Simple two-state protein folding kinetics requires near-levinthal thermodynamic cooperativity

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 510-523

  Kaya, Hüseyin ^a   Chan, Hue Sun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Calorimetric cooperativity; Chevron plot; Chevron rollover, non Arrhenius kinetics, G models; Contact order; Single domain proteins

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SINGLE DOMAIN PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ASYMMETRIC CATALYSIS; CALORIMETRY; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CHEVRON PLOT; CONTINUUM GO MODEL; CURVE FITTING; ENTHALPY; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NEAR LEVINTHAL THERMODYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; STEADY STATE; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; THERMODYNAMICS;

ALGORITHMS; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

ARRHENIUS;

EID: 0042130544     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10506     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Chan HS. Matching speed and locality. Nature 1998;392:761-763.
2. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics. Biochemistry 2000;39:11177-11183.
3. Chan HS, Kaya H, Shimizu S. Computational methods for protein folding: scaling a hierarchy of complexities. In: Jiang T, Xu Y, Zhang MQ, editors. Current Topics in Computational Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2002. p 403-447.
4. Chan HS. Modeling protein density of states: additive hydrophobic effects are insufficient for calorimetric two-state cooperativity. Proteins 2000;40:543-571.
5. Kaya H, Chan HS. Polymer principles of protein calorimetric two-state cooperativity. Proteins 2000;40:637-661 [Erratum: Proteins 2001;43:523].
6. Kaya H, Chan HS. Energetic components of cooperative protein folding. Phys Rev Lett 2000;85:4823-4826.
7. Kaya H, Chan HS. Towards a consistent modeling of protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how applicable is the transition state picture to folding and unfolding? J Mol Biol 2002;315:899-909.
8. Kaya H, Chan HS. Solvation effects and driving forces for protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how adequate is native-centric topological modeling? J Mol Biol 2003;326:911-931.
9. Go N. Theoretical studies of protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 1983;12:183-210.
10. Bryngelson JD, Wolynes PG, Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:7524-7528.
11. Taketomi H, Ueda Y, Go N. Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. 1. The effect of specific amino acid sequence represented by specific inter-unit interactions. Int J Pept Protein Res 1975;7:445-459.
12. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN. Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;298:937-953.
13. Li L, Shakhnovich EI. Constructing, verifying, and dissecting the folding transition state of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 with all-atom simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:13014-13018.
14. Portman JJ, Takada S, Wolynes PG. Microscopic theory ofprotein folding rates. II. Local reaction coordinates and chain dynamics. J Chem Phys 2001;114:5082-5096.
15. Micheletti C, Lattanzi G, Maritan A. Elastic properties of proteins: insight on the folding process and evolutionary selection of native structures. J Mol Biol 2002;321:909-921.
16. Linhananta A, Zhou Y. The role of sidechain packing and native contact interactions in folding: discontinuous molecular dynamics folding simulations of an all-atom Gō model of fragment B of Staphylococcal protein A. J Chem Phys 2002;117:8983-8995.
17. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;227:985-994.
18. Matthews CR. Effect of point mutations on the folding of globular proteins. Methods Enzymol 1987; 154:498-511.
19. Cheung MS, Garcia AE, Onuchic JN. Protein folding mediated by solvation: water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:685-690.
20. Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 1990;29:7133-7155.
21. Kolinski A, Galazka W, Skolnick J. On the origin of the cooperativity of protein folding: implications from model simulations. Proteins 1996;26:271-287.
22. Plotkin SS, Wang J, Wolynes PG. Statistical mechanics of a correlated energy landscape model for protein folding funnels, J Chem Phys 1997; 106:2932-2948.
23. Schindler T, Schmid FX. Thermodynamic properties of an extremely rapid protein folding reaction. Biochemistry 1996;35:16833-16842.
24. Scalley ML, Baker D. Protein folding kinetics exhibit an Arrhenius temperature dependence when corrected for the temperature dependence of protein stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:10636-10640.
25. Abkevich VI, Gutin AM, Shakhnovich EI. Free energy landscape for protein folding kinetics: intermediates, traps, and multiple pathways in theory and lattice model simulations. J Chem Phys 1994;101:6052-6062.
26. Chan HS. Modelling protein folding by Monte Carlo dynamics: chevron plots, chevron rollover, and non-Arrhenius kinetics, In: Grassberger P, Barkema GT, Nadler W, editors. Monte Carlo Approach to Biopolymers and Protein Folding. Singapore: World Scientific; 1998. p 29-44.
27. Chan HS, Dill KA. Protein folding in the landscape perspective: chevron plots and non-Arrhenius kinetics. Proteins 1998;30:2-33.
28. Northey JGB, Di Nardo AA, Davidson AR. Hydrophobic core packing in the SH3 domain folding transition state. Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:126-130.
29. Ventura S, Vega MC, Lacroix E, Angrand I, Spagnolo L, Serrano L. Conformational strain in the hydrophobic core and its implications for protein folding and design. Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:485-493.
30. Koga N, Takada S. Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Gō-like model. J Mol Biol 2001;313:171-180.
31. Jewett AI, Pande VS, Plaxco KW. Cooperativity, smooth energy landscapes and the origins of topology-dependent protein folding rates. J Mol Biol 2003;326:247-253.
32. Miller EJ, Fischer KF, Marqusee S. Experimental evaluation of topological parameters determining protein-folding rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:10359-10363.
33. Kaya H, Chan HS. Contact order dependent protein folding rates: kinetic consequences of a cooperative interplay between favorable nonlocal interactions and local conformational preferences. Proteins 2003;52:524-533.
34. Chan HS, Shimizu S, Kaya H. Cooperativity principles in protein folding. Methods Enzymol 2003. Forthcoming,
35. Segawa S, Sugihara M. Characterization of the transition state of lysozyme unfolding. I. Effect of protein-solvent interactions on the transition state. Biopolymers 1984;23:2473-2488.
36. Chen B-L, Baase WA, Schellman JA. Low-temperature unfolding of a mutant of phage T4 lysozyme. 2. Kinetic investigations. Biochemistry 1989;28:691-699.
37. Jackson SE, Fersht AR. Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 1. Evidence for a two-state transition. Biochemistry 1991;30:10428-10435.
38. Kuhlman B, Luisi DL, Evans PA, Raleigh DP. Global analysis of the effects of temperature and denaturant on the folding and unfolding kinetics of the N-terminal domain of the protein L9. J Mol Biol 1998;284:1661-1670.
39. Makhatadze GI, Privalov PL. Energetics of protein structure. Adv Protein Chem 1995;47:307-425.
40. Lee CY, McCammon JA, Rossky PJ. The structure of liquid water at an extended hydrophobic surface. J Chem Phys 1984;80:4448-4455.
41. Lum K, Chandler D, Weeks JD. Hydrophobicity at small and large length scales. J Phys Chem B 1999;103:4570-4577.
42. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Origins of protein denatured states compactness and hydrophobic clustering in aqueous urea: inferences from nonpolar potentials of mean force. Proteins 2002;49:560-566.
43. Baldwin RL. Folding intermediates in protein folding. BioEssays 1994;16:207-210.
44. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 1995;21:167-195.
45. Dill KA, Chan HS. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:10-19.
46. Kaya H, Chan HS. Origins of chevron rollovers in non-two-state protein folding kinetics. Phys Rev Lett 2003;90:258104.
47. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Anti-cooperativity and cooperativity in hydrophobic interactions: three-body free energy landscapes and comparison with implicit-solvent potential functions for proteins. Proteins 2002;48:15-30 [Erratum: Proteins 2002;49:2941.
48. Makarov DE, Plaxco KW. The topomer search model: a simple, quantitative theory of two-state protein folding kinetics. Protein Sci 2003;12:17-26.
49. Crippen GM, Chhajer M. Lattice models ofprotein folding permitting disordered native states. J Chem Phys 2002;116:2261-2268.
50. Fan K, Wang J, Wang W. Folding of lattice protein chains with modified Gō potential. Eur Phys J B 2002;30:381-391.
51. Clementi C, Garcia AE, Onuchic JN. Interplay among tertiary contacts, secondary structure formation and side-chain packing in the protein folding mechanism: all-atom representation study of protein L. J Mol Biol 2003;326:933-954.
52. Pokarowski P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. A minimal physically realistic protein-like lattice model: designing an energy landscape that ensures all-or-none folding to a unique native state. Biophys J 2003;84:1518-1526.
53. Englander SW, Mayne L, Bai Y, Sosnick TR. Hydrogen exchange: the modern legacy of Linderstrφm-Lang. Protein Sci 1997;6:1101-1109.
54. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Cooperativity in protein folding: from lattice models with sidechains to real proteins. Fold Des 1998;3:127-139.
55. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Is there a unique melting temperature for two-state proteins? J Comput Chem 2002;23:161-165.
56. Zwanzig R. Simple model of protein folding kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:9801-9804.
57. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
58. Dunbrack RL. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:431-440.
59. Li MS, Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Folding in lattice models with side chains. Comput Phys Comm 2002;147:625-628.
60. Galzitskaya OV, Garbuzynskiy SO, Ivankov DN, Finkelstein AV. Chain length is the main determinant of the folding rate for proteins with three-state folding kinetics. Proteins 2003;51:162-166.
61. Garcia-Mira MM, Sadqi M, Fischer N, Sanchez-Ruiz JM, Muñoz V. Experimental identification of downhill protein folding. Science 2002;298:2191-2195.