern analysis to study the resistance behaviour of enterococcus to tetracycline in bulk milk. In Proceedings of the SVEPM: 24 - 26 March 2004 Edited by: Reid SWJ, Menzies FD, Russell AM. Martigny, Switzerland; 2004:134-142.
23. Fuchs K, Deutz A: Use of variograms to detect critical spatial distances for the Knox's test. Prev Vet Med 2002, 45:37-45.
24. Grayman WM, Males RM: Risk-based modeling of early warning systems for pollution accidents. Water Sci Technol 2002, 46:41-49.
25. Hadorn DC, Rüfenacht J, Hauser R, Stärk KDC: Risk-based design of repeated surveys for the documentation of freedom from non-highly contagious diseases. Prev Vet Med 2002, 56:179-192.
26. Hadorn DC, Hauser R, Stärk KDC: Epidemiologische Grundlagen und Resultate der Stichprobenuntersuchung 2001 in der schweizerischen Schweinepopulation. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk 2002, 144:532-541.
27. Hueston WD, Yoe CE: Estimating the overall power of complex surveillance systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics: 6-11 August, 2000 Edited by: Salman MD, Morley PS, Ruch-Gallie R. Breckenridge, Colorado; 2000:758-760.
28. International Animal Health Code [http://www.oie.int]. Office International des Epizooties, Paris
29. Ledergerber U: Foundation of a herd classification scheme by risk profiling and risk ranking of antimicrobial resistance in the food chain. Report 2005 [http://www.dfvf.dk/Default.asp?ID=9726]. International EpiLab, Copenhagen
30. Martin SW, Shoukri M, Thorburn MA: Evaluating the health status of herds based on tests applied to individuals. Prev Vet Med 1992, 14:33-43.
31. Martin PAJ, Cameron A: Documenting freedom from avian influenza. In Report International EpiLab, Copenhagen; 2003.
32. McNamee D: Risk-based auditing for internal auditors 1997 [http://www.mc2consulting.com]. Mc2 Management Consulting
33. Morignat E, Ducrot C, Roy R, Baron T, Vinard JL, Biacabe AG, Madec JY, Bencsik A, Debeer S, Eliazsewicz M, Calavas D: Targeted surveillance to assess the prevalence of BSE in high-risk populations in western France and the associated risk factors. Vet Rec 2002, 151:73-77.
34. Paige JC, Chaudry MH, Pell FM: Federal surveillance of veterinary drugs and chemical residues (with recent data). Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Anim Pract 1999, 15:45-60.
35. Paisley LG: Economic aspects of disease monitoring with special reference to bovine paratuberculosis. Acta Vet Scand 2001:17-25.
36. Preston BL, Shackelford J: Risk-Based Analysis of Environmental Monitoring Data: Application to Heavy Metals in North Carolina Surface Waters. Environ Manage 2002, 30:279-293.
37. Risk Analysis Glossary [http://www.sra.org/resources_glossary_p-r.php]
38. Rothman KJ, Greenland S: Modern epidemiology 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
39. SaFoodChain - the food safety consortium [http://www.safoodchain.org]
40. Salman MD, Stark KDC, Zepeda C: Quality assurance applied to animal disease surveillance systems. Rev Sci Tech OIE 2003, 22:689-696.
41. Smalley JB, Minsker BS, Goldberg DE: Risk-based in situ bioremediation design using a noisy genetic algorithm. Water Ressour Res 2000, 36:3043-3052.
42. Standard guide for risk-based corrective action E2081-00 [http://www.astm.org].
43. Stärk KDC, Mortensen S, Olsen AM, Barfod K, Botner A, Lavritsen DT, Strandbygard B: Designing serological surveillance programmes to document freedom from disease with special reference to exotic viral diseases of pigs in Denmark. Rev Sci Tech OIE 2000, 19:715-724.
44. Suess EA, Gardner IA, Johnson WO: Hierarchical Bayesian model for prevalence inferences and determination of a country's status for an animal pathogen. Prev Vet Med 2002, 55:155-171.
45. Thornton R: Ambitious domesticated animal surveillance review initiated. Biosecurity Issue 2004, 51:6-7.
46. Thurmond MC: Conceptual foundations for infectious disease surveillance. J Vet Diagn Invest 2003, 15:501-514.
47. Use of risk-based decision making [http://www.epa.gov/swerust1/directiv/ od961017.htm#Whatis]
48. Wagner P, Fuchs K: Sampling plan for the BHV-1 monitoring in a free region (in German). Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on BHV 1-, BVD- and Paratuberculosis Eradication: 9-11 March 2005; Stendal, Germany 2005 in press.
49. Webb CR, Wilesmith JW, Simmons MM, Hoinville LJ: A stochastic model to estimate the prevalence of scrapie in Great Britain using the results of an abattoir-based survey. Prev Vet Med 2001, 51:269-287.
50. Ziller M, Selhorst T, Teuffert J, Kramer M, Schlüter H: Analysis of sampling strategies to substantiate freedom from disease in large areas. Prev Vet Med 2002, 52:333-343.