Probing the origins of two-state folding

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 139, Issue 14, 2013, Pages

  Lane, Thomas J ^a   Schwantes, Christian R ^a   Beauchamp, Kyle A ^a   Pande, Vijay S ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOLDING RATES; FOLDING TIME; INTERCONVERSIONS; MEASUREMENTS OF; NATIVE STATE; NATURAL CONSEQUENCES; PROTEIN SYSTEM; RANDOM MODEL;

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PHYSICS;

THERMODYNAMICS;

PROTEIN;

CHEMISTRY; KINETICS; PROTEIN FOLDING; THERMODYNAMICS; ARTICLE;

KINETICS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84886934999     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.4823502     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. S. Jackson and A. R. Fersht, Biochemistry 30, 10428 (1991). 10.1021/bi00107a010
2. D. Perl, C. Welker, T. Schindler, K. Schröder, M. A. Marahiel, R. Jaenicke, and F. X. Schmid, Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 229 (1998). 10.1038/nsb0398-229
3. E. Rhoades, M. Cohen, B. Schuler, and G. Haran, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 14686 (2004). 10.1021/ja046209k
4. D. Barrick, Phys. Biol. 6, 015001 (2009). 10.1088/1478-3975/6/1/015001
5. A. I. Bartlett and S. E. Radford, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 582 (2009). 10.1038/nsmb.1592
6. J. D. Bryngelson, J. Onuchic, N. D. Socci, and P. Wolynes, Proteins 21, 167 (1995). 10.1002/prot.340210302
7. W. Eaton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5897 (1999). 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5897
8. J. Sabelko, J. Ervin, and M. Gruebele, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6031 (1999). 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6031
9. M. M. Garcia-Mira, M. Sadqi, N. Fischer, J. M. Sanchez-Ruiz, and V. Muñoz, Science 298, 2191 (2002). 10.1126/science.1077809
10. W. Y. Yang and M. Gruebele, Nature (London) 423, 193 (2003). 10.1038/nature01609
11. W. Y. Yang and M. Gruebele, Biochemistry 43, 13018 (2004). 10.1021/bi049113b
12. W. Y. Yang and M. Gruebele, Biophys. J. 87, 596 (2004). 10.1529/biophysj.103.039040
13. M. Gruebele, C. R. Biol. 328, 701 (2005). 10.1016/j.crvi.2005.02.007
14. H. Nguyen, M. Jager, J. W. Kelly, and M. Gruebele, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 15182 (2005). 10.1021/jp052373y
15. M. Sadqi, D. Fushman, and V. Muñoz, Nature (London) 442, 317 (2006). 10.1038/nature04859
16. F. Liu and M. Gruebele, J. Mol. Biol. 370, 574 (2007). 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.036
17. F. Liu, D. Du, A. A. Fuller, J. E. Davoren, P. Wipf, J. W. Kelly, and M. Gruebele, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2369 (2008). 10.1073/pnas. 0711908105
18. R. Albert and A. Barabasi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002). 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
19. M. E. J. Newman, Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 40 (2002). 10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00201-1
20. Complexity theory has not traditionally focused on this topic, but the tools are there for its investigation. See, e.g.
21. A. N. Samukhin, S. N. Dorogovtsev, and J. F. F. Mendes, Phys. Rev. E 77, 036115 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.036115
22. F. Chung, L. Lü, and V. Vu, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 6313 (2003). 10.1073/pnas.0937490100
23. It should be noted that we do not wish to show this converse holds in general. We suspect that there exist systems that are thermodynamically two-state, but under certain conditions will display multi-exponential kinetics.
24. T. Schindler, M. Herrler, M. A. Marahiel, and F. X. Schmid, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 663 (1995). 10.1038/nsb0895-663
25. M. Jacob, T. Schindler, J. Balbach, and F. X. Schmid, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 5622 (1997). 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5622
26. A. Sali, E. Shakhnovich, and M. Karplus, Nature (London) 369, 248 (1994). 10.1038/369248a0
27. H. Kaya and H. S. Chan, Proteins 52, 510 (2003). 10.1002/prot.10506
28. H. Kaya and H. S. Chan, J. Mol. Biol. 315, 899 (2002). 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5266
29. P. F. N. Faísca and K. W. Plaxco, Protein Sci. 15, 1608 (2006). 10.1110/ps.062180806
30. One additional possibility has been suggested by Robert McGibbon: it could be that two-state systems are considered "typical" by the folding community, and non-two state systems are thought of as pathological and therefore not studied. For the purposes of this paper we ignore this possibility, but it is important that those working in the field keep it in mind.
31. G. R. Bowman, V. A. Voelz, and V. S. Pande, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 664 (2011). 10.1021/ja106936n
32. V. S. Pande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 198101 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 105.198101
33. T. J. Lane and V. S. Pande, J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 6764 (2012). 10.1021/jp212332c
34. A. Dickson and C. L. Brooks, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3044-3052 (2012). 10.1021/ct300537s
35. G. R. Bowman and V. S. Pande, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 10890 (2010). 10.1073/pnas.1003962107
36. N. S. Bogatyreva, A. A. Osypov, and D. N. Ivankov, Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D342 (2009). 10.1093/nar/gkn696
37. E. T. Jaynes, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 31, 579 (1980). 10.1146/annurev.pc. 31.100180.003051
38. G. Stock, K. Ghosh, and K. A. Dill, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 194102 (2008). 10.1063/1.2918345
39. J.-H. Prinz, H. Wu, M. Sarich, B. Keller, M. Senne, M. Held, J. D. Chodera, C. Schütte, and F. Noé, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 174105 (2011). 10.1063/1.3565032
40. 3.
41. P. Li, F. Y. Oliva, A. N. Naganathan, and V. Muñoz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 103 (2008). 10.1073/pnas.0802986106
42. T. J. Lane and V. S. Pande, preprint arXiv:1301.4302v1 (2013).
43. M. B. Prigozhin and M. Gruebele, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 3372-3388 (2013). 10.1039/c3cp43992e
44. M. Wang, Y. Tang, S. Sato, L. Vugmeyster, C. J. McKnight, and D. P. Raleigh, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 6032 (2003). 10.1021/ja028752b
45. J. Kubelka, T. K. Chiu, D. R. Davies, W. A. Eaton, and J. Hofrichter, J. Mol. Biol. 359, 546 (2006). 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.034
46. A. Reiner, P. Henklein, and T. Kiefhaber, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 4955 (2010). 10.1073/pnas.0910001107
47. We have only carried out the perturbation to first order. The perturbations we want to consider are small, since large perturbations stray too far from the entropy maximum solution and therefore are expected to imply work done by biology.
48. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Academic Press, 2004).
49. Because of the spreading of the eigenvalues, this gap will be smaller than before. One could calculate the probabilistic difference from the Tracy-Widom distribution, but we have not undertaken this task (yet).
50. C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Commun. Math. Phys. 177, 727 (1996). 10.1007/BF02099545
51. Note that this expression requires ε∼O(1/N), which for large state number N makes ε very small.
52. F. Rao and A. Caflisch, J. Mol. Biol. 342, 299 (2004). 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.063
53. T. J. Lane, G. R. Bowman, K. Beauchamp, V. A. Voelz, and V. S. Pande, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18413 (2011). 10.1021/ja207470h
54. R. M. Levy, W. Dai, N.-j. Deng, and D. E. Makarov, " How long does it take to equilibrate the unfolded state of a protein?," Protein Sci. (published online).
55. A. Dickson and C. L. Brooks III, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 4729-4734 (2013). 10.1021/ja311077u
56. S. Waldauer, O. Bakajin, and L. Lapidus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 13713 (2010). 10.1073/pnas.1005415107